High-dose ranitidine for the prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients taking NSAIDs

Clinical Guidelines for Drug-Related Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition

Korean guidelines for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced peptic ulcer were previously developed in 2009 with the collaboration of the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research and Korean Society of Gastroenterology. However, the previous guidelines were based mainly upon a review of the relevant literature and expert opinion. Therefore, the guidelines need to be revised. We organized a guideline Development Committee for drug-related peptic ulcer under the auspices of the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research in 2017 and developed nine statements, including four for NSAIDs, three for aspirin and other antiplatelet agents, and two for anticoagulants through a de novo process founded on evidence-based medicine that included a literature search and a meta-analysis, A consensus was reached through the application of the modified Delphi method. The primary target of these guidelines is adult patients undergoing long-term treatment with NSAIDs, aspirin or other antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants. The revised guidelines reflect the expert consensus and is intended to assist clinicians in the management and prevention of drug-induced peptic ulcer and associated conditions.

[Clinical Guidelines for Drug-induced Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition]

The Korean guidelines for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced peptic ulcers were previously developed under co-work with the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research and Korean Society of Gastroenterology at 2009. On the other hand, the previous guidelines were based mainly on a literature review and expert opinions. Therefore, the guidelines need to be revised. In this study, a guideline development committee for drug-induced peptic ulcers was organized under the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research in 2017. Nine statements were developed, including four for NSAID, three for aspirin and other antiplatelet agents, and two for anticoagulants through de novo processes based on evidence-based medicine, such as a literature search, meta-analysis, and the consensus was established using the modified Delphi method. The primary target of this guideline was adult patients taking long-term NSAIDs, aspirin, or other antiplatelet agent and anticoagulants. The revised guidelines reflect the consensus of expert opinions and are intended to assist relevant clinicians in the management and prevention of drug-induced peptic ulcers and associated conditions.

Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis hospitalized for stroke-a cross-sectional study

Specific data regarding the full range of stroke outcomes among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are lacking. This study aimed to investigate outcomes in RA patients hospitalized for a stroke. The study retrieved data from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005. We identified 26,336 patients who were hospitalized for stroke treatment. Of these patients, 736 patients with a prior diagnosis of RA before the index hospitalization were selected as the study group. We selected 2208 age-sex-matched patients without RA as the comparison group. We performed conditional logistic regressions to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality and secondary diagnoses of pneumonia, urinary tract infections (UTIs), peptic ulcers, acute respiratory failure, and the use of mechanical ventilation to compare RA patients and comparison patients. We also compared the length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs between patients with RA and comparison patients. We found that RA patients had a significantly increased risk of peptic ulcer during the stroke hospitalization (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.05-2.20). However, there were no significant differences between patients with RA and comparison patients in terms of in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, UTIs, acute respiratory failure, or the use of mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, the LOS of stroke hospitalization did not differ between the two groups. We concluded that RA patients hospitalized for a stroke do not have a significantly different risk of in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, UTIs, and mechanical ventilator use, but they have a higher risk of peptic ulcers. Additionally, among patients with a subarachnoid/intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke, RA patients were more likely to have received mechanical ventilation than comparison patients (adjusted OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.14-3.15).

Prescription audit of NSAIDs and gastroprotective strategy in elderly in primary care

BACKGROUND

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) is deemed a major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease in elderly population that requires concomitant therapy with gastroprotective agents (GPAs).

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the rational prescribing of NSAIDs and GPAs, and extent of adherence to the guideline recommendations in primary care.

METHODS

Nationwide audit of prescriptions issued to elderly patients (≥65 years) with hypertension or diabetic hypertension in primary care.

RESULTS

Among 2090 elderly, 45.9% were on low-dose aspirin, and 13.5% on other NSAIDs. Diclofenac-XR was the most frequently prescribed NSAIDs to three-quarter patients whereas naproxen, the safest NSAID for patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk, was rarely prescribed. Among those on NSAID, 82.9% were on a scheduled dosing regimen; of these 78.8% received long-term NSAID therapy (3.9±0.9 months). The prescription rate of GPAs was low: 29.2% for aspirin and 33.3% for other NSAIDs. A quarter of the patients on histamine type-2 receptor antagonists received ranitidine at subtherapeutic single-dose for gastroprotection. Approximately half of the patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were prescribed supra-therapeutic double-dose regimen: omeprazole and esomeprazole accounted for 63.2% of overall prescribed PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The rational choice of NSAIDs and physicians' adherence to gastroprotective measures was suboptimal in primary care. The choice of NSAIDs and gastroprotective strategy in elderly be guided by the CV and gastrointestinal adverse events likelihood due to the NSAIDs and risk profile of patients for such adverse events.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gastroprotection, and benefit-risk

Background

Gastroprotective agents (GPA) substantially reduce morbidity and mortality with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin.

Objective

To evaluate efficacy of NSAIDs, protection against NSAID-induced gastrointestinal harm, and balance of benefit and risk.

Methods

Free text searches of PubMed (December 2012) supplemented with “related citation” and “cited by” facilities on PubMed and Google Scholar for patient requirements, NSAID effectiveness, pain relief benefits, gastroprotective strategies, adherence to gastroprotection prescribing, and serious harm with NSAIDs and GPA.

Results

Patients want 50% reduction in pain intensity and improved fatigue, distress, and quality of life. Meta-analyses of NSAID trials in musculoskeletal conditions had bimodal responses with good pain relief or little. Number needed to treat (NNTs) for good pain relief were 3 to 9. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and high-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H₂RA) provided similar gastroprotection, with no conclusive evidence of greater PPI efficacy compared with high-dose H₂RA. Prescriber adherence to guidance on use of GPA with NSAIDS was 49% in studies published since 2005; patient adherence was less than 100%. PPI use at higher doses over longer periods is associated with increased risk of serious adverse events, including fracture; no such evidence was found for H₂RA. Patients with chronic conditions are more willing to accept risk of harm for successful treatment than their physicians.

Conclusion

Guidance on NSAIDs use should ensure that patients have a good level of pain relief and that gastroprotection is guaranteed for the NSAID delivering good pain relief. Fixed-dose combinations of NSAID plus GPA offer one solution.

Editorial: single-tablet ibuprofen/double-dose famotidine for reduction of gastric and duodenal ulcers (REDUCE Trials): what can be reduced?

Patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) who are at high risk of gastroduodenal ulcer complications often do not receive gastroprotective co-therapy. Fixed-dose combination tablets of an NSAID and a proton-pump inhibitor or misoprostol are intended to improve adherence. Whether the use of these combination tablets will improve adherence and clinical outcome remains largely uninvestigated. Unlike proton-pump inhibitors and misoprostol, the efficacy of histamine-2-receptor antagonists in preventing gastroduodenal ulcers associated with NSAID use is questionable. Nonetheless, a new fixed-dose combination tablet of an NSAID and famotidine will soon be available on the market. The study by Laine et al. is a pooled analysis of two large-scale, carefully designed randomized trials (REDUCE trials) of a fixed-combination tablet of ibuprofen and famotidine on the incidence of endoscopic ulcers. How the study findings may influence clinical practice deserves further consideration.

The economics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a US managed-care setting: a retrospective, claims-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding events.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with a UGI bleeding event were identified in US national health-plan claims data (1999-2003) and propensity matched to control patients without UGI bleeding in the same health plan. Matching criteria included age, gender, index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, geographic region, and prior medical utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 9,033 UGI-bleed patients and 579,018 control patients met the inclusion criteria, yielding 4,651 matched pairs. After matching, differences between the UGI bleed and general population cohorts remained for office visits, ER visits, and ER costs during the 6-month baseline period prior to the index date. During the 12 months following the index date, both UGI-related healthcare utilization and total healthcare, medical, and pharmacy costs incurred by the UGI-bleed cohort were significantly greater (p< 0.0001) than those incurred by the general population cohort (mean of $20,405 vs. 3,652), even after excluding the initial hospitalization costs (mean of $11,228 vs. 3,652). Costs were primarily due to inpatient hospitalizations (mean of $13,059 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $729 for the general population cohort) and ambulatory services (mean of $4,037 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $1,537 for the general population cohort). Sixteen percent of the UGI-bleed cohort had a GI-related hospitalization, and about 40% of total costs occurred after the initial hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with UGI bleeds experienced significantly higher (p< 0.0001) 12-month health-resource utilization and costs than patients without UGI bleeds. This study provides empirical evidence of the long-term economic burden associated with UGI bleeding. Interpretation of the results should take into account the lack of available information in claims data that could have an effect on study outcomes, such as particular clinical and disease-specific parameters that are not mitigated by propensity score and comorbidity index matching. In addition, this study is limited by the intensive demographic matching that was done between the two cohorts, which may have eliminated the sickest UGI patients and the healthiest general health-plan population patients.

[Guidelines of prevention and treatment for NSAID-related peptic ulcers]

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used medications in Korea. Gastrointestinal toxicity, including peptic ulcer, is a common adverse effect of NSAIDs. Risk factors for NSAID-related peptic ulcer include a previous history of peptic ulcer, advanced age, high dose, concomitant use of corticosteroids, anticoagulants, other NSAIDs including low-dose aspirin. Preventive measure(s), such as COX-2 inhibitor, proton pump inhibitor or misoprostrol, should be done for patients requiring NSAID therapy who have high-risk factor(s) for peptic ulcer. Low dose aspirin also increases the risk of peptic ulcer, so preventive measure(s) should be done for high-risk patients. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori is recommended for high-risk NSAID-users. Treatment strategies for peptic ulcers in NSAID users are mostly the same for peptic ulcers in NSAID non-users.

Prevention of NSAID-related upper gastrointestinal toxicity: a meta-analysis of traditional NSAIDs with gastroprotection and COX-2 inhibitors

Background:

Traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors (COX-2s) are important agents for the treatment of a variety or arthritic conditions. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of misoprostol, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the prevention of tNSAID related upper gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and to review the upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety of COX-2s.

Methods:

An extensive literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prophylactic agents used for the prevention of upper GI toxicity, and RCTs that assessed the GI safety of the newer COX-2s. Meta-analysis was performed in accordance with accepted techniques.

Results:

39 gastroprotection and 69 COX-2 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Misoprostol, PPIs, and double doses of H2RAs are effective at reducing the risk of both endoscopic gastric and duodenal tNSAID-induced ulcers. Standard doses of H2RAs are not effective at reducing the risk of tNSAID-induced gastric ulcers, but reduce the risk of duodenal ulcers. Misoprostol is associated with greater adverse effects than the other agents, particularly at higher doses. COX-2s are associated with fewer endoscopic ulcers and clinically important ulcer complications, and have fewer treatment withdrawals due to GI symptoms than tNSAIDS. Acetylsalicylic acid appears to diminish the benefit of COX-2s over tNSAIDs. In high risk GI patients, tNSAID with a PPI or a COX-2 alone appear to offer similar GI safety, but a strategy of a COX-2 with a PPI appears to offer the greatest GI safety.

Conclusion:

Several strategies are available to reduce the risk of upper GI toxicity with tNSAIDs. The choice between these strategies needs to consider patients’ underlying GI and cardiovascular risk.

Systematic review: ulcer definition in NSAID ulcer prevention trials

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials of peptic ulcer prevention, the most appropriate definition of an ulcer remains challenging.

AIMS

To evaluate the ulcer definitions used in clinical trials of ulcer prevention among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users and to determine whether any specific definition is preferred.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Medline and EMBASE databases was conducted. Results were limited to full papers published in English from June 1987 to June 2007 that met the following criteria: randomized, controlled non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trials of > or =8 weeks' duration, with a primary end point of ulcer upon endoscopy.

RESULTS

Forty five publications met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Overall, an ulcer diameter of > or =3 mm was used in 25 publications and most included a description of ulcer depth. Of the remainder, ulcer was defined as any lesion with unequivocal/observable depth (with no lower limit for ulcer diameter; five publications) or an excavated mucosal break >3 mm (one publication), whereas nine defined a minimum ulcer size of > or =5 or >5 mm. Ulcer definition was unclear in the remaining five publications.

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials of ulcer prevention among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, a gastric or duodenal lesion > or =3 mm in diameter with significant depth is the preferred definition.

Inappropriate Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Events Among Long-Term Users in the Elderly

Although use of NSAIDs and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is well known to be associated with gastrointestinal (GI) complications and potential mortality, these medications continue to be widely prescribed in the elderly. Age is a significant risk factor for NSAID-induced GI events; indeed, patients >75 years of age carry the highest risk and are similar in this respect to patients with a history of peptic ulcer. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastropathy is indicated in patients at risk. It is accepted that patients >60 years of age taking NSAIDs should participate in prevention strategies such as co-therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or misoprostol, or use of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective NSAIDs (also called coxibs). Although up to 33% of subjects with no risk factors who receive NSAIDs over-utilise GI preventive therapies, under-utilisation of gastroprotective therapy is more prevalent among those with risk factors, of which the most frequent is age. At least half of those at risk do not receive appropriate preventive therapy, either because they do not receive co-therapy with PPIs or misoprostol or are not treated with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, or because they receive co-therapy with antacids or histamine H(2) receptor antagonists, which are not effective. Adherence to the prescribed preventive therapy is an additional problem for those who are prescribed a PPI or misoprostol. Over 30% of patients are non-adherent and the lowest rate of non-adherence is associated with the first NSAID prescription, which increases the risk of ulcer bleeding compared with those who are fully adherent. Predictors of nonadherence include long-term use of NSAIDs and a high average daily dose of NSAIDs. Predictors of adherence include a history of upper gastrointestinal events, anticoagulant use, rheumatological disease and use of low-dose salicylates, among others. Another important aspect is self-medication; this is common in the elderly, who also have several risk factors for GI complications, and may be a factor in over one-third of all NSAID-related complications. In summary, aging is a key risk factor for GI complications in patients taking NSAIDs. Appropriate prevention strategies should be used in the elderly and those at risk; special attention should be paid to compliance and self-medication.

Review article: prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastrointestinal complications--review and recommendations based on risk assessment

The incidence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications remains high despite the availability of potent anti-ulcer drugs and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications can be minimized by prospective assessment of patients' baseline risk, rational choice and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and selective use of co-therapy strategies with gastroprotectives. Current recommendations regarding strategies using anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for prevention of clinical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug upper gastrointestinal events are largely derived from studies using surrogates such as endoscopic ulcers, erosions, and symptoms in low- to average-risk patients. Conclusions based on surrogate and potentially manipulatable end-points are increasingly suspect with regard to applicability to clinical situations. This article reviews the risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin and includes the effect of the patients' baseline risk, and the confounding effects of Helicobacter pylori infection. In addition, uncertainties regarding the clinical efficacy of anti-ulcer drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related ulcer complications are put into perspective. We propose management strategies based on the risk category: low risk (absence of risk factors) (least ulcerogenic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug at lowest effective dose), moderate risk (one to two risk factors) (as above, plus an antisecretory agent or misoprostol or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor), high risk (multiple risk factors or patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, steroids, or anticoagulants) (cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor alone with steroids, plus misoprostol with warfarin, or plus a proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol with aspirin), and very high risk (history of ulcer complications) (avoid all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, if possible or a cyclo-oxygenase-2 plus a proton pump inhibitors and/or misoprostol). The presence of H. pylori infection increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users by two- to fourfold suggesting that all patients requiring regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy be tested for H. pylori.

Traitements curatif et préventif des ulcères gastro-duodénaux induits par les AINS

The use of treatments to heal or to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) associated gastroduodenal lesions is based on replacement of mucosal prostaglandin deficiency or inhibition of acid secretion. Four-week acid suppression by proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with 7-day eradication triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori positive patients is effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcer upon discontinuation of NSAIDs. In the event NSAIDs must be continued, PPIs (omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg) are more effective than H2-blockers and cytoprotective agents (sucralfate, misoprostol) to heal mucosal lesions. In long-term prevention studies, omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 15 mg, and pantoprazole 20 mg significantly reduce gastric and duodenal ulcer rates. Misoprostol 800 microg is as effective as PPIs for preventing symptomatic and complicated gastric ulcers, but less effective to prevent duodenal ulcer, with a high rate of adverse effects such as diarrhea. Helicobacter pylori eradication in infected patients decrease the risk of NSAIDs-associated lesions but is less effective than concomitant antisecretory treatment. Current data from comparative studies of PPIs vs ranitidine or misoprostol are in favor of the PPIs as well tolerated and effective drugs in the prophylaxis of NSAIDs-related gastroduodenal lesions in high-risk patients.

What is the most effective therapy for preventing NSAID-induced gastropathy?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal toxicity is associated with morbidity and mortality, and given the very wide use of NSAIDs, is problematic and costly to society. Several options are now available to minimize gastrointestinal toxicity from NSAIDs. These options include the proton pump inhibitors, misoprostil, double-dose H2-receptor blockers and the COX-2 selective NSAIDs. No head-to-head clinical trials have compared these options. The effectiveness of these strategies to minimize NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity is summarized. In addition, their associated adverse effect profiles and costs are compared.

Adherence to proton pump inhibitors or H2-receptor antagonists during the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) prescribed as prophylaxis for NSAID-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) toxicity is dependent upon patient adherence.

AIM

To describe patient adherence to prophylactically prescribed PPIs and H2RAs in the clinical setting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the Integrated Primary Care Information Project database. The study population consisted of incident non-specific NSAID users prescribed a PPI or H2RA specifically as prophylaxis for NSAID-related UGI toxicity. Patients were classified as non-adherent if < 75% of days of NSAID use were covered by one of these agents, and as continuing users after discontinuation of NSAID use if they had a renewed prescription for these agents after their last NSAID prescription.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 784 patients: 374 with H2RAs, 405 with PPIs, and 5 with both PPI and H2RA. Eighty-five percent of H2RA users and 7% of PPI users were prescribed these drugs at doses below the minimum recommended/effective dose for NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulcer prophylaxis. Thirty-seven percent of patients were non-adherent. The lowest rate of non-adherence was associated with the first NSAID prescription (9%), increasing to 61% for patients with >/= 3 prescriptions. In a cohort of subjects who stopped their NSAID and were followed for up to 2 years (n = 711), there was significant persistent use of acid suppressive agents; 40% of patients had at least one additional prescription for the acid suppressive agent after stopping NSAIDs, and> 30% received enough drug to cover a period longer than 2 months after stopping their NSAID.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of PPI and H2RA prescriptions, when prescribed as prophylactic strategy, does not correspond with the pattern of NSAID use. Physicians should consider the medical impact of non-adherence with dual therapies and the impact of prolonged use of GPAs on treatment cost.

Critical effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the effectiveness of omeprazole for prevention of gastric or duodenal ulcers among chronic NSAID users

BACKGROUND

The recently reported OMNIUM and ASTRONAUT NSAID ulcer prevention trials using omeprazole to prevent endoscopic ulcer recurrence among chronic NSAID users suggested superiority over misoprostol or ranitidine.

AIM

To test the hypothesis the results from the OMNIUM and ASTRONAUT studies would not be generalizible as ulcer healing and ulcer recurrence would differ in relation to Helicobacter pylori status.

METHODS

The data regarding H. pylori status were made available by AstraZenca allowing separate analysis of the outcome of those with NSAID ulcers (i.e. without H. pylori infection) and those NSAID use was complicated with the presence of an active H. pylori infection.

RESULTS

Reanalysis confirmed that omeprazole was superior to placebo for the prevention of ulcer recurrence in chronic NSAID users. However, overall omeprazole was not significantly better than the subtherapeutic dose (400 microg/day) of misoprostol (14.5% vs. 19.6%, respectively, p =.93); 400 microg of misoprostol was actually superior to omeprazole for the prevention of gastric ulcers among those NSAID ulcers (8.2% vs. 16.6% for misoprostol and omeprazole, respectively; p <.05). Omeprazole was also not statistically different from misoprostol for gastric ulcer prevention in those whose NSAID use was complicated by an active H. pylori infection. Omeprazole was not significantly different from 300 mg of ranitidine for the prevention of NSAID gastric ulcers (14.6% vs. 11.6%, respectively, p =.56). Duodenal ulcers were over represented among H. pylori infected NSAID users and duodenal ulcer prevention was more sensitive to acid suppression than gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSION

The OMNIUM and ASTRONAUT trials may have provided an unrealistic sense of security regarding the effectiveness of omeprazole for protection against ulcer recurrence in chronic NSAID users.

Prophylaxis and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal side-effects

The use of specific agents to heal mucosal lesions or to prevent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity, has focused upon two approaches: replacement of prostaglandin deficiency and inhibition of acid secretion. Acid suppression with traditional ulcer healing doses of H2-blockers is effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers upon discontinuation of the offending drug. In the event the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug must be continued, the use of H2-blockers is associated with a decrease in the healing rate. In long-term prevention studies, H2-blockers significantly reduce duodenal ulcer rates, but are ineffective in reducing gastric ulceration. More potent acid inhibition with a double-dose of H2-blockers (famotidine 80 mg daily, ranitidine 600 mg daily) may reduce the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Marked acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole 20-40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg daily) also appears to be very effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients continuing the offending drug as well. An analysis of pooled data from comparative studies on omeprazole vs ranitidine, misoprostol and sucralfate shows a therapeutic advantage in favour of the proton pump inhibitor, ranging from 10 to 40%. In long-term prevention studies, omeprazole (20 mg daily) and pantoprazole (40 mg daily) have also been shown to reduce the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related dyspepsia. Current data from recent comparative studies of omeprazole (20 mg daily) vs ranitidine (150 mg daily) and misoprostol (200 microg daily) showed that, after 6 months' follow-up, the proton pump inhibitor was significantly superior to control drugs in reducing the risk both of gastric and duodenal ulcer. Misoprostol (at doses ranging from 400 microg to 800 microg/day) is an effective form of therapy for preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal lesions. However high-dose misoprostol only, seems adequate for the prevention of ulcer complications, mainly in high-risk non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Thus, available data are undoubtedly in favour of the proton pump inhibitors as well tolerated and effective drugs in the prophylaxis and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.

Role of acid suppressants in prophylaxis of NSAID damage

Gastric acid contributes to the pathogenesis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulceration via several mechanisms, including conversion of superficial to deeper injury, impairment of haemostasis, and interference with ulcer healing. The suppression of acid secretion has been shown to reduce the severity of NSAID-induced mucosal damage in experimental models and clinical studies. Current evidence indicates that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the preferred treatment for the healing of gastric ulcers when NSAIDs cannot be discontinued. PPIs are superior to standard-dose H(2)-receptor antagonists and equivalent to low-dose misoprostol in preventing NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Whether there is any significant advantage of PPIs over higher doses of H(2)-receptor antagonists or misoprostol is unknown. The efficacy of PPIs is enhanced in the presence of H. Pylori infection. Omeprazole has been shown to be effective for the secondary prevention of ulcer bleeding in H. pylori -infected NSAID users. The efficacy of PPIs for the prevention of ulcer complications in H. pylori-negative NSAID users remains uncertain.

NSAID gastrointestinal toxicity

Toxic effects in the upper gastrointestinal tract, primarily complicated gastric and intestinal ulcers, are the most common undesirable effects of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). During the last several years there have been several advances, both in the laboratory and clinically, toward reducing NSAIDs' gastrointestinal toxicity. Some of these important developments have been the delineation of mechanisms of NSAID-induced GI toxicity, identification of groups at highest risk for development of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, recognition of co-therapies that could reduce NSAID toxicity, and, most recently, development of classes of NSAIDs that have an improved gastrointestinal safety profile. Many of these advances occurred during the last year. This review focuses on several of the important recent observations that have improved our understanding and the safety of NSAIDs in the gastrointestinal tract.

The gastroduodenal toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a review of the literature

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are popular and important for the treatment of inflammation and pain. However, conventional NSAIDs are intrinsically toxic to the gastroduodenal (GD) mucosa. The literature can, and should, guide us towards safer prescribing of NSAIDs. Factors known to increase the risk of GD toxicity include: history of peptic ulcer disease; advanced age; high doses; and coadministration of aspirin, anticoagulants or corticosteroids. Patients with any one of these risk factors, with the possible exception of age alone, should receive gastroprotective prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol. Standard dose H2 antagonists do not protect against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers and are unsuitable for prophylaxis. Awareness of risk factors and appropriate prophylactic agents will minimize the risk to patients. Whether the new generation of highly selective COX-2 inhibitors and nitric oxide-donating NSAIDs are safer drugs in long-term use be remains to be proven, though initial clinical trial data are positive.

Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

MATERIAL

This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n= 104, age range 22-80 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requiring chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the study), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classification grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1: 1 to 3 erosions, submucosal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2: 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemorrhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 30 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza score grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remission was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantoprazole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even more marked when only those patients with normal mucosa at baseline (grade 0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remission was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94% in the pantoprazole and 55% (95% confidence limits 33% - 77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=O.036. Adverse events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placebo treatment groups, respectively

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with rheumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.

Prevention of chronic NSAID induced upper gastrointestinal toxicity

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important agents in the management of arthritic and inflammatory conditions, and are among the most frequently prescribed medications in North America and Europe. However, there is overwhelming evidence linking these agents to a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness of common interventions for the prevention of NSAID induced upper GI toxicity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A literature search was conducted, according to the Cochrane methodology for identification of randomized controlled trials in electronic databases, including MEDLINE from 1966 to January 2000, Current Contents for 6 months prior to January 2000, Embase to Febuary 1999, and a search of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from 1973 to 1999. Recent conference proceedings were reviewed and content experts and companies were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of prostaglandin analogues (PA), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for the prevention of chronic NSAID induced upper GI toxicity were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data regarding population characteristics, study design, methodological quality and number of patients with endoscopic ulcers, ulcer complications, symptoms, overall drop-outs, drop outs due to symptoms. Dichotomous data was pooled using Revman V3.1. Heterogeneity was evaluated using a chi square test.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. All doses of misoprostol significantly reduced the risk of endoscopic ulcers. Misoprostol 800 ug/day was superior to 400 ug/day for the prevention of endoscopic gastric ulcers (RR=0.18, and RR=0. 38 respectively, p=0.0055). A dose response relationship was not seen with duodenal ulcers. Misoprostol caused diarrhea at all doses, although significantly more at 800ug/day than 400ug/day (p=0.0012). Misoprostol was the only prophylactic agent documented to reduce ulcer complications. Standard doses of H2RAs were effective at reducing the risk of endoscopic duodenal (RR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.10-0. 57) but not gastric ulcers(RR=0.73; 95% CI:0.50-1.09). Both double dose H2RAs and PPIs were effective at reducing the risk of endoscopic duodenal and gastric ulcers (RR=0.44; 95% CI:0.26-0.74 and RR=0.37;95% CI;0.27-0.51 respectively for gastric ulcer), and were better tolerated than misoprostol.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Misoprostol, PPIs, and double dose H2RAs are effective at preventing chronic NSAID related endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcers. Lower doses of misoprostol are less effective and are still associated with diarrhea. Only Misoprostol 800ug/day has been directly shown to reduce the risk of ulcer complications.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastrointestinal toxicity

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are currently the most widely used class of therapeutic agents. By inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) and reducing gastrointestinal prostaglandins, they provide effective analgesia and suppress inflammation in a variety of conditions. However, through the same mechanism of COX inhibition, they also cause significant gastrointestinal toxicity. One of the most common methods to reduce NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity has been to co-prescribe prophylactic therapies such as acid-reducing agents or the synthetic prostaglandin analogue, misoprostol. More recently safer NSAIDs, such as the COX-2 specific NSAIDs or the nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs, have been developed or are currently in development. This article reviews mechanisms of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Also reviewed are data on the gastrointestinal consequences of the prophylatic co-therapies, COX-2 specific NSAIDs and nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs.

Agents used in the prevention and treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated symptoms and ulcers

Coprescription of gastroprotective agents is a common practice for patients requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, although there is limited evidence that some of these agents are effective. The prostaglandin analog misoprostol and the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole appear to be efficacious in decreasing NSAID-associated ulcers. Misoprostol has also been shown to decrease NSAID-associated gastrointestinal (GI) complications by 40% compared with placebo. Despite the efficacy of these drugs, their effectiveness in the general population has not yet been adequately determined with respect to reduction of symptoms and improvement in patient quality of life. Sucralfate and bismuth appear to be largely ineffective, and histamine receptor antagonists, when given at traditional ulcer-healing doses, decrease symptoms and duodenal ulcers only. The issue of outcomes research, therefore, needs to be more fully incorporated into any analysis of the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the widespread clinical use of such gastroprotective drugs.