Immunohistochemical expression of CD10 antigen in uterine adenosarcoma

Prognostic factors in uterine adenosarcoma: subanalysis of the SARCUT study

Objective

The purpose of the study was to analyse the role of prognostic factors on the risk of recurrence and overall survival of patients with uterine adenosarcoma.

Methods

A retrospective international multicentre study involving 46 centres collected 32 cases of uterine adenosarcoma, and these cases were included in the present subanalysis. Clinical and demographic features and tumour characteristics were gathered, as well as information on treatment and relapse. Disease-free and overall survival were analysed.

Results

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 85.3% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.5%. The risk factors significantly associated with overall survival were age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.15; p = 0.004) and FIGO stage II-III (HR 17.75, 95% CI 2.87-109.93; p = 0.002). Patients who experienced early relapse (within 12 months) had a tumour size >30 mm and advanced stage. The majority of recurred cases were treated with radiotherapy or surgery and obtained a good response rate.

Conclusion

The most significant prognostic factors in uterine adenosarcoma were age and FIGO stage and, indirectly, tumour size at diagnosis. The use of secondary surgery and/or radiotherapy could help in prolonging the disease-free status of the patients.

[Endometrial and other rare uterine sarcomas : Diagnostic aspects in the context of the 2020 WHO classification]

Uterine sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies. Mostly (40-50%), they are leiomyosarcomas, followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS), low-grade (LG) and high-grade (HG), as well as undifferentiated sarcoma of the uterus (UUS) and adenosarcomas (AS). Other, non-organ-specific tumours such as NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasia, perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) are extremely difficult to differentiate.In the most recent WHO classification, endometrial stromal tumours are subdivided as follows: benign, expansively growing endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) with sharp demarcation, the histologically similar-looking LG-ESS with infiltrative growth, the highly malignant HG-ESS and, as a diagnosis of exclusion, the highly aggressive UUS lacking specific lines of differentiation. LG-ESS can be differentiated from HG-ESS in most cases histomorphologically and immunohistochemically, but molecular investigations are necessary in individual cases. HG-ESS can be divided into 4 subtypes (YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion low-grade component, YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion high-grade component, ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion or BCOR-ITD) on the basis of molecular findings. Prognostically unfavourable factors in AS are severe sarcomatous overgrowth, deep myometrial invasion, high-grade histology and lymphatic vessel invasion. Tumours with NTRK fusion are immunohistochemically positive for S100 and TRK. PEComas express cathepsin K and HMB45, as well as TFE3 when translocation is present. Almost every IMT shows an alteration in the ALK gene In the case of overlapping morphology and simultaneous therapeutic and prognostic relevance, it is becoming increasingly important to verify or confirm the suspected histomorphological diagnosis by immunohistochemical and possibly molecular investigations.

[Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of uterine sarcomas-recommendations for surgical pathology]

Uterine sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies, derived from the myometrium, the endometrial stroma, and very rarely from the nonspecialized uterine soft tissue. The actual incidence is about 1.5 for Caucasian and 3.0 for Afro-American women. There is no grading system for leimoysarcoma defined by the WHO classification; however, if clinicians request, the FNCLCC grading can be specified in analogy to soft tissue sarcomas. Adenosarcomas must be distinguished from adenofibromas (the existence of which is questionable)-with the vast majority of these tumors being uterine adenosarcomas. Within adenosarcomas, deep myometrial invasion (>50%), sarcomatous overgrowth, and a high-grade heterologous component are associated with a higher recurrence rate and poor survival. The immunohistochemical panel represents a very helpful tool for distinguishing low-grade from high grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) and may be supplemented by molecular analyses. Steroid hormone receptor analysis should be performed for all ESS due to the possible therapeutic relevance. Undifferentiated uterine sarcomas represent a diagnosis of exclusion and have a very poor prognosis. Carcinosarcomas represent a special subtype of endometrial carcinomas and are in fact not uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas may present substantial intratumoral heterogeneity and adequate embedding is mandatory. Lesions ≤2 cm in the largest dimension should be processed completely and larger tumors should be processed with one block per centimeter for the largest tumor dimension.

Immunohistochemical markers and the clinical course of adenosarcoma: a series of seven cases

Background

Uterine adenosarcoma, a rare uterine tumor subtype, is a biphasic tumor consisting of epithelial and mesenchymal elements. To date, there is no research comparing the histopathological features and immunohistochemistry of primary and recurrent tumors; furthermore, the relationship between pathology and the clinical course remains unclear. We reviewed the pathology and immunohistochemical features of patients with adenosarcoma and investigated the relevance of the histomorphological features to the clinical course. We also compared the immunohistochemical features of the primary and recurrent tumors.

Methods

The data of seven patients with adenosarcoma who underwent surgery in our hospital were evaluated. We performed immunohistochemical staining for the progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, p53, and two Switch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable chromatin remodeling proteins (SMARCA4, BCOR), which were recently developed for the undifferentiated sarcoma diagnosis in addition to conventional staining methods.

Results

All patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB–IC diseases. All tumors were polypoid and every patient presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Six patients aged over 50 years and were menopausal; one patient aged under 50 years and was non-menopausal (average age: 59.1 years). Histologically, the sarcomatous components were homologous and heterogenous in six and one patient, respectively. Four and three cases were recurrent and non-recurrent, respectively. The recurrent patients showed high-grade morphology with sarcomatous overgrowth and were negative for ER and PR. Three recurrences could be evaluated by imaging, showing recurrence only in a distant area; biopsy specimens from these tissues revealed the identical mesenchymal component found in the primary tumor without a benign epithelial component. Immunohistochemical staining results were also similar to the corresponding of the original tumor, except for the p53 expression in one patient. At the primary site, p53 was overexpressed in two recurrent patients and had a wild-type level in one recurrent patient; however, all three recurrent tissues showed p53 overexpression. None of our patients showed SMARCA4 loss, and BCOR expression was positive in one case.

Conclusions

Initial pathological adenosarcoma analysis with appropriate immunohistochemical staining is vital for prognostic assessment. p53 expression might increase at recurrence. SMARCA4 and BCOR might not be an index of malignancy.

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Target Validation Analysis of Müllerian Adenosarcoma: A Tumor With Complex but Specific Genetic Alterations

Mullerian adenosarcoma (MAS) is a biphasic tumor with malignant stroma. It is most commonly of endometrial origin but occasionally originates in the cervix, ovary, or other pelvic/peritoneal sites. The typical MAS is low grade with an indolent clinical course; however, tumors with sarcomatous overgrowth (SO) or a high-grade sarcoma tend to be aggressive. Tumor etiology is largely unknown. To better understand the global genome alterations and gene mutations in MAS, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and target validation analysis were performed. MAS showed remarkable chromosome (chr) copy number variation (CNV), specifically, gains in chr 1q, 5p, 12p, 12q, and 17q and losses in chr 3p, 3q, 9p, and 11q. Gain of chr 12q13-15 was present in 50% of cases. The selected gene products in gain regions were upregulated as measured by immunohistochemistry. HMGA2 overexpression was significantly correlated with SO. While the structural variation (SV) rate was relatively low overall, a disproportionally high rate of break-ends at chr 7 was noted involving 6 in-frame rearrangement fusion genes. Among 40 frequently mutated genes detected by WGS and validated in 29 MAS by next generation sequencing (NGS), KMT2C, and BCOR were frequently seen in MAS both with and without SO, while MAGEC1 and KDM6B were strongly associated with SO. Overall, a higher rate of frequently mutated genes was found in MAS with SO (33%) than MAS without (11%). This study uncovers the complex and specific genetic alterations in this malignancy. The findings provide a tool for future investigation of these molecular changes in tumorigenesis and target therapies.

Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors: Update on Classification, Staging, and Molecular Features

The spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasia in the uterus has expanded in recent years. First, the identification of prevalent, recurrent molecular alterations has led to a more biologically and clinically congruent classification of endometrial stromal tumors. Likewise, the diagnostic criteria of several rare and miscellaneous tumor types have been refined in recent case series (Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor). Pure mesenchymal tumors are still broadly classified based on morphology according to the tumor cell phenotype. Smooth muscle tumors predominate in frequency, followed by tumors of endometrial stromal derivation; the latter are covered in depth in this article with an emphasis on defining molecular alterations and their morphologic and clinical correlates. The remaining entities comprise a miscellaneous group in which cell derivation does not have a normal counterpart in the uterus (eg, rhabdomyosarcoma) or is obscure (eg, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma). This article discusses their clinical relevance, recent insights into their molecular biology, and the most important differential diagnoses. Regarding the latter, immunohistochemistry and (increasingly) molecular diagnostics play a role in the diagnostic workup. We conclude with a few considerations on intraoperative consultation and macroscopic examination, as well as pathologic staging and grading of uterine sarcomas as per the most recent American Joint Cancer Commission and the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique staging systems.

Uterine adenosarcomas: A dual-institution experience

There has been limited literature about treatment and follow-up strategies of uterine adenosarcomas because of their rare nature. For this study we retrospectively investigated the medical database of the two major womens' health hospitals in Turkey. A total of 15 patients were identified from the hospital's database. Median follow-up was 86.43 months for all patients. Seven out of 15 patients had recurrences during their follow-up. Among these 7 patients, 4 of them had stage IA disease. Median Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were calculated as 41.47 and 57.21 months, respectively. According to our study, polypoid tumours confined to the uterus with superficial myometrial invasion can be treated without comprehensive surgical staging. We believe that, publishing all the data in an organised manner even though they are small in size, gives us an opportunity to design meta-analysis for the development of more appropriate treatment strategies.

Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for mullerian adenosarcoma of the female genital tract

Mullerian adenosarcomas of the female genital tract are rare malignancies, originally described in the uterus, the most common site of origin, but they may also arise in extrauterine locations. Uterine adenosarcomas make up 5% of uterine sarcomas and tend to occur in postmenopausal women. They are usually low-grade tumors and are characterized by a benign epithelial component with a malignant mesenchymal component, which is typically a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma but can also be a high-grade sarcoma. Tumors that exhibit a high-grade sarcomatous overgrowth have a worse outcome. Adenosarcomas have been described as being midway along the spectrum between benign adenofibromas and carcinosarcomas. They generally have a good prognosis with the exception of deeply invasive tumors or those with high-grade sarcomatous overgrowth. Extrauterine adenosarcomas also have a higher risk for recurrence. In view of their rarity, there have not been any clinical trials in mullerian adenosarcomas and relatively little research. This article reviews the current knowledge and provides recommendation for the management of mullerian adenosarcomas.

Immunohistochemical panel to differentiate endometrial stromal sarcoma, uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma: something old and something new

AIMS

To evaluate an immunohistochemical panel differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) from uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) and leiomyoma (LM).

METHODS

94 cases (28 ESS, 41 ULMS, 25 LM) were retrieved and arrayed. 10 immunomarkers (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CD10, smooth muscle actin, desmin, h-caldesmon, transgelin, GEM, ASC1, stathmin1) were used. A predictive model was constructed and examined by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis to determine area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The combination of ER(+)/PR(+)/CD10(+)/GEM(-)/h-caldesmon(-)/transgelin(-) can predict ESS versus ULMS with AUC predictive value of 0.872 (95% CI 0.784 to 0.961, p<0.0001). The combination of ER(+)/PR(+)/CD10(+)/h-caldesmon(-)/transgelin(-) can predict low grade (LG) ESS from 'LG' ULMS with AUC predictive value of 0.914 (95% CI 0.832 to 0.995, p<0.0001). Finally, ULMS and ESS, including the LGs, were more likely to be stathmin1(+) than LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the different clinical course and management, adding novel antibodies (GEM, transgelin) to the well established immunohistochemistry panel seemed to be useful in distinguishing ESS from ULMS and LG ESS from 'LG' ULMS. Finally, stathmin1 expression could be of value in differentiating LM from uterine sarcomas.

Targeted genomic analysis of Müllerian adenosarcoma

Müllerian adenosarcoma (MA) is a rare mixed mesenchymal tumour of the female genital tract, composed of malignant stroma and benign-appearing epithelium. Sarcomatous overgrowth (SO) is the only established histological variable associated with higher stage and shorter survival. Specific molecular or immunohistochemistry (IHC) tools for the diagnosis of MA are lacking. Our goal was to study genomic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) in MA to understand better its pathobiology, and develop specific diagnostic and prognostic tools. DNA was extracted from 20 samples of MA from 18 subjects (12 without SO and 6 with SO), including two in which areas of both typical MA histology and SO were independently tested. Samples were analysed using a targeted next-generation sequencing assay interrogating exonic sequences of 275 cancer genes for mutations and CNVs as well as 91 introns across 30 genes for cancer-associated rearrangements. The mean number of mutations in MA with SO (mean 9.7; range 3-14) did not differ significantly from that in MA without SO (mean 9.6; range 5-16). MA with SO had significantly higher mean numbers of gene-level CNVs (24.6) compared to MA without SO (5; p = 0.0002). The most frequent amplification involved MDM2 and CDK4 (5/18; 28%), accompanied by focal CDK4 and MDM2 and diffuse HMGA2 expression using immunohistochemistry. MYBL1 amplification was seen in 4/18 (22%), predominantly in SO. Alterations in PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN pathway members were seen in 13/18 (72%). Notably, TP53 mutations were uncommon, present in only two cases with SO. Three out of 18 (17%) had mutations in ATRX, all associated with SO. No chromosomal rearrangements were identified. We have identified a number of recurrent genomic alterations in MA, including some associated with SO. Although further investigation of these findings is needed, confirmation of one or more may lead to new mechanistic insights and novel markers for this often difficult-to-diagnose tumour.

Diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in uterine mesenchymal tumors

Immunohistochemistry may be helpful in the diagnosis of mesenchymal uterine tumors. This article reviews the immunoreactions used most frequently in the diagnosis of uterine smooth muscle tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas, UTROSCTs, PEComas, adenomyomas, adenosarcomas and carcinosarcomas.

The biology of uterine sarcomas: A review and update

Uterine sarcoma is a rare neoplasm, accounting for only 5% of uterine malignancies. The pathogenesis of uterine sarcoma remains largely unknown, although recent basic science and pre-clinical animal models have provided a better understanding of tumor biology. The aim of this study was to review the clinical features, imaging characteristics, genetic aberrations and therapeutic approaches in uterine sarcoma. This study reviewed the English-language literature on clinical and basic studies on uterine sarcoma. The common variants of uterine sarcoma are carcinosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). Genetic profiling efforts have identified amplification, overexpression and mutation, while the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis driven by these genomic and genetic aberrations have yet to be fully elucidated yet. Recent genome-wide studies have also identified complex chromosomal rearrangements as oncogenic mechanisms. The cell cycle regulators, p16 and p53, are frequently over-expressed and appear to be involved in key modifications of sarcomagenesis. Molecular-targeted therapy has now been evaluated in clinical trials for certain subtypes. In conclusion, aberrations of cell cycle control would be a critical step in the development of uterine sarcoma. This review has provided new areas of study targeting molecular and genetic pathways.

Pathology of mixed Müllerian tumours

The term 'mixed Müllerian tumour' applies to uterine tumours composed of epithelial and mesenchymal elements of Müllerian origin. These neoplasms are classified into adenomyomas, adenofibromas, adenosarcomas, and carcinosarcomas (malignant Müllerian mixed tumours) based on whether the epithelial and stromal elements are benign or malignant. The rare atypical polypoid adenomyoma usually involves the lower uterine segment and, on curettings, may be confused with invasive adenocarcinoma. Adenosarcomas are low-grade neoplasms classified halfway along the spectrum of mixed Müllerian tumours, with adenofibromas at one end and carcinosarcomas (malignant Müllerian mixed tumours) at the other. Some tumours currently classified as 'adenofibromas' on the basis of their low mitotic count and lack of nuclear atypia are, in fact, well differentiated adenosarcomas. Carcinosarcoma is composed of admixed but distinctive carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. On the basis of the clonal origin of both tumour components, carcinosarcomas are currently thought to be metaplastic carcinomas rather than uterine sarcomas.

[Uterine sarcoma treatment]

There are many common features between uterine sarcomas - leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma and adenosarcoma -with regards to course, therapy and follow-up, such as post-menopausal bleeding or additional premenopausal bleeding, as well as rapid growth. There is a new staging system according to FIGO and new therapy recommendations according to NCCN. Prior to therapy, imaging staging of the pelvis, abdomen and chest should be carried out due to the frequency with which metastases are found at the time of diagnosis. In the case of disease spread in uterine sarcomas and malignant mixed tumors, good supportive therapy is a possible therapy option instead of chemo- or radiotherapy. The approach - observation, surgery, lymphonodectomy, mono- or polychemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy - is chosen according to the extent of spread and the resection status. Neoadjuvant therapies are not as yet established.

Calretinin: diagnostic utility in the female genital tract

The utility of calretinin was first described in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. In the female genital tract, calretinin was initially reported in Wolffian remnants and related lesions and later used in the diagnosis of sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary, endometrial stromal tumors with sex cord-like differentiation, and uterine tumors resembling sex cord tumors of the ovary. This review discusses calretinin expression in normal tissues of the female genital tract and highlights its potential utility in the diagnosis of these subsets of neoplasms with emphasis to tumors that may constitute a problem in their differential diagnosis. In particular, the limited utility of calretinin in the diagnosis of sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary, in the differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and serous tumors involving the ovary and/or peritoneum, and in the differential diagnosis between Wolffian lesions and endometrial carcinoma are addressed.

Mullerian adenosarcomas: an immunophenotypic analysis of 35 cases

Mullerian adenosarcomas (MAs) are rare mixed mesenchymal and epithelial neoplasms that occur most commonly in the uterus. Although the epithelial component is typically benign, the mesenchymal component of most adenosarcomas morphologically resembles that observed in endometrial stromal tumors and is responsible for their clinical behavior. Thus, the differential diagnosis usually includes not only low-grade endometrial stromal tumors, but also adenofibroma, carcinosarcoma, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma especially in small samples. The objective of this study was to ascertain the immunophenotypic profile of the epithelial and mesenchymal components of MAs and delineate possible differences between conventional mesenchymal areas and areas of sarcomatous overgrowth. Representative sections from 35 MAs, 28 of them without sarcomatous overgrowth (MA-NSO) and 7 with sarcomatous overgrowth (MA-SO), were included in the study. Thirty tumors arose in the uterus, 4 were pelvic, and 1 originated in the colon. Adequate blocks were selected and immunostained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), CD10, WT1, smooth muscle actin, desmin, AE1/3 cytokeratin, CD34, calretinin, inhibin, c-kit, and Ki-67. The mesenchymal component expressed ER in 21/27 MA-NSOs but in only 1/7 MA-SOs (65% overall). PR was expressed in 21/26 MA-NSOs and 4/7 MA-SOs (76% overall), whereas AR was positive in 10/27 MA-NSOs and 5/7 MA-SOs (35% overall). CD10 was expressed in 23/28 MA-NSOs but in only 2/7 MA-SOs (71% overall), and WT1 positivity was seen in 22/27 MA-NSOs and 6/7 MA-SOs (79% overall). Sixty-seven percent of MAs expressed smooth muscle actin, 32% desmin, including both examples of MA-SOs with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, and 25% expressed AE1/3 cytokeratin. CD34 expression was found in 35% of the tumors, but it was almost always patchy in distribution and weak in intensity, as was calretinin expression, seen only in 12% of the cases. Expression of c-kit and inhibin in greater than 5% of the tumor cells was not encountered. The median and mean Ki-67 labeling indices were 10% and 12%, respectively (range, <5% to 40%). The median and mean Ki-67 indices were both 5% in MA-NSOs compared with 30% and 28%, respectively, in MA-SOs. The epithelial compartment demonstrated expression for ER (24/32), PR (23/31), and AE1/3 cytokeratin (33/33); rare cases expressed CD10 (4 cases) and AR (1 case). In summary, the immunophenotype of most MAs resembled that of endometrial stromal tumors (positive for ER, PR, WT1, and CD10, with variable expression of muscle markers, AR and cytokeratin). The proliferative rate in the stromal component was strongly related to the presence of sarcomatous overgrowth. ER, PR, and CD10 expression was lost in MA-SOs relative to conventional low-grade stromal areas of mullerian/mesodermal adenosarcomas, reflecting the "dedifferentiation" of this component.

Pathology of uterine malignancies

This overview covers epithelial, stromal and mesenchymal malignancies of the body of the uterus, excluding the cervix. The distinction of type I and type II endometrial adenocarcinoma with the morphological variants of this tumour is discussed and some molecular aspects are explored. The concept of carcinosarcoma representing a metaplastic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium that behaves more like a carcinoma than a sarcoma is explained. Some types of mixed epithelial and stromal neoplasm are described and contrasted with carcinosarcoma. The concept of stromal sarcoma and high-grade uterine sarcoma is described and an outline of malignant smooth muscle tumours of the uterus includes a description of smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential and worrying benign smooth muscle lesions.

CD10 Expression in Pure Stromal and Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors of the Ovary

CD10 has been recently advocated as a good immunohistochemical marker for endometrial stromal tumors. Metastatic endometrial stromal tumors to the ovary and primary endometrioid stromal sarcomas may show overlapping histological features with pure stromal and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs). We investigated CD10 expression in a large series of pure stromal and SCSTs of the ovary to ascertain whether CD10 may aid in this differential diagnosis. Archival material from 11 fibromas, 10 thecomas, 10 sclerosing stromal tumors (SSTs), 10 adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs), 4 luteinized AGCTs, 9 juvenile granulosa cell tumors (JGCTs), 9 Sertoli cell tumors, 9 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 11 sex cord tumors with annular tubules, 10 steroid cell tumors (StCTs), and 8 fibrosarcomas of the ovary were immunostained for CD10. The percentage of cells stained (<5%, 5%-39%, 40%-75%, and >75%) and intensity of staining (1+, 2+, 3+) were evaluated. CD10 was expressed in 7 of 10 thecomas (4 with 5%-75% and mostly 1+), 9 of 10 SSTs (7 with 5%-39% + cells, mostly 1+), 9 of 10 AGCTs (<5%-39%, four 1+, five 2+), 1 of 4 luteinized AGCTs (<5% and 1+), 8 of 9 JGCTs (mostly <5% to 39% and +1), 4 of 9 Sertoli cell tumors (either focal or >75% with variable intensity), 4 of 9 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (mostly <10% with variable staining), with the Leydig cells being positive in only 1 tumor (1+ and <5%), and 7 of 10 StCTs (4 tumors with more than 75% + cells, from 1+ to 3+). All fibromas, all but 1 fibrosarcoma (<5% and 1+), and all sex cord tumors with annular tubules were CD10 negative. CD10 expression was frequently seen in StCTs, SSTs, and thecomas of the ovary, although the latter 2 categories usually showed only faint immunoreactivity. In conclusion the frequency and intensity of CD10 immunoreactivity in pure stromal and sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors are low and contrast with the typical strong and diffuse immunostaining seen in endometrial stromal tumors; however, faint CD10 positivity is consistent with the diagnosis of ovarian SCST. Steroid cell tumors are often positive for CD10, but these tumors do not pose problems in differential diagnosis with endometrial stromal tumors. CD10 may play a useful role in aiding the differential between endometrial stromal tumors in the ovary and SCST and stromal tumors.

CD10, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in ovarian adenosarcoma

BACKGROUND

: The low incidence of ovarian adenosarcomas explains the paucity of available data regarding their biologic markers. Our aim was to investigate the presence of CD10, estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) in these tumors.

CASE

: Four cases of primary ovarian adenosarcoma were retrieved in our pathology databases. We assessed the immunohistochemical stainings for ER, PR and CD10 in 3 ovarian adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth (OAS), and 1 ovarian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth (OAS-S). When considering the malignant stromal component, 2 OAS showed the presence of ER and PR, whereas the OAS-S was only ER positive. CD10 positivity was observed in the sarcomatous cells of all 3 OAS but was absent in the OAS-S.

CONCLUSION

: The identification of a hormone sensitive disease is the main clinical implication of this study. Moreover, the current results add OAS to the list of CD10 positive ovarian tumors.