Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with lansoprazole and clarithromycin

Polaprezinc, a mucosal protective agent, in combination with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin increases the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of polaprezinc, a mucosal protective agent, in combination with a 7-day triple therapy containing lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin, as a treatment for Helicobacter pylori.

METHODS

Sixty-six consecutive patients suffering from dyspeptic symptoms with H. pylori infection were randomly allocated to one of two regimens: one group (LAC; n = 31) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxycillin 500 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 400 mg b.d. for 7 days. The other group (LACP; n = 35) received the LAC regimen plus polaprezinc 150 mg b.d. for 7 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by rapid urease test, histology and culture at entry and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Five patients did not complete the treatment: no follow-up endoscopy was performed on two patients in the LAC group; one patient in the LAC group and two in the LACP group had their treatment stopped due to severe diarrhoea. By per protocol analysis, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 24 of the 28 evaluable patients (86%; 95% CI: 72-100%) after LAC therapy, and in 33 of the 33 evaluable patients (100%) after LACP therapy (P < 0.05). On intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of eradication were 24 of 31 patients (77%; 95% CI: 62-93%) in the LAC group, and 33 of 35 patients (94%; 95% CI: 86-100%) in the LACP group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A 7-day triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin is effective in H. pylori eradication, but this regimen is significantly improved by the addition of polaprezinc.

Discontinuation rates of Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens: a meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to determine what factors in treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori are associated with increased discontinuation rates. Studies were selected from the 1990-1996 MEDLINE data base, and references in published articles and reviews were obtained. Each article was uniformally abstracted for factors that could potentially affect dropout rates. Drug regimens with high numbers of doses per day had highest dropout rates (p=0.0001). The total dropout rate was lowest for regimens containing a proton pump inhibitor (OR = 0.75, CI 0.57, 0.98). The rate was high in regimens containing a bismuth compound due to side effects (OR = 2.79, CI 1.78, 4.36). The main finding was that drug regimens for eradication of H. pylori that have a high number of doses per day result in higher discontinuation rates than regimens with fewer doses per day.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole--an open pilot study

BACKGROUND

The most extensively studied Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen comprises omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Macrolide antibiotics other than clarithromycin should achieve similar efficacy, but they have not yet been thoroughly tested.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen using lansoprazole, roxithromycin, and metronidazole on the basis of multicentre outpatient care in an open pilot study.

METHODS

163 patients with duodenal ulcer and proven H. pylori infection received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by another 7 days of lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. H. pylori status was determined by urease quick test, histology, microbiology and 13C-urea breath test before starting and at least 4 weeks after completing treatment.

RESULTS

150 patients were available for evaluation; H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 84.7% (127/ 150) as determined by urease quick test, 78.0% (117/150) by histology, 81.3% (109/134) by 13C-urea breath test; and in 75.3% (113/150), at least two tests were negative. Side-effects were reported in 34 patients (most commonly diarrhoea and changes in liver function tests), in two cases the study medication was interrupted. Prior to treatment, 23% of the H. pylori isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 3.4% against roxithromycin. After unsuccessful treatment, 84% of the isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 21% against roxithromycin. Primary resistance to metronidazole increased the chance of treatment failure approximately sevenfold (7% vs. 53%).

CONCLUSIONS

For H. pylori eradication, the combination of lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole proved to be as safe as other current triple therapy regimens, while a comparison of efficacy rates yet remains to be assessed in prospective controlled trials. The metronidazole-resistant H. pylori is not rare in Germany and, in the present study, has strongly influenced treatment success.

Dual therapy using a double dose of lansoprazole with amoxicillin versus triple therapy using a double dose of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection: results of a prospective randomized open study

OBJECTIVES

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori is recommended in duodenal ulcer disease. The aim of this randomized open trial was to evaluate and compare H. pylori eradication and safety after a dual therapy consisting of lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) versus a triple therapy consisting of lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) administered from day 1 to day 14.

METHODS

All patients with an ulcer received lansoprazole (30 mg) from day 15 to day 28. H. pylori status was determined from antral biopsies using histology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) upon inclusion and 1-3 months after the end of the treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients included in the study, five did not adhere to the protocol. H. pylori eradication was obtained in 37.5% of the patients receiving lansoprazole-amoxicillin (n = 9/24) and in 95.2% of the patients receiving lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (n = 20/21, p < 0.0002). Minor side effects appeared in 8.3% of the cases during dual therapy (n = 2/24) and in 52% during triple therapy (n = 13/22, p < 0.001). These side effects consisted mainly of diarrhea and a metallic taste.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant administration of double doses of lansoprazole with amoxicillin and clarithromycin is very efficacious against H. pylori infection compared with dual therapy.

Triple versus dual therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori and preventing ulcer recurrence: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and/or amoxicillin in different dosing regimens

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of dual and triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic(s) for therapy of Helicobacter pylori-associated duodenal ulcer disease have been compared using results from independent studies using different methods and regimens, making interpretation difficult. In a large, double-blind, multicenter study conducted in the United States, we compared a triple therapy regimen with four dual therapy and one monotherapy regimens in the eradication of H. pylori and the prevention of ulcer recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with active duodenal ulcer disease or history of duodenal ulcer disease within the past year and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive one of six 14-day treatment regimens: lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 gm b.i.d.; lansoprazole 30 mg b.id. and either clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. or t.i.d.; lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. or t.i.d. with amoxicillin 1 gm t.i.d.; or lansoprazole 30 mg t.i.d. alone. No additional acid suppression therapy followed eradication therapy. Primary efficacy endpoints were eradication of H. pylori and ulcer recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 396 patients enrolled in the study, 352 met the entry criteria for duodenal ulcer status and H. pylori positivity. At 4-6 wk after the end of therapy, H. pylori was eradicated from 94% (44 of 47) of patients receiving lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin triple therapy, 77% (39 of 51) of those receiving lansoprazole t.i.d./amoxicillin t.i.d., 75% (36 of 48) of those receiving lansoprazole b.i.d./clarithromycin t.i.d., 57% (28 of 49) of those receiving lansoprazole b.i.d./clarithromycin b.i.d., 53% (26 of 49) of those receiving lansoprazole b.i.d./amoxicillin t.i.d., and 2% (1 of 53) of those receiving lansoprazole monotherapy (p < or = 0.05, triple therapy vs each dual therapy and each dual therapy vs monotherapy). Of those patients who were documented as free of ulcer at 4-6 wk after treatment, ulcers recurred within 6 months in 7% of patients receiving triple therapy, as compared with 13-23% of patients receiving dual therapy, and 69% of patients receiving lansoprazole monotherapy. Patients who were H. pylori negative at 4-6 wk after treatment were less likely to have an ulcer recurrence than were patients who were H. pylori positive (11% [10 of 95] vs 47% [20 of 43], respectively, across treatment groups). For triple therapy and dual therapy, a similar proportion of patients reported a drug-related adverse event (23% vs 17-33%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with active or a recent history of duodenal ulcer, a 14-day course of lansoprazole-based triple therapy without additional acid suppression therapy is highly effective in the eradication of H. pylori and in preventing ulcer recurrence. Among the dual therapies, higher eradication rates occurred when lansoprazole (with amoxicillin) or clarithromycin (with lansoprazole) was administered t.i.d. vs b.i.d., but the rates were still significantly lower than with lansoprazole triple therapy with all three drugs administered b.i.d.

Low dose of clarithromycin in triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: one or two weeks?

The aims of this pilot study were: (i) to compare the efficacy of low-dose clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily) for 1 or 2 weeks; and (ii) to evaluate possible therapeutic advantages in associating the low-dose clarithromycin with an anti-secretory agent or tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate (De Nol; Yamanouchi Pharm, Corugate Milano, Italy). A prospective, randomized, open trial was carried out on consecutive outpatients with dyspeptic symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection. We enrolled 129 patients in one of the following schedules: (A) De Nol 120 mg q.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks; (B) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks; or (C) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 1 week. Results were evaluated by Per Protocol (PP) and Intention-To-Treat analysis (ITT). Eradication rate was 100% after treatment A, 92.6% after treatment B and 86.5% after treatment C by PP and 83.3, 75.7, and 68.1%, respectively by ITT. Side effects were reported by 16 subjects: 26.6% in group A; 9.1% in group B; and 7.5% in group C; in two cases side effects led to the withdrawal of the treatment. In conclusion, 500 mg clarithromycin per day in association with omeprazole and metronidazole, for 1 week gave comparable results to the same schedule for a 2 week period. The use of clarithromycin with bismuth and metronidazole produced a therapeutic gain compared with both of the anti-secretory schedules, although this was not statistically significant.

Lansoprazole. An update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. It has proved effective in combination regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and as monotherapy to heal and relieve symptoms of gastric or duodenal ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. After initial healing, it may be used to prevent recurrence of oesophageal erosions or peptic ulcers in patients in whom H. pylori is not the major cause of ulceration and to reduce basal acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages are 15 to 60 mg/day, although dosages of < or = 180 mg/day have been used in patients with hypersecretory states. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, short term lansoprazole monotherapy was similar to omeprazole and superior to histamine H2 receptor antagonists in achieving healing rates > 90%. Lansoprazole was as effective a component of H. pylori eradication regimens as omeprazole, tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) or ranitidine. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in symptom relief and healing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and tended to relieve symptoms more rapidly than omeprazole, although initial healing was similar. As maintenance treatment, lansoprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in relieving symptoms and preventing relapse. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in healing and relieving symptoms of oesophageal erosions associated with Barrett's oesophagus; healing was maintained for a mean of 2.9 years in > or = 70% of patients. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in prophylaxis of redilatation of oesophageal strictures. After > or = 4 years of use in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole 60 to 180 mg/day effectively controlled basal acid output. Dosages may be reduced in some patients once healing and symptom relief has been achieved. Preliminary studies of lansoprazole in patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia or stress ulcers show promise. Although studies show lansoprazole is potentially effective in treating gastrointestinal bleeding, future studies should assess patients' H. pylori status. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, diarrhoea, dizziness and nausea appearing to be the most common adverse effects. Tolerability of lansoprazole does not deteriorate with age and the drug is well tolerated in long term use (< or = 4 years) in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or reflux disease. Thus, lansoprazole is an important alternative to omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in acid-related disorders. In addition to its efficacy in healing or maintenance treatment, it may provide more effective symptom relief than other comparator agents.

Review: eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Problems and recommendations

The successful isolation of Helicobacter pylori from stomachs of patients with gastritis and peptic ulcer has revolutionized our concepts of the pathogenesis of gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and gastric B cell lymphoma. Eradication of H. pylori heals gastritis and H. pylori-related peptic ulcer. After a successful cure of H. pylori infection, virtually no recurrence of duodenal ulcer is seen. However, treatment to cure the infection has proved difficult. Numerous clinical trials have been attempted, but as yet no ideal regimen has been identified. Monotherapies have many drawbacks and should be avoided. Dual therapies combining a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and an antimicrobial agent provide higher eradication rates than those involving two antimicrobial agents. Bismuth-based triple therapies are more effective than dual therapies in eradicating H. pylori infections. However, poor compliance and frequent adverse effects have made these combinations less favourable in clinical practice. Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies have shown more consistent and higher eradication rates with a short duration of treatment, good patient compliance, fewer side effects, prompt symptom relief and fast ulcer healing. Results from PPI-based quadruple therapies are promising; however, large multicentre clinical trials are needed to confirm the effect and the complex regimen again may compromise compliance outside of the clinical trial setting. Eradication of H. pylori infection is cost-effective in the long-term management of peptic ulcer disease compared with maintenance therapy with antisecretory drugs.

Helicobacter pylori eradication using a 7-day regimen of low-dose clarithromycin, lansoprazole and amoxycillin

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a 7-day regimen of clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. as a treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

H. pylori status of dyspeptic patients was assessed by 13C-urea breath test and at endoscopy by histology, culture and rapid urease testing of gastric biopsies. Fifty-one H. pylori-positive patients were treated with the above regimen. H. pylori status was reassessed by 13C-urea breath test not less than 28 days after completing treatment. Adverse events and compliance were evaluated.

RESULTS

On an intention-to-treat basis. H. pylori infection was cured in 77% (95% CI: 65-88%) of patients. Minor side-effects including diarrhoea, nausea and taste disturbance were reported by 64% of patients. Ninety-five per cent of patients consumed > 95% of tablets. Metronidazole resistance was 29% but all cultures were sensitive to amoxycillin and clarithromycin.

CONCLUSION

This 7-day treatment with low-dose clarithromycin was moderately effective in curing H. pylori infection. Although compliance was excellent, there was a high frequency of minor adverse events.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is now recognised as the major cause of chronic active gastritis and peptic ulcer disease and eradication of the infection will prevent recurrence of the majority of such ulcers. A large number of different treatment combinations have been tried, but 100% H pylori eradication has not been achieved due to the use of wrong drug combinations or dosages, non-compliance and development of primary or acquired bacterial resistant strains. However, consistent 95-96% H pylori eradication can now be achieved with triple therapy employing a high-dose proton pump inhibitor twice daily together with any two of the following drugs: nitroimidazole, clarithromycin, or amoxycillin in appropriate dosages taken two to three times daily and all concurrently for one week. The problem of resistant bacterial strains has to be addressed, as this development is one of the consequences of failed eradication treatment.

Seven-day triple therapy with lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole for the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection: a short report

BACKGROUND

To refine our understanding of anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens further, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole given in combination with clarithromycin and metronidazole for 7 days in an open-label, multicenter study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

H. pylori-positive patients self-administered lansoprazole, 30 mg; clarithromycin, 500 mg; and metronidazole, 500 mg bid for 7 days. Patients were assessed at pretreatment, at which time the presence of H. pylori was documented by rapid urease test or histology and culture, following study drug administration (week 1) for a brief evaluation only, and at least 4 weeks posttreatment (week 5), including endoscopy with collection of biopsy specimens for culture and histology testing.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 59 had confirmed H. pylori infection, and 51 were included in an intent-to-treat analysis of efficacy. Primary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance were observed in 84% and 8% of study patients, respectively. One month after the end of therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 40 of 51 patients (78%); 95% confidence interval, (65%-89%). The triple-therapy regimen was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients (4%) requiring premature withdrawal from the study due to treatment-related adverse events. Taste perversion (15.0%) and diarrhea (11.7%) were the most frequently reported adverse events possibly or probably related to study medication during the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, a 1-week, triple-drug combination of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole is effective treatment for and well-tolerated by patients with H. pylori infection.

A risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is the cause of chronic active gastritis and predisposes to peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Furthermore, H. pylori is linked to the pathogenesis of gastric lymphoma and gastric cancer. However, treatment of this infection has proven difficult. In the last decade, many antimicrobial compounds have been studied extensively as monotherapy as well as in combination with bismuth or acid-suppressive drugs. The individual drugs and the most important eradication regimens are discussed with special regard to their risks. In the past, highly complex multidrug regimens, fear of adverse effects and frequent eradication failures have hampered the broad acceptance of H. pylori-eradication therapies. Recently, new 1-week, low-dose combination regimens of 2 antibacterials with a proton pump inhibitor have consistently achieved eradication rates of 90% and more with an acceptably low rate of adverse effects. One week's standard triple therapy [tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (or bismuth salicylate plus metronidazole plus tetracycline or amoxicillin) has been shown to be highly effective and tolerated better in combination with a proton pump inhibitor. This regimen is, however, more complex and has more adverse effects. Therefore, it is not recommended as first-line therapy. Equipped with these therapies physicians can now be strongly encouraged to use H. pylori eradication as the therapy of choice for patients with PUD and even extend this treatment to other H. pylori-associated disease conditions.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is probably the most common bacterial infection worldwide and the accepted cause of chronic active gastritis. It has a critical role in duodenal ulcer, where the prevalence of infection is 90-95%. There is a dramatic reduction in the rate of ulcer recurrence after successful eradication of the organism to about 4% per annum compared with up to 80% when the infection persists. What is true for duodenal ulcers is also true for patients with gastric ulcer who are infected with H. pylori. The risk of recurrent ulcer complications with bleeding is virtually abolished following successful eradication of H. pylori; in contrast, the risk of rebleeding is about 33% in patients still harboring the organism. The treatment of H. pylori infection in patients with confirmed peptic ulcer on first presentation or recurrence has been advocated by a Consensus Conference of the National Institutes of Health. The most evaluated regimens include dual therapy with a proton pump inhibitor and either amoxicillin or clarithromycin, and bismuth-based triple therapy with metronidazole and tetracycline. The use of a proton pump inhibitor-containing regimen offers the advantage of rapid symptom relief and the highest rates of duodenal ulcer healing. Moreover, combinations of a proton pump inhibitor and clarithromycin show more predictable and higher eradication rates than amoxicillin combinations. Newer triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor plus two antibacterial agents given for 7-1O days are being increasingly described and may become the treatment of choice if initial results are confirmed. However, the optimum dosage regimen needs to be established. A new combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin has also recently been shown to be effective. At this time it is reasonable to consider all patients with confirmed duodenal or gastric ulcer for eradication of H. pylori, and no patient should be considered for elective surgery without first being offered eradication therapy.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Although there are numerous publications reporting eradication results, the general picture is confused by the bewildering multiplicity of treatment schedules employed by the various workers. The over-riding need now is for large scale trials, and more especially for direct comparisons of different treatment regimens in the same populations of patients. Such data are entirely absent from the literature at present. Standardization of definitions and of methodology pertaining to diagnosis of eradication, recording of side effects, measurement of compliance and determination of recurrence or of reinfection, is badly needed. As the definition of eradication remains arbitrary, it is important to include genome fingerprinting techniques in the long-term follow-up for recurrence, so that the question of reinfection versus recrudescence can be examined (Bell et al, 1993b; Xia et al, 1994). Because of the wide differences in the agents used in H. pylori eradication therapies, proper double-blinding of treatment trials remains a difficult problem. This can be dealt with to some extent by ensuring that the interpretation of tests for H. pylori eradication is performed by personnel unaware of the clinical details. Review of the existing data on eradication of H. pylori indicates that clinically useful results can be achieved in some 70 to 95% of patients, on an intention to treat basis. Compliance, side effects and resistance to metronidazole remain the limiting factors. Efficacy, freedom from side effects, simplicity and low cost will determine the success of any regimen in the future. At present, it is not possible to make firm recommendations in favour of one regimen over another, but it seems reasonable to forecast that dual therapies consisting of a PPI and an antibiotic will receive much attention. Preparations consisting of an H2RA associated with a bismuth compound, which are used together with an antibiotic are an interesting approach. Compliance should be as good as with a normal dual therapy and the eradication results look promising (Wyeth et al, 1994; Webb et al, 1994). The advantages of dual therapies that include a PPI lie in their simplicity, in not relying on imidazole for their anti-H. pylori effect but on the profound inhibition of acid output produced by the PPI. Thus PPI based dual therapy can probably evoke better compliance than the more complicated regimens. The use of PPIs has other advantages in addition to decreasing the MIC90 of the antibiotic combined with it. This is because administration of a powerful inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, such as a PPI, will aid the rapid healing of an ulcer crater and will rapidly relieve the symptoms of peptic ulceration. Gastrin releasing peptide-stimulated acid secretion is raised in duodenal ulcer patients to approximately sixfold over control levels according to El-Omar et al (1993b), and although it returns to normal following the eradication of H. pylori, this process takes time to become effective (El-Omar et al, 1993a). Suppression of acid output provides an immediate therapeutic shield, while the decrease in inflammation and acid output secondary to H. pylori eradication can be established. The most widespread resistance to antibiotics exhibited by H. pylori is with respect to imidazoles. The prevalence of metronidazole resistance is widespread in the emergent countries (Glupczynski et al, 1990), but it is also appreciable in the West, especially in women, who may have been given metronidazole in the treatment of pelvic infections (Rautelin et al, 1992; Banatvala et al, 1994). Moreover, H. pylori becomes resistant to metronidazole very easily and often as a result of treatment which includes an imidazole compound (Malfertheiner, 1993; Banatavala et al, 1994). On the other hand, H. pylori resistance to macrolides is not widespread and does not develop easily during their administration. It is difficult to forecast which antibiotic will be the most widely used agent