1
|
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021. J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:267-285. [PMID: 35226174 PMCID: PMC8938399 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01861-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In Japan, with the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and growing public interest, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology issued Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009 and a revised 2nd edition in 2015. A number of studies on GERD were subsequently conducted in Japan and abroad, and vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), became available for the first time in Japan in February 2015. The revised 3rd edition (Japanese edition), which incorporates new findings and information, was published in April 2021. These guidelines are summarized herein, particularly sections related to the treatment of GERD. The important clinical issues addressed in the present revision are (i) the introduction of treatment algorithms that classify GERD into reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, (ii) the clarification of treatment algorithms based on to the severity of reflux esophagitis, and (iii) the positioning of vonoprazan in the treatment for GERD. The present guidelines propose vonoprazan as the initial/maintenance treatment for severe reflux esophagitis. They also recommend vonoprazan or PPI as an initial treatment for mild reflux esophagitis and recommended PPI and proposed vonoprazan as maintenance treatment. These updated guidelines offer the best clinical strategies for GERD patients in Japan and hope that they will be of global use for the diagnosis and treatment for GERD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Habu Y, Hamasaki R, Maruo M, Nakagawa T, Aono Y, Hachimine D. Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan. J Gen Fam Med 2021; 22:237-245. [PMID: 34484992 PMCID: PMC8411401 DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstays of treatment. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of PPIs. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan (VPZ), was recently introduced, which may provide clinical benefits. This study was performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of alternative long-term strategies including continuous and discontinuous treatment with VPZ for the management of reflux esophagitis in Japan. METHODS A health state transition model was developed to capture the long-term management of reflux esophagitis. Four different strategies were compared: (a) intermittent PPI using lansoprazole (LPZ); (b) intermittent P-CAB; (c) maintenance PPI using LPZ; and (d) maintenance P-CAB. RESULTS Intermittent P-CAB was the most cost-effective, and the number of days for which medication was required with this strategy was fewest. Maintenance PPI was more efficacious, but more costly than intermittent P-CAB. Maintenance P-CAB was more efficacious, but more costly than maintenance PPI. Co-payments were higher for maintenance PPI than for intermittent P-CAB, and for maintenance P-CAB than for maintenance PPI, which were considered reasonable for the majority of patients to improve symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Intermittent P-CAB appears to be the strategy of choice for the majority of reflux esophagitis patients in clinical practice. If a patient is not satisfied with the symptom control of the current strategy, switching to a more effective strategy appears to be a reasonable option for the majority of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuki Habu
- Department of GastroenterologySaiseikai‐Noe HospitalOsakaJapan
| | - Ryuhei Hamasaki
- Department of GastroenterologySaiseikai‐Noe HospitalOsakaJapan
| | - Motonobu Maruo
- Department of GastroenterologySaiseikai‐Noe HospitalOsakaJapan
| | | | - Yuki Aono
- Department of GastroenterologySaiseikai‐Noe HospitalOsakaJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JS, Jung AR, Park JM, Park MJ, Lee YC, Eun YG. Comparison of Characteristics According to Reflux Type in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 11:141-145. [PMID: 28993603 PMCID: PMC5951063 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as an acidic, nonacidic, or mixed type according to 24-hour multi-channel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring and the clinical characteristics of each type. METHODS Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent 24-hour MII pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool. Eighty-three patients were diagnosed with LPR. The patients were classified into three groups according to the pH of the hypopharyngeal probe: the acid reflux group, nonacid reflux group, and mixed reflux group. Subjective symptoms and objective findings were evaluated based on patients' responses to the Short Form 12 Survey (SF-12), LPR health-related quality of life (LPR-HRQOL), reflux symptom index, and reflux finding score. RESULTS The results of each group were compared. As a result, 34 patients were classified into the nonacid reflux group and 49 into the mixed reflux group. There were no patients classified as having acid reflux alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, LPR-HRQOL, or the mental component score of the SF-12. However, the physical component score of the SF-12 was higher in the nonacid reflux group (P=0.018). The DeMeester composite score (P=0.015) and total number of LPR events (P=0.001) were lower in the nonacid reflux group than in the mixed reflux group. CONCLUSION In conclusion, no LPR patient had only acid reflux. The nonacid reflux LPR patients showed similar clinical characteristics and findings compared to the mixed reflux group, but exhibited significantly fewer LPR episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Seok Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ah Ra Jung
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Min Park
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Jin Park
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Gyu Eun
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antacid therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: more questions than answers? THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2017; 5:591-598. [DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
5
|
Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, Oshima T, Manabe N, Fujiwara Y, Nagahara A, Kawamura O, Iwakiri R, Ozawa S, Ashida K, Ohara S, Kashiwagi H, Adachi K, Higuchi K, Miwa H, Fujimoto K, Kusano M, Hoshihara Y, Kawano T, Haruma K, Hongo M, Sugano K, Watanabe M, Shimosegawa T. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:751-67. [PMID: 27325300 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1227-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
As an increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reported in Japan, and public interest in GERD has been increasing, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology published the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009. Six years have passed since its publication, and there have been a large number of reports in Japan concerning the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and Barrett's esophagus during this period. By incorporating the contents of these reports, the guidelines were completely revised, and a new edition was published in October 2015. The revised edition consists of eight items: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, internal treatment, surgical treatment, esophagitis after surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract, extraesophageal symptoms, and Barrett's esophagus. This paper summarizes these guidelines, particularly the parts related to the treatment for GERD. In the present revision, aggressive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy is recommended for severe erosive GERD, and on-demand therapy or continuous maintenance therapy is recommended for mild erosive GERD or PPI-responsive non-erosive GERD. Moreover, PPI-resistant GERD (insufficient symptomatic improvement and/or esophageal mucosal break persisting despite the administration of PPI at a standard dose for 8 weeks) is defined, and a standard-dose PPI twice a day, change in PPI, change in the PPI timing of dosing, addition of a prokinetic drug, addition of rikkunshito (traditional Japanese herbal medicine), and addition of histamine H2-receptor antagonist are recommended for its treatment. If no improvement is observed even after these treatments, pathophysiological evaluation with esophageal impedance-pH monitoring or esophageal manometry at an expert facility for diseases of the esophagus is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiko Iwakiri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Sendagi 1-1-5, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan. .,Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
| | - Yoshikazu Kinoshita
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Yasuki Habu
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Oshima
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Noriaki Manabe
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Fujiwara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Akihito Nagahara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Osamu Kawamura
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Iwakiri
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Soji Ozawa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Ashida
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Shuichi Ohara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Kashiwagi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Adachi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Higuchi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Motoyasu Kusano
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Yoshio Hoshihara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Tatsuyuki Kawano
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Ken Haruma
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Michio Hongo
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Kentaro Sugano
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Mamoru Watanabe
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brænd AM, Jensen KB, Klovning A, Straand J. Clinical drug trials in general practice: a 10-year overview of protocols. Trials 2013; 14:162. [PMID: 23725228 PMCID: PMC3672091 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2012] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Drugs predominantly prescribed in general practice should ideally be tested in that setting; however, little is known about drug trials in general practice. Our aim was to describe drug trials in Norwegian general practice over the period of a decade. Methods The present work concerns a 10-year retrospective study of protocols submitted to the Norwegian national medicines agency (1998 to 2007) identifying all studies involving general practitioners (GPs) as clinical investigator(s). We analyzed the number of trials, drug company involvement, patients, participating doctors, payment, medications tested and main diagnostic criteria for inclusion. We also analyzed one trial in greater detail. Results Out of 2,054 clinical drug trials, 196 (9.5%) were undertaken in general practice; 93% were multinational, 96% were industry funded and 77% included patients both from general practice and specialist care. The trials were planned to be completed in the period 1998 to 2012. A total of 23,000 patients in Norway and 340,000 patients internationally were planned to be included in the 196 trials. A median of 5 GPs participated in each trial (range 1 to 402). Only 0.7% of 831 GP investigators had general practice university affiliations. Median payment for participating investigators was €1,900 (range €0 to 13,500) per patient completing the trial. A total of 30 pharmaceutical companies were involved. The drugs most commonly studied were antidiabetics (21%), obstructive airway disease medications (12%), agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (10%), and lipid modifying agents (10%). One trial, presented in more detail, had several characteristics of a seeding or marketing trial. Conclusions Only one in four drug trials involving general practice were solely general practice trials and almost all were industry initiated without input from academic general practice. There was a large variation in the number of patients, participating doctors, and economic compensation for trial investigators, with some investigators receiving substantial payments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Maria Brænd
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Valutazione economica della terapia di mantenimento al bisogno con esomeprazolo nella malattia da reflusso gastroesofageo. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/bf03320536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
8
|
Huerta-Iga FM, Tamayo-de la Cuesta JL, Noble-Lugo A, Remes-Troche JM, Valdovinos-Díaz MA, Carmona-Sánchez RI. [The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part I]. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2012; 77:193-213. [PMID: 23153413 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2012.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2012] [Revised: 10/06/2012] [Accepted: 10/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The changes, advances, and new discoveries regarding different aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have made it necessary to update the Mexican Consensus published in 2002. AIMS To elaborate a new Mexican Consensus on GERD. METHODS The general project coordinators selected six GERD experts to carry out an extensive review of the literature for the purpose of elaborating statements on the principal aspects of GERD. These were then placed under the consideration of specialists in the study of this disease. Definitive approval by all participants was reached using the modified Delphi method with three rounds of anonymous and iterative voting. The following scale was employed: A- in complete agreement; B- in agreement, but with minor concerns; C- in agreement, but with major concerns; D- in disagreement, but with major concerns; E- in disagreement, but with minor concerns; or F- in complete disagreement. Consensus was declared when 67.00% or more of the participants concurred on a category of agreement (A, B, or C). RESULTS A consensus was reached on 160 of the statements upon completion of the voting rounds, with 90.00% concurrence for the majority of them. CONCLUSIONS The 2011 Mexican Consensus on Gastroesophageal Disease is a practical and up-to-date consultation tool, providing the opinion of Mexican experts on all the new information available about this disease. It allows there to be homogeneity in diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, all of which serves to benefit our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Huerta-Iga
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ángeles Torreón, Torreón, Coa, México.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hvenegaard A, Juhl HH, Habicht A. Does participation in clinical trials influence the costs of future management of patients? THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2012; 13:569-574. [PMID: 22072320 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0359-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2010] [Accepted: 10/05/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An earlier study showed that from a societal perspective it was less expensive to encourage patients to self-regulate their medication for GERD (gastro-esophageal reflux disease) by treating patients on-demand. OBJECTIVE The objective was to investigate whether physician involvement in a clinical trial financed by the pharmaceutical industry subsequently results in higher health care costs. STUDY DESIGN An open, observational, multicenter study compared direct medical costs and total costs for three groups of patients with different exposure to the clinical trial; (1) Dual exposed, where both the patients and the GP participated in the former clinical trial, (2) GP exposed, where only the GP participated in the former clinical trial and (3) nonexposed, where neither the patients nor the GP participated in the former clinical trial. RESULTS We did not find any statistically significant differences in neither direct medical nor total costs. However, we did observe a numerical difference in direct medical costs of 24% higher in the dual exposed group compared to the nonexposed group mainly due to a higher consumption of prescribed medication. The higher direct medical cost in the dual exposed group was however counterbalanced by lower observed direct nonmedical and indirect costs. CONCLUSION Although we did not find any statistical significant differences in health care costs, we did observe a higher consumption of prescribed medication and lower costs of work hours lost if both patient and GPs participated in a former clinical trial. The results may be limited due to a lower number of patients included than expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hvenegaard
- Danish Institute for Health Services Research, 27-29 Dampfaergevej, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patient satisfaction with medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = JOURNAL CANADIEN DE GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2012; 26:196-204. [PMID: 22506259 DOI: 10.1155/2012/235476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction is increasingly regarded as an important aspect of measuring treatment success in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). OBJECTIVE To review how satisfied patients with GERD are with their medication, and to analyze the usefulness of patient satisfaction as a clinical end point by comparing it with symptom improvement. METHODS Systematic searches of the PubMed and EMBASE databases identified clinical trials and patient surveys published between 1966 and 2009. RESULTS Twelve trials reported that 56% to 100% of patients were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment for GERD. Patient satisfaction levels were higher for PPIs than other GERD medications in two trials. The sample-size-weighted average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI after four weeks of treatment in trials was 93% (95% CI 87% to 99%), with 73% (95% CI 62% to 83%) being 'very satisfied'. In four surveys, the average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI treatment was 82% (95% CI 73% to 90%) and 62% (95% CI 48% to 75%) were 'very satisfied'. Seven trials found a positive association between patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, and two surveys between satisfaction and improved health-related quality of life. Three trials found that continuous treatment yielded higher rates of satisfaction than on-demand therapy. CONCLUSIONS More than one-half of patients were satisfied with their PPI medication in trials, and more patients were satisfied with PPIs than other medication types. An association between patient satisfaction and symptom resolution was found, suggesting that patient satisfaction is a useful end point for evaluating GERD treatment success.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lifestyle factors affecting gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a cross-sectional study of healthy 19864 adults using FSSG scores. BMC Med 2012; 10:45. [PMID: 22554226 PMCID: PMC3353848 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common disorder worldwide, comprised of reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). As more than half of GERD patients are classified into the NERD group, precise evaluation of bothersome epigastric symptoms is essential. Nevertheless, compared with many reports targeting endoscopic reflux esophagitis, large-scale studies focusing on GERD symptoms have been very scarce. METHODS To elucidate lifestyle factors affecting GERD symptoms, 19,864 healthy adults in Japan were analyzed. Sub-analyses of 371 proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users and 539 histamine H₂-receptor antagonist (H₂RA) users were also performed. Using the FSSG (Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD) score as a response variable, 25 lifestyle-related factors were univariately evaluated by Student's t-test or Pearson's correlation coefficient, and were further analyzed with multiple linear regression modelling. RESULTS Average FSSG scores were 4.8 ± 5.2 for total subjects, 9.0 ± 7.3 for PPI users, and 8.2 ± 6.6 for H₂RA users. Among the total population, positively correlated factors and standardized coefficients (β) for FSSG scores are inadequate sleep (β = 0.158), digestive drug users (β = 0.0972 for PPI, β = 0.0903 for H₂RA, and β = 0.104 for others), increased body weight in adulthood (β = 0.081), dinner just before bedtime (β = 0.061), the habit of midnight snack (β = 0.055), lower body mass index (β = 0.054), NSAID users (β = 0.051), female gender (β = 0.048), lack of breakfast (β = 0.045), lack of physical exercise (β = 0.035), younger age (β = 0.033), antihyperglycemic agents non-users (β = 0.026), the habit of quick eating (β = 0.025), alcohol drinking (β = 0.025), history of gastrectomy (β = 0.024), history of cardiovascular disease (β = 0.020), and smoking (β = 0.018). Positively correlated factors for PPI users are female gender (β = 0.198), inadequate sleep (β = 0.150), lack of breakfast (β = 0.146), antihypertensive agent non-users (β = 0.134), and dinner just before bedtime (β = 0.129), whereas those for H₂RA users are inadequate sleep (β = 0.248), habit of midnight snack (β = 0.160), anticoagulants non-users (β = 0.106), and antihypertensive agents non-users (β = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS Among many lifestyle-related factors correlated with GERD symptoms, poor quality of sleep and irregular dietary habits are strong risk factors for high FSSG scores. At present, usual dose of PPI or H₂RA in Japan cannot fully relieve GERD symptoms.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rohof WO, Lei A, Hirsch DP, Ny L, Astrand M, Hansen MB, Boeckxstaens GE. The effects of a novel metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist (AZD2066) on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux episodes in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35:1231-42. [PMID: 22469098 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05081.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2011] [Revised: 08/03/2011] [Accepted: 03/10/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists inhibit transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) in animals and acid reflux in humans. AIM To assess the effect of single doses of the mGluR5 antagonist AZD2066 on TLESRs and reflux in humans. METHODS Healthy male volunteers received AZD2066 13 mg and placebo (part A), or AZD2066 2 mg and AZD2066 6 mg and placebo (part B), in a randomised crossover study. Postprandial manometry/pH-impedance measurements were taken after each dose. RESULTS A total of 13 individuals completed part A of the study and 19 individuals completed part B. There was a significant reduction in the geometric mean number of TLESRs (27%; P = 0.02) and the geometric mean number of reflux episodes (51%; P = 0.01) in subjects receiving AZD2066 13 mg compared with placebo. Adverse events in participants receiving AZD2066 13 mg were mostly related to the nervous system [dizziness (3/13); disturbance in attention (3/13)]. Adverse events were reversible and of mild intensity. There were no serious adverse events. The effects of AZD2066 appeared dose-dependent, with smaller reductions in TLESRs and reflux episodes (relative to placebo) and fewer adverse events observed for AZD2066 2 mg and AZD2066 6 mg compared with AZD2066 13 mg. CONCLUSION The mGluR5-mediated inhibition of TLESRs may be a useful approach for inhibiting gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W O Rohof
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Esomeprazole relieves upper gastrointestinal symptoms in high-risk and average-risk NSAID users in daily clinical practice: results from an open-label study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24:281-7. [PMID: 22246328 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e32834f4d19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether esomeprazole can provide relief for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients at different gastrointestinal risk. METHODS A multicentre, prospective, open-label study was conducted, wherein NSAID users visiting their general practitioner for upper gastrointestinal symptoms were asked to participate. Patients were treated with 20 mg esomeprazole and treatment effect was evaluated within 8 weeks. Response was defined as a maximum of 1 day per week with gastrointestinal symptoms during the last week of treatment. Partial response was defined as more than 50% improvement in the number of days per week with symptoms compared with baseline. Patients not meeting the above-mentioned criteria were classified as nonresponders. Patients who completely responded were compared with partial responders and nonresponders and were analysed according to their baseline gastrointestinal risk. RESULTS A total of 1042 patients (mean age: 57 years; standard deviation: 15; 43% male) were analysed. Complete response, partial response and nonresponse were achieved in 57, 24 and 19% of the patients, respectively. Similar response was seen in average-risk and high-risk patients (58 and 56%; P=0.46) and in nonselective NSAID and selective cyclooxygenase-2 users (57 and 53%; P=0.32). CONCLUSION Esomeprazole (20 mg) improved NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Baseline gastrointestinal risk did not influence esomeprazole effectiveness.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gastroesophageal reflux disease: drug therapy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0104-4230(11)70124-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
15
|
|
16
|
What is nonacid reflux disease? CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = JOURNAL CANADIEN DE GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2011; 25:35-8. [PMID: 21258666 DOI: 10.1155/2011/626752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the gold standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In clinical practice, failure of PPIs occurs frequently, and may affect up to 30% of patients in a typical gastroenterology practice. Multichannel impedance monitoring combined with pH monitoring helps to detect nonacid reflux, and if symptoms correlate with these nonacid reflux episodes, nonacid reflux disease can be diagnosed. In contrast to PPIs, reflux inhibitors target transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, which are involved in the pathophysiology of reflux disease and may be the appropriate future treatment for nonacid reflux disease. The present article discusses the current understanding of nonacid reflux disease, its diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
|
17
|
El-Serag H, Becher A, Jones R. Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32:720-37. [PMID: 20662774 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04406.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms can occur despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. AIM To assess the prevalence and potential determinants of persistent GERD symptoms in primary care and community-based studies. METHODS Studies were identified by systematic PubMed and Embase searches; pooled prevalence data are shown as sample-size weighted means and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Nineteen studies in individuals with GERD taking a PPI were included. In interventional, nonrandomized primary care trials, the prevalence of persistent troublesome heartburn and regurgitation was 17% (6-28%) and 28% (26-30%) respectively; in randomized trials, it was 32% (25-39%) and 28% (26-30%), respectively. In observational primary care and community-based studies, 45% (30-60%) of participants reported persistent GERD symptoms. Overall, persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI treatment were more likely in studies with a higher proportion of female participants [>60% vs. <50%, risk ratio (RR): 3.66; P < 0.001], but less likely in studies from Europe than in those from the USA (RR: 0.71; P < 0.001), and were associated with decreased psychological and physical well-being. CONCLUSIONS Persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI treatment are common in the primary care and community setting. Alternative approaches to management are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H El-Serag
- Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boeckxstaens GE, Beaumont H, Mertens V, Denison H, Ruth M, Adler J, Silberg DG, Sifrim D. Effects of lesogaberan on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2010; 139:409-17. [PMID: 20451523 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2010] [Revised: 04/15/2010] [Accepted: 04/29/2010] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are a major mechanism behind reflux. This study assessed the effects of lesogaberan (AZD3355), a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist, on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function when used as add-on treatment in patients with reflux symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received lesogaberan (65 mg) or placebo twice on day 1 (morning/evening) and once on day 2 (morning), in addition to existing PPI treatment. Patients consumed a standardized meal 45-60 minutes after morning doses. Ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring was conducted for 24 hours after the first dose on day 1. Stationary manometry and impedance-pH monitoring was conducted for 4 hours after the third dose on day 2. RESULTS Of 27 randomized patients, 21 were included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis. During the 24 hours after treatment start, lesogaberan reduced the mean number of reflux events by approximately 35% compared with placebo. During the 3 postprandial hours on day 2, lesogaberan reduced the geometric mean number of TLESRs by 25% and increased geometric mean LES pressure by 28% compared with placebo. The most common adverse events were headache (placebo: 11/27 patients; lesogaberan: 8/25 patients) and paresthesia (transient; placebo: 3/27 patients; lesogaberan: 5/25 patients). CONCLUSIONS In patients with reflux symptoms despite PPI treatment, lesogaberan decreased the number of TLESRs and reflux episodes, and increased LES pressure compared with placebo. These findings support further evaluation of lesogaberan as an add-on treatment in patients partially responding to PPIs.
Collapse
|
19
|
Effect of lesogaberan, a novel GABA(B)-receptor agonist, on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:1208-17. [PMID: 20222915 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04283.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are a major mechanism behind gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM To assess the effect of lesogaberan (AZD3355) - a novel peripherally active GABA(B) receptor agonist - on TLESRs. METHODS Twenty-four healthy men were enrolled in this single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-centre, three-period crossover phase 1 study. Subjects were randomized to receive single oral doses of lesogaberan (0.8 mg/kg), baclofen (40 mg) and placebo, separated by washout periods of < or = 7 days. Subjects finished a meal 1 h after the dose. Oesophageal manometry and pH-metry measurements were taken during the 3 h after the meal. RESULTS Twenty-one subjects completed the study. Compared with placebo, lesogaberan 0.8 mg/kg significantly reduced the number of TLESRs by 36% [geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.82] and significantly reduced the number of acid reflux episodes (mean reduction: 1.6; 95% CI: 0.34-2.9). Lesogaberan also significantly increased lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) pressure by 39% compared with placebo (GMR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.18-1.64). Comparable results were observed with baclofen. Similar numbers of adverse events were reported by subjects taking lesogaberan and placebo. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, lesogaberan significantly reduced TLESRs and acid reflux episodes and increased LES pressure.
Collapse
|
20
|
Moraes-Filho JPP, Navarro-Rodriguez T, Barbuti R, Eisig J, Chinzon D, Bernardo W. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: an evidence-based consensus. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2010; 47:99-115. [DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032010000100017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2009] [Accepted: 07/21/2009] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common disorders in medical practice. A number of guidelines and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GERD have been published in different countries, but a Brazilian accepted directive by the standards of evidence-based medicine is still lacking. As such, the aim of the Brazilian GERD Consensus Group was to develop guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GERD, strictly using evidence-based medicine methodology that could be clinically used by primary care physicians and specialists and would encompass the needs of physicians, investigators, insurance and regulatory bodies. A total of 30 questions were proposed. Systematic literature reviews, which defined inclusion and/or exclusion criteria, were conducted to identify and grade the available evidence to support each statement. A total of 11,069 papers on GERD were selected, of which 6,474 addressed the diagnosis and 4,595, therapeutics. Regarding diagnosis, 51 met the requirements for the analysis of evidence-based medicine: 19 of them were classified as grade A and 32 as grade B. As for therapeutics, 158 met the evidence-based medicine criteria; 89 were classified as grade A and 69 as grade B. In the topic Diagnosis, answers supported by publications grade A and B were accepted. In the topic Treatment only publications grade A were accepted: answers supported by publications grade B were submitted to the voting by the Consensus Group. The present publication presents the most representative studies that responded to the proposed questions, followed by pertinent comments. Follow examples. In patients with atypical manifestations, the conventional esophageal pH-metry contributes little to the diagnosis of GERD. The sensitivity, however, increases with the use of double-channel pH-metry. In patients with atypical manifestations, the impedance-pHmetry substantially contributes to the diagnosis of GERD. The examination, however, is costly and scarcely available in our country. The evaluation of the histological signs of esophagitis increases the diagnostic probability of GERD; hence, the observation of the dimensions of the intercellular space of the esophageal mucosa increases the probability of diagnostic certainty and also allows the analysis of the therapeutic response. There is no difference in the clinical response to the treatment with PPI in two separate daily doses when compared to a single daily dose. In the long term (>1 year), the eradication of H. pylori in patients with GERD does not decrease the presence of symptoms or the high recurrence rates of the disease, although it decreases the histological signs of gastric inflammation. It seems very likely that there is no association between the eradication of the H. pylori and the manifestations of GERD. The presence of a hiatal hernia requires larger doses of proton-pump inhibitor for the clinical treatment. The presence of permanent migration from the esophagogastric junction and the hernia dimensions (>2 cm) are factors of worse prognosis in GERD. In this case, hiatal hernias associated to GERD, especially the fixed ones and larger than 2 cm, must be considered for surgical treatment. The outcomes of the laparoscopic fundoplication are adequate.
Collapse
|
21
|
Latin american consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease: an update on therapy. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2009; 33:135-47. [PMID: 19664853 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2009] [Revised: 05/14/2009] [Accepted: 05/28/2009] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
22
|
Bytzer P. What makes individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease dissatisfied with their treatment? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7:816-22. [PMID: 19286478 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2008] [Revised: 03/03/2009] [Accepted: 03/05/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as therapeutics for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in randomized controlled trials, a number of studies have shown that a proportion of patients with GERD are not satisfied with their treatment. This article reviews the possible reasons why patients are dissatisfied with the way their disease is managed. METHODS Studies published between 1970 and 2007 were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and the author's existing database. The 2708 publications were reviewed, and irrelevant ones were excluded. Eleven studies were found to be appropriate for use in this review. RESULTS Patients who are given prescriptions for PPIs tend to be more satisfied than those given H(2)-receptor antagonists. Partial responders are likely to be more dissatisfied than patients whose symptoms are fully resolved. A decrease in health-related quality of life is associated with greater dissatisfaction. Patients are more likely to be satisfied if they are taken seriously by their physician and if their symptoms are investigated. They are also more likely to be satisfied if the patient-physician consultation is interactive. CONCLUSIONS Patient satisfaction is a complex issue that depends on many factors. Patient satisfaction can be influenced by treatment regimen, general level of well-being, the bedside manner of the physician, and the quality of patient-physician communication. Improvements in recognition of GERD can improve management of the disease as well as patient satisfaction with their care and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bytzer
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Køge University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM. Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104 Suppl 2:S27-32. [PMID: 19262544 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are superior to histamine-2 receptor antagonists for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis. Antisecretory therapy (AST), however, accounts for significant cost expenditure in the United States including over-the-counter and prescription formulations. Moreover, emerging data illustrate the potential risks associated with long-term PPI therapy including variations in bioavailability of common medications, vitamin B12 deficiency, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, community-acquired pneumonia, and hip fracture. For these reasons, it is imperative to use the lowest dose of drug necessary to achieve desired therapeutic goals. This may entail the use of step-down, step-off, or on-demand PPI therapy for the treatment of GERD. In addition, PPIs are the most commonly used medications for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), despite little evidence to support their use. Compounding this problem is evidence that patients erroneously administered SUP are often discharged on long-term PPI therapy. Pharmacy-driven step-down orders, limitation of the use of PPIs for SUP in non-ICU settings, and meticulous chart review to ensure that hospitalized patients are not discharged home on a PPI without an appropriate indication are interventions that can ensure proper PPI utilization with minimal of risk and optimization of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel J Heidelbaugh
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Pace F, Tonini M, Pallotta S, Molteni P, Porro GB. Systematic review: maintenance treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors taken 'on-demand'. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:195-204. [PMID: 17593065 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03381.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy 'on-demand' is often used as an alternative to continuous maintenance therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM We conducted a systematic review with the specific objectives to ascertain whether on-demand PPI therapy was effective in preventing symptomatic relapse and to assess the relative efficacy of on-demand vs. continuous PPI maintenance strategy. METHODS Randomized-controlled clinical trials comparing on-demand PPI vs. placebo or on-demand vs. continuous PPI therapy in GERD patients were identified by searching the Medline database and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. RESULTS Seventeen studies were found which met inclusion criteria. Out of the 17 studies: five investigated exclusively patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), four patients with NERD and mild oesophagitis, two patients with erosive oesophagitis only, and two patients with uninvestigated GERD symptoms, respectively. Four further studies were not investigating the effectiveness of the therapies but primarily pharmacoeconomic or quality of life parameters. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the analysis of 17 studies, we can conclude that on-demand therapy with currently available PPI appears to be effective in the long-term management of patients with NERD or mild and uninvestigated forms of GERD, but not in patients with (severe) erosive oesophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pace
- Division of Gastroenterology, L. Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
The following pages summarize the proceedings of a symposium held in May 2006 on the emerging role of on-demand therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Medical therapy for GERD has undergone significant change in recent years with the advent of effective, but expensive, antisecretory agents. On-demand (patient-driven) therapy is attractive to payers and patients, because it appears to be both cost-effective and convenient. Many individuals appear to accept occasional symptomatic breakthrough in exchange for personal control of their disease. On-demand therapy should be distinguished from intermittent therapy, which is either patient- or physician-driven, but which requires intermittent episodes of continuous therapy followed by discontinuation until symptoms recur. Proton pump inhibitors appear to be effective on-demand agents despite theoretical pharmacodynamic limitations for this class of drug. The available data support the use of on-demand therapy for GERD in uninvestigated reflux disease, nonerosive reflux disease, and possibly mild esophagitis as well. On-demand therapy should not be considered for patients with severe esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Metz
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Meineche-Schmidt V, Hvenegaard A, Juhl HH. Participation in a clinical trial influences the future management of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24:1117-25. [PMID: 16984506 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03046.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term effects of participation in trials has not been reported. A randomized-controlled trial (the ONE study) reported on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with esomeprazole in primary care, testing on-demand treatment vs. treatment courses. AIM To evaluate the impact of participation in a trial on General Practitioners management and patient behaviour. METHODS Management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was compared between General Practitioners who participated in ONE (ONE-GPs) and a random sample of General Practitioners who did not participate in ONE (Other-GPs). Symptom presentation and satisfaction with treatment was compared between patients who had participated in ONE (ONE-patients) and patients who had not (Other-patients). RESULTS ONE-GPs prescribed on-demand treatment with proton-pump inhibitors to 47% of the patients, Other-GPs to 27%. ONE-patients consulted for significantly less symptoms compared with Other-patients. ONE-patients reported significantly higher patient satisfaction compared with Other-patients. ONE-patients used 98 doses during 6 months whereas Other-patients used 76 doses. CONCLUSIONS Participation in a clinical trial influenced both doctors and patients. Treatment modalities introduced by the trial were used in daily practice by the General Practitioners. Patients who had participated in the trial consulted for less symptoms and used more medication, compared with patients who did not participate.
Collapse
|
28
|
Cohen H, Moraes-Filho JPP, Cafferata ML, Tomasso G, Salis G, González O, Valenzuela J, Sharma P, Malfertheiner P, Armstrong D, Lundell L, Corti R, Sakai P, Ceconello I. An evidence-based, Latin-American consensus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18:349-68. [PMID: 16538106 DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
In recognition of the high prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its importance in Latin America, the InterAmerican Association of Gastroenterology and the InterAmerican Society of Digestive Endoscopy organized a Latin-American Consensus on GORD in Cancun, Mexico in September 2004. The main objectives of the consensus meeting were to provide evidence-based guidance with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of GORD, relevant to all countries in the region. The methodology, results and recommendations of the consensus are described in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Cohen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Uruguayan Medical School, Montevideo, Uruguay.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
The evidence regarding the efficiency of potent gastric acid inhibition is exposed after a systematic search and a critical evaluation of its quality, using a specific score. The aim was to review alternative options, in economic terms, especially related with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The results show that the superiority of the proton pump inhibitors over the histamine H2 receptor antagonist is clear in moderate and severe oesophagitis and in patients with persistent or severe symptoms. This evidence is clearly related with the intensity of the gastric inhibition. An associated benefit is the improvement of the quality of life obtained with this potent gastric acid inhibition profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Carballo
- Gastroenterology Section, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mason J, Hungin APS. Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--the health economic implications. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22 Suppl 1:20-31. [PMID: 16042656 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02606.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
For the vast majority of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease appropriate care involves the management of symptoms with lifestyle advice and drugs. However, there is dissension about the appropriate use of endoscopy, whether drugs should be stepped up or down according to potency, how long drugs should be used for, the role of lifestyle advice, and, related to this, the role of patients' lifestyle choices. This exploration of the economics of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease reviews its cost burden to the UK, assesses published economic models for their strengths and weaknesses and examines current recommendations for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease management from a socioeconomic perspective. Drugs prescribed predominantly for dyspepsia cost the UK National Health Service a projected pound sterling 625 million in 2004, 7% of the primary care prescribing budget. When general practitioners consultations, endoscopies, over-the-counter sales and sickness absences are included the UK cost rises to pound sterling 1.5 billion: approximately half of this cost can be ascribed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Emphasis upon regular review and stepping down treatment (while maintaining adequate symptom relief) is both clinically appropriate and resource efficient. Other cost-effectiveness issues largely lack objective answers because investment in treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease depends upon how much more, at the margin, society wishes to invest for further but diminishing symptom relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Mason
- School for Health, University of Durham, Wolfson Research Unit, University Boulevard, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sjöstedt S, Befrits R, Sylvan A, Harthon C, Jörgensen L, Carling L, Modin S, Stubberöd A, Toth E, Lind T. Daily treatment with esomeprazole is superior to that taken on-demand for maintenance of healed erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22:183-91. [PMID: 16091055 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02553.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On-demand therapy with esomeprazole is effective for long-term treatment of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it has not been evaluated in erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS To compare endoscopic and symptomatic remission over a 6-month period when patients with healed erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are treated with esomeprazole 20 mg, either once daily or on-demand. METHODS Patients with verified erosive reflux oesophagitis of Los Angeles grades A-D were enrolled. Following 4-8 weeks treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily, those who were endoscopically healed and had symptom control during the last week were randomized to maintenance therapy for 6 months with esomeprazole 20 mg, taken either once daily or on-demand. RESULTS Of 539 enrolled patients, 494 (91%) were healed at 8 weeks and 477 were randomized to maintenance therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg, 243 once daily and 234 on-demand. After once daily treatment, 81% of patients were still in remission at 6 months, compared with only 58% who took on-demand treatment (P < 0.0001). A difference in remission was found irrespective of baseline grade of oesophagitis, but it was more pronounced for the more severe grades. There was no difference in overall symptomatic remission between the two treatments, although heartburn was significantly more prevalent in the on-demand group. CONCLUSIONS Once daily esomeprazole 20 mg was better than that taken on-demand for maintaining healed erosive oesophagitis, regardless of baseline Los Angeles grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sjöstedt
- Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Uncomplicated reflux disease comprises the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD). The objectives of treatment are the adequate control of symptoms with restoration of quality of life, healing of lesions and prevention of relapse. Treatment of NERD consists in the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for 2-4 wk, although patients with NERD show an overall poorer response to PPI treatment than patients with ERD owing to the fact that patients with NERD do not form a pathophysiologically homogenous group. For long-term management on-demand treatment with a PPI is probably the best option. In patients with ERD, therapy with a standard dose PPI for 4-8 wk is always recommended. Long-term treatment of ERD is applied either intermittently or as continuous maintenance treatment with an attempt to reduce the daily dosage of the PPI (step-down principle). In selected patients requiring long-term PPI treatment, antireflux surgery is an alternative option. In patients with troublesome reflux symptoms and without alarming features empirical PPI therapy is another option for initial management. Therapy should be withdrawn after initial success. In the case of relapse, the long-term care depends on a careful risk assessment and the response to PPI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Labenz
- Jung-Stilling Hospital, Wichern str. 40, D-57074 Siegen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Janssen W, Meier E, Gatz G, Pfaffenberger B. Effects of pantoprazole 20 mg in mildgastroesophageal reflux disease: Once-daily treatment in the acute phase, and comparison of on-demand versus continuous treatment in the long term. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH 2005; 66:345-63. [PMID: 24672134 PMCID: PMC3964567 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2005] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disorder,and although effective short-term treatment strategies are known, the rate of relapse within 1 year is as high as 90% despite successful acute treatment. Consequently, most patients with GERD require an effective long-term management strategy to achieve adequate symptom control and maintain mucosal healing. OBJECTIVE The present study was undertaken to compare the control ofGERD symptoms during long-term (24-week) treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg used on-demand or continuously in patients with mild GERD after complete relief of acute GERD symptoms. METHODS Patients with endoscopically confirmed Savary/Miller grade 0(normal mucosa) or I (patchy red lesions without white coating or with central white coating) GERD were enrolled in this multinational, multicenter study comprising 2 phases. In the first phase, which was open label, patients were treated with pantoprazole 20 mg QD for 4 weeks. The presence and intensity of the symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and pain on swallowing were assessed. In the second phase, which was an open-label, 24-week, randomized design, only patients completely free of GERD symptoms after acute treatment were included. During this phase, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg was directly compared with continuous treatment. The rate of failure to control GERD symptoms after 24 weeks of treatment was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subsequently, the difference between treatments (on-demand minus continuous) and its 95% CI were calculated, and the on-demand treatment was tested for noninferiority using a predefined noninferiority margin of 20%. The mean daily symptom loads were compared between the treatment groups using the 1-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test on a 5% α level. The point estimate of the difference was determined using the Hodges-Lehman estimator and the 1-sided 95% CI according to Moses. The number of patients unwilling to continue due to insufficient control of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and pain on swallowing was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier (time-to-event) analysis. Analysis was performed in the same manner as for the rate of failure to control GERD symptoms, but the 95% CI was interpreted for statistical superiority. RESULTS A total of 558 patients were enrolled in this study. At the end of theacute phase, 82.1% of patients in the per-protocol (PP) population and 79.1% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population were relieved of all GERD symptoms, and subsequently entered the long-term phase. After 24 weeks of treatment, analysis of the failure rates revealed that on-demand treatment was noninferior to continuous treatment because the 95% CI was completely below 20% (ITT, 12.1% difference [95% CI, -∞ to 18.9%]; PP, 10.1% difference [95% CI, -∞ to 17.7%]). The higher perceived mean (SD) daily symptom load in the on-demand group (ITT, 1.26 [1.491 vs 0.82 [1.341) was balanced by the reduced tablet intake in that group (PP, 0.51 [0.31 ] vs 0.97 [0.11 ] tablets/d; P < 0.001). With respect to the rate of patients unwilling to continue treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed between the on-demand and continuous groups (ITT/PP, 0.95/1.13 vs 0.95/1.26). CONCLUSIONS In this study of pantoprazole 20 mg tablets in patients withmild GERD, patients receiving on-demand treatment benefited despite their higher symptom load. The similar rates of unwillingness to continue treatment in both groups might suggest that patients were satisfied with the on-demand treatment strategy. On-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg was found to be noninferior compared with continuous therapy with regard to symptom control. Both on-demand and continuous treatments were well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gudrun Gatz
- Department of Gastroenterology, ALTANA Pharma AG, Konstanz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zacny J, Zamakhshary M, Sketris I, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. Systematic review: the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21:1299-312. [PMID: 15932360 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02490.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with either histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for patients with erosive oesophagitis or symptomatic heartburn. METHOD We conducted randomized-controlled trials of non-continuous therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. RESULTS Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Because of variation in outcome measures statistical pooling of results was not possible. Results were analysed qualitatively. Four studies evaluated intermittent therapy of treatment 3 days a week with omeprazole 20 mg or daily with ranitidine which were not efficacious compared to a daily proton pump inhibitor. Famotidine 10 and 20 mg, ranitidine 75 mg and cimetidine 200 mg were efficacious in five on-demand studies for relief of symptomatic heartburn episodes. In three of four studies, evaluating only non-erosive (endoscopy-negative) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg and omeprazole 10 and 20 mg a day were efficacious using willingness to continue as an endpoint. Lansoprazole 30 mg and omeprazole 20 mg maintained symptom control in 60-70% of healed oesophagitis patients. CONCLUSIONS Intermittent proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist therapy is not effective in maintaining control in oesophagitis patients. H2-receptor antagonists are effective for relief of heartburn episodes. On-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy may work in a proportion of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Zacny
- Division of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|