Ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in patients with endometriosis

Controlled ovarian stimulation for endometriosis patients with ultra-long GnRH-agonist or GnRH-antagonist protocols: A retrospective study by propensity score matching

OBJECTIVES

Although in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer is the most effective treatment for infertile patients with endometriosis, ovarian stimulation protocols are controversial.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited 639 patients with endometriosis from January 2016 to June 2020; 111 and 528 patients were treated with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and ultra-long GnRH agonist protocols, respectively. Potential baseline differences between the regimens were adjusted by propensity score matching. Clinical and laboratory data, including the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), were compared.

RESULTS

Ovulation induction required significantly longer use of gonadotropins in the GnRH agonist group. However, the GnRH agonist group had a lower starting dose of gonadotropin (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, significantly lower clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates were observed in the GnRH antagonist group receiving fresh assisted reproductive technology cycles (all p < 0.05); however, pregnancy outcomes using the subsequent freeze-thaw cycles for the same oocyte retrieval were not significantly different. CCPR and CLBR for the oocyte retrieval cycles of the antagonist and ultra-long agonist protocols were similar. The ultra-long agonist protocol resulted in more favorable implantation of fresh embryos and improved clinical outcomes of the fresh cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel strategy could be appropriate for endometriosis patients who are temporarily unsuitable for fresh embryo transfer. The GnRH antagonist protocol can be combined with the whole embryo freezing strategy to achieve CCPR and CLBR similar to the ultra-long agonist regimen, thus simultaneously avoiding the long pre-treatment duration of GnRH agonists during the ultra-long agonist protocol.

The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

A total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR.

RESULT(S)

In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E₂) value on Day hCG + 9, progesterone (P) value on Day hCG + 9, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR were more favourable in the depot GnRH-a protocol than in the long GnRH-a protocol (P < 0.05). However, the moderate or severe OHSS rates were higher in the depot group than in the long group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness, luteal support medication, early pregnancy loss rates, mid- and late-term pregnancy loss rates, or foetal malformation rates between the two protocols.

CONCLUSION(S)

Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health.

Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of 302 patients with endometrium <8 mm undergoing fresh embryo transfer at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. In 148 cycles of the GnRH-a prolonged protocol, one depot of 3.75 mg GnRH-a was injected on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, while in 154 cycles of the short GnRH-a long protocol, 0.1 mg of GnRH-a was injected daily from the mid-luteal phase. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and characteristics of stimulation procedures.

Results

Live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group than in the other group (36.5% vs 20.8%, P=0.002; 43.9% vs 28.2%, P=0.006, respectively). The live birth rate was significantly increased in the prolonged protocol group (crude OR: 2.190, 95% CI: 1.311, 3.660; adjusted OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.430, 4.224) compared with that in the reference group. The implantation rate of the former group was also significantly higher than that of the latter group (35.4% vs 15.9%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two protocols. In terms of stimulation procedures, the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group required significantly higher Gn time (10.9 vs 9.5 days, P=0.000) and Gn consumption (2625.0 vs 2047.5 IU, P=0.000) than the short GnRH-a long protocol group.

Conclusion

The GnRH-a prolonged protocol in fresh embryo transfer cycles yielded better clinical outcomes of patients with thin endometrium than the short GnRH-a long protocol.

Mild starting dosage ovarian stimulation combined with a modified prolonged GnRH-a protocol improved IVF/ICSI outcomes in normal ovarian responders

INTRODUCTION

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is essential for artificial reproduction technology (ART). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a mild starting dosage of r-FSH ovarian stimulation after the modified prolonged GnRH-a down-regulation protocol for COH on the clinical outcomes in normal ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the retrospective study, the patients were separated into two groups according to the starting dosage of r-FSH: a mild dosage group (75 IU ≤ r-FSH < 150 IU, n = 858) and a conventional dosage group (150 IU ≤ r-FSH ≤ 225 IU, n = 535). Data were collected from clinical records. The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Although the duration of r-FSH treatment was a little longer in the mild dosage group, the total r-FSH dosage and the cost of ovarian stimulation were significantly lower than those in the conventional dosage group. Furthermore, compared to the conventional dosage group, the number of retrieved oocytes was also lower in the mild dosage group, whereas the rates of two pronuclei (2PN) fertilized oocytes and good-quality embryos were remarkable higher. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher in the mild dosage group. There was no difference in early miscarriages rate, incidence of moderate and severe ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) or incidence of ectopic pregnancy between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified prolonged GnRH-a pituitary down-regulation regimen combined with mild r-FSH starting dosage improved IVF/ICSI outcomes and reduced the financial cost in normal ovarian responders.

Does prolonged pituitary down-regulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improve the live-birth rate in in vitro fertilization treatment?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a prolonged duration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in pituitary down-regulation for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on the live-birth rate in nonendometriotic women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Normogonadotropic women undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Three hundred seventy-eight patients receiving a prolonged pituitary down-regulation with GnRH-a before ovarian stimulation and 422 patients receiving a GnRH-a long protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live-birth rate per fresh ET.

RESULT(S)

In comparison with the long protocol, the prolonged down-regulation protocol required a higher total dose of gonadotropins. A lower serum luteinizing hormone (LH) level on the starting day of gonadotropin and the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and a fewer number of oocytes and embryos were observed in the prolonged down-regulation protocol. However, the duration of stimulation and number of high-quality embryos were comparable between the two groups. A statistically significantly higher implantation rate (50.27% vs. 39.69%), clinical pregnancy rate (64.02% vs. 56.87%) and live-birth rate per fresh transfer cycle (55.56% vs. 45.73%) were observed in the prolonged protocol.

CONCLUSION(S)

Prolonged down-regulation in a GnRH-a protocol might increase the live-birth rates in normogonadotropic women.

Comparative study on the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with transvaginal ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration and long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist alone

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the effects of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with transvaginal ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration on the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the infertile patients with ovarian endometriosis.

METHODS

The 134 patients with ovarian endometriosis who underwent GnRH-a combined with transvaginal ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration and IVF-ET were served as experimental group. The 102 patients with ovarian endometriosis who underwent GnRH-a and IVF-ET were served as control group. After treatment, the cyst size, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), number of ovum pick-up, fertility rate, cleavage rate, high-quality embryo rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and abortion rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the 134 patients of experimental group, 138 cysts disappeared after GnRH-a combined with three times of transvaginal ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration. In the 102 patients of control group, of the 114 cysts, 34 disappeared after GnRH-a, 67 were decreased and 13 were unchanged. The abortion rate was significantly lower in experimental group than in control group. The level of serum E2 on HCG day, the number of ovarian follicles with 14 mm or more, the number of retrieved oocytes, high-quality embryo rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in experimental group than in control group (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

GnRH-a combined with transvaginal ultrasound-guided cyst aspiration can obtain better therapeutic effects and pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients with ovarian endometriosis who underwent IVF-ET.

Endometrioma and ART: Does the Needle Work?

Aim and Objectives

The aim of this study was to see if the fertility outcome improved when IVF/ICSI was done after administration of GnRH analogs and cyst aspiration in comparison with patients in whom either only cyst aspiration or only GnRh analogs were administered.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective study done in a tertiary level ART center which included 30 patients over a span of 5 years from 2004 to 2009. All of them had endometriomas and underwent assisted reproductive techniques (ART) either after cyst aspiration with or without GnRH analog pretreatment or only GnRH analog pretreatment.

Depending on the pretreatment received, they were classified into three groups:

• Group B: Both GnRH analog and cyst aspiration

• Group C: Only cyst aspiration

• Group G: Only GnRH analog.

The patients were not randomized.

The number of days required for stimulation, total dose of stimulation required, number of oocytes obtained, quality of embryos, and the pregnancy rates for each group were tabulated for comparison.

Statistical analysis

The significance of the difference in ART outcome after the different modalities of pretreatment, which was estimated in terms of pregnancy rates was evaluated by calculating the p-value.

Observations and results

Significant difference was observed between the pregnancy rates in the three groups, with the maximum pregnancy rate in group B, followed by the group G and then the group C. The p-value showed a trend, though not statistically significant, indicating the need for larger prospective studies with greater number of subjects.

Conclusion

Pretreating endometriomas by aspirating the cysts and administering three doses of GnRH analog depot preparation prior to IVF/ICSI seems to be better than administering GnRH analog depot preparation alone or aspirating the cysts alone in terms of the number of days required for stimulation, the number of oocytes obtained, and the clinical pregnancy rates.

GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for stage I–II endometriosis and endometrioma in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) in mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma.

DESIGN

Prospective randomize trial.

SETTING

A private IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 246 ICSI cycles in 246 patients were divided into three groups: women with mild-to-moderate endometriosis (n = 98); women who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma (n = 81); women with endometrioma and no history of previous surgery (n = 67).

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients in each group were randomized to COH with either triptrolein or cetrorelix.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical parameters, characteristics of COH, and ICSI results were analyzed.

RESULT(S)

Outcomes of COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a were similar in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis. Implantation rates were 15.9% vs. 22.6% and clinical pregnancy rates were 27.5% vs. 39% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients who had ovarian surgery for endometrioma. Implantation rates were 12.5% vs. 14.8% and clinical pregnancy rates were 20.5% vs. 24.2% with GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols, respectively, in patients with endometrioma and no history of ovarian surgery.

CONCLUSION(S)

Considering the implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, COH with both GnRH antagonist and GnRH-a protocols may be equally effective in patients with mild-to-moderate endometriosis and endometrioma who did and did not undergo ovarian surgery.

Prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy reduced expression of nitric oxide synthase in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and infertility

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether endometrial expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) or inducible NOS (iNOS) protein in women with endometriosis-associated infertility is different from that in the fertile controls, whether GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) regulates the endometrial expression of NOS in women with endometriosis-associated infertility, and whether there is a correlation between serum E2 or P levels, and the endometrial expression of eNOS or iNOS.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

SETTING

University hospital for reproductive medicine and gynecologic endocrinology.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty patients with endometriosis-associated infertility and 19 patients with carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometrial biopsy specimens and blood samples.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Endometrial eNOS and iNOS protein relative levels and serum concentrations of E2 or P.

RESULT(S)

By Western blot analysis, iNOS was not detected, and a unique menstrual cycle-dependent expression of eNOS was observed. Eutopic endometrium in women with endometriosis-associated infertility before GnRH-a treatment showed higher levels of eNOS than that of the control group. After 3 months of GnRH-a therapy, eNOS levels in the endometrium were reduced. In addition, a significant positive correlation was found between serum E2 or P concentrations, and the endometrial expression of eNOS.

CONCLUSION(S)

The GnRH-a treatment attenuated the endometrial expression of eNOS in women with endometriosis-associated infertility. Endogenous ovarian steroids influence endometrial eNOS expression.

Should endometriomas be treated before IVF–ICSI cycles?

The laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas appears to increase the chances of spontaneous conception, but the value of this treatment in women selected for IVF-ICSI cycles is debated. Studies recruiting women with unilateral disease and comparing ovarian responsiveness in the affected and contralateral intact gonads indicate that excision of endometriomas is associated with a quantitative damage to ovarian reserve. There are no randomized trials comparing laparoscopic excision to expectant management before IVF-ICSI cycles. The idea that surgery increases IVF pregnancy rates is not supported by the available evidence. However, the chance of conception is not the only issue that has to be considered. Some potential drawbacks are associated with both therapeutical strategies. Specifically, costs and hazard of surgical complications support expectant management whereas oocyte retrieval risks, the possibility of missing occult malignancy and endometriosis progression due to ovarian stimulation would favour surgical treatment. Alternative therapeutical options include medical treatment and ultrasound-guided aspiration. Whereas prolonged GnRH agonist down-regulation may be beneficial, data on ultrasound aspiration are more controversial.