Comparison of the effects of fasting morning, fasting evening and fed bedtime administration of tenatoprazole on intragastric pH in healthy volunteers: a randomized three-way crossover study

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole

Background

The pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be affected by food intake. We aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole.

Setting

The study population comprised 186 healthy volunteers participating in 6 bioequivalence clinical trials.

Method

Subjects were evaluated to determine the effect of a high-fat breakfast on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (n = 36), rabeprazole (n = 69), and pantoprazole (n = 81).

Main outcome measure

Drug plasma concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

Results

Food affected the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (increased T_max and decreased AUC and C_max), pantoprazole (increased T_max and decreased AUC), and rabeprazole (increased T_max, C_max and half-life). Food increased variability in T_max for all 3 drugs, delaying absorption around 3 to 4 h and until 20 h in some subjects.

Conclusion

As food delays the absorption of PPIs and increases their variability, it would be better to administer these drugs under fasting conditions.

Trial registration

European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT: 2004–003863-59 (registration date 05/MAR/2004), EudraCT 2006–001162-17 (registration date 17-MAR-2006), EudraCT: 2007–002489-37 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2007–002490-31 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2010–024029-19 (registration date 23-NOV-2010).

Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The management of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD (rGERD) is a challenge in clinical practice. Since up to one-third of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) are not satisfied with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, new drug development targeting different pathophysiologies of GERD is imperative. At present, no other drugs serve as a more potent acid suppression agent than PPIs. As an add-on therapy, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, alginates, prokinetics and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors have some impact on the subgroups of rGERD, but greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects for widespread use are required. Visceral hypersensitivity also contributes to the perception of GERD symptoms, and neuromodulators including antidepressants play a role in this category. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring helps to distinguish functional heartburn from true GERD, and psychologic medication and cognitive behavior therapy are further therapy options instead of PPIs.

25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were clinically introduced more than 25 years ago and have since proven to be invaluable, safe, and effective agents for the management of a variety of acid-related disorders. Although all members in this class act in a similar fashion, inhibiting active parietal cell acid secretion, there are slight differences among PPIs relating to their pharmacokinetic properties, metabolism, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical indications. Nevertheless, each is effective in managing gastroesophageal reflux disease and uncomplicated or complicated peptic ulcer disease. Despite their overall efficacy, PPIs do have some limitations related to their short plasma half-lives and requirement for meal-associated dosing, which can lead to breakthrough symptoms in some individuals, especially at night. Longer-acting PPIs and technology to prolong conventional PPI activity have been developed to specifically address these limitations and may improve clinical outcomes.

New and future drug development for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Medical therapy remains the most popular treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Whilst interest in drug development for GERD has declined over the last few years primarily due to the conversion of most proton pump inhibitor (PPI)'s to generic and over the counter compounds, there are still numerous areas of unmet needs in GERD. Drug development has been focused on potent histamine type 2 receptor antagonist's, extended release PPI's, PPI combination, potassium-competitive acid blockers, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation reducers, prokinetics, mucosal protectants and esophageal pain modulators. It is likely that the aforementioned compounds will be niched for specific areas of unmet need in GERD, rather than compete with the presently available anti-reflux therapies.

Circadian rhythms and medical diseases: does it matter when drugs are taken?

BACKGROUND

Chronobiology is devoted to the study of biological rhythms. It is possible that a given medication may be therapeutic and safe when administered at some time, but subtherapeutic or poorly tolerated at another.

METHODS

We focused on some classes of drugs, widely used by the internists, performing a PubMed search with the single drugs associated with the MeSH terms "Chronotherapy", "Circadian rhythm", and "Chronobiology, phenomena". Among the studies found, we considered only those provided with discrete numerosity or clearly stated methodological characteristics.

RESULTS

The results of available studies were given, along with a series of short take-home messages at the end of each mini-chapter devoted to: antihypertensives, statins, anticoagulants, analgesics, drugs for acid-related disorders, and anti-asthmatic drugs. In particular, evidence of morning vs. evening administration, when applicable, was given for each medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate evidence seems to support that at least ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, simvastatin, corticosteroids (slow-release formulation) for arthritic patients, and ranitidine should preferably be administered in the evening. Morning dosing could be better for proton pump inhibitors, whereas time of administration is not crucial for asthma inhalation drugs. Studies are available for other drugs, but not so strong enough to draw definite conclusions. For now, we need prospective intervention trials specifically designed to investigate the long-term effects of a temporal approach to medical therapy. However, since switching to morning-evening administration or vice versa is simple and inexpensive, in some cases it could be considered, remembering that, in any case, adherence remains the crucial point.

Evolving pharmacological approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have considerably improved quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, many patients remain symptomatic despite standard PPI therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on evolving therapeutic strategies related to the pathophysiological processes of GERD and insufficient response to PPIs. Several clinical trials evaluated new PPI formulations and newer types of acid-suppressive drugs. These studies have evaluated traditional end points in GERD, but have not shown clinical superiority to current PPIs. Novel therapeutic strategies targeting underlying mechanisms of GERD, such as transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and esophageal hypersensitivity, are being developed for add-on therapy to PPIs. Prokinetic drugs may also have some potential in the add-on treatment of GERD with insufficient response to PPIs. Add-on studies are hampered by insufficient information on optimal patient selection and lack of established end points.

EXPERT OPINION

Newer drugs for symptomatic control in GERD have largely focused on improved acid suppression, without evidence of clinical superiority. Drugs targeting esophageal motility and sensitivity to be used as add-onc therapy in PPI insufficient responders have not reached Phase III trials to date, due to difficulties with patient selection, tolerability and end points.

The effect of once daily omeprazole and succinic acid (VECAM) vs once daily omeprazole on 24-h intragastric pH

BACKGROUND

Parietal cell H(+)/K(+) ATPase activation is essential for optimal proton pump inhibitor (PPI) activity. Succinic acid (SA) was shown to induce gastric acid secretion. VECAM is a combination of omeprazole (OMP) and SA. To compare the effect of once daily bedtime dosing of VECAM 40 and VECAM 20 without food vs OMP 20 mg administered before breakfast on gastric acidity.

METHODS

Open label, randomized, crossover study enrolling 36 healthy subjects comparing the study treatments at steady state for 24 h intragastric pH monitoring.

KEY RESULTS

The median percent time intragastric pH > 4 demonstrated that VECAM 40 was superior to VECAM 20 (65.7%vs 49.1%P < 0.0001) and OMP 20 mg (65.7%vs 47.6%P = 0.005) during 24 h. VECAM 40 was superior to VECAM 20 (52.8%vs 38.8%P = 0.0079) and OMP 20 mg (52.8%vs 27.2%P < 0.0001), and VECAM 20 was superior to OMP 20 mg (38.8 vs 27.2 P = 0.0069) during the nighttime. VECAM 20 and OMP 20 mg were comparable during 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

VECAM 40 and VECAM 20 were significantly better in maintaining intragastric pH > 4 during the nighttime than OMP 20 mg. Succinic acid eliminates the need for a subsequent meal for intragastric pH control by VECAM.

New pharmacologic approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article highlights current and emerging pharmacological treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), opportunities for improving medical treatment, the extent to which improvements may be achieved with current therapy, and where new therapies may be required. These issues are discussed in the context of current thinking on the pathogenesis of GERD and its various manifestations and on the pharmacologic basis of current treatments.

Proton pump inhibitors inhibit metformin uptake by organic cation transporters (OCTs)

Metformin, an oral insulin-sensitizing drug, is actively transported into cells by organic cation transporters (OCT) 1, 2, and 3 (encoded by SLC22A1, SLC22A2, or SLC22A3), which are tissue specifically expressed at significant levels in various organs such as liver, muscle, and kidney. Because metformin does not undergo hepatic metabolism, drug-drug interaction by inhibition of OCT transporters may be important. So far, comprehensive data on the interaction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with OCTs are missing although PPIs are frequently used in metformin-treated patients. Using in silico modeling and computational analyses, we derived pharmacophore models indicating that PPIs (i.e. omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and tenatoprazole) are potent OCT inhibitors. We then established stably transfected cell lines expressing the human uptake transporters OCT1, OCT2, or OCT3 and tested whether these PPIs inhibit OCT-mediated metformin uptake in vitro. All tested PPIs significantly inhibited metformin uptake by OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3 in a concentration-dependent manner. Half-maximal inhibitory concentration values (IC(50)) were in the low micromolar range (3-36 µM) and thereby in the range of IC(50) values of other potent OCT drug inhibitors. Finally, we tested whether the PPIs are also transported by OCTs, but did not identify PPIs as OCT substrates. In conclusion, PPIs are potent inhibitors of the OCT-mediated metformin transport in vitro. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of this drug-drug interaction with potential consequences on metformin disposition and/or efficacy.

Advances in drug therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing drastically in China. GERD could probably cause reflux esophagitis, chronic cough, asthma, Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma, and frequently affects health-related quality of life. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provides effective symptomatic relief in most patients; however, some patients appear refractory to the treatment with PPIs. The long term use of PPIs might also cause adverse effects, such as interstitial nephritis, fracture and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Many new drugs for GERD have emerged recently. This article reviews the advances in drug therapy for GERD.

New pharmacologic approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease

This article highlights current and emerging pharmacological treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), opportunities for improving medical treatment, the extent to which improvements may be achieved with current therapy, and where new therapies may be required. These issues are discussed in the context of current thinking on the pathogenesis of GERD and its various manifestations and on the pharmacologic basis of current treatments.

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of S-tenatoprazole-Na 30 mg, 60 mg and 90 mg vs. esomeprazole 40 mg in healthy male subjects

BACKGROUND

Racemic tenatoprazole 40 mg/day provides more prolonged acid suppression than esomeprazole 40 mg/day.

AIM

To compare pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of tenatoprazole and esomeprazole.

METHODS

A single-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, 4-way, cross-over study was conducted in 32 healthy male subjects. S-tenatoprazole-Na 30, 60 or 90 mg, or esomeprazole 40 mg was administered once daily for 5 days with 10-day washout intervals. The 24-h intragastric pH was recorded at baseline and on day 5 of each period.

RESULTS

On day 5, median pH (5.34 +/- 0.45 and 5.19 +/- 0.52 vs. 4.76 +/- 0.82, respectively, P < 0.002) and percentage time with pH > 4 (80 +/- 11 and 77 +/- 12, vs. 63 +/- 11 respectively, P < 0.0001) for 24-h were higher with S-tenatoprazole-Na 90 mg and 60 mg than esomeprazole. In nocturnal periods, S-tenatoprazole-Na 90 mg, 60 mg and 30 mg were superior to esomeprazole with regard to median pH (5.14 +/- 0.64, 4.94 +/- 0.65, 4.65 +/- 0.86 and 3.69 +/- 1.18 respectively, P < 0.0001) and percentage time with pH > 4 (77 +/- 12, 73 +/- 17, 64 +/- 17 and 46 +/- 17 respectively, P < 0.0001). Proportion of subjects with nocturnal acid breakthrough with S-tenatoprazole-Na 90 mg, 60 mg and 30 mg was significantly less than with esomeprazole (54.8, 43.3, 56.7 and 90.3 respectively, P < 0.04). The proportion of subjects with >16 hrs with pH >4 was significantly higher with S-tenatoprazole-Na 90 mg and 60 mg than with esomeprazole (87.1%, 83.3% and 41.9% respectively, P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

S-tenatoprazole-Na produced significantly greater and more prolonged dose-dependent 24-h and nocturnal acid suppression than esomeprazole. S-tenatoprazole-Na may provide greater clinical efficacy compared with current PPIs for patients with ineffective once-daily therapy.

Insights into the future of gastric acid suppression

The development of effective acid-suppression therapy (particularly PPIs) has revolutionized the treatment of acid-related diseases. Despite the overall effectiveness of these agents, they have some shortcomings, including a delayed onset of action, incomplete acid suppression in the majority of patients, and the need for ingestion before a meal to achieve maximal efficacy. Attempts to overcome these issues have included the development of isomeric PPIs (such as esomeprazole), alterations in drug delivery (such as delayed-release dexlansoprazole), and combined therapy with nonenterically coated PPIs and antacids (such as 'naked' omeprazole combined with sodium biocarbonate). Other acid-suppression agents in development or in late-phase trials include potassium-competitive acid blockers, new histamine receptor 2 antagonists, and gastrin antagonists. Although these agents could potentially achieve complete gastric acid suppression, risks may be associated with this level of suppression, including enteric infections and malabsorption of nutrients such as vitamin B(12), iron and calcium. This Review provides an update on the status of acid-suppression therapy and discusses directions for future research.

Medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Antisecretory therapies that raise intragastric pH provide the best healing of the esophageal mucosal damage that occurs in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Continuous maintenance therapy is also effective to reduce the likelihood of recurrence of esophagitis and control symptoms in the long term. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is an effective approach for healing esophagitis and controlling symptoms. Endoscopic and surgical treatments may provide an option for patients who are refractory to PPIs in whom reflux has been clearly demonstrated. Long-term antireflux medication is often needed after surgical treatment because of persisting or recurrent pathologic reflux and symptoms. An alternative approach to controlling transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, such as the GABA-B agonists, deserves further study.

A comparative study of intragastric acidity during post-breakfast and pre-dinner administration of low-dose proton pump inhibitors: a randomized three-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

The absorption and bioavailability of proton pump inhibitors is influenced by food intake. Proton pump inhibitors bind to the parietal cell active proton pump, which is maximally stimulated after dinner: usually the largest meal of the day. However, it has not been fully clarified whether the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors differs between post-breakfast and pre-dinner dosing.

AIM

To perform a pH-monitoring study to clarify this issue for two low-dose proton pump inhibitors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects were 20 healthy male volunteers (seven Helicobacter pylori-positive and 13 H. pylori-negative), who were divided into two groups of 10 and administered 15 mg lansoprazole or 10 mg rabeprazole, respectively. All subjects underwent ambulatory intragastric 24-h pH- monitoring under three conditions allocated randomly: (i) without medication, (ii) seventh day of post-breakfast administration and (iii) eighth day of pre-dinner administration of each drug.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the percentage time during which pH > or =4.0 in the 24-h period between post-breakfast and pre-dinner administration of both drugs (56.6% vs. 55.8%; P = 0.557), although intragastric acidity during administration of both drugs was significantly lower than that without medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of drug administration does not significantly influence the efficacy of low-dose proton pump inhibitors.