Review article: drug therapy for reflux oesophagitis

The role and limitations of H2-receptor antagonists in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs in up to 44% of adults in the USA. Most individuals do not seek medical help, self-medicating with antacids. Manifestations of GERD range from symptoms without oesophagitis, which constitute the bulk of patients who self-medicate, to active oesophagitis and then to complications such as stricture and ulceration. It is the more severe cases who tend to come to the gastroenterologist, but it must be remembered that reflux symptoms are probably around 5-10 times more common than actual oesophagitis. Since acid in the refluxate is responsible for the bulk of the symptoms and mucosal damage, antacids are often used for quick relief--which of course may not be sustained. More prolonged suppression of acid secretion, such as by a histamine H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is required to give long-lasting symptomatic relief and heal any inflammatory change. H2-receptor antagonists inhibit acid secretion with an effect that lasts for 4-8 h with a single dose, decreasing stimulated acid secretion by around 70%. When treating oesophagitis, the H2RAs suffer from the disadvantage of their relatively short duration of action (compared with PPIs), development of tolerance, and incomplete inhibition of acid secretion in response to a meal. Therefore, it is not easy for the H2RAs to achieve optimum conditions for healing the more severe forms of oesophagitis--even very high doses may fail. In mild GERD the H2RAs have been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Feline esophagitis secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical signs and radiographic, endoscopic, and histopathological findings

Chronic esophagitis due to gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is rarely reported in the cat. This paper describes the clinical signs and diagnostic findings, including radiographic, endoscopic, and histopathological abnormalities, in three young, purebred, male cats with esophagitis presumed to be secondary to GER. Clinical signs included regurgitation, dysphagia, and weight loss. Contrast radiography revealed GER, esophageal dilatation, and decreased motility. Endoscopy showed hyperemia, increased vascularity, ulcers, erosion, and an abnormal lower esophageal sphincter. Histopathological lesions included squamous hyperplasia and dysplasia, erosions, ulcers, and an inflammatory infiltrate of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutrophils. Long-term follow-up demonstrated progression of the disease in two of the cats.

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)--acid reflux and symptom patterns

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggest that patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) treated with anti-reflux medications show lower symptom improvement rates than patients with erosive oesophagitis treated with the same medications.

AIM

To determine the acid reflux and symptom patterns of patients with NERD in comparison with those with erosive oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus, and to identify different NERD subgroups.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients seen for classic heartburn symptoms were evaluated for the study. Oesophageal mucosal injury was assessed by upper endoscopy and classified by Hetzel-Dent criteria. Patients with Hetzel-Dent grades 0-1 were considered to have NERD. The extent of oesophageal acid exposure was determined by ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were found to have NERD, 36 erosive oesophagitis and 42 Barrett's oesophagus. Compared with patients with erosive oesophagitis (75%) and Barrett's oesophagus (93%), those with NERD (45%) were significantly less likely to have an abnormal pH test (P = 0.0001). Patients with Barrett's oesophagus had the highest mean number of acid reflux events (210 +/- 17.7), compared with those with erosive oesophagitis (139.7 +/- 15.2) and NERD (95.3 +/- 9.4) (P = 0.0001); however, the rate of perceived acid reflux events was similar and very low in all groups (NERD, 3.6%; erosive oesophagitis, 2.9%; Barrett's oesophagus, 2.17%). NERD-positive patients (abnormal pH test) had a similar extent of oesophageal acid exposure to those with erosive oesophagitis. NERD-positive patients were more likely to demonstrate a symptom index greater than 75% than NERD-negative patients (normal pH test) (61.9% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.0001). In the NERD-negative group, those with a negative symptom index reported having heartburn at pH < 4 only 12.7% of the time, compared with 70.7% of the time in those with a positive symptom index, despite a similar mean number of heartburn episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NERD commonly demonstrate a negative pH test. Acid reflux characteristics and symptom patterns suggest a heterogeneous group of patients.

Acid suppression in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Why? How? How much and when?

For patients with suboptimal relief from lifestyle modifications, acid suppressive therapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). While a great deal of attention is focused on complications of GORD, adequate symptom relief remains an important and practical therapeutic goal. Adequate symptom relief is an achievable and easily measurable endpoint that both restores quality of life and prevents many potential complications.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease--should we adopt a new conceptual framework?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has traditionally been approached as a spectrum of diseases. Over the years, this important concept affected our current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms resulting in GERD. Additionally, it had a profound impact on our therapeutic approach and treatment algorithms. However, literature review reveals that there is scant data to support the spectrum paradigm. Consequently, we propose categorizing GERD into three unique groups of patients: nonerosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. Thus far, studies have demonstrated very little movement between these groups. Although the spectrum concept focused our attention on esophageal mucosal injury, the new proposed conceptual model shifts our attention to esophageal symptoms. Furthermore, dividing GERD into three unique groups of patients will allow us to concentrate on the different mechanisms that lead to the development of each of these GERD-related disorders and thus help us to focus on the specific therapeutic modalities that will benefit each individual group of patients.

Stability of gastric secretory inhibition during 6-month treatment with omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

A trend toward relapse of reflux symptoms and esophagitis during long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors has been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existence of tachyphylaxia to the effect of proton pump inhibitors on gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux over time.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with reflux esophagitis underwent 24-h intragastric and intraesophageal pH-metry after 7, 90, and 180 days of continued dosing with 20 mg of omeprazole once daily before breakfast.

RESULTS

The total median percentages of time gastric pH <4 (interquartile range) were 49% (35-70%), 60% (36-76%), and 42% (26-66%) after 7, 90, and 180 days (p = 0.14). Percentages of time gastric pH <3 were 41%, 54%, and 34%, respectively (p = 0.19). The median percentages of total time esophageal pH <4 were 1.1%, 2.5%, and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.70). Healing of esophagitis was achieved in 84% of the patients after 6 months. Heartburn improved in six, worsened in three, and was unchanged in 10 patients (p = 0.16). There was no statistical significant relationship between change in esophageal acid exposure and change in severity of heartburn.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of 20 mg of omeprazole once daily consistently controlled patients' symptoms and kept gastric acidity at a stable level over a period of 6 months. There is no evidence of diminution in the effects of 20 mg of omeprazole over time that could indicate the development of tolerance.

Role of drug therapy in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disorder in children

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is the effortless passage of gastric contents into the distal oesophagus. It can be classified as functional (or symptomatic), in which the infant remains free from disease, or a pathological (GOR disease, GORD), in which gastrointestinal, respiratory or neurobehavioural signs occur with intraoesophageal acidification and the development of oesophagitis. Functional or symptomatic GOR is successfully treated by conservative measures and does not require investigative diagnostic tools; however, both drug administration and an investigative approach are mandatory in patients with GORD. There is currently a great range of proven therapeutic options for GORD that are directed at counteracting the pathogenetic components of the disorder. In this report we discuss the role of different drug classes for treating GORD in children. The choice of therapy for GORD depends upon the severity of signs and the degree of oesophagitis. The presence of oesophagitis, as documented by endoscopy, suggests the use of antisecretory drugs; H2 receptor antagonists are the first-line agents. Nevertheless, individuals with refractory disease or those patients requiring potent inhibition of acid secretion (for example, GORD with respiratory involvement) can be given proton pump inhibitors. Other groups of patients who need potent inhibition of acid secretion are children with neurological dysfunction and those with Barrett's oesophagus. It is still unclear whether patients with frequent relapses are candidates for long term administration of antisecretory drugs or for surgical fundoplication.

Medical therapy. Management of the refractory patient

Although relatively rare, GERD patients refractory to medical therapy remain a challenge for the clinician. Refractoriness can be diagnosed only if the patient is properly studied on medication and if what should be adequate medical therapy has been given a sufficient therapeutic trial. Use of 24-hour intragastric and intraesophageal pH-metry has improved the ability to manage patients who appear to be nonresponders. Simple advice and minor adjustments to medical therapy are usually all that is needed for most patients, but in some, management requires knowledge of the principles outlined in this article. If followed, only a small group of patients should be medically refractory.

On demand therapy of reflux oesophagitis--a prospective study of symptoms, patient satisfaction and quality of life

BACKGROUND

In patients with low-grade reflux oesophagitis adequate symptom control is the aim of treatment. Effervescent tablets alleviate heartburn more rapidly than ordinary tablets.

AIM

To investigate symptom control, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life and disease progress when ranitidine 150 mg effervescent tablets were offered as on demand treatment. We also wanted to investigate whether any biological or psycho-social factor could predict patient satisfaction.

METHOD

Consecutive patients with endoscopically verified reflux oesophagitis grade I-II were followed up for 12 months. 24 h pH-metry, disease history, symptoms and several psycho-social factors were registered at baseline and 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included. Mean age was 50.7 years (range 21-82), 63% were men. Mean tablet consumption was 1.21 per day (range 7-1016 tablets/year). At the 1-year follow-up discomfort resulting from reflux symptoms was significantly reduced (P<0.001), and the patients' social and vocational life improved. Eighty-four percentage of the patients were satisfied with the treatment. 24 h pH-metry or number of reflux episodes did not change. We did not find any factors able to predict patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

On demand therapy with ranitidine effervescent tablets was well accepted by the majority of patients with reflux oesophagitis grade I. Even though the number of reflux episodes did not change, the patients experienced less discomfort due to reflux symptoms, and their social and vocational life was better. There was no significant progression of the disorder during the 1-year follow-up. No predictive factor for patient satisfaction was found.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is the most common cause of indigestion in the community, and is usually chronic. Typical symptoms are recurrent retrosternal burning (heartburn) and regurgitation of sour or bitter fluid. In patients with typical symptoms and no alarm symptoms (pain on swallowing, dysphagia, weight loss or anaemia), treatment may be instituted without investigation. Patients with alarm symptoms and those who respond poorly or relapse after initial treatment require investigation (endoscopy and possibly pH monitoring). About 60% of reflux sufferers have no evidence of mucosal injury; their management aims to relieve symptoms. About 40% of reflux sufferers have oesophagitis and/or complications such as Barrett's oesophagus or oesophageal stricture at endoscopy. Drug therapy consists of H2-receptor antagonists, cisapride or proton-pump inhibitors.

The effect of cisapride in maintaining symptomatic remission in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has traditionally been assessed as healing of reflux oesophagitis, which may not be relevant in patients with moderate disease. In these patients symptom relief and patient satisfaction with therapy are of fundamental importance. Cisapride has well-documented prokinetic effects and may be well suited for long-term therapy of GORD, but its effectiveness in purely symptomatic treatment is unknown. We therefore compared two dosage regimens of cisapride with placebo over a period of 6 months in patients with evidence of gastrooesophageal reflux, initially treated with antisecretory medication, with regard to maintaining symptom relief and satisfaction with treatment.

METHODS

Five hundred and thirty-five patients with reflux oesophagitis grade 1 (n = 293) or 2 (n = 124) or with no reflux oesophagitis but pathologic 24-h pH-metry (n = 118) achieved satisfactory symptom relief with an H2-receptor antagonist or proton pump inhibitor within 4-8 weeks. In a double-blind randomized, parallel-group study, they were then treated with cisapride, 20 mg at night or 20 mg twice daily, or placebo and followed up for a maximum period of 6 months. Relapse was defined as dissatisfaction with therapy or an average consumption of more than two antacid tablets a day.

RESULTS

Median time to relapse was 63 days for cisapride, 20 mg twice daily; 59 days for cisapride, 20 mg at night; and 49 days for placebo. Time to relapse was not significantly different (P = 0.09). Presence and grade of oesophagitis at base line, type of therapy before randomization, and pattern of non-reflux symptoms at base line did not influence these findings significantly.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that cisapride is of limited value in maintenance therapy of GORD in patients in whom symptom relief has been accomplished with potent antisecretory medication. This 'step-down' approach to therapy seems disadvantageous in the long-term therapy of GORD.

Ranitidine effectively relieves symptoms in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Acid secretion inhibitors are of dubious value to most patients with functional dyspepsia but might be effective in a subset. The aims of the trial were to compare the effect of ranitidine with that of placebo in selected subsets of patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-six patients with functional dyspepsia were included in a double-blind multi-crossover (MCO) trial. After 6 weeks an effect score (Xs) with a range of 0-5 was calculated. They were then stratified in accordance with their score and randomized to 4 weeks' double-blind treatment with ranitidine or placebo. Overall symptoms were scored on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and the change in score (measured in millimetres) was the primary effect measure.

RESULTS

Two hundred and six patients completed the study. The effect of ranitidine and placebo in the 'responders' (76 patients with Xs of 4-5 after the MCO period) was 28 mm and 5 mm, respectively (P < 0.001), and in all patients 19 mm and 12 mm, respectively (P < 0.03). No effect was seen in 'nonresponders' (130 patients with Xs of 0-3 after the MCO period). The clinical improvement, as judged by the patients given ranitidine during the last 4-week period was statistically significantly different in favour of responders compared with nonresponders. We were unable to characterize the responders on the basis of demographics, symptoms, and signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranitidine has a good and clinically significant effect in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia.

Ranitidine therapy for esophagitis in children with developmental disabilities

Esophagitis is common in children with cerebral palsy. Because histamine2-receptor antagonists such as ranitidine have not been uniformly effective, we treated disabled children with esophagitis with greater than usual doses. Endoscopy and pH monitoring were used to monitor dose and response to treatment. A dose of 9.3 +/- 0.9 mg/kg/day did not improve visual or microscopic esophagitis after 3 months. A dose of 14.8 +/- 3.9 mg/kg/day resulted in only slight microscopic improvement, but symptoms were improved. There was no correlation between esophageal reflux index at enrollment and either severity of esophagitis or response to treatment. Elevation of gastric pH by ranitidine was infrequent. These results affirm that pH monitoring does not reliably identify disabled children with reflux esophagitis nor does ranitidine reliably heal this disorder.

Are frequent short gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes the cause of symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia responding to treatment with ranitidine?

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) responding to treatment with H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically useful characteristics. This trial compares the gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern as measured by 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring in patients responding to ranitidine with that of non-responders.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with NUD were randomized to 6 weeks' double-blind alternating treatment with 150 mg ranitidine twice daily or placebo and classified as responders or non-responders.

RESULTS

Pathologic gastro-oesophageal reflux was seen in 3 of the 13 responders and 4 of the 18 no-responders (NS). The responders had frequent short reflux episodes (< 1 min in duration). When 4 patients with > or = 5 reflux episodes longer than 5 min were excluded, the number of short reflux episodes (median) in responders and non-responders was 32 and 14, respectively. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.025). There were no other differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study patients with NUD responding to ranitidine were characterized by frequent short reflux episodes in the absence of numerous long reflux episodes.

Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) ranges from episodic symptomatic reflux without oesophagitis to severe oesophageal mucosal damage, such as Barrett's metaplasia or peptic stricture. The multifactorial pathogenesis of GORD prevents medical cure of the disease. GORD is a chronic disease with a high tendency to relapse, requiring a long term treatment strategy in practically all patients. Complete healing of all mucosal lesions is not necessarily the aim of treatment in all patients. In milder forms of reflux disease, symptom relief is the most important goal. Many patients with mild GORD do well on symptomatic self-care with antacids and/or alginate. In addition, lifestyle changes should be advised to all patients: these improve symptoms and enhance the efficacy of therapy. In the acute treatment of GORD the prokinetic drug cisapride has been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms and healing grade I to II oesophagitis. Cisapride decreases symptomatic and endoscopic relapse in patients with mild GORD. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are effective in relieving reflux symptoms in about 50% of patients, but with regard to healing, H2-antagonists appear to be mainly effective in grades I and II and not in higher grades of oesophagitis. Maintenance treatment with H2-antagonists is mainly symptomatically effective in patients with mild GORD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide significantly higher healing rates of reflux oesophagitis than H2-antagonists, even in the more severe cases of oesophagitis and Barrett's ulcers. PPIs are also effective in patients with oesophagitis refractory to treatment with H2-antagonists. PPIs have become the drugs of first choice in healing of all patients with more severe forms of reflux oesophagitis, and increasingly also for patients with milder forms of oesophagitis, certainly those who fail to respond to other drugs. In maintenance treatment of GORD, PPIs are the most effective drugs, offering the possibility of keeping nearly all patients in remission with adjusted doses. Current patient data of up to 5 years indicate the safety of this strategy for this period, but the exact consequences of strong acid inhibition over a longer period still have to be clarified. At present, all but a few patients with GORD can be managed adequately by medical therapy.