Necrotising fasciitis or pyoderma gangrenosum: A fatal dilemma

Postsurgical Pyoderma Gangrenosum Requiring Plastic Surgical Intervention: A Practical Review

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by immune dysfunction and pathergy. Thus, it is frequently seen in patients with underlying systemic illnesses or postoperatively. For the performance of the debridement or closure of the resultant defect, plastic surgeons are often involved in the care of pyoderma patients. However, both procedures may exacerbate the injury. Therefore, plastic surgeons must be familiar with the presentation of postsurgical pyoderma to avoid further damage and safely repair related soft tissue defects. A systematic search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed using the following keywords: "pyoderma gangrenosum" and "surgery." This online database search has identified 656 studies published between 1958 and 2022. Only reconstructed cases of postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum were selected. Twenty-eight patients who developed pyoderma after dermatologic, plastic, orthopedic, cardiovascular, general, or obstetric surgery were included in this study. The average time to the PG presentation and diagnosis was 5.5 and 17 days, respectively. Diagnostic scoring tools were not used, and the diagnosis was primarily based on histopathology after repeated treatment failures. The patients received split- or full-thickness skin grafts, local, pedicled, and free flaps. An estimated 82.1% underwent skin grafting, whereas 42.9% underwent flap reconstruction. In addition, 21.4% got both the graft and flap. Accurate diagnosis of PSPG, prevention of further surgical injury, and timely medical management are vital for improving patient outcomes. Reconstruction can be performed, if required. However, despite the availability of different reconstructive techniques, there is no standard approach to the management of the PSPG.

Practical aspects of the diagnosis and management of pyoderma gangrenosum

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare autoinflammatory ulcerative neutrophilic skin disease. Its clinical presentation is a rapidly progressing painful skin ulcer with ill-defined borders and surrounding erythema. The pathogenesis of PG is complex and not fully understood. Clinically, patients with PG often have various systemic diseases, the most common being inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and arthritis. Due to the lack of specific biological markers, diagnosing PG remains difficult, which easily resulting in misdiagnosis. Some validated diagnostic criteria have been applied in clinical practice that facilitate its diagnosis. The treatment of PG currently consists mainly of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agents, especially biological agents, which have bright prospects for PG therapy. After the systemic inflammatory response is controlled, the problem of wounds becomes the main contradiction in PG treatment. Surgery is not controversial for PG, increasing evidence shows that with adequate systemic treatment, the benefits of reconstructive surgery for patients are increasing.

[Necrotizing fasciitis in the head and neck region-three case reports and a review of the literature]

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening, usually bacterial, soft tissue infection that rarely affects the head and neck region. Rapid progression and systemic illness are typical for the disease and complicate diagnosis. Immediate surgical and antimicrobial therapy is required. Three cases of cervicofacial NF are presented in this case report. All patients showed a rapidly progressing, painful swelling and redness in the cervicofacial region. After diagnosing NF based on clinical symptoms, laboratory parameters, and CT, the patients were treated with systemic antibiotics and multiple extensive debridements. Two of the three patients died within 48 h from systemic illness with septic organ failure; one patient was discharged after intensive care treatment and reconstruction of the tissue defects caused by debridement. NF is a fast-developing soft tissue infection associated with high mortality and morbidity, and is often recognized too late. Diagnosis is based on clinical signs such as progressive diffuse swelling, pain, erythema, and early systemic illness. Laboratory parameters (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis [LRINEC] score) and imaging via CT or MRT are helpful. CT/MRT images can show soft tissue swelling with pathognomonic gas formation. Immediate surgical debridement and antimicrobial therapy are critical for survival. Intravenously administered immunoglobulins and hyperbaric pressure therapy should only be used as supplementary treatments.

Necrotizing fasciitis from perforated sigmoid diverticulitis with subsequent pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report

Postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum is a very rare form of cutaneous ulceration that is poorly recognized outside of dermatology and in some circumstances has been mistaken for necrotizing fasciitis. Here, we present a rare case of sigmoid diverticulitis with left ureter obstruction that perforated and quickly progressed into necrotizing fasciitis of the left buttock and leg via retroperitoneal spread in an immunocompetent patient. Nearly a year after intense surgical therapy, the patient rapidly developed ulcerating lesions over the left hip which presented a diagnostic dilemma. These were initially thought to represent Marjolin’s ulcers, which would require aggressive local excision. Multiple diagnostic imaging tests and biopsies eventually confirmed pyoderma gangrenosum, which was successfully treated with immunosuppressive therapy. This case highlights the need for a very broad differential diagnosis and wide expertise consultation when managing unusual postsurgical complications, especially when treatment modality critically depends on the correct diagnosis.

Necrotising fasciitis or pyoderma gangrenosum: A fatal dilemma

Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is mostly a polymicrobial, severe soft tissue infection that progresses rapidly, penetrating through the subcutaneous tissue to the fascial planes and the muscles. The pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), on the other hand, is a rare, rapidly progressive (except for the post-surgical PG), autoinflammatory ulcerative skin and soft tissue condition. In this study, we tried to emphasise the importance of diagnosing the NF as well as the PG. Although these two clinical presentations have some standard features, awareness of different symptoms in detail affect the outcome. Any surgical discipline can face NF or PG and, therefore, should be aware of them to decrease the mortality rate. Forty-five patients with NF and PG who were treated between January 2008 and October 2018 were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively for age, sex, localisation, onset of symptoms and diagnosis, predisposing factors, characteristics of tissue defects, laboratory findings, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) scores, isolated microbiological agents, surgical intervention, and mortality rate. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data were analysed. Among these 45 patients, 14 patients had PG, and 31 patients had NF. The mean age and SD for the NF and PG groups were 50.80 ± 17.67 and 50.78 ± 12.72, respectively. Five patients had rheumatological disorders; four patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) in the PG group. Males had higher risk than females in NF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.077, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.017-0.34), and females had higher risk in PG (relative risk [RR] = 5). We compared the LRINEC score of NF patients with PG patients. The mean value of this score was 4.53 for PG patients, and 6.06 for NF patients. Fifteen patients (33.3%) had a radiological evaluation. MRI, CT, and USI were used as imaging modalities. Necrotising fasciitis and PG are two distinct entities that are in general difficult to distinguish. Therefore, differential diagnosis and rapid treatment are crucial for lowering the mortality rate.