Fexofenadine hydrochloride enhances the efficacy of contact immunotherapy for extensive alopecia areata: Retrospective analysis of 121 cases

Dupilumab induces hair regrowth in pediatric alopecia areata: a real-world, single-center observational study

Alopecia areata (AA) is nonscarring hair loss characterized by Th1 and concomitant Th2 skewing, particularly in atopic patients. Despite novel developments for adult AA, safe and effective treatments for pediatric patients remain limited. Dupilumab, with a well-studied safety profile, may have therapeutic potential for atopic pediatric AA. To evaluate the ability of dupilumab to regrow hair in pediatric AA patients. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study to evaluate hair regrowth [using Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT)] with dupilumab in 20 children with both AD and AA (age range 5-16 years, mean 10.8 years; baseline SALT range 3-100, mean 54.4). Patient demographics, atopic history, IgE and SALT scores were collected at 12wk follow-up visits, up to > 72wks, to evaluate hair regrowth. Spearman correlations with clinical data were performed. Patients showed clinical improvement over the follow-up period (range 24 to > 72wks, mean 67.6wks) with significant mean(± SD) reduction in SALT at 48wks versus baseline [20.4(± 35.1) vs 54.4(± 37.6), respectively; p < 0.01] and continued improvement up to > 72wks [2.2(± 4.9), p < 0.01]. Baseline SALT positively correlated with disease duration (r = 0.54, p < 0.01), and negatively correlated with improvement in SALT at weeks 24, 36, and 48 (|r|≥ 0.65, p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Baseline IgE positively correlated with improvement in SALT at week 36 (r > 0.60, p < 0.05). Dupilumab was well-tolerated, with no new safety concerns. These real-world data support the utility of dupilumab to safely treat pediatric AA patients, corroborating the role of Th2 skewing in children with AA and associated atopy, warranting larger clinical trials.

Associations between season, climate, and pediatric alopecia areata flares in Providence, Rhode Island

Patients with alopecia areata (AA) may experience episodic hair loss that follows seasonal patterns. To assess associations between seasonal variation, climate factors, and AA flare frequency in pediatric AA patients, we performed a retrospective chart review of 123 pediatric AA patients at Brown Dermatology (Providence, Rhode Island) who experienced hair loss between January 2017 and December 2019. We assessed association of seasonal variation with monthly occurrence of AA flares. We then assessed association between climate variables and monthly AA hair loss frequency using Spearman rank correlation analyses. We conducted stratified analyses in patients with and without history of atopy. The greatest proportion of hair loss episodes occurred in winter (28.1%), followed by autumn (26.3%), spring (23.8%), and summer (21.7%). We found significant correlations between AA hair loss frequency and air pressure (R = 0.61) and hours of sunlight (R = - 0.60). These correlations remained significant among patients with no history of atopic disease but were not significant among those with history of atopy. Limitations include small sample size. This regional analysis supports the role of climate in AA hair loss episodes through assessment of seasonal occurrences and identification of correlations between climate characteristics and AA flare frequency.

Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Alopecia Areata in Korea: Part II Systemic Treatment

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic disease with an unpredictable course and can have a severe psychological impact on an individual.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence and consensus-based statements regarding the treatment of patients with AA in Korea.

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies from inception to May 2021 regarding the systemic treatment of AA. Evidence-based recommendations were also prepared. The evidence for each statement was graded and classified according to the strength of the recommendations. Hair experts from the Korean Hair Research Society (KHRS) voted on the statement, and an agreement of 75% or greater was considered as having reached consensus.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids, oral cyclosporine monotherapy or combination with systemic corticosteroids, and oral Janus kinase inhibitors in severe AA patients. Systemic steroids may be considered for pediatric patients with severe AA. A consensus was achieved in three out of nine (33.3%), and one out of three (33.3%) statements pertaining to systemic treatment in adult and pediatric AA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study produced up-to-date, evidence-based treatment guidelines for AA associated with the consensus obtained by experts based on the Korean healthcare system.

Prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment patterns of Japanese patients with alopecia areata: A descriptive study using Japan medical data center claims database

Real-world data on alopecia areata (AA) demographics, comorbidities, and treatment patterns are sparse, not only in Japan but worldwide. This cross-sectional study assessed the current prevalence of AA in Japan, including analysis of severe subsets, frequency of comorbidities, and unmet medical needs surrounding treatment. Patients registered in the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (January 2012 to December 2019) and diagnosed with AA were included. Prevalence was calculated yearly, with the most common comorbidities evaluated, and treatments described in the Japanese Dermatological Association AA management guidelines and approved in Japan were included in the analysis. In total, 61 899 patients were diagnosed with AA. Among them, 1497 were diagnosed with severe subtypes. AA prevalence in Japan has been gradually increasing (from 0.16% in 2012 to 0.27% in 2019). The most common comorbidities are allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma. Depression and anxiety are frequent in these patients, as are autoimmune diseases, e.g., vitiligo, thyroid diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis. Intriguingly, the analysis found Down syndrome to be a comorbidity associated with severe AA in children. The principal treatments were topical corticosteroids, followed by carpronium chloride and cepharanthine. The use of systemic corticosteroids and antihistamines is increased in severe disease. The Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines do not support the use of oral corticosteroids in children; however, in the database, this has been prescribed in up to 2.5% and 9.8% of all pediatric and severe pediatric AA cases, respectively. Despite the limitations of using a claims database, the current study demonstrates that AA prevalence in Japan has gradually increased in recent years, with allergic diseases being the most common comorbidities. The data also imply that there is a need for effective and safe therapies, especially for severe and pediatric cases.

An Updated Review on Current Treatment of Alopecia Areata and Newer Therapeutic Options

Alopecia areata (AA) is a dermatological disease that causes nonscarring hair loss. It can occur at any age and has an unpredictable and variable evolution in individuals. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the novel therapies currently being used, as well as upcoming therapeutic options in the treatment of AA.

Alopecia Areata: Burden of Disease, Approach to Treatment, and Current Unmet Needs

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune hair loss disorder with variations in distribution, duration, and severity. The disease is chronic and often follows an unpredictable course, frequently leading to stress and anxiety for those who suffer from it. Throughout the years more knowledge has been gained regarding pathogenesis, diagnostic tools, impact on quality of life, as well as treatment strategies for alopecia areata. However, challenges in treating and alleviating the burden of disease remain. In this article, we discuss updates regarding the pathogenesis and treatment of alopecia areata and highlight unmet needs of the condition, including a review of limitations of current treatments, accessibility to management strategies, and the need for disease awareness and advocacy.

Lesson to Learn From Cellular infiltrate in Scalp Biopsy of Alopecia Areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common cause of hair loss. It is mediated by T lymphocytes. Scalp biopsy findings in AA differ according to the disease phase and activity.

OBJECTIVES

To study the cellular infiltrate in the transverse section of scalp biopsy of AA at different disease stages and in relation to disease activity.

METHODS

The study was performed on 40 subjects with AA. A 4-mm punch biopsy was obtained from an AA scalp lesion. Biopsies were sectioned horizontally; 2 anatomical levels were studied (mid dermal and deep dermal levels).

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of AA showed noncicatrical alopecia. A significant relation was found between the course of AA and the terminal:vellus ratio. Peribulbar lymphocytic infiltration was seen in 70% of cases. Mast cells were observed in 87.5% of cases, including fibrous tract and around the arrector pili muscles. Eosinophils were detected in the scalp biopsy of 22.5% of cases. Course and activity of AA were significantly related to the peribulbar lymphocytic cell infiltration but not to mast cells and eosinophils.

CONCLUSION

Although a peribulbar lymphocytic infiltrate is the classical finding of AA, it is absent in the chronic phase. Mast cells are commonly found in the scalp biopsy of AA and could explain the potential therapeutic effect of antihistamines.

Alopecia areata: Current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines

Alopecia areata (AA) is a relatively common nonscarring hairloss disease characterized by an autoimmune response to anagen hair follicles (HFs). Accumulated evidence suggests that collapse of the HF immune privilege subsequent to triggering events, represented by viral infection, leads to autoimmune response in which autoreactive cytotoxic CD8+NKG2D+ T cells mainly target exposed HF autoantigens. AA had been recognized as type 1 inflammatory disease, but recent investigations have suggested some roles of type 2- and Th17-associated mediators in AA pathogenesis. The significance of psychological stress in AA pathogenesis is less emphasized nowadays, but psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety, attract greater interest in AA management. In this regard, the disease severity may not solely be evaluated by the extent of hair loss. Use of trichoscopy markedly improved the resolution of the diagnosis and evaluation of the phase of AA, which is indispensable for the optimization of treatment. For the standardization of AA management, the establishment of guidelines/expert consensus is pivotal. Indeed, the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) and other societies and expert groups have published guidelines/expert consensus reports, which mostly recommend intralesional/topical corticosteroid administration and contact immunotherapy as first-line treatments, depending on the age, disease severity, and activity of AA. The uniqueness of the JDA guidelines can be found in their descriptions of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, antihistamines, and other miscellaneous domestically conducted treatments. Considering the relatively high incidence of spontaneous regression in mild AA and its intractability in severe subsets, the importance of course observation is also noted. Evidenced-based medicine for AA is currently limited, however, novel therapeutic approaches, represented by JAK inhibitors, are on their way for clinical application. In this review, the latest understanding of the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology, and update on therapeutic approaches with future perspectives are summarized for AA, following the current version of the JDA AA management guidelines.

Influence of climate factors on pediatric alopecia areata flares in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Patients with alopecia areata (AA) may experience episodic disease flares characterized by increasing hair loss that follow a seasonal pattern. However, no studies have examined whether specific climate factors contribute to the seasonal pattern of AA flares. Using Spearman rank correlation analyses, we assessed the association between climate variables and AA flare frequency per month in 336 children with AA in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Region-specific monthly values for average ambient temperature, air pressure, cloudiness, hours of sunlight, relative humidity, number of days with sun, number of days with rain, volume of precipitation, wind gust, wind speed, and UV index from January 2015 to December 2017 were obtained from World Weather Online. We found significant (P < 0.05) correlations between AA flare frequency and UV index (R = − 0.66), precipitation (R = − 0.66), number of days with rain (R = − 0.70), number of days with sun (R = 0.62), and air pressure (R = 0.80). Stratified analyses showed even stronger associations with UV index and precipitation in patients with an atopic comorbidity. New significant correlations appeared with temperature, wind speed, and UV index of the prior month. However, in patients who did not have atopic comorbidities, we generally observed weaker and non-significant correlations between climate and AA flare frequency. This study suggests that certain climate factors may mediate the seasonal pattern of AA flares and may contribute to AA pathogenesis. Atopic AA patients may be more susceptible to the influence of climate compared to those with no history of atopy.

Alopecia Areata: an Update on Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common chronic tissue-specific autoimmune disease, resulting in hair loss, that affects up to 2% of the general population. The exact pathobiology of AA has still remained elusive, while the common theory is the collapse of the immune privilege of the hair follicle caused by immunological mechanism. Multiple genetic and environment factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AA. There are several clinical treatments for AA, varying from one or multiple well-defined patches to more diffuse or total hair loss of the scalp (alopecia totalis) or hair loss of the entire body (alopecia universalis). The available treatments for AA, such as corticosteroids and other immunomodulators, minoxidil, and contact immunotherapy, are of limited efficacy with a high risk of adverse effects and high recurrence rates, especially for patients with severe AA. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of AA have led to the development of new treatment strategies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, biologics, and several small molecular agents. In addition, modern therapies for AA, including antihistamines, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and other novel therapies have been well explored. In this review, we discussed the recent advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of AA.

Use of H-1 Antihistamine in Dermatology: More than Itch and Urticaria Control: A Systematic Review

H-1 antihistamines are commonly used in dermatological practice for itch and urticaria control. The widespread expression of H-1 receptor on different cells in the skin and various biologic functions of H-1 antihistamines indicate the possible treatment potentials of H-1 antihistamines in dermatology. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, targeting articles reporting use of antihistamine for purposes other than itch and urticaria control in dermatological practice. Several off-label usages of antihistamines were identified, including alopecia, acne, Darier disease, eosinophilic dermatoses, paraneoplastic dermatoses, psoriasis, lichen nitidus, radiation dermatitis, skin dysesthesia, and cutaneous malignancies. Additional benefits were observed when H-1 antihistamines were used either alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities. Although various novel uses of H-1 antihistamines have been uncovered, the evidence level of most included studies is weak. Further randomized control trials are warranted to better evaluate the efficacy and dosage of H-1 antihistamine for dermatological disorders.

New and Emerging Therapies for Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that affects up to 2% of the general population. Currently available treatment options for AA are of limited efficacy and can be associated with adverse effects. The advancement in understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of AA has led to the development of novel treatment options, with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor class of drugs at the forefront of ongoing clinical trials. Platelet-rich plasma, fecal transplants, and cytokine-targeted therapy with ustekinumab and dupilumab have also been shown to regrow hair in patients with AA in individual case reports or small studies. Several other novel therapies have preliminary data or are being tested in clinical trials.

Alopecia Areata Is Associated with Atopic Diathesis: Results from a Population-Based Study of 51,561 Patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence of T_H1/IFN-γ overactivation as a major pathogenic driver somewhat conflicts with data supporting robust allergic background in patients with alopecia areata (AA). Previous investigations of immunological dysregulations show that both T_H1- and T_H2-related markers are overexpressed in AA. Clinical correlations in large populations may shed light on the immune pathways most likely to result in the clinical phenotype of AA.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the atopic comorbidities among patients with AA in a large population-based study.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with AA and a matched comparison group, analyzing the associations between AA and 4 atopic comorbidities: asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis. χ² and t tests were used for univariate analysis, and logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. The study was performed using the computerized database of the Clalit Health Services, encompassing more than 4.4 million subjects.

RESULTS

The study population included 51,561 patients with AA and 51,410 matched control subjects. The prevalence of asthma (7.8% vs 6.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17-1.28; P < .001), AD (3.9% vs 2.6%; OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44-1.66; P < .001), allergic rhinitis (16.0% vs 12.8%; OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.25-1.34; P < .001), and allergic conjunctivitis (23.5% vs 19.6%; OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23-1.30; P < .001) was significantly higher among patients with AA as compared with matched control subjects. Patients with AA also had a significantly higher probability of having more than 1 atopic comorbidity, with increasing OR as the number of concomitant atopic conditions increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis supports the previous literature and provides strong generalizability of significant atopy in patients with AA, suggesting T_H2 pathogenicity in AA, and challenging the traditional view of AA as a single-axis, T_H1-centered disease.

Allergy promotes alopecia areata in a subset of patients

In this commentary, we focus on allergy as a facilitating factor in the pathogenesis of alopecia areata (AA). From previous studies on AA, it is well known that subsets of patients can have one or more of; seasonal relapse, comorbid atopic rhinitis, asthma and dermatitis, lesion infiltrating eosinophils and plasma cells, high levels of total IgE, specific IgE for house dust mites (HDMs), and/or disrupted skin barrier function by the evaluation of filaggrin. Allergy and AA share a similar genetic background; both contributing to an immune reaction imbalance. Furthermore, adjunctive treatment with antihistamines, or desensitization for HDM, can reduce the severity of alopecia in atopic AA patients. Therefore, allergies may contribute to the onset and relapse of AA. Identification of an allergic or atopic immune component in AA patient subsets may indicate adjunctive treatment intervention measures against allergies should be taken which may improve the success of conventional AA treatment.

Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Mediates Ebastine-Induced Human Follicle Dermal Papilla Cell Proliferation

Ebastine is a second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist that is used to attenuate allergic inflammation. Ebastine has also shown to affect hair loss; however, the immunoregulatory effect of ebastine cannot completely exclude the possibility of spontaneous hair regrowth in ebastine-treated mice. In this study, we examined the effects of ebastine on the growth of human follicle dermal papilla cells (HFDPC) using a WST-1 cell proliferation assay and a bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay. Ebastine was shown to significantly increase the proliferation of HFDPC. The expression levels of cell-cycle regulatory proteins and an antiapoptotic protein were increased in ebastine-treated HFDPC. Furthermore, elevated expression levels of phospho-AKT and phospho-p44/42 extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) were observed in ebastine-treated HFDPC. Ebastine-mediated HFDPC growth was completely reversed by blocking ERK kinase. The results from our present study suggest that the regulation of HFDPC proliferation by ebastine might be directly involved in hair regrowth through the ERK signaling pathway.

Alopecia Areata: a Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis and Management

Alopecia areata is a common hair loss condition that is characterized by acute onset of non-scarring hair loss in usually sharply defined areas ranging from small patches to extensive or less frequently diffuse involvement. Depending on its acuity and extent, hair loss is an important cause of anxiety and disability. The current understanding is that the condition represents an organ-specific autoimmune disease of the hair follicle with a genetic background. Genome-wide association studies provide evidence for the involvement of both innate and acquired immunity in the pathogenesis, and mechanistic studies in mouse models of alopecia areata have specifically implicated an IFN-γ-driven immune response, including IFNγ, IFNγ-induced chemokines and cytotoxic CD8 T cells as the main drivers of disease pathogenesis. A meta-analysis of published trials on treatment of alopecia areata states that only few treatments have been well evaluated in randomized trials. Nevertheless, depending on patient age, affected surface area and disease duration, an empiric treatment algorithm can be designed with corticosteroids and topical immunotherapy remaining the mainstay of therapy. The obviously limited success of evidence-based therapies points to a more important complexity of hair loss. At the same time, the complexity of pathogenesis offers opportunities for the development of novel targeted therapies. New treatment opportunities based on the results of genome-wide association studies that implicate T cell and natural killer cell activation pathways are paving the way to new approaches in future clinical trials. Currently, there are ongoing studies with the CTLA4-Ig fusion protein abatacept, anti-IL15Rβ monoclonal antibodies and the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, ruxolitinib and baricitinib. Ultimately, the options available for adapting to the disease rather than treating it in an effort to cure may also be taken into consideration in selected cases of long-standing or recurrent small spot disease.

Subclinical sensitization with diphenylcyclopropenone is sufficient for the treatment of alopecia areata: Retrospective analysis of 159 cases

BACKGROUND

Contact immunotherapy with diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is presently considered the treatment of choice for extensive alopecia areata. However, a major concern with contact immunotherapy is that it causes various adverse effects (AEs) that contribute to discontinuation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether a modified DPCP treatment protocol can promote hair regrowth with fewer AEs.

METHODS

All patients were sensitized with 0.1% DPCP and began treatment with 0.01% DPCP. Thereafter, the DPCP concentration was slowly increased according to the treatment response and AEs. This was a retrospective review of DPCP treatment with modified protocols in 159 patients with alopecia areata.

RESULTS

Of the 159 patients, 46 (28.9%) showed a complete response and 59 (37.1%) showed a partial response. No patients had AEs after sensitization. During the treatment, only 3 patients (1.9%) showed severe AEs, and 55 showed moderate AEs; however, all were well controlled with antihistamines alone or antihistamines and medium-potency topical steroids. There was no association between treatment response and AEs.

LIMITATIONS

Sample size, subject composition, and the retrospective study design represent potential limitations.

CONCLUSION

A modified DPCP treatment protocol with subclinical sensitization could induce a favorable therapeutic response and result in fewer AEs.

What causes alopecia areata?

The pathobiology of alopecia areata (AA), one of the most frequent autoimmune diseases and a major unsolved clinical problem, has intrigued dermatologists, hair biologists and immunologists for decades. Simultaneously, both affected patients and the physicians who take care of them are increasingly frustrated that there is still no fully satisfactory treatment. Much of this frustration results from the fact that the pathobiology of AA remains unclear, and no single AA pathogenesis concept can claim to be universally accepted. In fact, some investigators still harbour doubts whether this even is an autoimmune disease, and the relative importance of CD8(+) T cells, CD4(+) T cells and NKGD2(+) NK or NKT cells and the exact role of genetic factors in AA pathogenesis remain bones of contention. Also, is AA one disease, a spectrum of distinct disease entities or only a response pattern of normal hair follicles to immunologically mediated damage? During the past decade, substantial progress has been made in basic AA-related research, in the development of new models for translationally relevant AA research and in the identification of new therapeutic agents and targets for future AA management. This calls for a re-evaluation and public debate of currently prevalent AA pathobiology concepts. The present Controversies feature takes on this challenge, hoping to attract more skin biologists, immunologists and professional autoimmunity experts to this biologically fascinating and clinically important model disease.

Alopecia areata: a new treatment plan

Many therapeutic modalities have been used to treat alopecia areata, with variable efficacy and safety profiles. Unfortunately, none of these agents is curative or preventive. Also, many of these therapeutic agents have not been subjected to randomized, controlled trials, and, except for topical immunotherapy, there are few published studies on long-term outcomes. The treatment plan is designed according to the patient's age and extent of disease. In this paper, the therapeutic agents are organized according to their efficacy and safety profiles into first-line, second-line, and third-line options.