A controlled clinical trial of treatment with ALG in established rejection of renal allografts

ATGAM Associated Coagulopathy in Renal Transplant Patients: A Report of Two Unusual Cases

Polyclonal antibodies, used for both induction and rejection therapy in renal transplant recipients, are associated with such side effects as chills and fever. We describe two patients who developed a coagulopathy during antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM) therapy, a previously unknown complication. The laboratory tests revealed prolonged prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times and thrombocytopenia. Discontinuation of ATGAM therapy resulted in correction of these abnormalities.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Registry data shows that the incidence of acute rejection has been steadily falling. Approximately 10% to 35% of kidney recipients will undergo treatment for at least one episode of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year. Treatment options include pulsed steroid therapy, the use of an antibody preparation, the alteration of background immunosuppression, or combinations of these options. Over recent years, new treatment strategies have evolved, and in many parts of the world there has been an increase in use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate and a reduction in the use of cyclosporin and azathioprine use as baseline immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection. There are also global variations in use of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to treat acute rejection. This is an update of a review published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to: (1) to evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for first episode of rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (2) evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different classes of antibody preparation in preventing graft loss and resolving cellular or humoral rejection episodes when used as a treatment for steroid-resistant rejection in kidney transplant recipients; (3) determine how the benefits and adverse events vary for each type of antibody preparation; and (4) determine how the benefits and harms vary for different formulations of antibody within each type.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 18 April 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing all mono- and polyclonal antibody preparations, given in combination with any other immunosuppressive agents, for the treatment of cellular or humoral graft rejection, when compared to any other treatment for acute rejection were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 new studies (18 reports, 346 participants) in this update, bring the total number of included studies to 31 (76 reports, 1680 participants). Studies were generally small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. The risk of bias was inadequate or unclear risk for random sequence generation (81%), allocation concealment (87%) and other bias (87%). There were, however, a predominance of low risk of bias for blinding (75%) and incomplete outcome data (80%) across all the studies. Selective reporting had a mixture of low (58%), high (29%), and unclear (13%) risk of bias.Seventeen studies (1005 participants) compared therapies for first acute cellular rejection episodes. Antibody therapy was probably better than steroid in reversing acute cellular rejection (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and preventing subsequent rejection (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99; moderate certainty), may be better for preventing graft loss (death censored: (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.12; low certainty) but there was little or no difference in death at one year. Adverse effects of treatment (including fever, chills and malaise following drug administration) were probably reduced with steroid therapy (RR 23.88, 95% CI 5.10 to 111.86; I2 = 16%; moderate certainty).Twelve studies (576 patients) investigated antibody treatment for steroid-resistant rejection. There was little or no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in reversing rejection, preventing subsequent rejection, or preventing graft loss or death. Two studies compared the use of rituximab for treatment of acute humoral rejection (58 patients). Muromonab-CD3 treated patients suffered three times more than those receiving either ATG or T10B9, from a syndrome of fever, chills and malaise following drug administration (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.21; I2 = 31%), and experienced more neurological side effects (RR 13.10 95% CI 1.43 to 120.05; I2 = 36%) (low certainty evidence).There was no evidence of additional benefit from rituximab in terms of either reversal of rejection (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.64), or graft loss or death 12 months (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.35). Rituximab plus steroids probably increases the risk of urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (RR 5.73, 95% CI 1.80 to 18.21).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In reversing first acute cellular rejection and preventing graft loss, any antibody is probably better than steroid, but there is little or no difference in subsequent rejection and patient survival. In reversing steroid-resistant rejection there was little or no difference between different antibodies over a period of 12 months, with limited data beyond that time frame. In treating acute humoral rejection, there was no evidence that the use of antibody therapy conferred additional benefit in terms of reversal of rejection, or death or graft loss.Although this is an updated review, the majority of newer included studies provide additional evidence from the cyclosporin/azathioprine era of kidney transplantation and therefore conclusions cannot necessarily be extrapolated to patients treated with more contemporary immunosuppressive regimens which include tacrolimus/mycophenolate or sirolimus. However, many kidney transplant centres around the world continue to use older immunosuppressive regimes and the findings of this review remain strongly relevant to their clinical practice.Larger studies with standardised reproducible outcome criteria are needed to investigate the outcomes and risks of antibody treatments for acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients receiving contemporary immunosuppressive regimes.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology

The more than 25 years of clinical experience with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), specifically Thymoglobulin, has transformed immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and haematology. The utility of rATG has evolved from the treatment of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease to the prevention of various complications that limit the success of solid organ and stem cell transplantation. Today, rATG is being successfully incorporated into novel therapeutic regimens that seek to reduce overall toxicity and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rATG in recipients of various types of solid organ allografts, recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants who are conditioned with both conventional and nonconventional regimens, and patients with aplastic anaemia. Over time, clinicians have learnt how to better balance the benefits and risks associated with rATG. Advances in the understanding of the multifaceted mechanism of action will guide research into new therapeutic areas and future applications.

Steroid-resistant rejection in kidney-transplanted patients: is ATG treatment for three or ten days preferable?

We carried out a randomized prospective trial to compare a 3-day with a 10-day course of antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-(Fresenius) for treatment of steroid-resistant rejection after renal transplantation. The aim was to study whether a short 3-day course was as safe and effective as the longer 10-day treatment. Thirty patients over a 3-year period were included. Patients that did not respond to treatment after 3 days received additional ATG from day 5 to day 10. The graft survival and the proportion of rejections reversed with the treatment were compared. Fifty percent responded promptly in the 3-day group and a further 29% after additional treatment. In the 10-day group, 62% responded to the treatment. There was no significant difference between the groups. We, therefore, suggest that the standard antirejection treatment with ATG could be shortened without an increased risk of graft failure.

Clinical experience with antilymphocyte serum

Many different antilymphocytic antisera have been used clinically, and the properties of any particular type of ALS are not necessarily identical to those of any other type. Nevertheless, it is possible to draw certain general conclusions about the effects of ALS in human subjects. ALS administration has often been shown to reduce the number of circulating E-rosette-positive lymphocytes, although the precise mechanisms by which this reduction occurs are not known. Using a combined technique of E-rosette formation and immunofluorescence, heterologous immunoglobulin has been demonstrated on T and non-T lymphocytes from patients receiving non-selective ALS. Fifteen years' experience has failed to provide convincing support for the view that ALS (including immunoglobulin prepared from the whole antiserum) prolongs human renal allograft survival. It is not yet known whether ALS is a useful immunosuppressive agent in cardiac transplantation. One observation of possible clinical interest is that bone marrow regeneration has occurred in a number of patients with aplastic anemia who have been treated with ALS. No satisfactory method has been developed for monitoring the dose of ALS in human subjects. Appropriate studies may determine whether monoclonal antilymphocytic antibodies are clinically useful, for example in prolonging the survival of transplanted organs, in preventing or treating graft-versus-host disease, or in treating lymphoma, leukemia, or aplastic anemia.

Antithymocyte globulin in cadaver kidney transplantation: a randomized trial based on T-cell monitoring

The influence of horse antihuman thymocyte globulin (ATG) on renal allograft survival was assayed between March 1977 and August 1978. Fifty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or the control group. Patients in both groups received azathioprine and prednisolone. ATG was added in the experimental group. The daily dosage was such as to maintain the rosette-forming cell (RFC) level at 10% of baseline values. The number of renal failure episodes (RFE's)was significantly lower in the experimental group during the period (1 month) ATG was given than it was in the control group during that same period of time. Two years after transplantation, kidney survival was 79% in the ATG group and 52% in the control group. The amount of steroids necessary to control RFE's was significantly lower in the ATG group. The dosages of ATG used in the experimental group were relatively small (average daily dose, 3.08 +/- 0.26 mg/kg of body wt), and adverse reactions were mild. Blood tolerance was excellent. T-cell monitoring thus appears to be an effective method in evaluating the daily dosage of ATG.