Detection of colorectal cancer cells from feces using quantitative real-time RT-PCR for colorectal cancer diagnosis

Selection of optimal extraction and RT-PCR protocols for stool RNA detection of colorectal cancer associated immune genes

There is a growing interest in using fecal mRNA transcripts as biomarkers for non-invasive detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). The following study compares different RNA extraction and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) methods for mRNA detection in stool and identifies a robust and sensitive protocol. A combination of the Stool total RNA purification kit (Norgen) and the Superscript III one-step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) provided high RNA purity and sensitive and consistent mRNA detection, making them well-suited candidates for large-scale studies. We tested the protocol by detecting the mRNA of several immune genes (CXCL1, IL8, IL1B, IL6, PTGS2, and SPP1) in 22 CRCs, 24 adenomatous polyps, and 22 control stool samples. All these inflammatory markers, except for CXCL1, showed a strong association with CRC. Cancer stool samples showed increased levels of IL1B, IL8, and PTGS2 transcripts compared to polyp and control groups. Thus, this work supports the potential use of fecal mRNA as biomarkers for CRC detection.

Noninvasive Stool RNA Test Approximates Disease Activity in Patients With Crohn's Disease

Background and Aims

Management of Crohn's disease (CD) requires frequent monitoring for disease activity and response to therapy. In this study, we examined the clinical utility of a novel stool-derived eukaryotic RNA (seRNA)-based diagnostic in patients with CD.

Methods

Stool samples were collected from 68 individuals for up to 3 time points prior to, and after initiation of an advanced therapy. Stool samples underwent RNA extraction and sequencing using a custom capture panel (n = 1507 transcripts). seRNA signatures were compared to Crohn's Disease Activity Index scores and endoscopies, when available. Random forest models classified disease severity when compared to Crohn's Disease Activity Index scores. seRNA signatures were also used to assess expression of the therapy target and cell type abundance at various time points.

Results

Across all 102 samples collected from 68 individuals, the classifier successfully parsed individuals with active disease (n = 37) relative to those in remission (n = 65) with 87% sensitivity and 77% specificity, respectively. A second classifier, which was employed on subjects with active disease (n = 37), successfully parsed individuals with mild disease (n = 15) from those with moderate disease (n = 22) with 93% and 86% sensitivity, respectively. For the 16 subjects with longitudinal data, seRNA expression of the therapeutic target (eg, ITGA4/ITGB7 for vedolizumab or IL12/IL23 for ustekinumab) as well as lymphocyte burden was correlated with response.

Conclusion

A novel seRNA and informatic-based method reliably discriminates active disease from remission and stratifies mild from moderate CD activity. This demonstrates preliminary feasibility to predict therapeutic response and assess disease activity for patients with CD.

Identification of Six Genes as Diagnostic Markers for Colorectal Cancer Detection by Integrating Multiple Expression Profiles

Background

Many studies have demonstrated the promising utility of DNA methylation and miRNA as biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC) early detection. However, mRNA is rarely reported. This study aimed to identify novel fecal-based mRNA signatures.

Methods

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were first determined between CRCs and matched normal samples by integrating multiple datasets. Then, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to reduce the number of candidates of aberrantly expressed genes. Next, the potential functions were investigated for the candidate signatures and their ability to detect CRC and pan-cancers was comprehensively evaluated.

Results

We identified 1841 common DEGs in two independent datasets. Functional enrichment analysis revealed they were mainly related to extracellular structure, biosynthesis, and cell adhesion. The CRC classifier was established based on six genes screened by LASSO regression. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CRC detection were 79.30%, 80.40%, and 0.85 (0.76–0.92) in the training set, and these indexes achieved 93.20%, 41.80%, and 0.73 (0.65–0.83) in the testing set. For validation set, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 98.90%, 98.00%, and 0.97 (0.94–0.99). The average sensitivities exceeded 90.00% for CRCs with different clinical features. For adenomas detection, the sensitivity and specificity were 74.50% and 64.00%. Besides, the six genes obtained an average AUC of 0.855 for pan-cancer detection.

Conclusion

The six-gene signatures showed ability to detect CRC and pan-cancer samples, which could be served as potential diagnostic markers.

The Impact of Matrix Metalloproteinase-11 Polymorphisms on Colorectal Cancer Progression and Clinicopathological Characteristics

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide and the most prevalent cancer in Taiwan. The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-11 is a proteolytic enzyme of the MMP family which is involved in extracellular matrix degradation and tissue remodeling. In this study, we focused on the associations of MMP-11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with CRC susceptibility and clinicopathological characteristics. The MMP-11 SNPs rs131451, rs738791, rs2267029, rs738792, and rs28382575 in 479 controls and 479 patients with CRC were analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction. We found that the MMP-11 SNP rs738792 “TC + CC” genotype was significantly associated with perineural invasion in colon cancer patients after controlling for clinical parameters [OR (95% CI) = 1.783 (1.074–2.960); p = 0.025]. The MMP-11 rs131451 “TC + CC” genotypic variants were correlated with greater tumor T status [OR (95% CI):1.254 (1.025–1.534); p = 0.028] and perineural invasion [OR (95% CI):1.773 (1.027–3.062); p = 0.040) in male CRC patients. Furthermore, analyses of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed that MMP-11 levels were upregulated in colorectal carcinoma tissue compared with normal tissues and were correlated with advanced stage, larger tumor sizes, and lymph node metastasis. Moreover, the data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database exhibited that the MMP-11 rs738792 “CC” and “CT” genotypic variants have higher MMP-11 expression than the “TT” genotype. In conclusion, our results have demonstrated that the MMP-11 SNPs rs738792 and rs131451 may have potential to provide biomarkers to evaluate CRC disease progression, and the MMP-11 rs131451 polymorphism may shed light on sex discrepancy in CRC development and prognosis.

Multitarget Stool mRNA Test for Detecting Colorectal Cancer Lesions Including Advanced Adenomas

Current approved non-invasive screening methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) include FIT and DNA-FIT testing, but their efficacy for detecting precancerous lesions that are susceptible to progressing to CRC such as advanced adenomas (AA) remains limited, thus requiring further options to improve the detection of CRC lesions at earlier stages. One of these is host mRNA stool testing. The aims of the present study were to identify specific stool mRNA targets that can predict AA and to investigate their stability under a clinical-like setting. A panel of mRNA targets was tested on stool samples obtained from 102 patients including 78 CRC stage I-III and 24 AA as well as 32 healthy controls. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to establish sensitivities and specificities for individual and combined targets. Stability experiments were performed on freshly obtained specimens. Six of the tested targets were found to be specifically increased in the stools of patients with CRC and three in the stools of both AA and CRC patients. After optimization for the choice of the 5 best markers for AA and CRC, ROC curve analysis revealed overall sensitivities of 75% and 89% for AA and CRC, respectively, for a ≥95% specificity, and up to 75% and 95% for AA and CRC, respectively, when combined with the FIT score. Targets were found to be stable in the stools up to 3 days at room temperature. In conclusion, these studies show that the detection of host mRNA in the stools is a valid approach for the screening of colorectal cancerous lesions at all stages and is applicable to a clinical-like setup.

Signature mRNA markers in extracellular vesicles for the accurate diagnosis of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

With the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), its accurate diagnosis is critical and in high demand. However, conventional methods are not ideal due to invasiveness and low accuracy. Herein, we aimed to identify efficient CRC mRNA markers in a non-invasive manner using CRC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). The expression levels of EV mRNAs from cancer cell lines were compared with those of a normal cell line using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Eight markers were evaluated in plasma EVs from CRC patients and healthy controls. The diagnostic value of each marker, individually or in combination, was then determined using recessive operating characteristics analyses and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Eight mRNA markers (MYC, VEGF, CDX2, CD133, CEA, CK19, EpCAM, and CD24) were found to be more abundant in EVs derived from cancer cell lines compared to control cell lines. A combination of VEGF and CD133 showed the highest sensitivity (100%), specificity (80%), and accuracy (93%) and an area under the curve of 0.96; hence, these markers were deemed to be the CRC signature. Moreover, this signature was found to be highly expressed in CRC-derived EVs compared to healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF and CD133 mRNAs comprise a unique CRC signature in EVs that has the potential to act as a novel, non-invasive, and accurate biomarker that would improve the current diagnostic platform for CRC, while also serving to strengthen the value of EV mRNA as diagnostic markers for myriad of diseases.

Role of Cellular Biomolecules in Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

Background:

Prevention is the primary strategy to avoid the occurrence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Generally, the concentrations of tumor markers tested during the diagnosis and believed to assist the detection of disease in the early stages of cancer. Some of the biomarkers are also important during treatment and real-time monitoring of the progress of treatment.

Methods:

We considered a rationale search of key references from the database of peer-reviewed research and review literatures of colorectal cancer. The topic of search was focused on the novel methods and modern techniques of Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of colorectal cancer. The screened publications were critically analysed using a deductive content analysis and the matter was put in separate headings and sub headings.

Results:

It was found that endoscopic examination, early detection, and surgery are some of the common strategies to manage colorectal cancer because late stages are difficult to treat due to the high-cost requirement and fewer chances of survival. As far as chemotherapy is concerned, systemic chemotherapy has been shown to offer the maximum benefit to patients with cancer metastasis. Among different chemotherapy measures, primary colorectal cancer prevention agents involve pharmaceuticals, phytochemicals, and dietary supplements are some of the standard options.

Conclusion:

In this review article, we have provided a comprehensive analysis of different biomarkers for the detection of colorectal cancer as well as different formulations developed for efficient treatment of the disease. The use of dietary supplements, the combinatorial approach, and nanotechnology-based strategies for colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment are some of the recent and modern methods of cancer management.

Significant antitumor effect of an antibody against TMEM180, a new colorectal cancer-specific molecule

The present state of therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is far from satisfactory, highlighting the need for new targets for this disease. We identified a new CRC‐specific molecule, TMEM180, a predicted 11‐pass transmembrane protein that apparently functions as a cation symporter. We developed an anti‐TMEM180 mAb and then succeeded in humanizing the mAb. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in CRC with the mAb showed a similar positivity rate as compared with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor mAb, and IHC with anti‐TMEM180 mAb did not show staining in major organs used in this study. Immune electron microscopy clearly indicated that TMEM180 was present on the tumor exosome. The TMEM180 promoter region contains 10 hypoxia‐responsive element consensus sequences; accordingly, SW480 cells upregulated TMEM180 under low‐oxygen conditions. Anti‐TMEM180 mAb has in vitro antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity and complement‐dependent cytotoxicity activity, and SW480 CRC xenografts were eradicated by the mAb. These data indicate that TMEM180 may be a new CRC marker and that a mAb against this protein could be used as antibody‐based therapy against CRC.

Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among females and third among males worldwide. It also contributes significantly to cancer-related deaths, despite the continuous progress in diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Biomarkers currently play an important role in the detection and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Risk stratification for screening might be augmented by finding new biomarkers which alone or as a complement of existing tests might recognize either the predisposition or early stage of the disease. Biomarkers have also the potential to change diagnostic and treatment algorithms by selecting the proper chemotherapeutic drugs across a broad spectrum of patients. There are attempts to personalise chemotherapy based on presence or absence of specific biomarkers. In this review, we update review published last year and describe our understanding of tumour markers and biomarkers role in CRC screening, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Goal of future research is to identify those biomarkers that could allow a non-invasive and cost-effective diagnosis, as well as to recognise the best prognostic panel and define the predictive biomarkers for available treatments.

Role of SLC6A6 in promoting the survival and multidrug resistance of colorectal cancer

The treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) might be improved by the identification of a signalling pathway that could be targeted with novel therapeutics. The results of this study indicate that the taurine transporter SLC6A6 is highly expressed in CRC cells compared with normal colonocytes. SLC6A6 knockdown (KD) attenuated cell survival and was accompanied by enhanced drug sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxycycline (DOX) and SN-38. Both the population frequency of the side population (SP) cells and their cancer stem cell (CSC)-like properties (such as tumour initiation, differentiation and chemoresistance) were abrogated by SLC6A6-KD. Conversely, SLC6A6 overexpression increased cell survival and the proportion of SP cells, enhancing multidrug resistance (MDR). Additionally, SLC6A6-siRNA treatment enhanced the cytotoxic effects of all 3 drugs, whereas the efficacy of ABCG2-siRNA treatment was limited to its 2 substrate drugs, DOX and SN-38. This study indicates that SLC6A6 plays an important role in the maintenance of CSC characteristics, thus promoting cell survival signalling and chemoresistance. Therefore, SLC6A6 inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for refractory CRC.

Critical appraisal of quantitative PCR results in colorectal cancer research: can we rely on published qPCR results?

The use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in cancer research has become ubiquitous. The relative simplicity of qPCR experiments, which deliver fast and cost-effective results, means that each year an increasing number of papers utilizing this technique are being published. But how reliable are the published results? Since the validity of gene expression data is greatly dependent on appropriate normalisation to compensate for sample-to-sample and run-to-run variation, we have evaluated the adequacy of normalisation procedures in qPCR-based experiments. Consequently, we assessed all colorectal cancer publications that made use of qPCR from 2006 until August 2013 for the number of reference genes used and whether they had been validated. Using even these minimal evaluation criteria, the validity of only three percent (6/179) of the publications can be adequately assessed. We describe common errors, and conclude that the current state of reporting on qPCR in colorectal cancer research is disquieting. Extrapolated to the study of cancer in general, it is clear that the majority of studies using qPCR cannot be reliably assessed and that at best, the results of these studies may or may not be valid and at worst, pervasive incorrect normalisation is resulting in the wholesale publication of incorrect conclusions. This survey demonstrates that the existence of guidelines, such as MIQE, is necessary but not sufficient to address this problem and suggests that the scientific community should examine its responsibility and be aware of the implications of these findings for current and future research.

Diagnostic value of stool DNA testing for multiple markers of colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic value of stool DNA (sDNA) testing for colorectal neoplasms remains controversial. To compensate for the lack of large-scale unbiased population studies, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of sDNA testing for multiple markers of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Science Direct, Biosis Review, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were systematically searched in January 2012 without time restriction. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model using sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic OR (DOR), summary ROC curves, area under the curve (AUC), and 95% CIs as effect measures. Heterogeneity was measured using the χ(2) test and Q statistic; subgroup analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies comprising 5876 individuals were eligible. There was no heterogeneity for CRC, but adenoma and advanced adenoma harboured considerable heterogeneity influenced by risk classification and various detection markers. Stratification analysis according to risk classification showed that multiple markers had a high DOR for the high-risk subgroups of both CRC (sensitivity 0.759 [95% CI 0.711 to 0.804]; specificity 0.883 [95% CI 0.846 to 0.913]; AUC 0.906) and advanced adenoma (sensitivity 0.683 [95% CI 0.584 to 0.771]; specificity 0.918 [95% CI 0.866 to 0.954]; AUC 0.946) but not for the average-risk subgroups of either. In the methylation subgroup, sDNA testing had significantly higher DOR for CRC (sensitivity 0.753 [95% CI 0.685 to 0.812]; specificity 0.913 [95% CI 0.860 to 0.950]; AUC 0.918) and advanced adenoma (sensitivity 0.623 [95% CI 0.527 to 0.712]; specificity 0.926 [95% CI 0.882 to 0.958]; AUC 0.910) compared with the mutation subgroup. There was no significant heterogeneity among studies for subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

sDNA testing for multiple markers had strong diagnostic significance for CRC and advanced adenoma in high-risk subjects. Methylation makers had more diagnostic value than mutation markers.

Exosome can prevent RNase from degrading microRNA in feces

BACKGROUND

Because the stability of miRNA in feces has not been clarified, we examined the stability of miRNA in feces.

METHODS

RNase was added into culture media of HT-29 cells and fecal homogenates. The relative quantifications of miRNA were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Cellular miRNA or exosomal miRNA were protected from RNase by the cellular membrane or the exosome; meanwhile, free miRNA was degraded immediately and completely by RNase.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that exosome or cellular membrane could prevent RNase from degrading miRNA inside the exosome or cells even in a dreadful condition, as in feces.

Fecal Tests: From Blood to Molecular Markers

Detection of molecular markers for colorectal neoplasia in feces has the potential to improve performance of simple noninvasive screening tests for colorectal cancer. Most research has explored the value of DNA-based, RNA-based, and protein-based markers. In all cases there has been a trend to move from a single marker to a panel of markers to improve sensitivity. Unfortunately, no type of molecular marker has proved specific for neoplasia. DNA tests have been improved by combining mutation detection with assessment of DNA integrity plus epigenetic markers of neoplasia. RNA-based approaches are just beginning to explore the full power of transcriptomics. So far, no protein-based fecal test has proved better than fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin. Finally, no marker or panel of markers has yet been developed to the point where it has been evaluated in large unbiased population studies to assess performance across all stages of neoplasia and in all practical environments.

Detection of fecal interferon-induced transmembrane protein messenger RNA for colorectal cancer screening

Interferon-induced transmembrane protein (IFITM) is reported to be frequently overexpressed in colorectal tumors. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of detecting fecal IFITM messenger RNA (mRNA) by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This pilot study included 21 patients with CRC and 23 healthy controls. Total RNA was isolated from the feces of the patients, and the expression levels of the mRNA of IFITM1, IFITM2 and IFITM3 were measured by real-time RT-PCR to detect CRC. Receiver operating characteristic curves of respective genes were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were determined. When the 44 patients were analyzed, the AUCs of fecal IFITM1, IFITM2 and IFITM3 expression analysis were 0.82, 0.80 and 0.65, respectively. The sensitivities were 67% [14/21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 43-85%], 67% (14/21; 95% CI 43-85%) and 71% (15/21; 95% CI 48-89%), respectively; and the specificities were 96% (1/23; 95% CI 78-100%), 96% (1/23; 95% CI 78-100%) and 61% (9/23; 95% CI 39-80%), respectively. When IFITM1 and IFITM2 were combined, the sensitivity was 86% (18/21; 95% CI 64-97%) and the specificity was 96% (1/23; 95% CI 78-100%). The fecal expression analysis of IFITM1 and IFITM2 mRNA by real-time RT-PCR for CRC screening exhibited high specificities, and the sensitivity was further improved by combining IFITM1 and IFITM2.

Factors that contribute to faecal cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA expression in subjects with colorectal cancer

Background:

We previously reported that a faecal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA assay was useful for identifying colorectal cancer (CRC). This study sought to investigate the factors that contribute to faecal COX-2 mRNA expression in subjects with CRC.

Methods:

The study cohort comprised 78 patients with CRC and 36 control subjects. The expressions of COX-2, β-2-microglobulin (B2M), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), E-cadherin (E-cad), and CD45 mRNA in faeces and COX-2 mRNA expression in tissue were determined by quantitative real-time RT–PCR.

Results:

The level of faecal expression of COX-2 mRNA in CRC was significantly higher than that in controls. A significant correlation was found between faecal COX-2 mRNA expression and faecal B2M, CEA, E-cad, or CD45 mRNAs, markers of exfoliated total cells, colonocytes, and leukocytes, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the expression of COX-2 mRNA in faeces and tumour surface area, COX-2 mRNA expression in primary tumour. There was no difference in faecal COX-2 mRNA expression between proximal CRC and distal CRC.

Conclusion:

COX-2 mRNA expression in faeces seems to originate from tumour lesion and to be affected by factors such as the number of exfoliated cells, exfoliation of inflammatory cells, COX-2 mRNA expression in tumour, and tumour size.

Clinical meaning of age-related expression of fecal cytokeratin 19 in colorectal malignancy

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of malignant death worldwide. Because young age of onset is often considered a poor prognostic factor for CRC, it is important to identify the poor outcomes of CRC in a younger population and to consider an aggressive approach by implementing early treatment. Our aim was to specifically quantify the fecal cytokeratin 19 (CK19) transcript from CRC patients and investigate its correlation with clinical stage, tumor malignancy, and age.

Methods

The quantitation of fecal CK19 transcript was determined by a quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain in 129 CRC patients (45 younger than 60 years at diagnosis) and 85 healthy controls. The levels of CK19 protein were examined both in colonic cell lines and tissues.

Results

The analysis of 45 younger CRC patients (age ≤ 60 years) revealed that patients at the M1 stage had significantly higher expression levels of fecal CK19 mRNA when compared with healthy controls (p < 0.001) and patients at the M0 stage (p = 0.004). Additionally, the degree of consistency between the mean level of fecal CK19 mRNA and the distant metastatic rate in each age interval was up to 89% (p = 0.042).

Conclusion

These results indicate that high levels of fecal CK19 mRNA represent a potential marker for colorectal malignancy and for aggressive treatment of younger CRC patients.