Severe Pemphigus Vulgaris Treated with Rituximab (Mabthera)

The emerging role of rituximab in autoimmune blistering diseases

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the CD20 molecule on B cells, resulting in their lysis. In autoimmune blistering diseases, the auto-antibody-producing B cells are destroyed and auto-antibody levels are reduced or eliminated. In the majority of patients, rituximab produces rapid clinical response and early resolution. In part, this accounts for the increased use of rituximab. Rituximab does not distinguish normal from pathologic B cells. Hence, shortly after its use, B-cell levels are zero and remain so for several months. In most patients, the use of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are continued after rituximab therapy, while their dosages are significantly decreased. In the majority of patients rituximab is used according to the protocol used in treating lymphoma patients or patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Approximately 50% of patients experience a relapse, requiring additional therapy. Serious adverse events and fatal outcomes have been reported, although their incidence is less than that observed with conventional therapy. Nonetheless, the causes, i.e. infections and septicemia, are similar. Several gaps exist in our understanding of how to optimally benefit from the use of this valuable biological agent. Future studies need to be targeted in designing and implanting protocols that maximize the benefit of rituximab and result in producing sustained prolonged remissions with minimal adverse events and a high quality of life.

Rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab is increasingly used in patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) who are nonresponders to conventional therapy.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted using the words pemphigus vulgaris and rituximab therapy from papers published between 2000 and 2012. Two protocols were used. In the lymphoma protocol, patients received four weekly infusions of rituximab (dose 375 mg/m(2)). The rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol consisted of two infusions of 1,000 mg each 15 days apart. The variables recorded from each study included clinical remission off or on therapy, relapse rate, incidence of serious adverse events, concomitant therapies, duration of follow-up, and when available, levels of B cells and autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were found, which reported 272 patients; 180 were treated by the lymphoma protocol and 92 by the RA protocol. Both protocols were effective in treating recalcitrant PV. The lymphoma protocol had a lower response rate, relapse rate and serious infections, but higher mortality, and there were nonresponders. The RA protocol produced a higher response rate, relapse rate, number of infections, but lower mortality rate, and lacked nonresponders. The cumulative follow-up for patients treated with the lymphoma protocol was 15.44 months (range 1-41) and 21.04 months (range 8.35-29) for the RA protocol. A major concern in both protocols was the high infection rates, some of which were fatal. A different protocol using a combination of rituximab with intravenous immunoglobulin in a defined manner with a definitive endpoint, used in a limited cohort of patients, showed promising results.

CONCLUSION

Neither protocol produced a sustained clinical remission and both required continued systemic therapy. Before initiation of treatment, physicians should have a specific goal and endpoint and be aware of its potential side effects and lack of information on its long-term effects. Patients should be carefully monitored during and after therapy.

Relevance of rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris: analysis of current data and the immunologic basis for its observed responses

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients with rituximab therapy has not been critically evaluated. This article will provide in significant detail the available data to date, in order to provide a clinical and immunologic basis for clinicians to decide how best to treat recalcitrant PV patients with rituximab. PV is an autoimmune blistering disorder that affects the skin and mucous membranes. The immunopathology is well characterized, including the target antigens. PV patients have traditionally been treated with systemic corticosteroids and adjuvant immunosuppressive therapies. Clinical remission has been achieved in roughly 30% of patients. However, many patients experience severe side effects from this immunosuppression, including death. B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab therapy has been used to treat several autoimmune diseases including PV. In this article, we examined the data on 153 patients with PV who have been treated with rituximab. Our focus is on the clinical response of the patients with emphasis on adjuvant therapies, dosing regimens, potential adverse events and mechanism of action related to B-cell modulation during therapy. Importantly, the use of rituximab has increased clinical remission rates to 65% including many patients who were able to discontinue all systemic medications. Finally, an expert commentary is provided, which includes suggestions for optimizing current therapy and recommends the future direction of the field. The authors strongly endorse the use of rituximab in treatment of PV patients, particularly those nonresponsive to or who develop serious side effects to conventional therapy. Proper monitoring of patients including peripheral B-cell counts and overt signs of infection are warranted, given the potential for prolonged B-cell depletion.

Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with refractory pemphigus vulgaris

OBJECTIVES

Recent reports have documented swift responses in refractory pemphigus vulgaris to rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. Nevertheless, no standard protocol has yet been established for the administration of rituximab in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. We report the results of prolonged treatment with rituximab therapy in two patients with refractory pemphigus vulgaris.

METHODS

A 22- and a 27-year-old man were diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris according to clinical, histopathological and immunofluorescence criteria. They failed to respond after several years of steroid and immunosuppressive treatment and experienced adverse effects. Rituximab was administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Single infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m2 were repeated at 2-monthly intervals four times because of a delayed response. The treatment was well tolerated, no side effects were observed and the previous corticosteroid therapy could be progressively withdrawn.

CONCLUSIONS

The good response of our patients suggests that rituximab may be a valuable treatment option for refractory pemphigus vulgaris. It is important that clinicians are aware that the response to rituximab in pemphigus may be delayed, and that prolonged treatment may have a good outcome.

Increased serum levels of a proliferation-inducing ligand in patients with bullous pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

B cells have been demonstrated to have critical roles in developing autoimmune bullous diseases. Recently identified tumor necrosis factor-like molecules, B cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) are essential molecules for B cell development, survival, and proliferation. Although the functions of APRIL have not been fully evaluated, recent studies suggest that circulating levels of APRIL are increased in various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine serum APRIL levels in patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and bullous pemphigoid (BP), and compare those with clinical findings and laboratory findings.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Sera from 15 PV patients, 43 BP patients, and 15 normal controls were subjected to ELISA assays to measure serum APRIL, BAFF, Dsg3, and BP180 levels.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Circulating APRIL levels were significantly elevated in BP patients but not in PV patients, and correlated with serum BAFF levels. Our study revealed that serum APRIL levels tended to be increased in the quite early stage of disease. In conclusion, circulating APRIL levels may be a useful marker for early activation of autoimmune diathesis, and furthermore, an effective therapeutic target molecule in patients with BP.