Assessment of practice using the National Health Service Knowledge and Skills Framework

Core nursing competency assessment tool for graduates of outcome-based nursing education in South Korea: A validation study

AIM

To develop a competency assessment instrument for nurses who have completed an outcome-based educational program based on national standards and to assess the content-, construct-, and criterion-related validity of that instrument.

METHODS

In the development stage, the competencies of nurses with 1-3 years' clinical experience after the completion of nursing education and training programs, based on national standards, were identified. A systematic literature review was conducted to derive the competencies in addition to the 12 national standard competencies. In the evaluation stage, the content-, construct-, and criterion-related validity of the developed tool were verified. For verification of the content validity at each stage, the participants were 10 nurse managers of general hospitals and 10 nurse professors. A factor analysis was conducted to assess the construct validity and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients and item-total correlation were used to assess the reliability of the developed scale. For the factor analysis, the participants were 141 nurses with 1-3 years' clinical experience who were recruited from four general hospitals. In order to evaluate the construct- and criterion-related validity, the correlations between a nursing performance measurement scale, a self-leadership tool, and the developed scale were examined.

RESULTS

A competency assessment instrument, consisting of 19 items on a 4-point scale, was developed and validated for assessing the competencies among nurses with 1-3 years' experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing research, policy awareness, and leadership competencies were required by the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education for nursing college graduates, but were removed due to poor content validity, indicating a need for nursing professionals to bridge the gap between educational standards in nursing colleges and clinical settings.

The use of skills inventories to assess and grade practice: Part 1--design and implementation

Employers increasingly require evidence of competent practice and cost-effective education that is fit for purpose. Historically, universities providing nurse education have been more concerned with the testing and grading of theory at undergraduate level which ultimately defines degree classification. This may be at the expense of recognising excellence in clinical practice which should be the ultimate goal of any nurse education programme. This paper reviews the development and introduction of an assessment tool to grade clinical competence in higher education level 6 post-registration critical care courses using a skills-based assessment strategy. The knowledge and practice components for each skill are defined within a standardised template. A number of skills pertinent to the area of practice and academic module are then collected in a skills inventory for assessment and grading which contribute to degree classification.

Implementing KSF competency testing in primary care. Part 2: Evaluation of the pilot of an appraisal tool

Assessment of competence is a way of measuring if staff are fit for purpose. Clinical competences, against which performance is measured, have been developed in a wide range of clinical settings in recent years (Department of Health (DH), 2008). Several trusts also operate an assessment centre in the recruitment and selection of staff, and these frequently involve competency testing in order to be certain that their new recruits are fit for their post. Agenda for Change (DH, 2004a) firmly links pay to the competences expressed in the Knowledge and Skills Framework (DH, 2004b; c) yet the KSF has not been implemented in all trusts. In part 1 of this article (Bentley and Dandy-Hughes, 2010), the process of Southwark PCT's competency project was described. This involved the process of writing measurable, manageable competences from the KSF, in order to develop staff to be fit for purpose. Part 2 evaluates the use of the appraisal tool that was developed from the KSF, and examines the role of the nurse consultant in education who led the competency project.