The benefits and problems associated with minimal access surgery

Evaluation of lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion on pain and quality of recovery for robotic abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background: Acute postoperative pain is associated with poor quality of recovery after surgery. Perioperative use of intravenous lignocaine or dexmedetomidine have demonstrated better pain control, early return of bowel function, and effects on quality of recovery.

Methods: Ninety-six women planned for elective robotic abdominal hysterectomy were randomized into four groups. Groups received lignocaine infusion (1.5 mg.kg⁻¹ loading, 2 mg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion) (Group I), dexmedetomidine infusion (1 µg.kg⁻¹ loading, 0.6 µg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion) (Group 2), lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg⁻¹ loading, 2 mg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion), and dexmedetomidine infusions (1 µg.kg⁻¹ loading, 0.5 µg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion) (Group 3), and normal saline 10 mL loading, 1 mL.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion) (Group 4). Primary outcome was visual analogue pain scores at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative fentanyl requirement, time of return of bowel sounds and flatus, QoR15 score on day 1, 2, and discharge.

Results: The VAS was significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3 compared to Groups 1 and 4. Total postoperative fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours was 256.25 ± 16.36 mcg (Group 1), 177.71 ± 16.81 mcg (Group 2), 114.17 ± 16.19 mcg (Group 3), and 304.42 ± 31.26 mcg (Group 4), respectively. Time to return of bowel sounds and passage of flatus was significantly shorter in Groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.01). QoR15 scores after surgery were higher in Group 3 compared to Groups 1, 2, and 4, (p < 0.01) respectively.

Conclusion: Combined infusion of lignocaine and dexmedetomidine significantly decreased postoperative pain, fentanyl consumption, and improved quality of recovery score after surgery in patients undergoing Robotic abdominal hysterectomy.

Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this analysis was to compare the trends in undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy (versus abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy) based on patient age, race, median income and insurance type, from 2003 to 2010.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

National sample of hospital admissions after hysterectomy.

PATIENTS

Health Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to review records of women who underwent hysterectomy for either menorrhagia or leiomyoma from 2003-2010.

INTERVENTION

The predicted probability of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy was determined for each year according to patient age, race, median income, and insurance type. The slopes of these values (i.e. the trend) was compared for each subgroup (i.e. black, white, Asian, etc.) in these categories.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 530, 154 cases were included in this study. Total number of hysterectomies decreased by 39% from 60,364 to 36,835 from 2003 to 2010. The percent of hysterectomies that were laparoscopic increased from 11% in 2003 to 29% in 2010. All groups analyzed experienced an increase in predicted probability of undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Of all women undergoing hysterectomy, the probability of undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy remained highest for women who were less than 35 years old, white, with the highest median income, and with private insurance from 2003-2010. The slope was significantly greater for (1) white females versus all other races analyzed (p<0.01), (2) females in the highest income quartile versus females in the lowest income quartile (p<0.01) and (3) females with private insurance versus females with Medicaid (p<0.01) or Medicare (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There remains a gap in distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies with regards to age, race, median income and insurance type that does not seem to be closing, despite the increased availability of laparoscopic hysterectomies.

Disparities in use of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a nationwide analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine patient and hospital characteristics that were associated with undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

DESIGN

Canadian Task Force Classification II-3.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. All women who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy for either menorrhagia or leiomyoma were included based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. A linear model with binomial distribution and logit link function was used to determine patient and hospital characteristics associated with hysterectomy approach.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 32 436 patients were included in this study. Of these, 32% patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomies, and 67% underwent abdominal hysterectomies. With regard to patient characteristics, women younger than 35 years old were more likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy when compared with each of the other age categories (p < .001). White women were more likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy than black women, Hispanic women, or women classified as "other" races (p < .001 for all comparisons). With regard to median income, patients from the lowest national quartile were less likely to undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy when compared with each of the other 3 national quartiles for income (p = .01, p < .001, p = .001, respectively). Payment by private insurance was associated with laparoscopic hysterectomy when compared with payment by Medicare or payment by insurance category "other" (p < .001 for both). With regard to hospital characteristics, hospitals in the Northeast were more likely to have laparoscopic hysterectomies than hospitals in the Midwest or South (p < .001 for both comparisons); urban hospitals were more likely than rural hospitals (p < .001); teaching hospitals were more likely than nonteaching hospitals (p < .001); and government-owned hospitals were less likely than private, nonprofit or private, investor owned (p < .001 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased popularity of and training in laparoscopic hysterectomies, there remains an obvious disparity in its delivery with regard to patient and hospital characteristics. Further investigation is needed on the etiology of this disparity and interventions that may alleviate it.

Laparoscopic removal of a large ovarian mass utilizing planned trocar puncture

BACKGROUND

Large cystic ovarian masses pose technical challenges to the laparoscopic surgeon. Removing large, potentially malignant specimens must be done with care to avoid the leakage of cyst fluid into the abdominal cavity.

CASE

We present the case of a large ovarian cystic mass treated laparoscopically with intentional trocar puncture of the mass to drain and remove the mass.

DISCUSSION

Large cystic ovarian masses can be removed laparoscopically with intentional trocar puncture of the mass to facilitate removal without leakage of cyst fluid.

Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to validate virtual reality simulation in assessing laparoscopic skills in gynecology by establishing the extent of realism of the simulation to the actual task (face validity) and the degree to which the results of the test one uses reflects the subject tested (construct validity).

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects (n = 56) were divided into 3 groups: novices (n = 15), intermediates (n = 20), and experts (n = 21). Participants completed 3 repetitions of a training program consisting of 4 basic skills and 3 gynecologic procedural simulations. The performance was compared between groups using a post hoc Student t test with the Bonferroni technique. Face validity was determined by using a questionnaire of 27 statements.

RESULTS

Resulting from the questionnaire, the opinion about the realism and training capacities of the tasks was favorable among all groups. The degree of prior laparoscopic experience was reflected in the outcome performance parameters of the tasks. Experts achieved significant better scores on specific parameters.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate acceptance and thus face validity of the system among both reference (novice, intermediate) and expert group. There is a significant difference between subjects with different laparoscopic experience and thereby construct validity for the laparoscopic simulator could be established.