Periareolar injection for localization of sentinel nodes in breast cancer patients

Sentinel Node Biopsy Imaging in Breast Cancer: Scatter Reduction Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Lead Shields

BACKGROUND

Point of injection scatter (SPI) confounds breast cancer sentinel lymph node detection. Round flat lead shields (FLSs) incompletely reduce SPI, requiring repositioning. We designed lead shields that reduce SPI and acquisition time.

METHODS

Two concave lead shields, a semioval lead shield (OLS) and a semispherical lead alloy shield (SLS), were created with a SICNOVA JCR 1000 3D printer to cover the point of injection (patent no. ES1219895U). Twenty breast cancer patients had anterior and anterior oblique imaging, 5 minutes and 2 hours after a single 111 MBq nanocolloid in 0.2 mL intratumoral or periareolar injection. Each acquisition was 2 minutes. Absolute and normalized background corrected scatter counts (CSCs) and scatter reduction percentage (%SR) related to the FLS were calculated. Repositionings were recorded. Differences between means of %SR (t test) and between means of CSC (analysis of variance) with Holm multiple comparison tests were determined.

RESULTS

Mean %SR was 91.8% with OLS and 92% using SLS in early images (P = 0.91) and 87.2%SR in OLS and 88.5% in late images (P = 0.66). There were significant differences between CSC using FLS and OLS (P < 0.001) and between FLS and SLS (P < 0.001), but not between OLS and SLS (P = 0.17) in early images, with the same results observed in delayed studies (P < 0.001 in relation to FLS and P = 0.1 between both curved lead shields). Repositioning was required 14/20 times with FLS, 4/20 times with OLS, and 2/20 times with SLS.

CONCLUSIONS

We designed 2 concave lead shields that significantly reduce the SPI and repositioning with sentinel lymph node lymphoscintigraphy.

The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In sentinel node surgery for breast cancer, procedural accuracy is assessed by calculating the false-negative rate. It is important to measure this since there are potential adverse outcomes from missing node metastases. We performed a meta-analysis of published data to assess which method has achieved the lowest false-negative rate.

METHODS

We found 3,588 articles concerning sentinel nodes and breast cancer published from 1993 through mid-2011; 183 articles met our inclusion criteria. The studies described in these 183 articles included a total of 9,306 patients. We grouped the studies by injection material and injection location. The false-negative rates were analyzed according to these groupings and also by the year in which the articles were published.

RESULTS

There was significant variation related to injection material. The use of blue dye alone was associated with the highest false-negative rate. Inclusion of a radioactive tracer along with blue dye resulted in a significantly lower false-negative rate. Although there were variations in the false-negative rate according to injection location, none were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of blue dye should be accompanied by a radioactive tracer to achieve a significantly lower false-negative rate. Location of injection did not have a significant impact on the false-negative rate. Given the limitations of acquiring appropriate data, the false-negative rate should not be used as a metric for training or quality control.

[Sentinel node in breast cancer. Experience of the Salah-Azaïz Institute of Tunis]

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer screening increased the ratio of small tumours. These tumours have a low lymph node metastatic potential. Sentinel node detection allows detecting axillary lymph node invasion without the morbidity of complete axillary lymph node dissection.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we report the results of the learning curve of sentinel node detection in the Institut Salah-Azaïz of Tunis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a prospective study between January 2004 and December 2005 in which 115 patients were included with breast cancer less than 3 cm without antecedents of breast surgery. All these women had sentinel node dissection by a colorimetric method and 30% had a combined method (colorimetric and isotopic).

RESULTS

The rate of detection was 97.3% (n = 112). An extemporaneous examination was performed in 91 patients. The rate of negative forgery of the extemporaneous examination was 4.3% and the sensitivity of 95.7%. There are no false positive with the extemporaneous exam. The sentinel lymph node was the only node invaded in 15 patients (44%). In 3 patients, the sentinel node was healthy whereas the axillary dissection was positive, so the false negative rate is about 2.6%.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node dissection is a reliable and feasible technique. It however requires a training of the surgeon, the pathologist and the nuclear doctor. It allows to reduce the morbidity of the treatment of the breast cancer by avoiding "useless" axillary dissection out in patients without node invasion. The increase in the number of the small cancers discovered during screening makes it possible to increase the number of patients who can profit from this technique.

Molecular markers of breast axillary lymph node metastasis

In breast cancer, axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic variables and a crucial component to the staging system. Several clinico-histopathological parameters are considered to be strong predictors of metastasis; however, they fail to accurately classify breast tumors according to their clinical behavior and to predict which patients will have disease recurrence. Methods based on genome-wide microarray analyses have been used to identify molecular markers with respect to the development of axillary lymph node metastasis. Most of these markers can be detected in the primary tumors, which can potentially lead to the ability to identify patients at the time of diagnosis who are at high risk for lymph node metastasis, allowing for early intervention and more suitable adjuvant treatments.

Prospective Multicentric Randomized Study Comparing Periareolar and Peritumoral Injection of Radiotracer and Blue Dye for the Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Sparing Procedures: FRANSENODE Trial

Purpose

To determine the optimal injection path for blue dye and radiocolloid for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in early breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

A prospective randomized multicentric study was initiated to compare the peritumoral (PT) injection site to the periareolar (PA) site in 449 patients.

Results

The detection rate of axillary SLN by lymphoscintigraphy was significantly higher (P = .03) in the PA group (85.2%) than in the PT group (73.2%). Intraoperative detection rate by blue dye and/or gamma probe was similar (99.11%) in both groups. The rate of SLN detection was somewhat higher in the PA group than in the PT group: 95.6% versus 93.8% with blue dye (P = .24) and 98.2% versus 96.0% by probe (P = .16), respectively. The number of SLNs detected by lymphoscintigraphy and by probe was significantly higher in the PA group than in the PT group, 1.5 versus 1.2 (P = .001) and 1.9 versus 1.7 (P = .02). The blue and hot concordance was 95.6% in the PA group and 91.5% in the PT group (P = .08). The mean ex vivo count of the SLN was significantly higher in the PA group than in the PT group (P < .0001).

Conclusion

This study strongly validates the PA injection technique given the high detection rate (99.1%) of SLN and the high concordance (95.6%) between blue dye and the radiotracer, as well as higher significant ex and in vivo counts, improving SLN probe detection.

Radio-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy using periareolar injection technique for patients with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Sentinel lymph node (LN) biopsy has been widely adopted in the axillary staging of clinical node-negative breast cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of radio-guided sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) using the periareolar injection technique for predicting the histopathologic status of axillary LNs in early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Between November 2003 and November 2004 in the National Taiwan University Hospital, radio-guided SLNB using the periareolar injection technique was consecutively performed in 213 female patients with early breast cancer (stage T1 and T2) but without clinically palpable axillary LN and previous chemotherapy. Two mCi of filtered (0.22 microm) (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid were injected in the afternoon 1 day before surgery (2-day protocol) or 1 mCi of the same radiopharmaceutical was injected on the morning of the surgery (1-day protocol). During surgery, a handheld gamma probe was used to identify the LNs with radioactivity in the axilla. A node was deemed a SLN if its radioactivity was >10% of the hottest node. All the SLNs identified were removed for histology.

RESULTS

Radioactive SLN was identified at surgery in 207 patients. The SLN identification rate was 97.2% (207/213). Of these 207 patients, 163 patients had received both SLNB and axillary LN dissection. Among these 163 patients, 77 patients had LN metastases and four had negative SLN but positive non-SLN. The false-negative rate of SLNB for the detection of axillary LN metastases was 5.2% (4/77). There were no statistical differences between false-negative and SLN positive groups for all factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that SLNB with periareolar injection of radiocolloid provides valuable information on the axillary nodal status in patients with early breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Identification Rates: The Influence of Radiocolloid Mapping, Case Volume, and the Place of the Procedure

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that high-volume surgeons performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at an academic medical center (AMC) would have the same identification rates at suburban surgical centers (SSCs).

METHODS

Twenty-one surgeons performed 1199 SLN biopsies in 1187 clinically node-negative patients with an intraoperative gamma probe (IOGP) plus blue dye (at AMC) or blue dye alone (at SSCs). Demographic, radiologic, and pathological data were analyzed by generalized estimating equations logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Four surgeons (group 1) performed 877 procedures (361, 247, 152, and 117 cases each), 426 with and 451 without IOGP. Seventeen surgeons (group 2) performed 322 procedures (2-92 cases each), 173 with and 149 without IOGP. Group 1 found 411 SLNs (96.5%) with and 419 (92.9%) without IOGP (P = .024). Group 2 found 163 (94.2%) with and 117 (78.5%) without IOGP (P < .0001). The odds of finding the SLN was 2.9 times higher with IOGP (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8, 4.7; P < .001) and 2.7 times higher by group 1 than group 2 surgeons (95% CI, 1.7, 4.3; P < .001), controlling for tumor size and surgery type.

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume surgeons identified more SLNs with IOGP (at the AMC) than without (at the SSCs). They also were more efficient than low-volume surgeons when blue dye alone was used. Low-volume surgeons were almost as efficient as high-volume surgeons when they used IOGP. Optimal identification of SLNs requires nuclear medicine facilities.

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intradermal, Intraparenchymal, and Subareolar Injection Routes for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Multiple injection routes, including intradermal (ID), intraparenchymal (IP), and subareolar (SA), are used for 99mTc-sulfur colloid administration for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare localization by ID, IP, and SA injection routes based on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative identification.

METHODS

Four hundred prospectively randomized breast cancers underwent SLN mapping and biopsy.

RESULTS

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated localization to the axilla in 126/133 (95%) ID, 82/132 (62%) IP, and 96/133 (72%) SA (P < 0.001 ID vs. IP and ID vs. SA; P = 0.081 IP vs. SA), with a mean duration of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy of 139 +/- 18 minutes. Mean time to first localization when localization was demonstrated on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was 8 +/- 14 minutes for ID, 53 +/- 49 for IP, and 22 +/- 29 for SA (P < 0.001 ID vs. IP and ID vs. SA; P = 0.003 IP vs. SA). Intraoperative identification of a SLN at the time of SLN biopsy was successful in 133/133 (100%) ID, 121/134 (90%) IP, and 126/133 (95%) SA (P < 0.001 ID vs IP; P = 0.014 ID vs. SA; P = 0.168 IP vs. SA), with a mean time from injection of 99mTc-sulfur colloid to start of SLN biopsy of 288 +/- 71 minutes. Mean intraoperative time to harvest the first SLN was 9 +/- 4 minutes for ID, 13 +/- 6 for IP, and 12 +/- 6 for SA (P < 0.001 ID vs. IP and ID vs. SA; P = 0.410 IP vs. SA).

CONCLUSIONS

The ID injection route demonstrated a significantly greater frequency of localization, decreased time to first localization on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, and decreased time to harvest the first SLN. This represents the first prospective randomized clinical trial to confirm superiority of the ID route for administration of 99mTc-sulfur colloid during SLN mapping and biopsy in breast cancer.

The influence of radioisotope vehicle on breast sentinel node detection

AIM

To assess the relationship between carrier molecule size and time elapsing between marker injection and sentinel node(s) biopsy in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIAL

The study performed on 122 women, in whom the sentinel node(s) was identified according to the procedure described below. In Group I (n=72 patients), SN identification was done with radioisotope marker of 400-3000 nm molecule size (tin colloid). In Group II (n=50 patients) radioisotope marker of <100 nm molecule size (colloidal albumin) was used.

METHODS

All the patients of both groups received the markers with a single-point, intradermal, periareolar injection. Four hours after the injection (Group I - surgery in the next day) or immediately before the surgery (in this same day) (Group II), stationary lymphoscintigraphy was performed.

RESULTS

Mean numbers of sentinel nodes identified with the radioisotope method in Groups I and II were 1.22 and 1.48, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relationship between the radioisotope marker molecule size and the injection-to-intra-operative evaluation time. Administration of small molecule size radioisotope marker several hours prior to the planned surgery appears to be the optimum procedure in this method of SN identification in patients with breast cancer.

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer—evaluation of exposureto radiation of medical staff

AIM

To measure the absorbed doses of radiation to hands of medical staff performing sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 2004, during sentinel node biopsies in 13 breast cancer patients (T1/T2N0). Sentinel nodes were identified with the use of combined radiotracer/blue dye technique (lymphoscintigraphy--99mTc on albumin carrier, surgery after 24 h; blue dye; intraoperative detection of gamma radiation). Highly sensitive thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) made of LiF were used to assess the absorbed doses of radiation during the procedure. During lymphoscintigraphy and during surgical procedure a total of 57 TLDs was placed on different parts of hands of medical staff.

RESULTS

Maximal dose recorded during lymphoscintigraphy by TLDs placed on the hands of the physician injecting the radiotracer was 164 microSv. Mean recorded doses were higher for non-dominant hand, especially for distal parts of the index finger, third finger and thumb. During the surgical procedure, TLDs placed on the hands of medical staff recorded much lower doses of radiation than during lymphoscintigraphy. The highest dose was recorded by TLD placed on the pulp of the dominant hand index finger (22 microSv) of the operating surgeon. Mean doses recorded by TLDs placed on the hands of the operating surgeon ranged from 2 to 8 microSv. The absorbed dose of radiation to hands of the scrub nurse was similar to that absorbed to hands of the operating surgeon.

CONCLUSION

The maximum recorded dose during sentinel node biopsy in this study was 2200 times smaller than current 1-year dose limit.

Factors predicting failure to identify a sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is widely accepted as a minimally invasive method of nodal staging, failure to identify an SLN mandates a level I/II axillary node dissection. The purpose of this study was to elucidate factors that independently predict failure to identify an SLN.

METHODS

Using a large multicenter prospective study of SLN biopsy for patients with invasive breast cancer, we performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to determine clinicopathologic factors predictive of failure to identify an SLN.

RESULTS

Of the total 4131 patients in the study, an SLN was not identified in 249 (6.0%). Tumor location (P = .409), biopsy type (P = .079), surgery type (P = .380), and histologic subtype (P = .999) were not significant predictors of failure to identify an SLN. On multivariate analysis, age greater than 60 years (OR = 1.469; 95% CI, 1.116-1.934, P = .006), nonpalpable tumors (OR = 0.639; 95% CI, 0.479-0.852, P = .002), injection technique with blue dye alone (OR = 0.389, 95% CI, 0.259-5.86, P < .001), and surgical experience of less than 10 SLN biopsy cases (OR = 1.886; 1.428-2.492, P < .001) were significant independent predictors of failure to identify an SLN. Optimal SLN biopsy technique using an intradermal and/or subareolar injection of radioactive colloid and blue dye can improve SLN identification rates regardless of patient and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age and tumor palpability significantly affect the ability to identify an SLN in patients with breast cancer. Optimal injection technique can significantly improve sentinel node identification rate regardless of these factors.

Le ganglion sentinelle sans curage systématique dans le cancer du sein : bilan d'une expérience de 1000 interventions

OBJECTIVE

To assess daily practice of 1000 sentinel node (SN) biopsies in breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Prospective review of 1000 consecutive sentinel node biopsies between February 2001 and June 2004. Analyses concerned technical aspects of sentinel node detection, pathologic results of the tumor and sentinel node, treatment and follow-up.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and seventy-eight SN were detected (98.7%). In univariate analyses, age, pathologic tumor size (20 mm) and method of detection (blue dye or isotopic vs. combined) were statistically significant. One hundred and fifty-six cases (16%) underwent immediate axillary dissection (AD), whereas 116 (12%) had a delayed AD. There were 923 invasive or micro-invasive carcinoma with detected SN: 282 SN (30.5%) were involved, either with macrometastases (166) or with micrometastases (116), 34% had positive non-sentinel node. Age and metastasis size were predictive for AD involvement. Sixteen percent of micrometastatic SN had positive AD, there was no predictive factor for axillary involvement. After a median follow-up of 20 months, there were 4 axillary recurrences: 1 (0.1%) after negative SN without AD, 1 (0.1%) after positive SN with positive AD, 1 (4.3%) after micrometatastatic SN without AD, and 1 (8.3%) after macrometastatic SN without AD. There were 55 ductal carcinoma in situ and 54 micro-invasive cancer: positive SN (with negative AD) were detected in only 2 cases (2.3%). There were initially 112 ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by percutaneaous biopsy, 25 of them (22%) had invasive disease on definitive histology. Among there, 12 had involved SN (with 4 positive AD).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

With a high detection rate and low recurrence rate, SN biopsy is considered in our institute as a reliable procedure and is used to evaluate regional nodal status of early breast cancer. Thus, 70% of AD can be omitted.