Rapid hip bone loss in active Crohn's disease patients receiving short-term corticosteroid therapy

Soybean Meal-Dependent Intestinal Inflammation Induces Different Patterns of Bone-Loss in Adult Zebrafish Scale

Inflammatory bowel disease have been linked to several health issues, including high risk of low bone mineral density. Danio rerio (zebrafish) is a good model to verify the effects of intestinal inflammation, since its gastrointestinal and immune systems are closely related to that of mammalians. Zebrafish is also a powerful model to study bone metabolism using the scale as the read-out model. Food strongly impacts zebrafish gut physiology, and it is well known that soybean meal induces intestinal inflammation. Adult zebrafish fed with defatted soybean meal (SBM) exhibited an intestinal inflammation evidenced by morphological alterations, inflammatory infiltrate, and increased mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TGFβ, TNF-α). The peak of acute intestinal inflammation, spanning between week 2 and 3, correlates with a transitory osteoporosis-like phenotype in the scale border. Later, a chronic inflammatory condition, associated with persistent IL-8 expression, correlates with the progression of resorption lacunae in the scale center. Both types of resorption lacunae were associated with intense osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity. After 3 weeks of SBM treatment, osteoclast activity decreased in the scale border but not in the center. At the same time, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is activated in the border to repair the bone matrix. This model can contribute to elucidate in vivo the molecular mechanisms that links intestinal inflammation and bone metabolism in IBD.

Can 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity predict the sensitivity of bone to therapeutic glucocorticoids in inflammatory bowel disease?

In healthy individuals measures of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) enzyme activity predict the change in bone formation markers in response to therapeutic glucocorticoids. It is unclear whether these measures remain predictive in inflammatory disease. We therefore examined whether 11β-HSD1 activity predicts changes in bone markers and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with therapeutic glucocorticoids. Prospective and cross-sectional studies were carried out in patients attending a gastroenterology clinic with active (n = 39) or clinically inactive (n = 34) IBD and healthy controls (n = 51). Urinary corticosteroid metabolite profiles were obtained on a spot urine sample and total corticosteroid metabolite excretion and 11β-HSD1 activity (measured as the ratio of tetrahydrocortisol to tetrahydrocortisone metabolites, [THF+alloTHF]/THE) determined. Patients with active disease were treated with an 8-week reducing course of oral prednisolone. The (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio was significantly increased in patients with IBD, even those in clinical remission. The baseline (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio failed to predict the decrease in bone formation markers or hip BMD. Measures of 11β-HSD activity do not predict bone loss during glucocorticoid treatment of active IBD, probably due to disease-related increases in 11β-HSD1 activity. Our observation of elevated 11β-HSD1 activity in clinically inactive IBD implicates gastrointestinal glucocorticoid activation in the maintenance of disease remission.

IL-6 may modulate the skeletal response to glucocorticoids during exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease

Whether inflammatory cytokines affect the skeletal response to glucocorticoid (GC) treatment is unclear. Our objectives were to (1) identify the cytokine(s) elevated during exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); (2) determine whether the cytokine(s) identified in this way is related to systemic GC sensitivity; and (3) examine whether cytokines and/or measures of GC sensitivity are related to changes in bone formation or resorption following GC therapy. We designed a combined cross-sectional and prospective study, including patients with active (n = 31) and inactive (n = 34) IBD as well as controls (n = 29). We assessed circulating concentrations of cytokines, PINP and betaCTX, as well as GC sensitivity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. IL-6 was the only cytokine increased in active IBD, 2.35 (2.63) versus 1.64 (1.21) versus 1.31 (2.79) pg/microl active IBD, inactive IBD, and controls, respectively (median [interquartile range]) (P = 0.03, ANOVA). IL-6 was positively related to magnitude of GC sensitivity (beta = 0.02, 95% CI 0.008-0.04, P = 0.005). Following treatment with GC in active IBD, PINP decreased (P < 0.001), whereas betaCTX showed no significant change (P = 0.2). Subsequently, multiple regression analyses revealed that plasma IL-6 concentrations were inversely related to the extent of PINP suppression following GC (beta = 3.3, 95% CI 0.2-6.4, P = 0.04, adjusted for baseline PINP and duration of GC treatment), while no association was observed with GC sensitivity. In conclusion, IL-6 is elevated in active IBD and may protect against GC-induced suppression of bone formation via a mechanism which appears to be independent of systemic GC sensitivity.

Use of risedronate to prevent bone loss following a single course of glucocorticoids: findings from a proof-of-concept study in inflammatory bowel disease

SUMMARY

We performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether risedronate 35 mg once weekly prevents bone loss following an 8-week reducing course of prednisolone given for an exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The greatest change in bone mineral density (BMD) was at Ward's triangle (WT), which fell by 2.2% in the placebo group, compared with a reduction of 0.8% in the risedronate group.

INTRODUCTION

Whether bisphosphonates can prevent bone loss associated with intermittent glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is unknown, reflecting the difficulty in performing RCTs in this context.

METHOD

To explore the feasibility of RCTs to examine this question, lumbar spine (LS; L2-4) and hip dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed in 78 patients commencing a GC therapy course for a relapse of IBD. They were then randomised to receive placebo or risedronate 35 mg weekly for 8 weeks, after which the DXA scan was repeated.

RESULTS

For LS BMD, there was no change in the placebo group (0.1 +/- 0.4, p = 0.9), but there was an increase after risedronate (0.8 +/- 0.4, p = 0.04; mean% +/- SEM by paired Student's t test). There were small decreases in both groups at the total hip (-0.5 +/- 0.3, p = 0.04; -0.5 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05, placebo and risedronate, respectively). At WT, BMD fell after placebo (-2.2 +/- 0.5, p = 0.001) but not risedronate (-0.8 +/- 0.5, p = 0.09; p = 0.05 for between-group comparison).

CONCLUSION

RCTs can be used to examine whether bisphosphonates prevent bone loss associated with intermittent GC therapy, providing metabolically active sites such as WT are employed as the primary outcome.

Bones and Crohn's: estradiol deficiency in men with Crohn's disease is not associated with reduced bone mineral density

Background

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis are frequent in Crohn's disease (CD), but the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Deficiency of sex steroids, especially estradiol (E2), is an established risk factor in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Aim

To assess if hormonal deficiencies in male CD patients are frequent we investigated both, sex steroids, bone density and bone metabolism markers.

Methods

111 male CD patients underwent osteodensitometry (DXA) of the spine (L1–L4). Disease related data were recorded. Disease activity was estimated using Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI). Testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), estradiol (E2), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), Osteocalcin and carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptids (ICTP) were measured in 111 patients and 99 age-matched controls.

Results

Patients had lower T, E2 and SHBG serum levels (p < 0.001) compared to age-matched controls. E2 deficiency was seen in 30 (27.0%) and T deficiency in 3 (2.7%) patients but only in 5 (5.1%) and 1 (1%) controls. Patients with E2 deficiency had significantly decreased T and DHT serum levels. Use of corticosteroids for 3 of 12 months was associated with lower E2 levels (p < 0.05). Patients with life-time steroids >10 g had lower BMD. 32 (28.8%) patients showed osteoporosis, 55 (49.5%) osteopenia and 24 (21.6%) had normal BMD. Patients with normal or decreased BMD showed no significant difference in their hormonal status. No correlation between markers of bone turnover and sex steroids could be found. ICTP was increased in CD patients (p < 0.001), and patients with osteoporosis had higher ICTP levels than those with normal BMD.

Conclusion

We found an altered hormonal status – i.e. E2 and, to a lesser extent T deficiency – in male CD patients but failed to show an association to bone density or markers of bone turnover. The role of E2 in the negative skeletal balance in males with CD, analogous to E2 deficiency in postmenopausal females, deserves further attention.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of intravenous clodronate for prevention of steroid-induced bone loss in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Osteoporosis is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Corticosteroids induce a rapid and important bone loss. Clinical trials have shown oral bisphosphonates to effectively prevent steroid-induced bone loss. However, patients with IBD have been excluded from most of these studies because of potential digestive adverse events. Clodronate is a non-amino-bisphosphonate available in intravenous form without expected digestive (as oral bisphosphonates) or proinflammatory (as amine bisphosphonates) side effects. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of intravenous clodronate in preventing steroid-induced bone loss.

METHODS

A 12-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in IBD patients beginning a steroid therapy. Sixty-seven patients (median disease duration, 38 mo; range, 1-240 mo) were randomized to receive one infusion per 3 months of either intravenous clodronate (900 mg, n = 33) or placebo. All the patients received calcium (1 g/day) and vitamin D (800 IU/day). The main outcome was the change in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) between baseline and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included change in femoral neck BMD and adverse events.

RESULTS

After 1 year, there was no change in BMD in the clodronate group, neither at the spine (-0.2%, not significant) nor at the femoral neck (2.3%, NS). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in lumbar spine (-2.0%, P = .0018) and femoral neck (-1.7%, P = .045) BMD in the placebo group. Tolerance to treatment was good.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous clodronate is effective in the prevention of bone loss induced by steroids in patients with IBD.

Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are a well-established treatment for active Crohn's disease and have been widely used for decades. It has become apparent, however, that a proportion of patients either fails to respond to corticosteroids or is unable to withdraw from them without relapsing. Furthermore, their use is associated with a range of side effects, such that long-term treatment carries unacceptable risk.

AIM

To review the evidence regarding the appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease, along with their side effects, safety and alternatives.

METHODS

To collect relevant articles, a PubMed search was performed from 1966 to November 2006 using the terms 'steroid', 'corticosteroid', 'glucocorticoid', 'prednisolone', 'prednisone', 'methylprednisolone', 'hydrocortisone', 'dexamethasone' and 'budesonide' in combination with 'Crohn(s) disease'. Relevant articles were reviewed, as were their reference lists to identify further articles.

RESULTS

When used correctly, corticosteroids are a highly effective, well tolerated, cheap and generally safe treatment for active Crohn' disease. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of recipients will either fail to respond (steroid-resistant) or will be steroid dependent at 1 year. Newer alternatives to corticosteroids are not, however, without risk themselves and, moreover, are not necessarily available universally.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are used widely to treat Crohn's disease, a situation that is unlikely to change in the near future. Accordingly, efforts should be made to ensure that they are used correctly and that their side effects are minimized. Reference is made to recently published guidelines and a simplified 'users guide' is presented.

Fracture risk with intermittent high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of fracture in patients receiving intermittent therapy with high-dose oral glucocorticoids (GCs).

METHODS

The study group comprised 191,752 patients from the UK General Practice Database who were 40 years of age and older and received therapy with GCs. The followup time period was divided into the categories of "current" and "no exposure." The daily dose and cumulative dose for each time period were determined. Relative risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, disease history, and drug history. Fractures of the radius/ulna, humerus, rib, femur/hip, pelvis, or vertebrae were included in the evaluation.

RESULTS

Patients who intermittently received high-dose GCs (daily dose > or =15 mg) and had no or little previous exposure to GCs (cumulative exposure < or =1 gm) had a small increased risk of osteoporotic (but not hip/femur) fracture; this risk increased substantially with increasing cumulative exposure. Among patients who received a daily dose > or =30 mg and whose cumulative exposure was >5 gm, the relative risk (RR) of osteoporotic fracture was 3.63 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.54-5.20), the RR of fracture of the hip/femur was 3.13 (95% CI 1.49-6.59), and the RR of vertebral fracture was 14.42 (95% CI 8.29-25.08).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent use of high-dose oral GCs (daily dose > or =15 mg and cumulative exposure < or =1 gm) may result in a small increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Conversely, patients who receive several courses of high-dose GCs (daily dose > or =15 mg and cumulative exposure >1 gm) have a substantially increased risk of fracture.

Effect of systemic glucocorticoid therapy on bone metabolism: an update

Glucocorticoids are widely used for a range of inflammatory conditions. However, their use is complicated by significant side effects. The most important of these from a clinical point of view is on bone, where glucocorticoids substantially increase the risk of osteoporosis and fracture. This review will give an overview of the pathophysiologic basis and epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, examine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches currently available, and suggest the likely impact of the most recent scientific, clinical and pharmaceutical advances. Glucocorticoids impact on both bone formation and bone resorption, a combination that leads to rapid bone loss and increase in fracture risk. Epidemiologic studies indicate that these risks are substantial, especially at the spine, increase with age and independently of bone density, and are maintained during glucocorticoid use. The best available treatments are bisphosphonates that preserve bone density and reduce the risk of fracture at the spine. Future areas that need to be addressed are the relationship between inflammation and the action of glucocorticoids on the skeleton, and the development of anabolic therapies for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is not a useful tool to screen patients with inflammatory bowel disease at high risk for metabolic bone disease

BACKGROUND

Up to 42% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significant metabolic bone disease. The current method of screening for osteopenia or osteoporosis involves dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This is relatively costly and involves radiation exposure. What is needed is a safe, inexpensive, and quick screening tool to identify patients who would benefit from DXA testing. This would reduce the number of patients undergoing DXA testing unnecessarily. We tried to determine if calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is a useful tool in screening high-risk patients with IBD for metabolic bone disease.

METHODS

Patients with IBD who presented to the clinic between August 29, 2003 and December 22, 2003 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry screening using a GE Lunar Achilles Insight quantitative ultrasound densitometry machine (QUS). Patients who were at high risk for significant metabolic bone disease (i.e., significant previous prednisone use or a long history of severe IBD) or who had a T-score on QUS less than or equal to -0.7 had DXA testing performed. The DXA results and QUS results were compared. The radiologist was blinded to the results of QUS.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients with IBD were enrolled. Fifty (40%) were considered high risk for metabolic bone disease. This cohort was comprised of 29 men (58%), of which 21 (73%) had Crohn's disease (CD). Eighty percent of this high-risk group had CD, and in both groups, the majority had used corticosteroids. The overall risk of significant metabolic bone disease in this high-risk group was 62% (DXA < or = -1.0). Heel density (T-score) correlated poorly with DXA (T-score) at either hip or spine at 0.40 even when 2 outlier patients (QUS = -2.9, DXA spine = 0.7, DXA hip = 0.8 and QUS = -3.6, DXA spine = -3, DXA hip = -4) were excluded. Likewise, no association in osteopenia or osteoporosis was seen between multiple variables. These included sex, disease type (ulcerative colitis or CD), smoking, and prior intestinal resection. The sensitivity of QUS to identify patients with significant metabolic bone disease was 74%, and specificity was 63%. A positive predictive value of 81% and negative predictive value of 53% were also less than ideal. The Altman-Bland analysis showed that the agreement between QUS and DXA was poor (-2.0, 2.1). Based on this analysis, QUS cannot replace DXA in the individual patient with IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is not a useful tool to screen high-risk patients with IBD for metabolic bone disease.

Therapy Insight: osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease—advances and retreats

There is a discrepancy between the high rates of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the relatively low fracture rates observed in population-based studies. When fractures occur, they are most common among the elderly IBD population. It has become clear that BMD is but one of several important factors to be considered when assessing fracture risk. Ideally, BMD should be assessed selectively, as opposed to assessing this measure in all IBD patients simply because they carry an IBD diagnosis. Preventing bone loss should begin with an attempt to limit corticosteroid-induced bone loss. This can be done by using the minimum effective prednisolone dose, substituting budesonide when appropriate, administering other steroid-sparing immunomodulators, or by prescribing additional agents that enhance bone health. The administration of calcium and vitamin D appears to maintain or enhance bone mass. Bisphosphonates are of unclear additional benefit to the majority of patients who are at low fracture risk. Although more data are required to understand the best strategy to prevent fractures, a greater appreciation of the role of selective BMD testing and the utility of simple therapeutic strategies (such as calcium and vitamin D supplements) is emerging.