If the "adaptive" immune system can recognize a significant portion of the pathogenic universe to which the "innate" immune system is blind, then

Food-Nonfood Discrimination in Ancestral Vertebrates: Gamete Cannibalism and the Origin of the Adaptive Immune System

Adaptive immunity is a complex system that appeared twice in vertebrates (in gnathostomes and in jawless fish) although it is not required for invertebrate defence. The adaptive immune system is tightly associated with self-non-self discrimination, and it is now clear that this interplay is not limited to the prevention of autoreactivity. Micro-organisms are usually considered for their pathogenicity or symbiotic ability, but, for most small metazoans, they mainly constitute food. Vertebrates are characterized by feeding by predation on larger preys, when compared to their ancestors who were filter feeders and ate micro-organisms. Predation gives a strong selective advantage, not only due to the availability of new food resources but also by the ability to eliminate competitors for environmental resources (intraguild predation (IGP)). Unlike size-structured IGP, intraspecific predation of juveniles, zygotes or gametes can be detrimental for species fitness in some circumstances. The ability of individuals to recognize highly polymorphic molecules on the surface of gametes present in the plankton and so distinguish self versus non-self gametes might have constituted a strong selective advantage in intraspecific competition. Here, I propose the theory that the capacity to rearrange receptors has been selected in ancestral vertebrates as a consequence of this strong need for discriminating between hetero-cannibalism versus filial cannibalism. This evolutionary origin sheds light on presently unexplained features of the immune system, including the existence of regulatory T cells and of non-pathogenic natural autoimmunity.

On the opposing views of the self-nonself discrimination by the immune system

Today's generally accepted view of the self-nonself discrimination was voiced by Miller(1) in 2004 in a thought-provoking essay. In spite of its popularity, this position has its limitations, which are analyzed here with a view toward establishing an interactive discussion that hopefully will culminate in agreed upon decisive experiments. The inadequacies of Miller's view of the self-nonself discrimination and their resolution under the associative recognition of antigen model are analyzed.

What roles do regulatory T cells play in the control of the adaptive immune response?

The immune system, like many systems responsive to specific stimuli, requires feedback regulation. The key regulatory element determining antigen-specific responsiveness is the effector T helper. As the response tends to overshoot, a feedback control of the magnitude of the response is critical to avoid immunopathology. This is the proposed role of the effector T suppressor (T(s)). The reasons for this interpretation of the data are discussed as are the reasons that the competing postulate is ruled out, namely that T(s) function in determining the self-non-self-discrimination. The regulatory T cell family consists of two lineages, T helpers and T(s). Differentiated derivatives of the T helper lineage drive the expression and amplification of specific classes of defensive effector cells. T(s) feedback to limit the magnitude of the process so that debilitating immunopathology is acceptably infrequent.

Does the signal for the activation of T cells originate from the antigen-presenting cell or the effector T-helper?

The present view is that the antigen-presenting cell (APC) processes and presents simultaneously on its surface several different antigens that are displayed randomly (with respect to their being Self or Nonself) as peptide-MHC complexes. The naive T-cell interacting with its ligand on the APC is activated by "co-stimulation," the first step on the pathway to effectors. This view ignores the requirement for associative recognition of antigen (ARA) in mediating both the Self-Nonself discrimination and the regulation of effector class. The introduction of ARA as a requirement for these two decision functions highlights a critical role for the effector T-helper (eTh) and necessitates rethinking the contribution of the APC.

Tissue Homeostasis and Immunity – More on Models

This article continues the ongoing debate around models of the immune system. Earlier contributors have paid much attention to the various processes that lead to adaptive immune system aggression or tolerance. They have often based their discussions around facts that have been established by experimental investigation. However, both the observation and interpretation of these facts have been influenced by the function--or system goal--that is believed to have generated them. The perception of this function (of all or part of the immune system) is influenced by long established theories in immunology (e.g. horror autotoxicus, clonal deletion in utero, pathogen elimination, clonal selection, auto-immunity and so on) which, for many, have become enshrined as facts. One function that has had less consideration and has not been extensively investigated is the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. When the immune system is viewed from this perspective, the facts invite alternative interpretations. Whilst this perspective may not necessarily be the only valid one, let alone a correct one, viewing things this way--at least briefly--might help to expose hidden assumptions. It also emphasizes that the immune system is a system and, as such, it can by analysed through the principles of general systems theory.

A three-cell model for activation of naïve T helper cells

It is generally assumed that the activation of naïve T helper (Th) cells is the result of a two-cell interaction between the Th cell and a dendritic cell (DC) and that three signals are required. Signal one or stimulation is the recognition by the T-cell receptor (TCR) of antigenic peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules. Signal two or co-stimulation is mainly provided by the triggering of CD28 on the T cell by CD80 and CD86 molecules on the DC. Signal three or polarization directs T-cell differentiation into various effector phenotypes such as Th1 and Th2. Both signals, two and three, are often assumed to result from the binding of microbial products or endogenous molecular danger signals to germline-encoded receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLR) on the DC. However, recent data challenge this two-cell model by revealing that Th1 polarization requires the presence of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) provided by a third cell. I propose here a three-cell model for naïve Th-cell activation. In this model, delivery of signal three by the DC is dependent on help provided by other innate immune cells such as NK cells, NK T cells, gammadelta T cells, mast cells, eosinophils and basophils. The rationale behind this model is that the innate immune system has been designed by evolution to select an appropriate class of immune response to protect the host.

On ‘Credo 2004’ as Viewed Under the ‘Development-Context’ Model of Colin Anderson

In analysing the Zinkernagel and Hengartner's 'Credo 2004,' Anderson introduces his 'development-context model' for the immunity-tolerance discrimination. He compares this model with the 'geographical model of Credo 2004' and our 'time-based two-signal model'. The discussion here deals with the advantages and limitations of the Anderson model considered largely at the level of principle. A meaningful discussion requires that we agree on the principle which separates the pathway of the effector output into two decision steps, the sorting of the repertoire and the regulation of effector class. The mechanism for the sorting of the repertoire is what might be referred to as the Self-Nonself discrimination. The black box approach, antigen-in, effector response-out, is what is referred to as the immunity-tolerance discrimination which includes the sorting of the repertoire. If this point of principle is accepted then we are left with a 'time-based two signal default model'.