Contact sensitisation in patients with chronic leg ulcers

Polysensitization in the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry (REIDAC): A 2019-2022 prospective study with cluster and network analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still limited clinical-practice data on specific clinical and patch test features, as well as on allergen clusters in polysensitization (PS).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency, relevance, symptoms duration and risk factors in polysensitized patients and to assess possible allergen aggregation.

METHODS

Prospective multicentric study (January 2019-December 2022) conducted in setting of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Register (REIDAC). Clinical and patch test data of polysensitized and oligosensitized patients were compared, and risk factors of PS were investigated with logistic multivariate regression. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and network analysis were used to study allergen aggregation in PS.

RESULTS

A total of 10,176 patients were analysed. PS was found in 844 (8.3%). Current relevance was significantly higher in polysensitized patients (p < 0.01). Risk factors for PS were atopic dermatitis (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.24-2.02), age (≥60 years vs. ≤24 years, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.25-2.44) and some special locations (legs vs. face OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25, hands vs. face OR: 1.46, 95% CI:1.15-1.85, arms vs. face OR: 1.49, 95% CI:1.01-2.20, trunk vs. face OR: 1.40, 95% CI:1.06-1.85). Cluster and network analyses revealed specific-allergen clusters and significant associations, including allergens belonging to metals group, fragrances and botanicals group, topical drugs group, rubber allergens and biocides.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that PS is structured by discernible patterns of specific-allergen clusters and reinforces significant allergen associations in PS. Cross-reactivity and/or concomitant sensitization could explain the formation of allergen clusters in PS.

Potential Allergens in Wound Care Products

Background: Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible. Objective: With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures. Methods: Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020. Results: Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol. Conclusions: Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.

Potential Allergens in Wound Care Products

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible.

OBJECTIVE

With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures.

METHODS

Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020.

RESULTS

Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol.

CONCLUSIONS

Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.

Contact dermatitis: An important consideration in leg ulcers

The prevalence of chronic wounds is increasing with the aging population, with 1% to 2% of the worldwide population experiencing leg ulcers and positive patch tests reported in up to 75% of this population. With the introduction of modern dressings and compression therapies, clinicians should be cognizant of the potential risk of contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact dermatitis (both allergic and irritant) to wound products may present as maceration, pain, and overall impaired wound healing. Herein, we review the literature on contact dermatitis to wound-care products.

Allergic contact versus irritant contact dermatitis in patients with hard-to-heal leg ulcer: clinical and diagnostic approach

BACKGROUND

Dermatitis of surrounding skin may complicate hard-to-heal leg ulcers, delaying wound healing. The coexistence of hard-to-heal leg ulcers and irritant or allergic contact dermatitis may create difficulties for both diagnostic and therapeutic management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of dermatitis occurring in the surrounding skin in a population affected by hard-to-heal leg ulcers during treatment, and to differentiate between allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) with the use of a patch test. Furthermore, we investigated which medications were most probably related to these conditions.

METHOD

We conducted an observational study from 21 February to 21 July 2017, enlisting all patients affected by hard-to-heal leg ulcers who attended the Wound Care Service of the Dermatologic Department of ASST, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

RESULTS

We enrolled 95 patients; 81 patients did not develop dermatitis, while 14 patients developed dermatitis of the surrounding skin. These patients underwent a patch test which gave a positive result in seven patients, permitting the diagnosis of ACD.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the incidence of dermatitis of the surrounding skin reported in the literature but reassessed the incidence of ACD as opposed to ICD.

Surrounding skin management in venous leg ulcers: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Chronic venous insufficiency may lead to the development of venous leg ulcers, the most common form of chronic wounds in the lower extremity. Key to venous leg ulcer care is the maintenance of healthy skin surrounding the ulcer, as failure to maintain skin integrity may influence the healing outcome. We thus reviewed the scientific literature looking for assessment and management instruments regarding this common but often neglected issue.

METHOD

The search included all studies published between 2000 and May 2019. Keywords used were: "peri-wound skin care", "surrounding skin venous ulcers", "surrounding skin management leg ulcers", and "peri-lesional skin management".

RESULTS

Management of moisture-balance with the selection of appropriate dressings is the most important target in surrounding-wound skin care. Moreover, contact dermatitis related to products and the dressings themselves is a neglected problem in patients with chronic leg ulcers which clinicians increasingly have to manage. The literature search revealed that there is an increasing interest in the use of noninvasive assessment tools in the field of wound care, and focusing on the surrounding-wound skin plays a role in assessing the potential of wound healing. Transepidermal water loss measurement (TEWL) and ultrasonography are two of the measurement techniques available.

CONCLUSION

The integrity of the surrounding skin is necessary for wound healing, and appropriate management is needed to address this aspect which is part of an overall approach to treating wounds.

[Frequency of contact sensitization to modern dressings used to treat chronic leg ulcer]

INTRODUCTION

Allergic contact dermatitis around chronic leg ulcers (CLU) is a common complication in patients presenting CLU and prolongs healing times. The aim of this study was to describe the rate of sensitization to modern dressings (MD) used in these patients and to assess whether there is a relation between the number of sensitizations and ulcer type, the time from onset of the ulcer, and patient age and gender.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at Reims University Hospital between 2010 and 2014 that included all patients with CLU of vascular etiology surrounded by eczematous lesions, and who had one of the patch-tests in the following 3 series: European baseline±leg ulcers±corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Among the 73 patients included, 43 % were polysensitized. Thirty-three patients (45 %) were sensitized to MD (38 % to hydrocolloids, 18 % to hydrogels, 7 % to hydrocellular dressings, 7 % to hydrofiber dressings, 5 % to contact layers and 3 % to alginates). Median age and sex did not differ between "polysensitized" patients and "non-polysensitized" patients (P=0.84 and P=0.25, respectively). Polysensitization was more frequent among patients presenting ulcers for more than 5 years (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Practically half of all patients presenting CLU with surrounding contact dermatitis had sensitization to modern dressings (mostly hydrocolloids and hydrogels). The rate of sensitization increased with the length of presence of CLU.

An unusual presentation of a common condition: Allergic contact dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis commonly affects patients with chronic venous leg ulcers and can contribute to impaired wound healing. Many allergens have been identified, and despite the use of advanced dressings, the incidence of allergy has remained high. We discuss an unusual presentation of allergic contact dermatitis in a patient with a chronic wound. The patient's history was consistent with a recurrent venous leg ulcer, but on this occasion, the wound continued to deteriorate despite optimal treatment. This prompted further investigation, which included patch testing. Although the clinical features were not suggestive of allergy, the patch test was positive for several allergens, including Atrauman^® dressings, which the patient was using at the time. This case highlights the importance of regular reassessment and accurate diagnosis for the management of chronic wounds. It also demonstrates that allergic contact dermatitis can contribute to delayed wound healing without causing the classical clinical features of inflammation of the surrounding skin, and even hypoallergenic, non-adherent dressings can be sensitising.

Contact sensitivity in patients with venous leg ulcer: A multi-centric Indian study

Venous leg ulcers are the most common form of non-healing leg ulcers. They are subjected to treatments such as topical medications, dressings, and compression therapies. This can lead to exposure to a number of allergens with subsequent sensitisation and contact dermatitis of the regional skin. This may contribute to the poor ulcer healing. To detect the various contact sensitisers in patients with venous leg ulcers through patch testing, patients from 6 centres across India with venous leg ulcers of longer than 6 weeks duration were enrolled for the study. They were patch tested using a special parch test kit with 27 antigens. A total of 172 patients were included in the study; 82 (48.2%) tested positive for at least 1 antigen. Among them, polyvalent sensitisation was noted in 71% of patients. Wood tar mix (10.4%) and the framycetin (8.7%) were the most common allergens. There is a high frequency of allergic sensitisation to various ingredients of topical therapies used in the venous ulcer management, which may interfere with wound healing. Avoiding them can help obtain a better therapeutic outcome.