Lights, fluorescence, action-Influencing wound treatment plans including debridement of bacteria and biofilms

Assessing Biofilm at the Bedside: Exploring Reliable Accessible Biofilm Detection Methods

INTRODUCTION

Biofilm is linked through a variety of mechanisms to the pathogenesis of chronic wounds. However, accurate biofilm detection is challenging, demanding highly specialized and technically complex methods rendering it unapplicable for most clinical settings. This study evaluated promising methods of bedside biofilm localization, fluorescence imaging of wound bacterial loads, and biofilm blotting by comparing their performance against validation scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

METHODS

In this clinical trial, 40 chronic hard-to-heal wounds underwent the following assessments: (1) clinical signs of biofilm (CSB), (2) biofilm blotting, (3) fluorescence imaging for localizing bacterial loads, wound scraping taken for (4) SEM to confirm matrix encased bacteria (biofilm), and (5) PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) to determine absolute bacterial load and species present. We used a combination of SEM and PCR microbiology to calculate the diagnostic accuracy measures of the CSB, biofilm blotting assay, and fluorescence imaging.

RESULTS

Study data demonstrate that 62.5% of wounds were identified as biofilm-positive based on SEM and microbiological assessment. By employing this method to determine the gold truth, and thus calculate accuracy measures for all methods, fluorescence imaging demonstrated superior sensitivity (84%) and accuracy (63%) compared to CSB (sensitivity 44% and accuracy 43%) and biofilm blotting (sensitivity 24% and accuracy 40%). Biofilm blotting exhibited the highest specificity (64%), albeit with lower sensitivity and accuracy. Using SEM alone as the validation method slightly altered the results, but all trends held constant.

DISCUSSION

This trial provides the first comparative assessment of bedside methods for wound biofilm detection. We report the diagnostic accuracy measures of these more feasibly implementable methods versus laboratory-based SEM. Fluorescence imaging showed the greatest number of true positives (highest sensitivity), which is clinically relevant and provides assurance that no pathogenic bacteria will be missed. It effectively alerted regions of biofilm at the point-of-care with greater accuracy than standard clinical assessment (CSB) or biofilm blotting paper, providing actionable information that will likely translate into enhanced therapeutic approaches and better patient outcomes.

Improving Wound Healing and Infection Control in Long-term Care with Bacterial Fluorescence Imaging

BACKGROUND

High bacterial burden stalls wound healing and can quickly progress to infection and sepsis in complex, older-adult patients in long-term care (LTC) or skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of point-of-care fluorescence (FL) imaging (MolecuLight i:X) of bacterial loads, which are frequently asymptomatic, to inform customized wound treatment plans for patients in LTC/SNFs.

METHODS

In this retrospective pre/postinterventional cohort study, the authors compared the healing and infection-associated outcomes of 167 pressure injuries from 100 Medicare beneficiaries before and after implementation of FL imaging.

RESULTS

Most patient demographics and wound characteristics did not differ significantly between the standard-of-care (SOC; n = 71 wounds) and FL (n = 96 wounds) cohorts. Significantly more wounds (+71.0%) healed by 12 weeks in the FL cohort (38.5%) versus the SoC cohort (22.5%). Wounds in the FL cohort also healed 27.7% faster (-4.8 weeks), on average, and were 1.4 times more likely to heal per Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (hazard ratio = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.90-2.12). Infection-related complications decreased by 75.3% in the FL cohort, and a significant shift from largely systemic to topical antibiotic prescribing was evidenced.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence-imaging-guided management of wounds significantly improved healing and infection outcomes in highly complex and multimorbid patients in LTC/SNFs. Proactive bacterial infection management via local treatments was enabled by earlier, objective detection. These reported outcome improvements are comparable to randomized controlled trials and cohort studies from less compromised, selectively controlled outpatient populations. Fluorescence imaging supports proactive monitoring and management of planktonic and biofilm-encased bacteria, improving patient care in a complex, real-world setting.

Assessing Pediatric Burn Wound Infection Using a Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging Device

Wound infection is the most common complication among pediatric burn patients. When not treated promptly, burn wound infection may lead to delayed healing, failure of skin grafts, or death. Standard burn wound assessment includes inspection for visual signs and symptoms of infection (VSSI) and microbial sampling. To aid in the assessment of burn wound infection, the MolecuLight, a point-of-care autofluorescence imaging device, was introduced at our pediatric burn program in 2020. The MolecuLight uses violet light to illuminate the wound bed, causing clinically relevant quantities of 29 different species of bacteria (>104 CFU/g) to fluoresce in real time. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of the MolecuLight in the management of pediatric burn wounds and determine if the findings from the MolecuLight corresponded to VSSI and/or microbial sampling. A retrospective review of patients 0-18 years who had burn wounds assessed with the MolecuLight between November 1, 2020 and June 8, 2023 was conducted. Data were extracted from the medical records of 178 eligible patients with 218 wounds imaged with the device. Fluorescence corresponded with VSSI in 81% of wounds and microbial findings in 82% of wounds. MolecuLight fluorescence, in combination with VSSI, improved sensitivity for detecting wound infections by 39% and decreased specificity by 19% compared to visual signs and symptoms in isolation. Incorporation of the MolecuLight in standard burn wound assessments can improve the detection of infections, which may promote improved wound healing outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.

Evaluation of the potential of Delta-aminolevulinic acid for simultaneous detection of bioburden and anti-microbial photodynamic therapy of MRSA infected wounds in Swiss albino mice

BACKGROUND

The dramatic increase of drug-resistant bacteria necessitates urgent development of platforms to simultaneously detect and inactivate bacteria causing wound infections, but are confronted with various challenges. Delta amino levulinic acid (ALA) induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) can be a promising modality for simultaneous bioburden diagnostics and therapeutics. Herein, we report utility of ALA induced protoporphyrin (PpIX) based simultaneous bioburden detection, photoinactivation and therapeutic outcome assessment in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infected wounds of mice.

METHODS

MRSA infected wounds treated with 10% ALA were imaged with help of a blue LED (∼405 nm) based, USB powered, hand held device integrated with a modular graphic user interface (GUI). Effect of ALA application time, bacteria load, post bacteria application time points on wound fluorescence studied. PpIX fluorescence observed after excitation with blue LEDs was used to detect bioburden, start red light mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), determine aPDT effectiveness and assess selectivity of the approach.

RESULTS

ALA-PpIX fluorescence of wound bed discriminates infected from uninfected wounds and detects clinically relevant load. While wound fluorescence pattern changes as a function of ALA incubation and post infection time, intra-wound inhomogeneity in fluorescence correlates with the Gram staining data on presence of biofilms foci. Lack of red fluorescence from wound granulation tissue treated with ALA suggests selectivity of the approach. Further, significant reduction (∼50%) in red fluorescence, quantified using the GUI, relates well with bacteria load reduction observed post topical aPDT.

CONCLUSION

The potential of ALA induced PpIX for simultaneous detection of bioburden, photodynamic inactivation and "florescence-guided aPDT assessment" is demonstrated in MRSA infected wounds of mice.

Integration of polysaccharide electrospun nanofibers with microneedle arrays promotes wound regeneration: A review

Utilizing electrospun nanofibers and microneedle arrays in wound regeneration has been practiced for several years. Researchers have recently asserted that using multiple methods concurrently might enhance efficiency, despite the inherent strengths and weaknesses of each individual approach. The combination of microneedle arrays with electrospun nanofibers has the potential to create a drug delivery system and wound healing method that offer improved efficiency and accuracy in targeting. The use of microneedles with nanofibers allows for precise administration of pharmaceuticals due to the microneedles' capacity to pierce the skin and the nanofibers' role as a drug reservoir, resulting in a progressive release of drugs over a certain period of time. Electrospun nanofibers have the ability to imitate the extracellular matrix and provide a framework for cellular growth and tissue rejuvenation, while microneedle arrays show potential for enhancing tissue regeneration and enhancing the efficacy of wound healing. The integration of electrospun nanofibers with microneedle arrays may be customized to effectively tackle particular obstacles in the fields of wound healing and drug delivery. However, some issues must be addressed before this paradigm may be fully integrated into clinical settings, including but not limited to ensuring the safety and sterilization of these products for transdermal use, optimizing manufacturing methods and characterization of developed products, larger-scale production, optimizing storage conditions, and evaluating the inclusion of multiple therapeutic and antimicrobial agents to increase the synergistic effects in the wound healing process. This research examines the combination of microneedle arrays with electrospun nanofibers to enhance the delivery of drugs and promote wound healing. It explores various kinds of microneedle arrays, the materials and processes used, and current developments in their integration with electrospun nanofibers.

Integrating Point-of-Care Bacterial Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Care with Continued Wound Measurement for Enhanced Wound Area Reduction Monitoring

AIM

This prospective observational study investigated wound area reduction (WAR) outcomes in a complex wound population composed of non-healing acute and chronic wounds. The relationship between bacterial autofluorescence signals and WAR was investigated. Area measurements were collected both manually and digitally, and both methods were compared for accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty-six participants with 27 wounds of varying etiologies were observed twice weekly for two weeks. Digital wound measurement, wound bacterial status assessment, and targeted debridement were performed through a point-of-care fluorescence imaging device (MolecuLight® i: X, MolecuLight Inc, Toronto, Canada). The wound area reduction (WAR) rate was calculated using baseline and last visit measurements. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, Fisher exact tests, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for method comparison, and ANOVA for bacterial subgroups, were applied as pertinent.

RESULTS

The overall average WAR was -3.80 cm2, or a decrease of 46.88% (manual measurement), and -2.62 cm2, or a 46.05% decrease (digital measurement via MolecuLight® device). There were no statistically significant differences between the WAR of acute and chronic wounds (p = 0.7877). A stepwise correlation between the WAR and bacterial status classification per fluorescence findings was observed, where persistent bacteria resulted in worse WAR outcomes. An overestimation of wound area by manual measurement was 23% on average.

CONCLUSION

Fluorescence imaging signals were linked to WAR outcome and could be considered predictive. Wounds exhibiting bacterial loads that persisted at the end of the study period had worse WAR outcomes, while those for which management was able to effectively remove them demonstrated greater WAR. Manual measurement of the wound area consistently overestimated wound size when compared to digital measurement. However, if performed by the same operator, the overestimation was uniform enough that the WAR was calculated to be close to accurate. Notwithstanding, single wound measurements are likely to result in overestimation.