Comparison between single morning and bedtime doses of 40 mg famotidine for the treatment of duodenal ulcer

Double-blind, randomized trial of roxatidine 150 mg in the early evening versus bedtime administration in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of early evening (19.00-21.00 hours) vs. bedtime (22.00-00.00 hours) oral administration of roxatidine 150 mg in the short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

METHODS

The trial was randomized, double-blind and double-dummy, with parallel groups. A total of 276 patients were recruited and randomly assigned either to roxatidine in the early evening (n = 139) or roxatidine at bedtime (n = 137).

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, 78% of patients receiving roxatidine in the early evening and 74% of those treated at bedtime had achieved complete healing, as determined by per-protocol analysis. With intention-to-treat analysis the healing rates were 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively. After 8 weeks the healing rates in the early evening and bedtime treatment groups were 92% and 95% (per-protocol analysis) and 78% and 84% (intention-to-treat analysis). Both treatments proved effective in reducing the frequency and severity of daytime and nocturnal epigastric pain, as well as other ulcer-related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the healing and analgesic properties of roxatidine in duodenal ulcer disease. Early evening or bedtime dosing with roxatidine 150 mg resulted in similar 4- to 8-week rates of duodenal ulcer healing.

Acid inhibitory characteristics of nizatidine in man: an overview

The antisecretory activity of nizatidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, has been extensively investigated in man both by quantitative acid secretory tests and by means of 24-h continuous ambulatory pH monitoring. Studies have shown that nizatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal, nocturnal and stimulated acid secretion. Particular modalities of nizatidine administration, such as early evening intake with supper or morning dosing, have been recently defined. Further studies are needed to clarify if rebound nocturnal acid hypersecretion may develop after abrupt withdrawal of nizatidine or if tolerance may develop during prolonged administration.

Mealtime versus nighttime acid inhibition. A clinical pharmacological study with ranitidine

This study was carried out in order to compare the effects of mealtime and bedtime regimens of ranitidine on gastric acidity. Fifteen duodenal ulcer patients in clinical remission were randomized to receive in single-blind fashion either placebo, ranitidine 300 mg at night (2200 hr) or ranitidine 150 mg three times a day given before each of the three daily meals (1800, 0800 and 1200 hr). Over 24 hr, the two active treatments produced a significantly greater acid inhibition than placebo, while the single daily regimen was superior to the three times a day regimen of ranitidine in terms of both rise in pH values (P less than 0.001) and duration of action expressed as time spent above 3.0 pH units (P less than 0.05). The analysis of these two parameters during fractioned periods of the circadian cycle showed that the three divided doses of ranitidine were more effective during the daytime (P less than 0.01) and the evening (P less than 0.001), whereas the bedtime dose of ranitidine was superior during the night (P less than 0.0001). Thus a short-lasting antisecretory action, which is, however, capable of fully controlling the high acidity of postprandial periods, might be the key to understanding the results of several recent clinical trials in which the suppression of daytime gastric acidity has been shown to promote similar or even faster duodenal ulcer healing rates than the suppression of nocturnal acidity.

A comparative study of once-a-day morning and once-a-day bedtime administration of 40 mg famotidine in treating duodenal ulcers

A randomized controlled study comparing once-a-day morning and once-a-day bedtime administration of 40 mg famotidine in treating duodenal ulcers was carried out in 99 Japanese patients. Endoscopic examinations were performed at the baseline and repeated at 3-week intervals until healing was confirmed. Eighty-two patients fulfilled the evaluation criteria (38 in the morning group and 44 in the bedtime group). In 13 of these patients the antisecretory effects of these regimens were also assessed by 24 h intragastric pH monitoring. The healing rates were 66% after 3 weeks and 95% after 6 weeks in the morning group, and 57% after 3 weeks and 80% after 6 weeks in the bedtime group. The differences were insignificant between the two groups, but there was a higher healing rate tendency after 6 weeks in the morning group (0.05 less than P less than 0.10). Regarding pain subsidence, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Both treatments were significantly superior to the control group in increasing 24 h intragastric pH. The morning regimen was significantly superior to the bedtime regimen in suppression of daytime acidity. On the contrary, the bedtime regimen was significantly superior to the morning regimen in suppression of nocturnal acidity. These findings suggest that suppression of nocturnal acidity is important but not essential to promote duodenal ulcer healing and suppression of daytime acidity is equally important. Thus, once-a-day morning administration of 40 mg famotidine seems to be at least as effective as once-a-day bedtime administration of 40 mg famotidine in treating duodenal ulcers.