Detection of disseminated urothelial cancer cells in peripheral venous blood by a cytokeratin 20-specific nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

The current status and clinical value of circulating tumor cells and circulating cell-free tumor DNA in bladder cancer

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is a complex disease, which is associated with highly aggressive tumor biologic behavior, especially in patients with muscle-invasive and advanced tumors. Despite multimodal therapy options including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, UCB patients frequently suffer from poor clinical outcome. Indeed, the potential of diverse opportunities for modern targeted therapies is not sufficiently elucidated in UCB yet. To improve the suboptimal treatment situation in UCB, biomarkers are urgently needed that help detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), predicting therapy response and subsequently prognosis as well as enabling patient stratification for further therapies and therapy monitoring, respectively. To date, decision making regarding treatment planning is mainly based on histopathologic evaluation of biopsies predominantly derived from the primary tumors and on clinical staging. However, both methods are imperfect for sufficient outcome prediction. During disease progression, individual disseminated tumor cells and consecutively metastases can acquire characteristics that do not match those of the corresponding primary tumors, and often are only hardly assessable for further evaluation. Therefore, during recent years, strong efforts were directed to establish non-invasive biomarkers from liquid biopsies. Urine cytology and serum tumor markers have been established for diagnostic purposes, but are still insufficient as universal biomarkers for decision-making and treatment of UCB patients. To date, the clinical relevance of various newly established blood-based biomarkers comprising circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating cell-free nucleic acids or tumor-educated platelets is being tested in cancer patients. In this review we summarize the current state and clinical application of CTCs and circulating cell-free tumor DNA originating from blood as biomarkers in patients with different UCB stages.

The prognostic and diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells in bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 30 published studies

There are inconsistent conclusions in the association between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and urothelial cancer (UC). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic and diagnostic value of CTCs in UC. We search Medline, Embase and Web of science for relevant studies. The study was set up according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. 30 published studies with a total of 2161 urothelial cancer patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that CTC-positive was significantly associated with tumor stage (≤ II vs III, IV) (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 2.34-9.03), histological grade (I, II vs III) (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.92-4.40), metastasis (OR = 5.12, 95% CI: 3.47-7.55) and regional lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.75-3.49). It was also significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.98, 95% CI: 2.20-7.21), progression/disease-free survival (PFS/DFS) (HR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.80-2.73) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 5.18, 95% CI: 2.21-12.13). Overall sensitivity and specificity of CTC detection assays were 0.35 (95% CI: 0.28-0.43) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99) respectively. In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that the presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood is an independent predictive indicator of poor outcomes for urothelial cancer patients. It can also be used as a noninvasive method for the confirmation of cancer diagnosis. More studies are required to further explore the role of this marker in clinical practice.

Circulating Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is a molecularly heterogeneous disease characterized by multiple unmet needs in the realm of diagnosis, clinical staging, monitoring and therapy. There is an urgent need to develop precision medicine for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Given the difficulty of serial analyses of metastatic tumor tissue to identify resistance and new therapeutic targets, development of non-invasive monitoring using circulating molecular biomarkers is critically important. Although the development of circulating biomarkers for the management of bladder cancer is in its infancy and may currently suffer from lower sensitivity of detection, they have inherent advantages owing to non-invasiveness. Additionally, circulating molecular alterations may capture tumor heterogeneity without the sampling bias of tissue biopsy. This review describes the accumulating data to support further development of circulating biomarkers including circulating tumor cells, cell-free circulating tumor (ct)-DNA, RNA, micro-RNA and proteomics to improve the management of bladder cancer.

Molecular markers in bladder cancer: Novel research frontiers

Bladder cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease encompassing distinct biologic features that lead to extremely different clinical behaviors. In the last 20 years, great efforts have been made to predict disease outcome and response to treatment by developing risk assessment calculators based on multiple standard clinical-pathological factors, as well as by testing several molecular markers. Unfortunately, risk assessment calculators alone fail to accurately assess a single patient's prognosis and response to different treatment options. Several molecular markers easily assessable by routine immunohistochemical techniques hold promise for becoming widely available and cost-effective tools for a more reliable risk assessment, but none have yet entered routine clinical practice. Current research is therefore moving towards (i) identifying novel molecular markers; (ii) testing old and new markers in homogeneous patients' populations receiving homogeneous treatments; (iii) generating a multimarker panel that could be easily, and thus routinely, used in clinical practice; (iv) developing novel risk assessment tools, possibly combining standard clinical-pathological factors with molecular markers. This review analyses the emerging body of literature concerning novel biomarkers, ranging from genetic changes to altered expression of a huge variety of molecules, potentially involved in BC outcome and response to treatment. Findings suggest that some of these indicators, such as serum circulating tumor cells and tissue mitochondrial DNA, seem to be easily assessable and provide reliable information. Other markers, such as the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT (serine-threonine kinase)/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway and epigenetic changes in DNA methylation seem to not only have prognostic/predictive value but also, most importantly, represent valuable therapeutic targets. Finally, there is increasing evidence that the development of novel risk assessment tools combining standard clinical-pathological factors with molecular markers represents a major quest in managing this poorly predictable disease.

Bladder cancer detection and monitoring: assessment of urine- and blood-based marker tests

Bladder cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, but the treatment and management of this disease can be very successful if the disease is detected early. The development of molecular assays that could diagnose bladder cancer accurately, and at an early stage, would be a significant advance. Ideally, such molecular assays would be applicable to non-invasively obtained body fluids, and be designed not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring disease recurrence and response to treatment. In this article, we assess the performance of current diagnostic assays for bladder cancer and discuss some of the emerging biomarkers that could be developed to augment current bladder cancer detection strategies.

Utility of urothelial mRNA markers in blood for staging and monitoring bladder cancer

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficiency of 6 mRNA bladder markers in staging urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) and monitoring UCC dissemination from blood samples.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2009, 347 blood samples were collected from 150 patients with UCC and 29 healthy controls. Sequential blood sampling was performed in patients undergoing cystectomy at surgery and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. The median follow-up was 33 months. The presence of KRT20, FXYD3, C10orf116, UPK2, AGR2, and KRT19 markers in blood was evaluated in all patients and controls by measuring the gene expression using preamplified cDNA and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Gene expression data were correlated with the tumor risk, follow-up, and outcomes data.

RESULTS

Expression of C10orf116 and KRT19 genes differed between patients and controls (P<.001). KRT20, C10orf116, and AGR2 differentiated between low- and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (P=.001, P=.011, and P=.001, respectively). FXYD3 differentiated between patients with high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and those with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (P=.009). In contrast, the 6 markers showed no differences in gene expression between metastatic and patients without metastases who had not undergone cystectomy (P=NS). None of the markers were significantly increased in the metastatic patients at 6, 12, 18, or 24 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The gene expression of bladder-specific mRNA markers in blood was different among the various tumor risk groups of patients with UCC. However, this gene expression analysis is not suitable for predicting metastases or monitoring UCC hematogenous dissemination in patients who have undergone cystectomy.

Diagnostic value of circulating tumor cell detection in bladder and urothelial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The diagnostic value and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection in patients with bladder cancer is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to consolidate current evidence regarding the use of CTC detection assays to diagnose bladder and other urothelial cancers and the association of CTC positivity with advanced, remote disease.

Methods

Studies that investigated the presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with bladder cancer and/or urothelial cancer were identified and reviewed. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-) of CTC detection in individual studies were calculated and meta-analyzed by random effects model. Overall odds ratio of CTC positivity in patients with advanced disease versus those with organ-confined cancer was also calculated.

Results

Overall sensitivity of CTC detection assays was 35.1% (95%CI, 32.4-38%); specificity, LR+, and LR- was 89.4% (95%CI, 87.2-91.3%), 3.77 (95%CI, 1.95-7.30) and 0.72 (95%CI, 0.64-0.81). CTC-positive patients were significantly more likely to have advanced (stage III-IV) disease compared with CTC-negative patients (OR, 5.05; 95%CI, 2.49-10.26).

Conclusions

CTC evaluation can confirm tumor diagnosis and identify patients with advanced bladder cancer. However, due to the low overall sensitivity, CTC detection assays should not be used as initial screening tests.

Detection of circulating tumor cells in bladder cancer patients

The methods employed for the detection of circulating bladder cancer cells (CBCs) and their use as a molecular staging tool in clinical settings are thoroughly reviewed. CBC isolation and enrichment methods are discussed according to their advantages and pitfalls along with the clinical data of PCR-based techniques used for CBC detection. In addition, we review the specificity of molecular markers that have been proposed so far for CBC identification, and we comment on the controversial clinical data, proposing laboratory approaches which may improve the clinical significance of CBC detection in bladder cancer.

DETECTION OF DISSEMINATED TUMOR CELLS IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD

Metastases are the major cause of cancer-related deaths in patients with solid epithelial malignancies, such as breast, colorectal and prostate carcinomas. Hematogenous spreading of tumor cells from a primary tumor can be considered as a crucial step in the metastasis cascade leading eventually to the formation of clinically manifest metastases. Consequently, as shown in recent studies, the detection of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood might be of clinical relevance with respect to individual patient prognosis and staging or monitoring of therapy. However, the rarity of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood renders the application of sensitive techniques mandatory for their detection. The emergence of highly sophisticated reverse transciptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, combining a preanalytical enrichment step with the assessment of multiple molecular tumor markers expressed in disseminated tumor cells, provides a powerful tool in detecting disseminated tumor cells with high sensitivity and specificity. This review will discuss currently used tumor markers as well as experimental means to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR assays to detect disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, and their clinical relevance assessed in recent studies.

Molecular biomarkers for cancer detection in blood and bodily fluids

Cancer is a major and increasing public health problem worldwide. Traditionally, the diagnosis and staging of cancer, as well as the evaluation of response to therapy have been primarily based on morphology, with relatively few cancer biomarkers currently in use. Conventional biomarker studies have been focused on single genes or discrete pathways, but this approach has had limited success because of the complex and heterogeneous nature of many cancers. The completion of the human genome project and the development of new technologies have greatly facilitated the identification of biomarkers for assessment of cancer risk, early detection of primary cancers, monitoring cancer treatment, and detection of recurrence. This article reviews the various approaches used for development of such markers and describes markers of potential clinical interest in major types of cancer. Finally, we discuss the reasons why so few cancer biomarkers are currently available for clinical use.

Molecular assessment of neck dissections supports preserving level IIB lymph nodes in selective neck dissection for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a clinically negative neck

OBJECTIVES

It was the aim of this study to determine whether level IIB lymph nodes can be saved in elective neck dissection as a treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx. We present a prospective analysis of a case series.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with SCC of the larynx and without palpable lymph nodes at the neck who underwent an elective neck dissection were prospectively studied. The incidence of micrometastasis to level IIB lymph nodes after performing elective neck dissection was evaluated by nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for cytokeratin (CK)19 and CK20 as well as by pathological examination.

RESULTS

Nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for CK19 and CK20 mRNA presented similar results but differed from the pathological examination. Of the 31 patients, 6 (19%) by pathological analysis and 9 (29%) by molecular analysis had lymph nodes positive for metastatic SCC. By molecular analysis, only 1 of the 31 patients had involvement of level IIB lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

This region may be preserved in elective neck dissection in patients with SCC of the larynx, so that accessory nerve dysfunction can be minimized and operative time can be saved.

Level IIb lymph nodes metastasis in elective supraomohyoid neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a molecular-based study

OBJECTIVES

To identify the incidence of level IIb lymph nodes metastasis in elective supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) as a treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective analysis of a case series.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with SCC of the oral cavity and with no palpable lymph nodes at the neck who underwent an elective SOHND were prospectively studied. The incidence of micrometastasis to level IIb lymph nodes after performing elective SOHND was evaluated by pathologic examination and molecular analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, 15 (31%) by pathologic analysis and 22 (46%) by molecular analysis had lymph nodes positive for metastatic SCC. By molecular analysis, 5 (10%) of the 48 patients had involvement of level IIb lymph nodes. All patients with metastasis to level IIb lymph nodes have their primary lesions in the tongue and constituted 22% of patients with tongue lesions. There was no instance of isolated metastasis to level IIb lymph nodes without involvement of other nodes in the SOHND specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, level IIb lymph node metastasis was only found in association with tongue carcinoma. Although this region may be preserved in elective SOHND in patients with SCC of the oral cavity, it should be included whenever the tongue is the primary site.

Screening and identification of differentially expressed transcripts in circulating cells of prostate cancer patients using suppression subtractive hybridization

BACKGROUND

Tumor metastasis and changes in host immunosurveillance are important components in cancer development. Tumor cell invasion into the bloodstream is an essential step for systemic metastasis. Currently, the detection of tumor cells in the circulation is mainly dependent upon the utilization of known epithelial cell markers. However, expression of these molecules is not limited to cancer patients; healthy people also have a small number of epithelial cells in their circulation. Utilizing these markers to detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) cannot adequately explain the mechanisms of tumor cell survival or their development of metastatic potential in peripheral blood. The immune system can also evolve along with the cancer, actually promoting or selecting the outgrowth of tumor variants. Unfortunately, both metastasis and immunosurveillance remain mysterious and are debatable because we have yet to define the molecules that participate in these processes. We are interested in identifying the existence of expressed genes, or mRNA species, that are specifically associated with circulating cells of cancer-bearing patients using prostate cancer (PCa) as a model.

RESULTS

We established two comprehensive subtracted cDNA libraries using a molecular technique called suppression subtractive hybridization. This technique selectively amplifies transcripts that are specifically expressed in circulating cells of either PCa patients or healthy men. Following sequencing reaction, we showed that 17 out of 23 (73.9%) sequenced clones did not match any mRNAs in the GenBank database. This result suggests that genes associated with alterations in circulating cells of cancer-bearing patients are largely unknown. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that two genes are up-regulated in circulating cells of PCa patients, whereas another two genes are down-regulated in the same patients.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive gene expression analysis is capable of identifying differentially expressed genes in circulating cells of healthy men and PCa patients. We did not attempt to enrich specific cell types in this study because phenotypes of CTCs and subsets of leukocytes participating in immunosurveillance remain largely unknown. Continuous studies of these differentially expressed genes will eventually lead us to understand the mechanisms involved in tumor metastasis and immune modulation during cancer development.

Detection of circulating MUC7-positive cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in bladder cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To determine whether MUC7 gene expression can be used as a bladder cancer marker in peripheral blood.

METHODS

Nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on four types of bladder cancer cell lines (RT4, T24, EJ-1 and TCC) and the peripheral blood of 38 (31 superficial disease and seven invasive disease) bladder cancer patients and 18 subjects with urinary tract infections or other non-malignant conditions to determine the expression of MUC7.

RESULTS

No MUC7 gene expression was detected in control subjects. MUC7-positive cells were detected in all bladder cancer cell lines and in 18 of 38 (47.4%) peripheral blood samples of bladder cancer patients. Based on the tumor stage, MUC7 was detected in 11 of 29 (37.9%) patients with superficial disease (Ta and T1) and in seven of nine (77.7%) invasive disease patients (>/=T2). There was a significant difference between superficial and invasive disease (P = 0.042). Based on tumor grade, we could not detect MUC7 in five patients with grade 1, in five of 15 patients (33.3%) with grade 2 and in 13 of 18 patients (72.2%) with grade 3. There was a significant difference between grades 1 and 3 (P = 0.007) and grades 2 and 3 (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that MUC7 is a highly specific marker for bladder cancer and may be a useful method for the molecular staging and management of bladder cancer.

VALUE OF REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN ASSAY IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD OF PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CANCER

PURPOSE

The nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method was used to determine expression of uroplakin II (UP II) or cytokeratin 20 (CK-20) in cells separated from the peripheral blood of patients with urothelial cancer. We examine whether UP II or CK-20 expression can be used as a urothelial cancer marker for urothelial cancer in cells isolated from peripheral blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood was taken from 20 healthy volunteers without a history of urothelial cancer, from 10 patients with a negative bladder biopsy for urothelial cancer and from 108 patients with urothelial cancer. Results of a nested RT-PCR assay were compared with pathological stage and recurrence.

RESULTS

None of the peripheral blood samples from the control subjects revealed a positive polymerase chain reaction result. Among 108 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder nested RT-PCR for UP II was positive in 25 (23%) versus 31 (29%) for CK-20 (p >0.05). Nested RT-PCR for UP II was positive in 5 (8%) patients with superficial stage disease (pTa and pT1) versus 8 (11%) positive for CK-20. Nested RT-PCR for UP II was positive in 15 (58%) patients with a stage of pT2 or advanced stages versus 17 (65%) positive for CK-20. Nested RT-PCR for UP II was positive in 13 (20%) and 10 (56%) patients with grades 2 and 3, respectively, versus 17 (27%) and 12 (67%) nested RT-PCR positive for CK-20. A significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free actuarial curve was noted among patients with superficial stage who were positive and negative on nested RT-PCR for UP II and CK-20 in peripheral blood, respectively, but not in the invasive stage. On multivariate analysis nested RT-PCR for UP II and CK-20 in peripheral blood were independent prognostic factors in patients with superficial stage disease but not with invasive stage disease. Lung and/or liver metastasis developed in 5 (80%) of 6 patients whose results after chemotherapy (consisting of cisplatin, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vinblastine sulfate and methotrexate) for nested RT-PCR for UP II and CK-20 remained positive.

CONCLUSIONS

These results seem to indicate that UP II and CK-20 mRNA in the blood may be useful tumor markers for predicting patient survival and the extent of urothelial cancer.

Effect of blood sample handling and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay sensitivity on detection of CK20 expression in healthy donor blood

Data concerning the specificity of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) as a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis (RT-PCR) marker to detect disseminated tumor cells in blood are conflicting. Underlying causes for these discrepancies need to be determined to clarify the significance of CK20 detection. Because differences in RT-PCR assays and blood sample handling may be important, their influence on CK20 detection was studied. Using a series of healthy donor blood samples spiked with colon tumor cells, the authors compared the sensitivities of two conventional PCRs with different primer sets and a quantitative LightCycler PCR (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany). Additionally, the influence of sample collection and preparation on assay specificity was studied by examining CK20 expression in the mononuclear cell fraction (MNC) of the first and the second aliquot of blood drawn from healthy donors and in the granulocyte cell fraction. At the concentration of one spiked tumor cell/mL blood, the CK20 detection frequency varied from 17% and 67% for the conventional to 78% for the LightCycler PCR. In the unspiked samples, CK20 was detected in 0% and 8% of the conventional and in 11% of the LightCycler PCR tests. Quantitative analysis revealed that CK20 was expressed at a high level in the granulocyte samples. The results demonstrate that differences in assay sensitivity and sample handling influence CK20 detection in blood.

Limitations of cytokeratin 20 RT-PCR to detect disseminated tumour cells in blood and bone marrow of patients with colorectal cancer: expression in controls and downregulation in tumour tissue

AIMS

Despite informative staging of patients with colorectal cancer, some patients with localised disease at diagnosis will develop recurrence or metastasis. Attempts to improve staging include sensitive detection of disseminated tumour cells in blood and bone marrow by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The results of this study have been considered in relation to the controversial results in the literature to elucidate the usefulness of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) RT-PCR to detect disseminated tumour cells further.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Blood and bone marrow samples from 30 patients with colorectal cancer were studied by CK20 RT-PCR. Specificity was evaluated in 47 blood and 15 bone marrow samples from non-cancer controls. In addition, the expression of CK20 mRNA and protein was studied in normal and tumour colon tissue samples.

RESULTS

CK20 expression was detected in nine of 30 and nine of 19 of the blood and bone marrow samples from patients with colorectal cancer, respectively. In non-cancer control blood and bone marrow samples, CK20 expression was detected in 10 of 47 and four of 15, respectively. A difference between patient and control samples may be observed in terms of frequency of positive PCR tests. In tissue samples, CK20 mRNA expression was downregulated in tumour compared with normal colon tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

CK20 expression was downregulated in tumour tissue compared with normal colon and a background expression of CK20 was seen in some control blood and bone marrow samples. Despite a lack of standardisation (which hampers comparison of studies), these results, together with other reports in the literature, suggest that CK20 may still be a suitable marker, but that background expression and threshold setting should be studied further.

Molecular detection and characterization of circulating tumor cells and micrometastases in prostatic, urothelial, and renal cell carcinomas

The detection and molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and micrometastases in urinary tract and prostatic tumors may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. In the last decade, numerous groups have attempted the detection of occult tumor cells in renal, prostatic, and urothelial carcinomas using the highly sensitive reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In prostatic carcinoma (PC), tissue-specific transcripts were detected with high specificity in the blood of patients with localized and advanced disease. PCR assays for PC detection were shown to be strong predictors of poorer outcome in some reports, while a lack of prognostic significance was found in other studies. There was a vast difference in the PCR positivity rates between various groups studying PC. This discrepancy could be due to variations in PCR methodology. In urothelial and renal cell carcinoma, the amount of research on the subject is still too limited. Currently, these assays for occult tumor cells are promising but are not yet ready to use in PC and urinary tract tumors. Because of the many limitations of PCR (e.g., false positives), many groups are developing new approaches for the detection of occult tumor cells. The most attractive technique involves immunomagnetic isolation of intact CTC and micrometastases prior to downstream analysis. The tumor-rich magnetic fraction can be subjected to RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry, and in situ hybridization. This will lead to better quantification and molecular characterization of these tumor cells.