Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring

Variability and accuracy of multiple saliva pepsin measurements in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients

OBJECTIVE

To study the variability and diagnostic value of multiple salivary pepsin measurements in the detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

Patients with LPR symptoms were consecutively recruited from December 2019 to Augustus 2022. Twenty-one asymptomatic individuals completed the study. The diagnostic was confirmed with hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). Patients collected three saliva samples during the 24-h testing period. Symptoms and findings were studied with reflux symptom score-12 and reflux sign assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of pepsin measurements were calculated considering morning, post-lunch and post-dinner samples. The consistency and relationship between HEMII-pH, pepsin measurements, and clinical features were investigated.

RESULTS

Morning, post-lunch and post-dinner saliva pepsin concentrations were measured in 42 patients. Pepsin measurements were 64.9%, 59.5%, and 59.0% sensitive for morning, post-lunch and post-dinner collections at cutoff ≥ 16 ng/mL. Considering the highest concentration of the three pepsin saliva collections, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 70.5%, 73.0%; 66.7% and 78.9%, respectively. Morning pepsin measurements reported higher consistency, sensitivity, and specificity than post-dinner and post-lunch pepsin measurements.

CONCLUSION

The collection of several saliva pepsin samples improves the detection rate of LPR. In case of high clinical LPR suspicion and negative pepsin test, a HEMII-pH study could provide further diagnostic information.

Saliva pepsin measurements in the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To study the diagnostic value of salivary pepsin measurement (Peptest) for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients.

METHODS

Patients with reflux symptoms were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to November 2022. Patients benefited from hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH), fasting and bedtime saliva collections to measure pepsin. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were evaluated for GERD and LPR patients considering the highest values of pepsin tests at ≥ 16, ≥ 75, and ≥ 216 ng/mL cutoffs. The relationship between HEMII-pH, endoscopic and clinical findings, and pepsin measurements was studied.

RESULTS

Saliva was collected in 109 LPR patients and 30 individuals with both LPR and GERD. The total number of pharyngeal reflux events was significantly higher in GERD-LPR patients compared with LPR patients (p = 0.008). The mean fasting and bedtime pepsin saliva concentrations were similar between groups. The sensitivity of Peptest in LPR patients was 30.5%, 70.2%, and 84.0% at cutoffs ≥ 16, ≥ 75 and ≥ 216 ng/mL. In GERD-LPR group, Peptest was 80.0%, 70.0%, and 30.0% sensitive. At cutoff 16 ng/mL, Peptest reported PPV of 20.7% and 94.8% in LPR-GERD and LPR groups, respectively. NPV were 73.9% and 8.7% in GERD-LPR and LPR groups, respectively. The consistency analysis between Peptest and HEMII-pH was not significant. Peptest was significantly associated with the number of acid pharyngeal reflux events (r_s = 0.182; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Pepsin saliva measurements appear to be not a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of GERD in LPR patients. Future studies are needed to determine the place of Peptest in laryngopharyngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux diseases.

Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Gastrointestinal motility disorders have a wide range of symptoms and affect patients' quality of life. With the advancement of endoscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy in motility disorders is becoming more significant. Endoscopy is necessary to rule out possible organic diseases in patients with suspected motility disorders and provide significant clues for their diagnosis. Moreover, interventional endoscopy may be a primary or alternative treatment option for selected patients with motility disorders, and it is becoming a promising field as new therapeutic applications are developed and utilized for various motility disorders. This review may provide suitable indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

[Intraoperative Aspiration]

术中误吸是外科手术中常见的肺部并发症，麻醉和体位是导致术中误吸的主要因素。近年来，围手术期肺保护已受到外科和麻醉医师的广泛关注，如何加速术后康复进程，减少相关并发症发生，显著改善患者预后已成为当前外科治疗的主要目标。本文将以术中误吸为重点，从解剖、病理生理、表现、诊断、处理和预防等方面展开综述。

Gastroesophageal Reflux Poses a Potential Risk for Late Complications of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common respiratory disorder in extremely low birth weight infants. Although most symptoms of BPD improve, some late complications exist, even with regular treatment. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER), also common in extremely premature infants, may be related to many cardiorespiratory symptoms. However, the potential of GER as a risk factor for late complications associated with BPD is still unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The goal of this study was to determine if GER increases the risk of late complications of BPD in infants.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort of 131 infants (79 male subjects, 52 female subjects) with BPD was enrolled. The development of late complications was assessed over an 18-month follow-up period. Twenty-four-hour pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance and gastric sodium concentrations were analyzed in all infants at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and at the last interview. Prevalence and risk factors of late complications of BPD were analyzed by using forward logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of late complications in BPD infants was 63.79% and included respiratory symptoms (49.14%), vomiting (38.79%), retinopathy of prematurity (25.86%), hypoxic-ischemic injury (3.45%), rehospitalization (26.72%), and sudden death (0.86%). Respiratory diseases constituted the most frequent complication. The prevalence of GER in BPD was 42.24% and included acid GER (18.10%) and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER; 24.14%). Risk factors for respiratory symptoms were gestational age ≤ 30 weeks (OR, 3.213; 95% CI, 1.221-8.460), birth weight < 1,500 g (OR, 2.803; 95% CI, 1.014-7.749), invasive ventilation > 7 days (OR, 4.952; 95% CI, 1.508-16.267), acid GER (OR, 4.630; 95% CI, 1.305-16.420), and DGER (OR, 5.588; 95% CI, 1.770-17.648). Infants with BPD and DGER were more prone to late complications than those with acid GER or no reflux.

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of late complications is high in infants with BPD. GER (and in particular, DGER) poses a tentative risk for these late complications.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03014453; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Empirical treatment of outpatients with gastroesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitors: A survey of Chinese patients (the ENLIGHT Study)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is recommended as a diagnostic indicator for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and as a therapy for symptomatic control, with responses generally seen within 4 weeks. However, there are no real-world data assessing the effectiveness of short-term empirical treatment with PPIs in patients with GERD in China.

METHODS

The ENLIGHT study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in China. The primary outcome was the overall response rate after 4 weeks' empirical treatment with PPIs. Adult patients aged between 18 and 65 years of age, with a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score of ≥ 8, prescribed empirical PPI treatment by their physicians and with no planned endoscopy were eligible to participate. Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive.

RESULTS

Overall, 987 patients were eligible to participate and were included in the full analysis set (FAS); 707 patients were included in the per protocol set. In the FAS, esomeprazole was received by 57.1% of patients and was the most commonly used PPI. After 4-week treatment, 71.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.9% to 74.2%) of patients were considered responders to PPI. The response rate at the end of 2-week PPI treatment reached 57.0% (95% CI, 52.5% to 61.7%). The median time to response was 13 days (95% CI, 12 to 15). Response rates at 2 and 4 weeks of the per protocol set were similar to those of the FAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term empirical PPI treatment can provide an effective relief of GERD symptoms in most Chinese patients in real-world practice.

Aspiration and allograft injury secondary to gastroesophageal reflux occur in the immediate post-lung transplantation period (prospective clinical trial)

OBJECTIVES

To provide novel pilot data to quantify reflux, aspiration, and allograft injury immediately post-lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic reflux/aspiration, associated with allograft dysfunction, occurs in lung transplant recipients. Early fundoplication has been advocated. Indications for surgery include elevated biomarkers of aspiration (bile salts) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Measurements have been mostly documented after the immediate posttransplant period. We report the first prospective study of reflux/aspiration immediately posttransplantation to date.

METHODS

Lung transplant recipients were recruited over 12 months. At 1 month posttransplantation, patients completed a Reflux Symptom Index questionnaire and underwent objective assessment for reflux (manometry and pH/impedance). Testing was performed on maintenance proton pump inhibitor. BALF was assessed for pepsin, bile salts, interleukin-8 and neutrophils.

RESULTS

Eighteen lung transplant recipients, median age of 46 years (range: 22-59 years), were recruited. Eight of 18 patients had abnormal esophageal peristalsis. Five of 17 patients were positive on Reflux Symptom Index questionnaire. Twelve of 17 patients had reflux. Three patients exclusively had weakly acid reflux. Median acid exposure was 4.8% (range: 1%-79.9%) and median esophageal volume exposure was 1.6% (range: 0.7-5.5). There was a median of 72 reflux events (range: 27-147) per 24 hours. A correlation existed between Reflux Symptom Index score and proximal reflux (r = 0.533, P = 0.006). Pepsin was detected in 11 of 15 BALF samples signifying aspiration (median: 18 ng/mL; range: 0-43). Bile salts were undetectable, using spectrophotometry and rarely detectable using dual mass spectrometry (2/15) (levels 0.2 and 1.2 μmol/L). Lavage interleukin-8 and neutrophil levels were elevated. A correlation existed between proximal reflux events and neutrophilia (r = 0.52, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplant recipients should be routinely assessed for reflux/aspiration within the first month posttransplant. Reflux/aspiration can be present early postoperatively. Pepsin was detected suggesting aspiration. Bile salts were rarely detected. Proximal reflux events correlated with neutrophilia, linked to allograft dysfunction and mortality. These results support the need for early assessment of reflux/aspiration, which may inform fundoplication.

Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring

CONTEXT

Esophageal pH monitoring is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal acid reflux. However, this method is very troublesome and considerably limits the patient's routine activities. Wireless pH monitoring was developed to avoid these restrictions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the first 24 hours of the conventional and wireless pH monitoring, positioned 3 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter, in relation to: the occurrence of relevant technical failures, the ability to detect reflux and the ability to correlate the clinical symptoms to reflux.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients referred for esophageal pH monitoring and with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied prospectively, underwent clinical interview, endoscopy, esophageal manometry and were submitted, with a simultaneous initial period, to 24-hour catheter pH monitoring and 48-hour wireless pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Early capsule detachment occurred in one (4%) case and there were no technical failures with the catheter pH monitoring (P = 0.463). Percentages of reflux time (total, upright and supine) were higher with the wireless pH monitoring (P < 0.05). Pathological gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 16 (64%) patients submitted to catheter and in 19 (76%) to the capsule (P = 0.355). The symptom index was positive in 12 (48%) patients with catheter pH monitoring and in 13 (52%) with wireless pH monitoring (P = 0.777).

CONCLUSIONS

1) No significant differences were reported between the two methods of pH monitoring (capsule vs catheter), in regard to relevant technical failures; 2) Wireless pH monitoring detected higher percentages of reflux time than the conventional pH-metry; 3) The two methods of pH monitoring were comparable in diagnosis of pathological gastroesophageal reflux and comparable in correlating the clinical symptoms with the gastroesophageal reflux.

Oesophageal sensation in response to high PCO(2) and acidic solutions in nonerosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Heartburn is commonly associated with the presence of acid in the oesophageal lumen. However, in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), the mechanism by which acid traverses the mucosa is not clear. We hypothesized that the luminal acid signal traverses the oesophageal epithelium in the form of the highly permeant gas CO(2) , which then is reconverted to H(+) in the submucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  Ten patients with heartburn, normal upper endoscopy and increased oesophageal acid exposure (NERD patients) and 10 healthy subjects were enrolled. Perceptual responses to intraoesophageal acid (0·1 N HCl solution) and a high PCO(2) solution were determined using a randomized cross over design. Stimulus-response functions to perfusions were quantified by three parameters: lag time to symptom perception, intensity rating and perfusion sensitivity score.

RESULTS

 In NERD patients, the difference in lag time to typical symptom perception, intensity rating and perfusion sensitivity score between high PCO(2) and acid perfusions was statistically significant (P = 0·02, 0·01 and 0·02, respectively). However, the difference in the same perfusion parameters between acid and high PCO(2) perfusions was nonsignificant in healthy controls. When NERD and controls were compared, the difference between the different perfusion variables was nonsignificant (adjusted to age).

CONCLUSIONS

In NERD subjects, acid perfusion reliably evoked heartburn symptoms of greater intensity than in healthy controls. Nevertheless, a high PCO(2) perfusion failed to produce symptoms in either group.

Oral manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Numerous case-control and other studies involving confirmation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by esophageal pH-metry and the assessment of dental erosions have shown significant associations between the two conditions in both adults and children. By contrast, when asked to vote on whether GERD may cause dental erosions, only 42% of physicians strongly agreed that such an association existed in adults, and just 12.5% strongly agreed for children, respectively in two global consensus reports. Part of this divergence between the perceptions of physicians and the findings of research publications may reflect a general lack of oral health education during medical training, and cursory oral examinations being made under less-than-ideal conditions. Adequate salivary secretions are essential for the protection of the teeth and the oropharyngeal and esophageal mucosa. The quantity and quality of the saliva require monitoring as many drugs, including several of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), can cause hyposalivation. In addition, PPIs do not always result in adequate acid suppression. Therefore, collaboration between physicians and dentists is strongly advocated to prevent or ameliorate possible adverse oral effects from both endogenous and exogenous acids, and to promote adequate saliva production in patients with GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and tooth erosion

The increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children and adults, and of “silent refluxers” in particular, increases the responsibility of dentists to be alert to this potentially severe condition when observing unexplained instances of tooth erosion. Although gastroesophageal reflux is a normal physiologic occurrence, excessive gastric and duodenal regurgitation combined with a decrease in normal protective mechanisms, including an adequate production of saliva, may result in many esophageal and extraesophageal adverse conditions. Sleep-related GERD is particularly insidious as the supine position enhances the proximal migration of gastric contents, and normal saliva production is much reduced. Gastric acid will displace saliva easily from tooth surfaces, and proteolytic pepsin will remove protective dental pellicle. Though increasing evidence of associations between GERD and tooth erosion has been shown in both animal and human studies, relatively few clinical studies have been carried out under controlled trial conditions. Suspicion of an endogenous source of acid being associated with observed tooth erosion requires medical referral and management of the patient as the primary method for its prevention and control.

Pathological bolus exposure plays a significant role in eliciting non-cardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pathological bolus exposure is defined in the present study as cases in which all reflux percentage times are above 1.4% of the total reflux number, as revealed by impedance-pH monitoring. The role of pathological bolus exposure in the pathogenesis of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is poorly known. We aimed to classify and characterize NCCP using combined impedance-pH monitoring.

METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients with NCCP were prospectively enrolled from January 2006 to October 2008. All the patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH metering.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (21.3%) had esophageal erosion upon endoscopy. Upon esophageal manometry, 37 patients (49.3%) had esophageal dysmotility. When the patients were classified based on MII-pH metering, 16 (21.3%) showed pathological acid exposure, and 40 (53.3%) showed pathological bolus exposure. The DeMeester score of patients with pathological acid exposure was higher than that of patients with pathological bolus exposure (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in age, sex, typical esophageal symptoms, presence of esophageal erosion, esophageal dysmotility, improvement with proton pump inhibitor medication, symptom index ≥ 50%, percentage of time clearance pH below 4 ≥ 4%, and all reflux time ≥ 1.4% in the fasting period between the two groups. When the patients were divided into gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related NCCP and non-GERD-related NCCP groups based on MII-pH metering and upper endoscopy, there was no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined impedance-pH monitoring improves the detection and characterization of NCCP. This study suggests that pathological bolus exposure plays a major role in eliciting NCCP.

Lung transplantation, gastroesophageal reflux, and fundoplication

Lung transplantation is an accepted treatment strategy for end-stage lung disease; however, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This review explores the role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and the evidence suggesting the benefits of anti-reflux surgery in improving lung function and survival. There is a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients post lung transplantation. This may be due to a high preoperative incidence, vagal damage and immunosuppression. Reflux in these patients is associated with a worse outcome, which may be due to micro-aspiration. Anti-reflux surgery is safe in selected lung transplant recipients; however there has been one report of a postoperative mortality. Evidence is conflicting but may suggest a benefit for patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery in terms of lung function and survival; there are no controlled studies. The precise indications, timing, and choice of fundoplication are yet to be defined, and further studies are required.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease correlation with posterior laryngitis

Background/Aim. Over the last years numerous studies have been performed dealing with mutual relations among gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and numerous diseases of the upper airways. The aim of the present study was to establish possible causal relationship between GERD and posterior laryngitis (PL). Methods. The study included 103 patients with gastrointestinal complaints. Diagnostic procedure included a medical history, gastroscopy and laryngeal directoscopy. The obtained data processed using classic methods of the descriptive statistics, as well as Pearson's chi-square test, Student's t test, rank sum test and Fisher's parametric analysis of variance. Results. Out of the total number of 103 examined patients, 33 (32%) were diagnosed with PL, while GERD was diagnosed in five of the examined patients all belonging to the PL group (15% of the patients with PL). In the remaining patients, PL was caused by other factors. All the patients with GERD had PL and globus sensation while 80% of GERD patients had prominent symptom of pain. Conclusion. The results of the study are indicative of the causal relationship between GERD and PL.

Bravo capsule system optimizes intragastric pH monitoring over prolonged time: Effects of ghrelin on gastric acid and hormone secretion in the rat

AIM: To evaluate measurements of intragastric pH with the Bravo capsule system over a prolonged time.

METHODS: A Bravo capsule was placed inside the rat gastric body and pH was studied for periods up to five consecutive days. For comparison, a gastric fistula model was used. Effects of ghrelin and esomeprazole, with or without pentagastrin, on gastric pH were studied. In addition, effects of esomeprazole on plasma ghrelin, gastrin and somatostatin were analyzed.

RESULTS: All rats recovered after surgery. The average 24-h pH during free feeding was 2.3 ± 0.1 (n = 20) with a variation of 18% ± 6% over 5 d. Ghrelin, 2400 pmol/kg, t.i.d. increased pH from 1.7 ± 0.1 to 3.1 ± 0.3 (P < 0.01) as recorded with the Bravo system. After esomeprazole (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) there was a dose-dependent pH increase of maximally 3.4 ± 0.1, with day-to-day variation over the entire period of 8% ± 3%. The fistula and pH studies generated similar results. Acid inhibition with esomeprazole increased plasma ghrelin from 10 ± 2 pmol/L to 65 ± 26 pmol/L (P < 0.001), and somatostatin from 10 ± 2 pmol/L to 67 ± 18 pmol/L (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: pH measurements with the Bravo capsule are reliable, and comparable to those of the gastric fistula model. The Bravo system optimizes accurate intragastric pH monitoring over prolonged periods and allows both short- and long-term evaluation of effects of drugs and hormones.

New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance

Esophageal testing aims to quantify gastroesophageal reflux or characterize esophageal motility. Reflux monitoring traditionally has been based on the detection of acidic reflux by a transnasal catheter that measures esophageal pH. Recently there have been two major developments in this field: the wireless Bravo pH capsule (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), which allows catheter-free monitoring, and impedance-pH measurement, a catheter-based technique that enables detection of acidic and nonacidic reflux. The assessment of esophageal motility has relied on conventional manometry for many years. Two new procedures also recently became available to assess esophageal motility: high-resolution manometry, which uses many closely spaced pressure sensors and provides spatiotemporal plots of esophageal pressure changes, and impedance manometry, a test that directly measures bolus transit and provides conventional manometric data. The advantages, disadvantages, and clinical importance of these new esophageal tests are discussed in this review.

GERD evaluation: time for a new paradigm?

In the past there has been reliance on heartburn and acid regurgitation as the cardinal symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux. Now it is recognized that diverse additional symptoms including extraesophageal manifestations are essential components of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Furthermore, previous reliance in mucosal damage at endoscopy as evidence of therapeutic success in the management of GERD has proven of only limited value in the diverse world of GERD symptoms. Indeed is now apparent that the relationship between symptoms and lesions is modest at best. Most patients with GERD have no overt erosions or ulceration at endoscopy and they frequently suffer from a wide array of complaints other than heartburn that contribute to their diminished perception of life's quality. To address these problems, multidimensional questionnaires designed to encompass the diverse symptomatology of GERD have been investigated, principally, to provide a reproducible metric of change in the subjective response to pharmacologic therapy during trials for patients with nonerosive reflux disease. The most promising of these instruments is The ReQuest questionnaire, because it has been extensively validated in multiple patient groups and cultures, appears highly promising in this regard and for erosive disease too and may ultimately prove to be of value for the initial evaluation of patients with GERD. We propose that accurate symptom delineation complemented with endoscopy performed in selected groups of patients will become the mainstay in diagnosis of GERD and the assessment of therapy efficacy.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in chronic laryngitis: prevalence and response to acid-suppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is thought to cause chronic laryngitis through laryngopharyngeal reflux. Response of laryngitis to treatment with acid-suppressive therapy supports this causal link.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with chronic laryngitis and response to proton-pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Patients with chronic laryngitis were recruited. The frequency and severity of reflux and laryngeal symptoms were scored and laryngitis graded by laryngoscopy. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring before receiving lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 65.6% (21 of 32). Based on positive pH test, the prevalence was 25% (eight of 32). The change in laryngeal symptom score and laryngitis grade was significantly higher in GERD compared with non-GERD patients (P = 0.010 for both). The proportion of patients with marked/moderate improvement in laryngeal symptoms were significantly higher in patients with reflux (14 of 21, 67%) compared to those without reflux (two of 11, 18%; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease amongst our patients with chronic laryngitis was high. The response to treatment with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with reflux disease compared to those without underlined the critical role of acid reflux in a subset of patients with chronic laryngitis.