Review article: lack of clinical significance of the interaction between H2-receptor antagonists and ethanol

Inhibition of human alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases by cimetidine and assessment of its effects on ethanol metabolism

Previous studies have reported that cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist used to treat gastric and duodenal ulcers, can inhibit alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) and ethanol metabolism. Human alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), the principal enzymes responsible for metabolism of ethanol, are complex enzyme families that exhibit functional polymorphisms among ethnic groups and distinct tissue distributions. We investigated the inhibition by cimetidine of alcohol oxidation by recombinant human ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1B2, ADH1B3, ADH1C1, ADH1C2, ADH2, and ADH4, and aldehyde oxidation by ALDH1A1 and ALDH2 at pH 7.5 and a cytosolic NAD(+) concentration. Cimetidine acted as competitive or noncompetitive inhibitors for the ADH and ALDH isozymes/allozymes with near mM inhibition constants. The metabolic interactions between cimetidine and ethanol/acetaldehyde were assessed by computer simulation using the inhibition equations and the determined kinetic constants. At therapeutic drug levels (0.015 mM) and physiologically relevant concentrations of ethanol (10 mM) and acetaldehyde (10 μM) in target tissues, cimetidine could weakly inhibit (<5%) the activities of ADH1B2 and ADH1B3 in liver, ADH2 in liver and small intestine, ADH4 in stomach, and ALDH1A1 in the three tissues, but not significantly affect ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1C1/2, or ALDH2. At higher drug levels, which may accumulate in cells (0.2 mM), the activities of the weakly-inhibited enzymes may be decreased more significantly. The quantitative effects of cimetidine on metabolism of ethanol and other physiological substrates of ADHs need further investigation.

Is there an interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol?

H2-antagonists are commonly prescribed drugs and alcohol use is widespread in the community. Any possible interaction may be important because of the frequent co-administration of both drugs and the potential for unexpected impairment of pyschomotor function, in particular, driving skills. Hepatic ADH is the major site of alcohol metabolism. ADH is also found in the stomach, but it is uncertain whether gastric ADH is able to metabolise a significant amount of alcohol in vivo. Significant first-pass metabolism can be demonstrated at lower doses of alcohol, and if alcohol is given after meals. Varying degrees of extraction of alcohol from the portal circulation probably explains the data regarding first pass metabolism rather than gastric metabolism by gastric ADH. H2-receptor antagonists inhibit gastric ADH activity to a variable extent. If gastric metabolism of alcohol is negligible then this inhibition has no relevance. Given the uncertainty regarding a mechanism of interaction, only carefully conducted studies in controlled environments will answer the question. The large inter-subject variability of alcohol absorption means that any study which seeks to determine the effect of an H2-receptor antagonist on ethanol metabolism must have sufficient numbers. A cross-over design, with each subject acting as his own control, is preferable to avoid ascribing an effect to treatment rather than to chance. The alcohol dosing studies are reviewed and the results summarised according to dose of alcohol given. At a dose of 0.15 g/kg of alcohol, four commonly used H2-antagonists may cause a small increase in blood alcohol concentrations in certain conditions. This absolute increase is very small. The magnitude of effect is far less than the effect of taking a meal before alcohol. At doses of 0.3 g/kg and above the majority of evidence favours no interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol. There is no interaction at doses that would be expected to impair psychomotor skills (above 25 mg/dl). There remains a question regarding the cumulative effect of repeated small doses of alcohol and further studies are required. The relationship between ethanol absorption and gastric emptying raises the possibility that the effects of H2-receptor antagonists observed at very low doses of alcohol may be due to the acceleration of gastric emptying by these drugs. This is an attractive hypothesis that explains many aspects of the debate, but studies of the effect of H2-antagonists on gastric emptying have been conflicting.

Omeprazole, ranitidine, and cimetidine have no effect on peak blood ethanol concentrations, first pass metabolism or area under the time-ethanol curve under 'real-life' drinking conditions

BACKGROUND

Considerable controversy persists over the influence of H2-receptor antagonists on the first pass clearance of ethanol. The majority of previously published studies have studied the effects of the drugs on low-dose ethanol in the fasting state. We elected to study the possible interaction under simulated real-life conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-three volunteers were given 0.6 g/kg body weight ethanol in the form of 4.8% beer following a standardized meal. Blood ethanol levels were measured over the next 3 h. Studies were repeated using ethanol administered as an intravenous infusion while subjects consumed the same volume of de-alcoholized beer. The effects of a minimum of 2 weeks of dosing with cimetidine, ranitidine and omeprazole were examined.

RESULTS

Following food, and with ethanol taken in the form of beer, mean first pass metabolism of ethanol was 58% (range 34-78%). No statistically significant difference was found following drug treatment in either percentage first pass metabolism, peak blood ethanol concentration or area under the time-blood ethanol curve.

CONCLUSION

Under these 'real-life' conditions, the concomitant administration of cimetidine, ranitidine or omeprazole is unlikely to have significant physical, social or forensic implications, since they do not significantly change ethanol elimination.

Use of measurements of ethanol absorption from stomach and intestine to assess human ethanol metabolism

Controversy exists concerning the site (stomach vs. liver) and magnitude of first-pass metabolism of ethanol. We quantitated gastric and total ethanol absorption rates in five male subjects and utilized these measurements to evaluate first-pass metabolism. Gastric emptying of ethanol (0.15 g/kg) was determined via a gamma camera and gastric absorption from the ratio of gastric ethanol to [14C]polyethylene glycol. Gastric absorption accounted for 30% and 10% of ethanol administered with food and water, respectively. With food, estimated gastric mucosal ethanol concentrations fell from 19 to 5 mM over 2 h. Calculations using these concentrations and kinetic data for gastric alcohol dehydrogenase showed <2% of the dose underwent gastric metabolism. Application of observed ethanol absorption rates to a model of human hepatic ethanol metabolism indicated that only 30% and 4% of the dose underwent first-pass metabolism when administered with food and water, respectively. We conclude that virtually all first-pass ethanol metabolism occurs in the liver and first-pass metabolism accounts for only a small fraction of total clearance.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between alcohol and other drugs

The frequent use of alcohol (ethanol) together with prescription drugs gives any described pharmacokinetic interaction significant clinical implications. The issue is both the effect of alcohol on the pharmacokinetics of various drugs and also the effect of those drugs on the pharmacokinetics of alcohol. This review discusses these pharmacokinetic interactions but also briefly describes some other effects of alcohol that are clinically relevant to drug prescribing. The use of several different study designs may be required before we can confidently state the presence or absence of any alcohol-drug interaction. Short term administration of alcohol in volunteers is the most common study design but studies of social drinking and prolonged moderate alcohol intake can be important in some situations. Community-based studies may illustrate the clinical relevance of any interaction. Alcohol can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs by altering gastric emptying or liver metabolism (by inducing cytochrome P450 2E1). Drugs may affect the pharmacokinetics of alcohol by altering gastric emptying and inhibiting gastric alcohol dehydrogenase. The role of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase in the first-pass metabolism of alcohol is reviewed in this article and the arguments for and against any potential interaction between alcohol and H2 receptor antagonists are also discussed. The inhibition of the metabolism of acetaldehyde may cause disulfiram-like reactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions between alcohol and prescription drugs are common, particularly the additive sedative effects with benzodiazepines and also with some of the antihistamine drugs; other interactions may occur with tricyclic antidepressants. Alcohol intake may be a contributing factor to the disease state which is being treated and may complicate treatment because of various pathophysiological effects (e.g. impairment of gluconeogenesis and the risk of hypoglycaemia with oral hypoglycaemic agents). The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and alcohol intake increases the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Effect of ranitidine hydrochloride (150 mg twice daily) on the pharmacokinetics of increasing doses of ethanol (0.15, 0.3, 0.6 g kg-1)

1. The interaction of ranitidine hydrochloride (150 mg twice daily for 15 doses) with single doses (0.15, 0.3 and 0.6 g kg-1) of ethanol was investigated in a placebo controlled study in 24 male subjects. Ethanol was given 1 h after a standard breakfast to maximise a drug ethanol effect if there is one. A balanced incomplete block design was used in that each subject received two of the three ethanol doses in the presence or absence of ranitidine. Blood samples (n = 18) were taken for 8 h after dosing and blood ethanol concentrations (BAC) were determined by head space analysis using a validated gas liquid chromatographic method. 2. At the lowest dose of ethanol studied the pharmacokinetic profile was largely first order but at the higher doses the usual zero order kinetics were seen. Using the technique of simultaneous fitting across all doses the Km and Vmax constants were similar and close to literature value of 100 mg l-1 and 200-300 mg h l-1 respectively. 3. Ranitidine, in common with other H2-receptor antagonists tested under the same experimental conditions, caused a small rise in BAC. However this was only evident at the smallest dose of ethanol studied and in common with many other publications, no effects were seen at the higher doses. The mean rise in blood ethanol following the 0.15 g kg-1 dose was 2.6 mg dl-1 (13.3 mg dl-1 for placebo and 15.9 mg dl-1 for ranitidine) and this change is of no clinical relevance.

First-pass metabolism of alcohol. Absence of diurnal variation and its inhibition by cimetidine after evening meal

To determine whether the first-pass metabolism (FPM) of orally consumed alcohol varies with the time of day, 12 healthy male subjects were tested with both oral and intravenous alcohol (0.3 g/kg), in the morning and evening, always 1 hr after the same standard meal. The results revealed no significant differences in FPM (81.6 +/- 11.6 vs 92.8 +/- 10.6 mg/kg) or in any other index of alcohol absorption and metabolism. Eleven subjects were also tested in the evening after treatment with cimetidine, an H2-antagonist that inhibits gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity in vitro. Compared to baseline, cimetidine (1 g/day for eight days) significantly decreased FPM (from 100.1 +/- 8.0 to 52.6 +/- 11.4 mg/kg, P < 0.01) and increased the systemic bioavailability of alcohol (from 66 +/- 3 to 82 +/- 4%, P < 0.01), as well as peak blood alcohol concentrations (from 4.3 +/- 0.4 to 5.9 +/- 0.5 mM, P < 0.05) and areas under the curve (from 5.1 +/- 0.5 to 7.0 +/- 0.5 mM/hr, P < 0.01). The results indicate the absence of diurnal variation in FPM and suggest that patients given cimetidine should be warned of its possible interaction with alcohol regardless of the time of day.

Inter-individual and intra-individual variability of ethanol concentration-time profiles: comparison of ethanol ingestion before or after an evening meal

1. The magnitude of the variability of ethanol absorption is an important factor for studies that seek to determine the significance of potential interactions between ethanol and drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of inter- and intra-individual variability of ethanol concentration-time profiles in fasted and fed subjects. 2. Twenty-four healthy male subjects were randomized to receive ethanol 0.3 g kg-1 before an evening meal on two study days and ethanol 0.3 g kg-1 after an evening meal on two study days. Plasma ethanol concentrations were measured at intervals from 0-240 min. 3. There were significant differences in the mean area under the ethanol concentration-time curve (AUC), the mean peak ethanol concentration (Cmax), the mean ethanol elimination slope and the time to peak ethanol concentration between the fed and fasted subjects. There were no significant differences between the first and second study days for either fed or fasting subjects for all parameters. 4. There was no statistically significant difference in inter- or intra-subject variance between fed and fasted studies although the coefficients of variation (standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the differences between the first and second study day were higher for fed studies. 5. The large inter- and intra-individual variability of alcohol absorption for both fasted and fed subjects must be considered in the design of alcohol-drug interaction studies.

Ranitidine increases the bioavailability of postprandial ethanol by the reduction of first pass metabolism

Blood ethanol concentrations after separate oral dosing and intravenous infusion of ethanol (0.15 g/kg) were measured in 16 control subjects and 13 subjects treated with ranitidine. All subjects underwent routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Peak blood ethanol concentrations, and area under the blood ethanol/time curve, were significantly higher in the ranitidine group after oral, but not intravenous, ethanol administration. The first pass metabolism, as calculated by the difference between the area under the curves, was significantly lower in the ranitidine group. In addition, all subjects withdrawn from ranitidine (n = 6) had a significant reduction in peak blood ethanol concentration and area under the curve after repeat dosing with oral ethanol. Both groups were well matched for age, sex, indications for endoscopy, findings at endoscopy, and gastric histology. These findings show that ranitidine increases the bioavailability of low dose ethanol and has possible short term forensic, and longterm physical implications for moderate drinkers who are taking the drug.

Metabolism of ethanol in rat gastric cells and its inhibition by cimetidine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several studies have shown that the stomach has sufficient alcohol dehydrogenase activity to metabolize a significant amount of alcohol and that cimetidine depresses this alcohol dehydrogenase activity. However, both gastric metabolism of ethanol and its inhibition by cimetidine remain controversial. Given the difficulty in assessing gastric metabolism of ethanol in vivo, this subject was investigated in vitro.

METHODS

Cultured rat gastric epithelial cells were incubated with 200 mmol/L [1-14C]ethanol for 90 minutes with and without cimetidine (0.1-1 mmol/L) or omeprazole (1 mmol/L). The quantity of ethanol oxidized by gastric cells was measured by the amount of acetate produced using ion exchange chromatography.

RESULTS

The majority of cells at confluency had typical features of mucous cells. The gastric cells metabolized significant amounts of ethanol, sufficient to account for in vivo first-pass metabolism of ethanol in rats. Cimetidine, but not omeprazole, reduced ethanol metabolism by 39.9% +/- 4.9% (P < 0.01), an inhibition comparable with that previously reported for first-pass metabolism in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cells in tissue culture are capable of significant ethanol oxidation, the in vitro rates are sufficient to account for first-pass metabolism of ethanol in vivo, and cimetidine inhibits ethanol metabolism in tissue culture, an effect that parallels its decrease of first-pass metabolism in vivo.

The effect of gastritis on human gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity and ethanol metabolism

BACKGROUND

Gastric mucosal alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) may decrease the bioavailability of ingested ethanol. Because this enzyme is found in highest concentrations in the superficial gastric mucosa, diffuse abnormalities of this tissue could lead to a decrease in the first pass metabolism of ethanol.

METHODS

Thirty-three adult subjects undergoing routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy had gastric biopsies performed for assessment of gastric histology and the measurement of gastric ADH activity. Twenty of these subjects underwent separate oral dosing and intravenous infusion of ethanol (0.15 g/kg body weight) in order to determine the first pass metabolism, and hence bioavailability, of ethanol.

RESULTS

Gastric histology was normal in 10 of the biopsies, showed chronic gastritis alone in 13 and significant glandular atrophy (i.e. atrophic gastritis) in a further 10. Gastric ADH activity in specimens with normal gastric histology was significantly higher than those with chronic gastritis (P = 0.02), and was further decreased in those specimens with significant atrophy (P < 0.00001). However, no correlation was found between gastric ADH activity and the first pass metabolism of ethanol (r = 0.09, P = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that although gastric ADH activity was decreased in individuals with abnormal gastric mucosa, ethanol bioavailability was not affected by gastric ADH activity. These data support the view that gastric ADH does not play a significant role in the first pass metabolism of alcohol.

Treatment of peptic ulcers from now to the millennium

The present strategies for the management of peptic ulceration are well tolerated and clinically effective. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists can be used for mild to moderate disease, and proton pump inhibitors are of particular benefit for patients with severe peptic ulceration and the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. However, none of these treatments provides protection against recurrent ulceration, except when taken as long-term continuous treatment. Long-term exposure to pharmacological agents raises problems of safety, particularly relating to a lack of intragastric acidity. In addition, the accelerated development of atrophic gastritis in patients receiving omeprazole requires investigation and assessment. It is unlikely that there will be any major development in the area of control of gastric acid secretion, except perhaps the introduction of specific immunization against gastrin. However, the clinical benefit of this strategy awaits assessment. The main area for development must be the introduction of convenient and effective regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Existing regimens are either simpler and relatively ineffective, or too complicated for widespread application. Bearing in mind the long gestation period of any new drug, it seems likely that the only innovative drug that will be introduced for the management of peptic ulceration before the millennium will be ranitidine bismuth citrate, an antisecretory anti-H. pylori drug that will usually be used in combination with an antibiotic.

Gender differences in the brain: implications for the study of human alcoholism

Gender differences in alcohol intake and response to alcohol may be influenced by basic variations in the organization and modulation of male and female brains. Although a number of genetic, social, environmental, and metabolic factors have been proposed to explain the gender differences observed in risk for alcoholism, alcohol intake, and medical consequences of excessive alcohol intake, very little attention has been given to the role of gender differences in the brain regarding alcohol use. Recent evidence documents the influence of neurosteroids on neurotransmitter activity in the brain and the impact of alcohol on neurosteroid levels. Neurosteroids are found in different levels in males and females during development and throughout life, depending on factors such as age, stage of development, estrous and menstrual cycles, and stress. This study discusses the hypothesis that many of the gender differences observed concerning alcohol use and misuse are determined by gender differences in the brain, which in turn differentially influence the behavioral and neurochemical responses of males and females to alcohol.

H2-antagonists and alcohol. Do they interact?

There are conflicting data on the existence of significant first-pass metabolism of alcohol (ethanol) in the human stomach and its inhibition by histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Alcohol is predominantly metabolised in the liver by the microsomal alcohol oxidising system, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and a catalase enzyme. Histochemical and kinetic studies have revealed several ADH isoenzymes in the gastric mucosa with different kinetic properties. After small oral doses of alcohol first-pass metabolism in the stomach occurs, as shown by reduced area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with intravenous or intraduodenal administration. The activity of gastric ADH is reduced in women, the elderly, Asian individuals, the fasting state, chronic alcoholism and after gastrectomy. The effect is only present with small (< or = 0.3 g/kg) alcohol doses and with a high alcohol concentration. In a number of studies, cimetidine in therapeutic doses over 7 days produced a significant increase in the AUC and in the peak plasma concentration after administration of alcohol 0.15 and 0.30 g/kg. This was related to an inhibition of gastric ADH activity, as shown by in vitro studies. Ranitidine inhibited gastric ADH to a similar extent on a molar basis, but its effect on alcohol levels in vivo was less constant in various studies. Nizatidine also reduced gastric alcohol first-pass metabolism, but famotidine and roxatidine did not show this effect. In other studies, H2-receptor antagonists did not change AUC and peak alcohol concentration. The controversy is not easy to resolve, since a number of the positive studies did not use a placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover design, while some of the negative studies did not exclude habitual alcohol consumers and included Oriental volunteers, although both groups have been shown to lack significant gastric ADH activity. In this case, when first-pass metabolism of alcohol does not exist, this by definition cannot be abolished by H2-antagonists. The inclusion of oral and intravenous dosage data of alcohol is mandatory to positively identify first-pass metabolism in any individuals. The significance of the effect of H2-antagonists on blood alcohol concentrations is minor. It only occurs in young, male, nonalcoholic, non-Asian individuals, and alcohol must be given in a small (social) dose, in a high concentration, and after meals. An increase in alcohol levels in predisposed patients during treatment with some H2-antagonists cannot be excluded, although the likelihood is small. Furthermore, carefully designed studies are needed to clarify fully the significance of this interaction.

Lack of effect of H2-receptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of alcohol consumed after food at lunchtime

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between H2-receptor antagonists and alcohol consumed at lunchtime, was investigated in 24 healthy non-alcoholic male subjects, each receiving ranitidine 150 mg four times daily, cimetidine 400 mg four times daily, famotidine 20 mg four times daily and placebo in an open, four-way cross-over study. The subjects consumed 50 g alcohol after a standard lunch on the eighth day of dosing with study medication. Blood samples taken during the 6 h after alcohol consumption were analysed for alcohol concentrations by gas liquid chromatography using head space analysis. None of the H2-receptor antagonists had any statistically significant effects on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for alcohol. Mean Cmax (95% CI) results for ranitidine were 547 (516, 580), cimetidine 531 (501, 563), famotidine 563 (530, 598) and placebo 529 (499, 561) mg l-1.

Famotidine increases plasma alcohol concentration in healthy subjects

The effect of famotidine on plasma alcohol concentration was studied in 24 healthy male subjects who demonstrated high apparent ethanol first-pass metabolism after oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) ethanol administration (i.e. AUC(po) < or = 40% of AUC(i.v.), where AUC is area under the plasma ethanol concentration-time curve). Six of the original 30 subjects screened (20%) did not demonstrate high first-pass metabolism and were excluded. In a randomized open crossover study, oral ethanol pharmacokinetics were assessed after breakfast in the morning following a 3-day regimen of famotidine, 40 mg/day, and following a no-drug control period. Famotidine increased the area under the plasma ethanol concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) by 29% (7.1 vs 5.5 mg.h/dL, P = 0.006) and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) by 23% (9.2 vs 7.5 mg/dL, P = 0.013). The changes in ethanol AUC0-t and Cmax may have been associated with changes in gastric emptying, as they were inversely correlated with changes in the time at which maximal plasma concentration was attained. There was considerable intra-individual variation in ethanol AUC and Cmax. As a result, regression to the mean is a potentially confounding problem in ethanol pharmacokinetic studies when subjects are selected on the basis of having low AUC(po), and properly controlled randomized studies of substantial size are required to detect modest drug effects. Small effects on ethanol pharmacokinetics have now been demonstrated with all four of the major H2-receptor antagonists, but these effects are seen only under specific experimental conditions and appear to be unimportant clinically.