Treatment of hyperthyroidism with standard doses of radioiodine aiming at ablation

Mudanças evolutivas no tratamento da doença de Graves com iodo radioativo: 12 anos de experiência em um hospital universitário

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a mudança no perfil e abordagem dos pacientes com doença de Graves submetidos a dose terapêutica de radioiodo. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Avaliamos, retrospectivamente, 226 pacientes portadores de doença de Graves submetidos a dose terapêutica de radioiodo entre janeiro de 1990 e dezembro de 2001. O período de 12 anos foi dividido em três períodos de 4 anos para fins de análise estatística, sendo comparadas variáveis clínicas e laboratoriais nos períodos descritos. RESULTADOS: Constatamos que o número de pacientes encaminhados para a dose terapêutica, assim como o percentual de pacientes do sexo feminino (de 62% para 86%; p = 0,005), tiveram incremento significativo. Houve aumento significativo no percentual de pacientes em uso de metimazol previamente à dose terapêutica (de 9,1% para 35,6%; p = 0,03). A dose média de iodo administrada também teve incremento significativo (de 7,6 mCi para 12,7 mCi; p = 0,000003), com reflexo direto em um maior percentual de pacientes curados (de 55,6% para 83,7%; p = 0,004) um ano pós-dose terapêutica. CONCLUSÃO: A dose terapêutica de radioiodo tem sido um método cada vez mais aceito nos pacientes com doença de Graves e a dose administrada tem sido cada vez maior, no intuito de cura permanente e diminuição das chances de recidiva.

Single dose planning for radioiodine-131 therapy of Graves’ disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with Graves' disease were studied one year after radioiodine-131 therapy to assess the relationship between the effectiveness of the therapy and the radioiodine doses used.

METHODS

Patients were classified into three groups according to thyroid function as hyperthyroidism, euthyroidism and hypothyroidism at one year after I-131 therapy. In these groups we compared the mean values of dose, dose per thyroid weight calculated with I-123 uptake before the therapy (pre D/W), dose per thyroid weight calculated with therapeutic I-131 uptake (post D/W), and absorbed dose.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the three groups in terms of dose or pre D/W. The mean values of post D/W and absorbed dose in the non-hyperthyroid (euthyroid and hypothyroid) group were significantly greater than those in the hyperthyroid group. Post D/W of 6.3 MBq/g was a threshold separating the non-hyperthyroid group from the hyperthyroid group. There was no correlation between pre D/W and post D/W; however, the mean post D/W was significantly greater than the mean pre D/W. All patients with pre D/W above 6.3 MBq/g showed non-hyperthyroidism at one year after the radioiodine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No indicators before the radioiodine therapy had significant relationships with the effectiveness of the therapy at one year after the treatment. However, the single therapy planned for setting the pre D/W above 6.3 MBq/g will certainly make the patients non-hyperthyroid. As this proposal of dose planning is based on a small number of patients, further study is needed.

A mathematical model of optimized radioiodine-131 therapy of Graves' hyperthyroidism

BACKGROUND: The current status of radioiodine-131 (RaI) dosimetry for Graves' hyperthyroidism is not clear. Recurrent hyperthyroidism and iatrogenic hypothyroidism are two problems which interact such that trying to solve one leads to exacerbation of the other. Optimized RaI therapy has therefore begun to be defined just in terms of early hypothyroidism (ablative therapy) as physicians have given up on reducing hypothyroidism. METHODS: Optimized therapy is evaluated both in terms of the greatest separation of cure rate from hypothyroidism rate (non-ablative therapy) or in terms of early hypothyroidism (ablative therapy) by mathematical modeling of outcome after radioiodine and critically discussing the three common methods of RaI dosing for Graves' disease. RESULTS: Cure follows a logarithmic relationship to activity administered or absorbed dose, while hypothyroidism follows a linear relationship. The effect of including or omitting factors in the calculation of the administered I-131 activity such as the measured thyroid uptake and effective half-life of RaI or giving extra compensation for gland size is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Very little benefit can be gained by employing complicated methods of RaI dose selection for non-ablative therapy since the standard activity model shows the best potential for cure and prolonged euthyroidism. For ablative therapy, a standard MBq/g dosing provides the best outcome in terms of cure and early hypothyroidism.

Late and transient increases in free T4 after radioiodine treatment for Graves' disease

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the fall in free T4 (FT4) in patients with Graves' disease after treatment with radioiodine in a fixed dose of 600 MBq. The study was performed at our outpatient clinic with patients referred from primary care during the time period January 1989 to January 1995. Only patients not given anti thyroid drugs after radioiodine were included. FT4 and TSH were measured every second week for the first three months, and thyroxine substitution started when the FT4 was at or below 15 pmol/l. Of the 60 patients thus available for evaluation, 7 required retreatment, giving a "success rate" of 88%. Of the 53 patients successfully treated with one dose of radioiodine, 36 had not been pretreated with anti thyroid drugs. Among these patients 13 (36%) had a transient increase in FT4 after radioiodine therapy, which mostly occurred after 4 to 6 weeks. The remaining 17 patients had been given carbimazole prior to radioiodine. In this group 8 (53%) had a transient increase in FT4, generally after 2 weeks. In conclusion, giving a fixed large dose of radioiodine and starting thyroxine substitution before hypothyroidism has developed is a workable clinical routine. Although a gradual fall in FT4 was the rule, a transient increase in FT4 was noticed in 30-50% of the patients 2 to 6 weeks after treatment.

Radioiodine therapy of Graves' hyperthyroidism: standard vs. calculated 131iodine activity. Results from a prospective, randomized, multicentre study

The present prospective, randomized, multicentre study was performed to directly compare for the first time the effectiveness of a standard activity of 555 MBq 131iodine vs. an activity calculated to deliver 100 Gy for treatment of Graves' thyrotoxicosis. Therapeutic success was defined as the elimination of hyperthyroidism 6 months after radioiodine application (range 4.5-8 months). A success rate of more than 90% in eliminating hyperthyroidism was reported for both approaches, but only in retrospective investigations. Investigated prospectively, hyperthyroidism was eliminated in only 71% of the patients receiving standard activity (70/98) and 58% of those randomized for calculated activity (62/107). In the patients with standard activity, therapeutic success was inversely related to thyroid size. The rate was 100% for thyroid volumes < or = 15 mL, 95% for 16-30 mL, 68% for 31-45 mL, 44% for 46-50 mL, 20% for 61-75 mL and 25% for > or = 75 mL. In those patients with an activity calculated to deliver 100 Gy (except in those with a volume < or = 15 mL) this size/outcome dependency was almost compensated. The rates were 86%, 65%, 45%, 61%, 41% and 45%, respectively. Furthermore, detailed statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation between the success of therapy and the radiation dose actually absorbed by the thyroid. The rate was 11% for a target dose of 50 Gy, 50% for 100 Gy, 67% for 150 Gy, 80% for 200 Gy, 84% for 250 Gy, 88% for 300 Gy, 90% for 350 Gy and 93% for 400 Gy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)