Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires

[Design of a clinical study to demonstrate the therapeutic benefit of another wound treatment product]

BACKGROUND

Due to new legal requirements, a patient-relevant benefit for other wound treatment products (sPW) must be demonstrated through clinical studies if reimbursement at the expense of the statutory health insurance is sought in the non-inpatient sector.

METHOD

An interdisciplinary group with expertise in clinical wound care has developed general recommendations for the design of suitable studies. In addition to regulatory documents, previous studies that have already been recognized as proof of benefit in other areas served as a basis.

RESULTS

Randomized controlled trials that cover at least the most common types of chronic wounds (arterial, venous, diabetic or pressure sore) are recommended as the best method for gathering evidence. Despite the heterogeneous etiology of chronic wounds, the results should also be transferable to other wound types. The test intervention does not usually consist of the sPW alone, but of a combined wound treatment that follows a treatment plan that is as clearly defined as possible. In the comparison group, all wound treatment options (besides the sPW) must also be available and used according to a similar predefined treatment plan. Depending on the intended purpose and treatment goal, complete wound closure should, if possible, be recorded as the cardinal - although not always as the primary - endpoint. In justified cases, e.g. in the case of intermediate use as part of phase-appropriate wound therapy for chronic wounds, a significant reduction in the wound area can also be considered for benefit assessment. Quality of life (e.g. pain) can also justify a benefit and can therefore be recorded as a primary outcome parameter in clinical trials. The duration of the clinical trial should be adapted to the central endpoints, the medical or nursing goal of wound care and the intended purpose of the sPW. A benefit does not always arise from microbiological, physiological, laboratory or histological parameters or imaging findings.

Patients with venous leg ulcers can be managed safely in the community ----results of an observational comparison study in Singapore

AIM

To examine the healing outcomes of patients with venous leg ulcers requiring compression bandaging in community care versus tertiary care.

METHOD

This was an analytical observational cohort study. Venous leg ulcer (VLU) patients who required compression bandaging were recruited from an outpatient vascular clinic between May 2021 and August 2022. Eligible patients received two-or four-layer compression bandaging and followed up with the community care or tertiary care centre nurses. The primary outcome was the difference in the total surface area of the VLU after 12 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the patient's quality of life, as measured by the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS).

RESULTS

Forty-seven VLU patients were recruited; 27 received compression bandaging in the community care and 20 by the tertiary care centre. Mean age 70 years old (SD 11.04). The two most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (51.06 %) and diabetes mellitus (38.29 %). Among those who completed follow-up (12 weeks), the median difference of the total surface area of the VLU between community-based care (p = 0.02) versus tertiary-based care (0.003) was significant. However, there was no difference in the healing status between community and tertiary-based care (p = 0.68). There was no difference in the quality of life of patients between groups.

CONCLUSION

This first tropical study comparing VLU healing outcomes between community and tertiary care found no significant difference in healing with compression bandaging by nurses in either setting. However, the small sample size and high dropout rate limit the generalizability of the findings, necessitating a larger-scale study with longer follow-up. Despite these limitations, the study is a crucial step toward improving wound care services in Singapore, and highlights the need for further research to guide future community wound care implementation.

Gdansk Wound-QoL Questionnaire: Pilot Study on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Ulcers with Emphasis on Professional Physician-Patient Relations

INTRODUCTION

Chronic wounds lower health-related quality of life (QoL), as they affect various aspects of life due to pain, odor, tedious treatment, and stigma from society. Implementing proper treatment, where patient is well informed and active is a key for best outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate health-related QoL among the patients with chronic ulcers, with the use of new scale Gdansk Wound QoL.

METHODS

We enrolled 108 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Before the education on day 0 patients were asked to fill in Gdansk Wound-QoL questionnaire, that was developed in cooperation between dermatologists, general and plastic surgeons, as well as wound nurses, as well as fill the follow-up Gdansk Would-QoL questionnaire on day 30, which was also the end of the study.

RESULTS

Study participants (N = 108) were on average 76.1 ± 10.8 years and all of whom had a venous ulcer on their lower limbs of average wound area of 10.8 cm2. QoL, according to the Gdansk Wound-QoL questionnaire, increased on average by 36.7% after 30 days trial. Moreover, on the follow-up visit 94.4% of the patients stated that their knowledge on the disease has increased and everyone was satisfied with the course of treatment proposed by the current doctor. Furthermore, 44.4% of the study group increased their activity at the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot descriptive observational study shows that Gdansk Wound-QoL questionnaire can provide professionals in wound care good feedback on health-related QoL of patients with chronic wounds. This information has the potential to enhance patients well-being and overall comfort.

Development and validation of a Chinese version chronic wound health-related quality of life instrument: A methodological study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To develop a Chinese version of a chronic wound health-related quality of life (QoL) instrument and to examine the psychometric properties of this instrument.

BACKGROUND

Existing QoL instruments are not tailored to the linguistic and cultural characteristics of Chinese-speaking patients; a version addressing this gap will increase clinical understanding of their healthcare experience and may help guide chronic wound care.

DESIGN

A methodological study.

METHODS

The method advanced by DeVellis (2017) was used to develop the instrument. An initial pool of 38 items was created. To optimize scale length and test reliability and validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. A total of 23 items formed the final pool. After two rounds of expert discussions, the average content validity index of the final 23 items was .89.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients completed the instrument and were divided into two groups for further analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that 15 items remained in four factors (social activity restrictions, physical and psychological disturbance, wound burden and daily life limitation), which accounted for 64.87% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable fit of the hypothesized factor structure and the convergent and discriminant validities were achieved. Cronbach's α coefficients for each factor were .807, .773, .799 and .713, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of a chronic wound health-related QoL instrument consists of 15 items in four subscales and demonstrates good reliability and validity.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This instrument can be used intermittently or continuously to evaluate the treatment effect of chronic wounds by assessing health-related QoL. Scholars in Chinese-speaking regions may find this culturally compatible instrument useful when conducting studies related to chronic wounds.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Two hundred twenty-six participants provided their perspectives on health-related QoL.

Quality of Life in Patients with Venous Leg Ulcers Treated by Means of Local Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy or Local Ozone Therapy-A Single Center Study

Background and Objectives: Venous leg ulcers pose a significant medical problem worldwide. The complexity of the problem determines the need for further interdisciplinary activities that will improve the quality of life for treated patients. This study compared the quality of life of patients with venous leg ulcers who received local hyperbaric oxygen therapy or local ozone therapy procedures as part of comprehensive treatment. Materials and Methods: The study included 129 patients (62 men and 57 women) with venous leg ulcers. Group I underwent local hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), and Group II underwent local ozone therapy (OZONE). In both groups, the patients' quality of life was assessed before the start of the treatment cycle, as well as 10 weeks and 6 months after the completion of the treatment, by means of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the Polish shortened version of the SF-36 scale. Results: After completing the respective therapeutic cycle, both groups showed statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvement in quality of life, according to the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the SF-36 scale. Differences were noted between the 1st examination (before treatment) and the 2nd examination (10 weeks after treatment), as well as the 3rd examination (6 months after treatment). In the EQ-5D-5L assessment of anxiety and depression, self-care, and activities of daily living 6 months after the end of treatment, better results were found in the group of patients treated with local hyperbaric oxygen therapy (p < 0.001). In this group, 6 months after the end of the treatment, a statistically significantly higher result on the EQ-VAS scale was also obtained (73.09 ± 19.8 points vs. 68.03 ± 17.37 points, p = 0.043). However, in the SF-36 assessment performed 6 months after the end of treatment, better results-a statistically significantly lower value of the quality of life index-were recorded in the group of patients treated with local ozone therapy (103.13 ± 15.76 points vs. 109.89 ± 15.42 points, p < 0.015). Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and local ozone therapy procedures have a beneficial effect on improving the quality of life of patients with venous leg ulcers.

Use of low-frequency contact ultrasonic debridement with and without polyhexamethylene biguanide in hard-to-heal leg ulcers: an RCT

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this research was to investigate the combination effect of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and low-frequency contact ultrasonic debridement (LFCUD) on the bacterial load in hard-to-heal wounds in adults, compared with ultrasonic debridement alone. Secondary outcomes included wound healing, quality of life (QoL) and pain scores.

METHOD

In this single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial participants were randomised to two groups. All participants received LFCUD weekly for six weeks, plus six weeks of weekly follow-up. The intervention group received an additional 15-minute topical application of PHMB post-LFCUD, at each dressing change and in a sustained dressing product. The control group received non-antimicrobial products and the wounds were cleansed with clean water or saline. Wound swabs were taken from all wounds for microbiological analysis at weeks 1, 3, 6 and 12.

RESULTS

A total of 50 participants took part. The intervention group (n=25) had a lower bacterial load at week 12 compared with the control group (n=25) (p<0.001). There was no difference in complete wound healing between the groups (p=0.47) or wound-related QoL (p=0.15). However, more wounds deteriorated in the control group (44%) compared with the intervention group (8%, p=0.01). A higher proportion of wounds reduced in size in the intervention group (61% versus 12%, p=0.019). Pain was lower in the intervention group at week six, compared with controls (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

LFCUD without the addition of an antimicrobial agent such as PHMB, cannot be recommended. Further research requires longer follow-up time and would benefit from being powered sufficiently to test the effects of multiple covariates.

Development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with peripheral artery disease (QOLPAD)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short and feasible questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The content of the new instrument is intended to correspond with the simultaneously developed instrument Patient Benefit Index for PAD (PBI-PAD), which evaluates treatment goals and benefits in this patient group.

METHODS

Fifty patients stated their disease burden on free-text questionnaires, which was used by an interdisciplinary expert panel to develop 12 items for the new instrument, named Quality of Life questionnaire for patients with peripheral artery disease (QOLPAD). The validity of the instrument was tested in patients from Germany with PAD stages I to IV who completed the QOLPAD, EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L; EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)), and Vascular Quality of Life questionnaire (VascuQoL) before (baseline) and three months after (follow-up) treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included at baseline (mean age: 68.6 years; 68% male), among whom, 57 provided data at follow-up. Most patients (86.4%) rated the completion of QOLPAD as being easy. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.74 (baseline) and 0.84 (follow-up). Convergent validity was indicated by significant correlations with the EQ-5D-3L (baseline: - 0.62; follow-up: - 0.81), EQ VAS (baseline: - 0.44, follow-up: - 0.79), VascuQoL global score (baseline: - 0.77; follow-up: - 0.87), global rating of impairment (baseline: 0.64; follow-up: 0.71), and PAD stage (baseline: 0.40; follow-up: 0.67). Sensitivity to change was confirmed by significant correlations of change in the QOLPAD with changes in convergent criteria; however, the high number of dropouts limits the generalizability of this finding.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that the QOLPAD is internally consistent and valid in patients receiving treatment for PAD in Germany.

Evaluation of Fluorescent Light Energy for the Treatment of Acute Second-degree Burns

INTRODUCTION

The use of photobiomodulation has been proposed to improve wound healing for the last two decades. Recent development in photobiomodulation has led to the development of a novel biophotonic platform that utilizes fluorescent light energy (FLE) within the visible spectrum of light for healing of skin inflammation and wounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this article, FLE was used in preliminary analysis on 18 case studies of acute second-degree burns and in a pilot study using an ex vivo human skin model. Efficacy of FLE on wound healing and tissue remodeling was evaluated by monitoring improvements in the treated tissues, assessing pain for the patients, and by performing human genome microarray analysis of FLE-treated human skin samples.

RESULTS

Healing was reported for all 18 patients treated with FLE for acute second-degree burns without reported adverse effects or development of infections. Furthermore, preliminary ex vivo skin model data suggest that FLE impacts different cellular pathways including essential immune-modulatory mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented in this article are encouraging and suggest that FLE balances different stages of wound healing, which opens the door to initiating randomized controlled clinical trials for establishing the efficacy of FLE treatment in different phases of wound healing of second-degree burns.

Simple Wound Irrigation in the Postoperative Treatment for Surgically Drained Spontaneous Soft Tissue Abscesses: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue abscesses are among the most frequently encountered medical problems treated by different surgeons. Standard therapy remains incision and drainage with sterile saline irrigation during postoperative wound healing period. Aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare sterile irrigation versus nonsterile irrigation.

STUDY DESIGN

A single center randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate postoperative wound irrigation. The control group used sterile irrigation, and the intervention group used nonsterile irrigation. Primary endpoints were reinfection and reintervention rates, assessed during follow-up controls for up to 2 years. Secondary endpoints were the duration of wound healing, inability to work, pain and quality of life.

RESULTS

Between 04/2016 and 05/2017, 118 patients were randomized into two groups, with 61 allocated to the control- and 57 to the intervention group. Reinfection occurred in a total of 4 cases (6.6%) in the sterile protocol and 4 (7%) in the nonsterile protocol. Quality of life and pain values were comparable during the wound healing period, and patients treated according to the nonsterile irrigation protocol used significantly fewer wound care service teams. Despite equal wound persistence rates, a substantially shorter amount of time off from work was reported in the nonsterile protocol group (p value 0.086).

CONCLUSION

This prospective, randomized trial indicates that a nonsterile irrigation protocol for patients operated on for soft tissue abscesses is not inferior to the standard sterile protocol. Moreover, a nonsterile irrigation protocol leads to a shorter period of inability to work with comparable pain and quality of life scores during the wound healing period.

Improvement in wound healing, pain, and quality of life after 12 weeks of SNF472 treatment: a phase 2 open-label study of patients with calciphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Calciphylaxis in end-stage renal disease is characterized by painful necrotic skin ulcers and high mortality. There are no approved therapies. SNF472, an intravenous formulation of myo-inositol hexaphosphate, inhibits the formation and growth of hydroxyapatite crystals, the final common pathway in the pathogenesis of vascular calcification.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm study, calciphylaxis patients on thrice-weekly hemodialysis and standard care, received intravenous SNF472 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was wound healing assessed using the quantitative Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT). Pain visual analog scale (VAS), quality of life (wound-QoL), and qualitative wound image review were secondary endpoints. Quantitative changes from baseline were analyzed by paired t-tests using multiple imputation to account for missing observations.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received SNF472. Improvements from baseline to week 12 were observed for mean BWAT score (- 8.1; P < 0.001), pain VAS (- 23.6 mm; P = 0.015) and wound-QoL global score (- 0.90; P = 0.003). Of the 9 patients with ulcerated lesions at baseline who completed treatment, wound image review showed improvement for 7. SNF472 was well tolerated with no serious treatment-related adverse events. The most common adverse events were infections which occur frequently in patients on hemodialysis. None of these were considered as treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

SNF472 was well-tolerated and improvements from baseline to week 12 in wound healing, pain, and quality of life were observed. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is planned to evaluate SNF472 in patients with calciphylaxis.