Human Amniotic Membrane: A New Option for Graft Donor Sites - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Bioengineering Skin Substitutes for Wound Management-Perspectives and Challenges

Non-healing wounds and skin losses constitute significant challenges for modern medicine and pharmacology. Conventional methods of wound treatment are effective in basic healthcare; however, they are insufficient in managing chronic wound and large skin defects, so novel, alternative methods of therapy are sought. Among the potentially innovative procedures, the use of skin substitutes may be a promising therapeutic method. Skin substitutes are a heterogeneous group of materials that are used to heal and close wounds and temporarily or permanently fulfill the functions of the skin. Classification can be based on the structure or type (biological and synthetic). Simple constructs (class I) have been widely researched over the years, and can be used in burns and ulcers. More complex substitutes (class II and III) are still studied, but these may be utilized in patients with deep skin defects. In addition, 3D bioprinting is a rapidly developing method used to create advanced skin constructs and their appendages. The aforementioned therapies represent an opportunity for treating patients with diabetic foot ulcers or deep skin burns. Despite these significant developments, further clinical trials are needed to allow the use skin substitutes in the personalized treatment of chronic wounds.

A Review of Current Uses of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

PURPOSE

To review and summarize the existing literature on the clinical applications of amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted on the PubMed database using the following search terms: "amniotic membrane" and "eyelid" or "orbit" or "fornix" or "socket" or "lacrimal".

RESULTS

In total 516 articles resulted from the search, of which 62 were included. Numerous cases and case series have been published on the use of amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction, eyelid and forniceal reconstruction, and cicatricial eyelid abnormalities. Surgical methods of securing the graft vary. Few comparative studies exist; some show a similar or improved result when compared to oral mucous membrane grafting for certain indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Amniotic membrane transplantation can be a useful tool for the oculoplastic surgeon when faced with a case requiring reconstruction of the posterior lamellae, particularly in patients without other graft donor sites available, and uses of AMT continue to expand. Additional studies directly comparing AMT to other reconstructive techniques would be helpful in choosing between the available surgical techniques and standardizing best practices.

Healing techniques for split-thickness skin grafts donor sites. Umbrella review

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the existing evidence and provide recommendations for the most effective management of partial-thickness graft donor sites in adults, with the goals of enhancing re-epithelialization, reducing pain, and preventing infection.

METHODOLOGY

Umbrella review. A systematic search was conducted encompassing databases such as Pubmed, CUIDEN, Cochrane Library, CINHAL Plus, SCOPUS, and LILACS. The search targeted systematic reviews published since 2011 that focused on examining the effectiveness of different approaches for the treatment of partial-thickness graft donor sites. Reviews with a low critical appraisal score according to AMSTAR 2 were excluded. The included reviews were evaluated using the SIGN scale to assess the level of evidence and grade the recommendations.

RESULTS

Five systematic reviews with meta-analysis were incorporated in the analysis. Platelet-rich plasma and human amniotic membrane demonstrated statistically significant improvements in re-epithelialization and pain reduction when compared to the control group. Moreover, platelet-rich plasma also exhibited a decrease in wound infection rates. Recombinant human growth hormone was found to expedite the re-epithelialization process.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings, the use of platelet-rich plasma is recommended to enhance re-epithelialization, alleviate pain, and reduce infection in partial-thickness graft donor sites among adults. Application of human amniotic membrane is recommended to accelerate re-epithelialization and alleviate pain, while recombinant human growth hormone is suggested to expedite the overall healing time of these wounds.

Application of amniotic membranes in reconstructive surgery of internal organs-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Amniotic membrane (AM) has great potential as a scaffold for tissue regeneration in reconstructive surgery. To date, no systematic review of the literature has been performed for the applications of AM in wound closure of internal organs. Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarize the literature on the safety and efficacy of AM for the closure of internal organs. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE-PubMed database and OVID Embase to retrieve human and controlled animal studies on wound closure of internal organs. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized clinical trials and the SYRCLE risk of bias tool for animal studies were used. Meta-analyses (MAs) were conducted for controlled animal studies to assess efficacy of closure, mortality and complications in subjects who underwent surgical wound closure in internal organs with the application of AM. Sixty references containing 26 human experiments and 36 animal experiments were included. The MAs of the controlled animal studies showed comparable results with regard to closure, mortality and complications, and suggested improved mechanical strength and lower inflammation scores after AM application when compared to standard surgical closure techniques. This systematic review and MAs demonstrate that the application of AM to promote wound healing of internal organs appears to be safe, efficacious, and feasible.

Comparison of human amniotic membrane and collagen nerve wraps around sciatic nerve reverse autografts in a rat model

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) and collagen nerve wraps are biomaterials that have been investigated as therapies for improving outcomes of peripheral nerve regeneration; however, their efficacy has not been compared. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of collagen and human amniotic membrane nerve wraps in a rodent sciatic nerve reverse autograft model. Lewis rats (n = 29) underwent sciatic nerve injury and repair in which a 10-mm gap was bridged with reverse autograft combined with either no nerve wrap (control), collagen nerve wrap or hAM nerve wrap. Behavioral analyses were performed at baseline and 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Electrophysiological studies were conducted at 8, 10 and 12 weeks. Additional outcomes assessed included gastrocnemius muscle weights, nerve adhesions, axonal regeneration and scarring at 12 weeks. Application of both collagen and hAM nerve wraps resulted in improvement of functional and histologic outcomes when compared with controls, with a greater magnitude of improvement for the experimental group treated with hAM nerve wraps. hAM-treated animals had significantly higher numbers of axons compared to control animals (p < 0.05) and significantly less perineural fibrosis than both control and collagen treated nerves (p < 0.05). The ratio of experimental to control gastrocnemius weights was significantly greater in hAM compared to control samples (p < 0.05). We conclude that hAM nerve wraps are a promising biomaterial that is effective for improving outcomes of peripheral nerve regeneration, resulting in superior nerve regeneration and functional recovery compared to collagen nerve wraps and controls.

Comparison of Collagen and Human Amniotic Membrane Nerve Wraps and Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair in Preclinical Models: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

 Collagen and human amniotic membrane (hAM) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomaterials that can be used as nerve wraps or conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. Both biomaterials have been shown to reduce scarring and fibrosis of injured peripheral nerves. However, comparative advantages and disadvantages have not been definitively shown in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to comprehensively evaluate the literature regarding the roles of hAM and collagen nerve wraps and conduits on peripheral nerve regeneration in preclinical models.

METHODS

 The MEDLINE database was queried using the PubMed search engine on July 7, 2019, with the following search strategy: ("amniotic membrane" OR "amnion") OR ("collagen conduit" OR "nerve wrap")] AND "nerve." All resulting articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Nerve type, lesion type/injury model, repair type, treatment, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

 Two hundred and fifty-eight articles were identified, and 44 studies remained after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seventeen studies utilized hAM, whereas 27 studies utilized collagen wraps or conduits. Twenty-three (85%) of the collagen studies utilized conduits, and four (15%) utilized wraps. Six (35%) of the hAM studies utilized conduits and 11 (65%) utilized wraps. Two (9%) collagen studies involving a conduit and one (25%) involving a wrap demonstrated at least one significant improvement in outcomes compared with a control. While none of the hAM conduit studies showed significant improvements, eight (73%) of the studies investigating hAM wraps showed at least one significant improvement in outcomes.

CONCLUSION

 The majority of studies reported positive outcomes, indicating that collagen and hAM nerve wraps and conduits both have the potential to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. However, relatively few studies reported significant findings, except for studies evaluating hAM wraps. Preclinical models may help guide clinical practice regarding applications of these biomaterials in peripheral nerve repair.

Human Amniotic Membrane: A New Option for Graft Donor Sites - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

There are currently no standardised guidelines on the optimum dressing used for graft donor sites. The aim was to compare the outcomes of human amniotic membrane (HAM) vs routine dressings in split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and a search of electronic information was conducted to identify all randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes of HAM vs routine dressings in STSG donor sites. Wound healing and infection rate were primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included severity of pain, discharge from donor site, the number of dressing changes, pruritus, and comfort. Fixed effect modelling was used for the analysis. Four studies enrolling 157 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between HAM and routine groups with wound healing time (P < .0001) and proportion of wounds healed by day 12 (P = .01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in infection rates (P = .27). For all secondary outcomes, HAM had improved results. HAM dressings are a superior option when compared with routine dressings used in current clinical practice for STSG donor sites as they improve wound healing and do not increase the infection rate.