Long-term follow-up of 13C-urea breath test results after Helicobacter pylori eradication: frequency and significance of borderline delta13CO2 values

Short-term outcomes and intermediate-term follow-up of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment for naïve patients: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the outcomes of Helicobacter pylori infection treatments for naïve patients in the real-world settings.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Single tertiary level academic hospital in China.

PARTICIPANTS

We identified patients initially receiving quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection from 2017 to 2020 in whom eradication was confirmed (n=23 470).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Efficacy of different initial H. pylori infection treatments.

SECONDARY OUTCOME

Results of urea breath test (UBT) after H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

Among 23 470 patients who received initial H. pylori treatment, 21 285 (90.7%) were treated with amoxicillin-based regimens. The median age of the patients decreased from 2017 to 2020 (45.0 vs 39.0, p<0.0001). The main treatments were therapies containing amoxicillin and furazolidone, which had an eradication rate of 87.6% (14 707/16 784); those containing amoxicillin and clarithromycin had an eradication rate of 85.5% (3577/4182). The date of treatment, age, antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment showed correlations with the failure of H. pylori eradication in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Finally, positive UBT results after eradication clustered around the cut-off value, in both the ¹³C-UBT and ¹⁴C-UBT.

CONCLUSIONS

The major H. pylori infection treatments for naïve patients were those containing amoxicillin and furazolidone, which offered the highest eradication rate. The date of treatment, age, antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment were risk factors for the failure of H. pylori eradication. Additionally, positive UBT results after eradication clustered around the cut-off value.

Evaluation of a New Monoclonal Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Stool Antigen Test for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Spanish Multicentre Study

The stool antigen test (SAT) represents an attractive alternative for detection of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a new SAT, the automated LIAISON® Meridian H. pylori SA based on monoclonal antibodies, compared to the defined gold standard 13C-urea breath test (UBT). This prospective multicentre study (nine Spanish centres) enrolled patients ≥18 years of age with clinical indication to perform UBT for the initial diagnosis and for confirmation of bacterial eradication. Two UBT methods were used: mass spectrometry (MS) including citric acid (CA) or infrared spectrophotometry (IRS) without CA. Overall, 307 patients (145 naïve, 162 with confirmation of eradication) were analysed. Using recommended cut-off values (negative SAT < 0.90, positive ≥ 1.10) the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 67%, 97%, 86%, 92% and 91%, respectively, obtaining an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.85. Twenty-eight patients, including seven false positives and 21 false negatives, presented a discordant result between SAT and UBT. Among the 21 false negatives, four of six tested with MS and 11 of 15 tested with IRS presented a borderline UBT delta value. In 25 discordant samples, PCR targeting H. pylori DNA was performed to re-assess positivity and SAT accuracy was re-analysed: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and AUC were 94%, 97%, 86%, 99%, 97% and 0.96, respectively. The new LIAISON® Meridian H. pylori SA SAT showed a good accuracy for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Lack of almagate interference in breath test results for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis (Almatest study)

OBJECTIVE

The ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori. Debate continues to surround the possible interference of antacid intake on its result. This study aims to confirm the non-interference of almagate in the determination of H. pylori by UBT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Observational, multicentre study in adult patients treated with almagate in whom a UBT (TAUKIT®) was indicated. When the UBT result was negative, use of almagate was stopped for 30 days and the UBT was repeated. When the result was positive, no further determinations were made. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who, having had a negative result in the first breath test, were positive in the second after having stopped taking almagate (UBT false negatives, possibly attributable to almagate).

RESULTS

Of the 167 evaluable patients, 59% were female, average age was 49 and 97% had gastrointestinal symptoms. The result of the first UBT was negative in 71% of cases. Of these, in the second UBT test after stopping the almagate, the negative result was confirmed in 97.5%. Out of the total number of cases evaluated, the rate of false negatives was 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking almagate has minimal or no interference in the result of UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. It can therefore be used in the weeks prior to a UBT.

PROSPECTIVE STUDY FOR VALIDATION OF A SINGLE PROTOCOL FOR THE 13C-UREA BREATH TEST USING TWO DIFFERENT DEVICES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF H. PYLORI INFECTION

BACKGROUND

13C-urea breath test (UBT) is the gold-standard, noninvasive method for H. pylori diagnosis. However, there is no uniform standardization of the test. This situation can be unpractical for laboratories running with two or more devices.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a prospective comparison validation study of UBT employing one validated protocol for two different devices: BreathID Hp Lab System® (Exalenz Bioscience Ltd, Israel), here called device A and IRIS-Doc2® (Wagner Analysen-Technik, Germany, now Mayoly Spindler Group, France), here called device B, in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

METHODS

A total of 518 consecutive patients (365 females, 153 males, mean age 53 years) referred for UBT were included. All patients received device A protocol as follow: after at least one hour fasting, patients filled two bags prior to the test, then ingested an aqueous solution containing 75 mg of 13C-urea with a 4.0 g citric acid powder and filled another two bags 15 min after ingesting the test solution. One pair of breath sample bags (before and after ingestion) was analyzed by the two different devices. A delta over baseline (DOB) ≥5‰ indicated H. pylori infection. Statistics: Wilcoxon test, kappa coefficient with 95% CI, Wilson's method.

RESULTS

Considering the device A protocol as the gold standard, its comparison with device B showed a sensitivity of 99.3% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.3-99.6). Kappa coefficient was 0.976 (95% IC: 0.956-0.997).

CONCLUSION

Correlation between the two devices was excellent and supports a uniform standardization of UBT.

Helicobacter pylori infection as a risk factor for serum bilirubin change and less favourable lipid profiles: a hospital-based health examination survey

Background

Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with several extragastric conditions including dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome. This study aimed to investigate additional metabolic parameters associated with H. pylori infection in a Chinese population.

Methods

Using a case-control approach we studied 617 subjects with ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) values ≥10‰ who were defined as being positive for H. pylori (cases), while 617 sex and age- matched subjects with ¹³C-UBT values ≤1‰ were defined as H. pylori negative (controls) in Beijing Tongren Hospital from March 2016 to May 2017. Biochemical parameters including serum bilirubin and lipids were tested.

Results

A total of 1982 subjects participated in this study. The H. pylori infected subjects had significantly lower serum direct bilirubin concentrations (2.34 ± 0.38 vs. 2.47 ± 0.90 μmol/L, P = 0.008). H. pylori infection was independently associated with lower direct bilirubin levels (OR = 1.497, 95% CI =1.121–1.999, P = 0.006) or total bilirubin levels (OR = 1.322, 95% CI =1.005–1.738, P = 0.046) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides(TG). In addition, the H. pylori infected subjects had higher LDL-C levels (2.98 ± 0.76 vs. 2.89 ± 0.75 mmol/L, P = 0.033) and lower HDL-C levels (1.39 ± 0.37 vs. 1.44 ± 0.41 mmol/L, P = 0.044). LDL-C was negatively correlated with direct bilirubin concentration (R = − 0.260, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Bilirubin has been found to be a potent endogenous antioxidant and negatively associated with metabolic syndrome. Our results suggest that H. pylori infection is an independent risk factor for serum bilirubin reduction and less favorable lipid profiles.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-3787-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Effect of posture on 13C-urea breath test in partial gastrectomy patients

AIM: To investigate whether posture affects the accuracy of ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) detection in partial gastrectomy patients.

METHODS: We studied 156 consecutive residual stomach patients, including 76 with H. pylori infection (infection group) and 80 without H. pylori infection (control group). H. pylori infection was confirmed if both the rapid urease test and histology were positive during gastroscopy. The two groups were divided into four subgroups according to patients’ posture during the ¹³C-UBT: subgroup A, sitting position; subgroup B, supine position; subgroup C, right lateral recumbent position; and subgroup D, left lateral recumbent position. Each subject underwent the following modified ¹³C-UBT: 75 mg of ¹³C-urea (powder) in 100 mL of citric acid solution was administered, and a mouth wash was performed immediately; breath samples were then collected at baseline and at 5-min intervals up to 30 min while the position was maintained. Seven breath samples were collected for each subject. The cutoff value was 2.0‰.

RESULTS: The mean delta over baseline (DOB) values in the subgroups of the infection group were similar at 5 min (P > 0.05) and significantly higher than those in the corresponding control subgroups at all time points (P < 0.01). In the infection group, the mean DOB values in subgroup A were higher than those in other subgroups within 10 min and peaked at the 10-min point (12.4‰± 2.4‰). The values in subgroups B and C both reached their peaks at 15 min (B, 13.9‰± 1.5‰; C, 12.2‰± 1.7‰) and then decreased gradually until the 30-min point. In subgroup D, the value peaked at 20 min (14.7‰± 1.7‰). Significant differences were found between the values in subgroups D and B at both 25 min (t = 2.093, P = 0.043) and 30 min (t = 2.141, P = 0.039). At 30 min, the value in subgroup D was also significantly different from those in subgroups A and C (D vs C: t = 6.325, P = 0.000; D vs A: t = 5.912, P = 0.000). The mean DOB values of subjects with Billroth I anastomosis were higher than those of subjects with Billroth II anastomosis irrespectively of the detection time and posture (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Utilization of the left lateral recumbent position during the procedure and when collecting the last breath sample may improve the diagnostic accuracy of the ¹³C-UBT in partial gastrectomy patients.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: What should be the gold standard?

Since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in 1983, numerous detection methods for the presence of the bacterium have been developed. Each one of them has been associated with advantages and disadvantages. Noninvasive tests such as serology, ¹³C urea breath test (UBT) and stool antigen tests are usually preferred by the clinicians. Serology has its own limitation especially in endemic areas while ¹³C UBT is technically very demanding. The stool antigen detection method, although specific, is usually associated with poor sensitivity. The ¹³C UBT is believed to be specific, but with present revelation of the fact that stomach is colonized by many other urease producing bacteria makes it questionable. Histology, culture, rapid urease test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the tests which are carried out on antral biopsies collected by invasive means. Histology has been proposed to be very sensitive and specific but the question is how by simply looking the morphology of the bacteria in the microscope, one can claim that the curved bacterium is exclusively H. pylori. Rapid urease test (RUT), the doctor’s test, is also challenged because the presence of other urease producing bacteria in the stomach cannot be denied. Moreover, RUT has been reported with poor sensitivity specially, when density of the bacterium is low. Isolation of H. pylori is essential to investigate its growth requirements, antibiotic susceptibility testing, studying virulence factor to develop vaccine and many more explorations. It has also got several disadvantages i.e., special condition for transporting, media, incubation and few days waiting for the colonies to appear, apart from the speed essentially needed to process the specimens. Till date, majority of the microbiological laboratories in the world are not equipped and trained to isolate such fastidious bacterium. The option left is PCR methods to detect H. pylori’s DNA in gastric mucosa, gastric juice, saliva, dental plaques and environmental specimens. There are speculations for false positivity due to detection of non-pylori Helicobacters due to genetic sharing; and false negativity due to low bacterial counts and presence of PCR inhibitors. However, specimen collection, transportation and processing do not require speed and special conditions. PCR based diagnosis may be considered as gold standard by designing primers extremely specific to H. pylori and targeting at least more than one conserved genes. Similarly specificity of PCR may be improved by use of internal Primers. Further, nested PCR will take care of false negatives by countering the effect of PCR inhibitors and low bacterial counts. Therefore, nested PCR based methods if performed properly, may be proposed as gold standard test.

Risk of recurrent Helicobacter pylori infection 1 year after initial eradication therapy in 7 Latin American communities

IMPORTANCE

The long-term effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication programs for preventing gastric cancer will depend on recurrence risk and individual and community factors.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate risk of H. pylori recurrence and assess factors associated with successful eradication 1 year after treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Cohort analysis of 1463 randomized trial participants aged 21 to 65 years from 7 Latin American communities, who were treated for H. pylori and observed between September 2009 and July 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 14-day lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (triple therapy); 5-day lansoprazole and amoxicillin followed by 5-day lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (sequential); or 5-day lansoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (concomitant). Participants with a positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT) 6 to 8 weeks posttreatment were offered voluntary re-treatment with 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

Recurrent infection after a negative posttreatment UBT and factors associated with successful eradication at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among participants with UBT-negative results who had a 1-year follow-up UBT (n=1091), 125 tested UBT positive, a recurrence risk of 11.5% (95% CI, 9.6%-13.5%). Recurrence was significantly associated with study site (P = .03), nonadherence to initial therapy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.31-6.13; P = .01), and children in the household (AOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35 per child; P = .03). Of the 281 with positive posttreatment UBT results, 138 completed re-treatment, of whom 93 tested UBT negative at 1 year. Among the 1340 who had a 1-year UBT, 80.4% (95% CI, 76.4%-83.9%), 79.8% (95% CI, 75.8%-83.5%), and 77.8% (95% CI, 73.6%-81.6%) had UBT-negative results in the triple, sequential, and concomitant groups, respectively (P = .61), with 79.3% overall effectiveness (95% CI, 77.1%-81.5%). In a single-treatment course analysis that ignored the effects of re-treatment, the percentage of UBT-negative results at 1 year was 72.4% (95% CI, 69.9%-74.8%) and was significantly associated with study site (P < .001), adherence to initial therapy (AOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.42; P < .001), male sex (AOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.25-2.13; P < .001), and age (AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27 per decade; P = .02). One-year effectiveness among all 1463 enrolled participants, considering all missing UBT results as positive, was 72.7% (95% CI, 70.3%-74.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

One year after treatment for H. pylori infection, recurrence occurred in 11.5% of participants who had negative posttreatment UBT results. Recurrence determinants (ie, nonadherence and demographics) may be as important as specific antibiotic regimen in determining the long-term success of H. pylori eradication interventions. Study findings are relevant to the feasibility of programs for the primary prevention of gastric cancer in high-incidence regions of Latin America.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01061437.

Accuracy of urea breath test performed immediately after emergency endoscopy in peptic ulcer bleeding

AIMS

The aim of this work is to investigate the accuracy of the urea breath test (UBT) performed immediately after emergency endoscopy in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).

METHODS

Urea breath test was carried out right after emergency endoscopy in patients with PUB. The accuracy of this early UBT was compared to a delayed one after hospital discharge that was considered the gold standard. Clinical and epidemiological factors were analyzed in order to study their influence on the accuracy of the early UBT.

RESULTS

Early UBT was collected without any complication and good acceptance from all the 74 patients included. In 53 of the patients (71.6%), a delayed UBT was obtained. Comparing concordance between the two tests we have calculated an accuracy of 83% for the early UBT. Sensibility and specificity were 86.36 and 66%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.68% and negative predictive value of 50% (Kappa index = 0.468; p = 0.0005; CI: 95%). We found no influence of epidemiological factors, clinical presentation, drugs, times to gastroscopy, Forrest classification, endoscopic therapy, hemoglobin, and urea levels over the accuracy of early UBT.

CONCLUSIONS

Urea breath test carried out right after emergency endoscopy in PUB is an effective, safe, and easy-to-perform procedure. The accuracy of the test is not modified by clinical or epidemiological factors, ulcer stage, or by the type of therapy applied. However, we have found a low negative predictive value for early UBT, so a delayed test is mandatory for all negative cases.

Low Grade Gastric Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Helicobacter pylori Eradication and Tumor Regression

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is widely accepted as initial therapy for low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, approximately 20% of patients with this disease are not responsive to H. pylori eradication therapy. The aim of this study was to assess remission and relapse rates of low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma after H. pylori eradication and identify the clinical factors that affect remission.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with gastric MALT lymphoma (May 2003 to May 2010) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients, 30 (77%) had a H. pylori infection. There were 35/39 (90%) patients with stage I. Among stage I, 25 patients with the infection underwent eradication therapy and 22/25 (88%) achieved remission. The total regression rate with eradication only in stage I was 24/28 (86%). The median time to remission was 98 days (range, 22 to 397 days). Age, tumor location, invasion depth, H. pylori burden, and severity of mononuclear leukocyte and neutrophil infiltration were not related to remission. However, patients with less neutrophil infiltration were more likely to achieve a successful first H. pylori eradication (p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the rate of low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma regression (86%) with H. pylori eradication alone was higher than that in Western studies (77.8%) and that neutrophil infiltration was inversely related to success of the first H. pylori eradication procedure.

Key points for designing and reporting Helicobacter pylori therapeutic trials: a personal view

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

The aim of this document is to provide a methodological framework and to review key aspects for adequately designing trials to evaluate new treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Non-systematic literature review.

RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the design of the article, we suggest selecting for future trials drugs to which H. pylori has no significant primary resistances and evaluating therapies with pilot studies before engaging in randomized trials. The manuscript defines how the number and type of H. pylori diagnostic tests necessary before and after the trial depend on the setting and reliability of the tests. It recommends the best methods and timing for H. pylori testing before and after therapy. Other recommendations are using current standard treatments as comparators of new therapies, determining antibiotic sensitivity - whenever useful and possible - using adequate randomization and allocation concealment but not necessarily blinding, and performing an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis. In addition, we give basic tips for reporting and discussing study results.

Efficacy of 2-week, second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole for the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Following the failure of first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, second-line therapy is conducted for 1 week using metronidazole instead of clarithromycin in Japan. Recent studies indicate that metronidazole-containing therapy has a higher eradication rate with prolonged treatment duration, even with metronidazole resistance. The aim of this study was to reveal the efficacy of 2-week metronidazole-containing second-line therapy.

METHODS

Eighty-two consecutive outpatients who had failed in the first-line eradication therapy were enrolled and second-line therapy was initiated with 10 mg rabeprazole, 750 mg amoxicillin, and 250 mg metronidazole twice daily. After they had been screened by hematological examination 1 week after initiation, the treatment was continued for 2 weeks after initiation in patients without hematological abnormality. Cure was essentially confirmed by the urea breath test.

RESULTS

After one patient was lost, hematological examination showed elevated serum aminotransferase in 14 of 81 patients. Although it was mild without clinical issues, they were ethically excluded from this study. In the remaining 67 patients and the lost patient, the eradication rate with 2-week therapy was 65/68 (96%, 95% confidence interval: 88-98%) by intention to treat analysis and 65/65 (100%, 94-100%) by per protocol analysis. The main adverse event was soft stools (39%), and no serious adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSION

This 2-week metronidazole-containing second-line therapy provides high efficacy in Japan where metronidazole resistance is rare.

Helicobacter pylori: diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple diagnostic methods and treatment strategies have been developed to detect and treat the Helicobacter pylori infection. Many of them have stood the test of time; others lost their value with the introduction of new test and treatment modalities. This review focuses on the current diagnostic methods and their clinical implications, as well as on established and novel treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The increasing antimicrobial resistance has resulted in a decline of the success rate of recommended eradication regimens. The current guidelines recommend as first-line treatment clarithromycin, amoxicillin or metronidazole, and proton pump inhibitor twice daily, but recent studies have demonstrated an increasing eradication failure with these regimens. Several treatment modifications have been adopted regarding duration and combination of substances.

SUMMARY

The currently recommended first-line treatments are effective and well tolerated. In areas with high antimicrobial resistance rates, new antibiotic combinations and modifications in the sequence of drug administration are proposed as alternative treatment options to standard triple therapy. Future treatment strategies have to focus on regional antimicrobial resistance adopted treatment selection and the development of new antibiotics.

Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastric MALT lymphoma: a pooled data analysis

OBJECTIVES

Helicobacter pylori eradication is recognized as the initial therapy for gastric low-grade, B-cell, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. This study assesses (i) the H. pylori eradication rates for various first- and second-line and rescue therapies and (ii) the associated reinfection rates in patients.

METHODS

Pooled data analysis of systematic review of the literature was performed in this study.

RESULTS

Data from 34 studies with 1,271 treated patients were used. After first-line therapy, the infection was cured in 91% (95% confidence interval (CI)=89.4-92.5) of cases, the eradication rate being higher after dual therapy compared with the 7- or 14-day triple therapies (P=0.0525). After second-line therapy, the eradication rate was 80.8% (95% CI=82.7-95.1), being higher after triple rather than quadruple therapy. Further therapies (from three to five attempts) cured the infection in 75% of patients. H. pylori infection was ultimately cured in 1,250 patients, resulting in eradication rates of 98.3% (95% CI=97.6-99) and 99.8% (95% CI=99.6-100) at intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis levels, respectively. Bacterial reinfection occurred in 18 (2.7%; 95% CI=1.4-3.9) of 676 patients who were followed-up (0.7% yearly). Overall, gastric lymphoma remission was achieved in 973 (77.8%) of 1,250 patients successfully cured of H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first comprehensive ( approximately 1,300 patients) analysis of the therapeutic management of H. pylori in gastric lymphoma patients. Data suggest that this infection is easily managed in these patients, being cured in nearly all cases.

Duplicate breath testing to confirm eradication of Helicobacter pylori: incremental benefit and cost in 419 patients

BACKGROUND

Current standards for establishing a cure of H. pylori infection require two breath tests taken at least 4 weeks apart, to be negative.

AIM

To determine the incremental cost and accuracy of repeating a urea breath test (UBT) in clinical practice.

METHODS

We identified 419 patients with documented Helicobacter pylori infection who received eradication therapy and then had two breath tests, one 4 weeks and the second at least 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. H. pylori infection was documented at baseline by a positive rapid urease test and histology.

RESULTS

In patients with successful eradication of H. pylori infection (n = 317), the mean +/- standard deviation delta over baseline (DOB) value before treatment was 43 +/- 29 ppm. Following treatment, the mean DOB in cured was 0.56 +/- 2.1 ppm at 1 month and was similar to the value obtained at the second breath (0.68 +/- 1; P = 0.39), which was performed 60 +/- 71 days after the first UBT. In patients remaining infected (n = 102), the mean DOB at baseline was 47 +/- 20 ppm. Four weeks after treatment, the DOB was 40 +/- 32 ppm. The second UBT was performed 94 +/- 72 days after the first and the DOB was significantly greater than the first (47 +/- 28; P = 0.040). There was no discordant result between the first breath test and second breath test. At a cost of 30 euros/breath test, the incremental cost of a second breath test was 12 570 euros in this cohort with no incremental clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

A single UBT, 4 weeks after treatment is as effective as two serial breath tests in confirming H. pylori eradication. The incremental cost of the second breath test is very high with no incremental clinical benefit.

An optimized 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection

AIM: To validate an optimized 13C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) protocol for the diagnosis of H pylori infection that is cost-efficient and maintains excellent diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS: 70 healthy volunteers were tested with two simplified ¹³C-UBT protocols, with test meal (Protocol 2) and without test meal (Protocol 1). Breath samples were collected at 10, 20 and 30 min after ingestion of 50 mg ¹³C-urea dissolved in 10 mL of water, taken as a single swallow, followed by 200 mL of water (pH 6.0) and a circular motion around the waistline to homogenize the urea solution. Performance of both protocols was analyzed at various cut-off values. Results were validated against the European protocol.

RESULTS: According to the reference protocol, 65.7% individuals were positive for H pylori infection and 34.3% were negative. There were no significant differences in the ability of both protocols to correctly identify positive and negative H pylori individuals. However, only Protocol 1 with no test meal achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%. The highest values achieved by Protocol 2 were 98.57%, 97.83%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: A 10 min, 50 mg ¹³C-UBT with no test meal using a cut-off value of 2-2.5 is a highly accurate test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection at a reduced cost.

13C-urea breath test during hospitalization for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of (13)C-urea breath test (UBT) to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding and treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding, and treated with omeprazole, had a first UBT performed the day after resuming oral feeding. Patients with a negative UBT during hospitalization underwent a repeated UBT 15 days after stopping PPIs.

RESULTS

The first UBT during hospitalization was positive in 86% of 131 patients. Time between admission and performance of the test was longer in patients with negative versus positive UBT (5.2 +/- 0.7 versus 4.3 +/- 0.5 days; p < .001). The repeated UBT became positive in 15 of 18 (83%) patients with a negative first UBT. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable associated with a negative first UBT was the time elapsed between admission and performance of the test (odds ratio = 6.6; 95%CI = 2.9-15.1).

CONCLUSION

Most H. pylori-positive patients with ulcer bleeding have a positive UBT (performed just after resuming oral feeding) despite previous treatment with high-dose PPIs. Nevertheless, to preclude false-negative results due to PPI therapy, the UBT should be performed as early as possible. If the infection cannot be demonstrated with this first UBT, H. pylori still needs to be definitively excluded with a second UBT performed after stopping PPIs.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

A growing interest in non-invasive tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori has been observed recently, reflecting a large number of studies published this year. New tests have been validated, and the old ones have been used in different clinical situations or for different purposes. Stool antigen tests have been extensively evaluated in pre- and post-treatment settings both in adults and children, and the urea breath test has been studied as a predictor of bacterial load, severity of gastric inflammation, and response to eradication treatment. Several studies have also explored the usefulness of some serologic markers as indicators of the gastric mucosa status. With regard to invasive tests, molecular methods are being used more and more, but the breakthrough this year was the direct in vivo observation of H. pylori during endoscopy.