Sequential therapy using high-dose esomeprazole-amoxicillin followed by gatifloxacin for Helicobacter pylori infection

Newer, Older, and Alternative Agents for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Narrative Review

Although discovered 40 years ago, Helicobacter pylori infection is still raising diagnostic and therapeutic problems today. The infection is currently managed based on statements in several guidelines, but implementing them in practice is a long process. Increasing antibiotic resistance and weak compliance of the patients limit the efficacy of eradication regimens, leaving much room for improvement. Third-generation proton pump inhibitors have added little to the results of the first two generations. Potassium-competitive acid blockers have a stronger and longer inhibitory action of acid secretion, increasing the intragastric pH. They obtained superior results in eradication when compared to proton pump inhibitors. Instead of innovative antibiotics, derivatives of existing antimicrobials were developed; some new fluoroquinolones and nitazoxanide seem promising in practice, but they are not recommended by the guidelines. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors have both anti-secretory and bactericidal effects, and some researchers are expecting their revival in the treatment of infection. Capsules containing components of the eradication regimens have obtained excellent results, but are of limited availability. Probiotics, if containing bacteria with anti-Helicobacter pylori activity, may be useful, increasing the rates of eradication and lowering the prevalence and severity of the side effects.

Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection-A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple regimens as second line treatment for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, open label trial was conducted at a large academic, tertiary care center in Israel. Patients who previously failed a standard triple treatment eradication course were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 10-day sequential therapy course, or a 14-day quadruple regimen. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by telephone questionnaires. The primary endpoint for analysis was the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication as defined by either a negative 13C-urea breath-test, or stool antigen test, 4-16 weeks after treatment assessed under the non-inferiority hypothesis. The trial was terminated prematurely due to low recruitment rates. See S1 Checklist for CONSORT checklist.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were randomized. Per modified intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rate was 49% in the sequential versus 42.5% in the quadruple regimen group (p-value for non-inferiority 0.02). Forty-two (84.0%) versus 33 (64.7%) patients completed treatment in the sequential and quadruple groups respectively (p 0.027). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the quadruple regimen group.

CONCLUSION

Sequential treatment when used as a second line regimen, was non-inferior to the standard of care quadruple regimen in achieving Helicobacter pylori eradication, and was associated with better compliance and fewer adverse effects. Both treatment protocols failed to show an adequate eradication rate in the population of Southern Israel.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01481844.

Quinolone-based first, second and third-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a very common bacterium that infects about 50% of the world population in urban areas and over 90% of people living in rural and developing countries. Fluoroquinolones, a class of antimicrobials, have been extensively used in eradication regimens for H. pylori. Levofloxacin is the most commonly used, and in second-line regimens, is one of the most effective options. However, an increasing resistance rate of H. pylori to fluoroquinolones is being observed, that will likely affect their effectiveness in the near future. Other novel fluoroquinolone molecules, such as moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin, have been proposed and showed encouraging results in vitro, although data on their clinical use are still limited. Further studies in large sample trials are needed to confirm their safety and efficacy profile in clinical practice.

[Ideal treatment for Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review]

BACKGROUND

The success rates of therapies for treating Helicobacter pylori vary greatly worldwide and the ideal treatment has yet to be clearly established.

AIMS

A systematic review was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of current first and second-line therapies in treating H.pylori infection.

METHODS

Two researchers independently carried out Internet search engine reviews (PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE) of clinical trials on adults published between 1990 and 2012 in both English and Spanish.

RESULTS

Forty-three (n=8,123) clinical trials were evaluated that included first and second-line triple, quadruple, and sequential therapies. The eradication rates of the standard triple therapy are unacceptable (≤80%) in countries where H.pylori is highly resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole. Administration of the standard triple therapy for more than 7 days does not improve its effectiveness. No statistically significant differences were observed between the eradication rates of the quadruple therapy with bismuth and the standard triple therapy. Even though the sequential and concomitant therapies are equally successful regimens, the triple therapy with levofloxacin offers the best results as first and second-line treatment, but quinolone resistance can diminish its effectiveness. The triple therapy with levofloxacin and the sequential and concomitant treatments were superior to the standard triple regimen as first-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is no ideal first or second-line treatment for achieving 100% eradication. The therapeutic order should be carried out according to the initial treatment and local antimicrobial resistance studies.

Pilot study: miscellaneous therapy is highly successful for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Success in H. pylori eradication with conventional therapies has decreased to unacceptable levels (≤80%). New schemes of combined treatment are currently needed.

AIM

To test a miscellaneous therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS/PATIENTS

Open-label, pilot, single-centre and prospective study. Patients received a 15-day treatment scheme that consisted of 5 initial days of lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s.; days 6 to 10: lansoprazole 30 mg q.d.s. and metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s.; days 11 to 15: lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s. Each patient underwent an upper endoscopy before treatment and a second follow-up endoscopy at least 4 weeks after therapy. Success was defined on the basis of an eradication rate following a per-protocol analysis ≥95%. Biopsies before and after therapy were obtained for histological evaluation and rapid urease test.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients were enrolled and 118 patients completed the study. The eradication rate for H. pylori with miscellaneous therapy was 94% (confidence Interval (CI) 95%, 90-98.3%) in the per-protocol analysis (PP) and 91% (95% CI, 86-96%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Adherence to treatment was 96% (113 patients). Among patients who completed treatment, 55% presented adverse events, mainly nausea and abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

A miscellaneous therapy, based on the combination of multiple medications in high doses for 2 weeks, and with gastric pH elevation, is a highly effective treatment as a first-line therapy for the eradication of H. pylori.

Primary resistance of Helicobacter pylori to levofloxacin and moxifloxacine in Iran

The increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori had a drastic effect on successful treatment. Up-to-date information on H. pylori antibiotic therapy in Iran is still limited. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among the H. pylori strains. Furthermore, the possibility of using fluoroquinolones for antibiotic treatment was investigated. Antral biopsy specimens obtained from dyspeptic patients were investigated for H. pylori. Bacterial culture and susceptibility tests were done based on standard methods. H. pylori ATCC 43504 was used as a quality control. In the current study, 30 H. pylori strains were selected randomly and retested to confirm our susceptibility tests. Of 170 patients, 150 were identified as positive for H. pylori (88.2%). In this study, 150 single colonies of H. pylori strains [81 women (54%), 69 men (46%); mean age 38.6; aged 21-70 years] were collected. Primary resistance of H. pylori isolates were clarithromycin (34%), metronidazole (78.6%), tetracycline (9.3%), amoxicillin (10%), levofloxacin (5.3%) and moxifloxacine (4.6%). In conclusion, our results show that we are confronting a new generation of resistant strains of H. pylori in Iran. This alarming finding indicates an urgent need for introduction of new effective antibiotics in our country. Since the majority of clinicians prefer to continue with the ineffective antibiotics as therapeutic regimens, they must also be prepared to deal with treatment failures.

Comparison of 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy with high-dose metronidazole or levofloxacin for second-line Helicobacter pylori therapy: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study was designed to compare the efficacies of levofloxacin-containing and high-dose metronidazole-containing quadruple therapies after failure of standard triple therapies.

METHODS

A total of 150 Helicobacter pylori-infected patients were enrolled in our study and randomly assigned to levofloxacin-containing quadruple therapy (EBTL group) (40 mg of esomeprazole twice daily, 300 mg of bismuth subcitrate four times daily, 500 mg of tetracycline four times daily and 500 mg of levofloxacin once daily for 10 days) (n = 76) or high-dose metronidazole-based quadruple therapy (EBTM group) (40 mg of esomeprazole twice daily, 300 mg of bismuth subcitrate four times daily, 500 mg of tetracycline four times daily and 500 mg of metronidazole four times daily for 10 days) (n = 74). Follow-up endoscopy or urea breath test was done 16 weeks later to assess the treatment response. Patients' responses, CYP2C19 genotypes and antibiotic resistances were also examined. All participants, caregivers and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that both groups showed similar eradication rates: EBTL, 78.9% (60/76) (95% CI 69.7%-88.1%) and EBTM, 79.7% (59/74) (95% CI 70.5%-88.7%) [risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.44-2.14]. Per-protocol results were EBTL = 87.0% (60/69) (95% CI 79.4%-94.9%) and EBTM = 90.8% (59/65) (95% CI 83.8%-97.8%) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.23-2.0). We did not find significant differences in compliance (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.54-2.3) and adverse events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.54-2.3) between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that only compliance was an important predictor for eradication failure. CYP2C19 polymorphism did not influence the eradicating effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10 day bismuth quadruple therapies with high-dose metronidazole or levofloxacin were effective even in areas with high resistance. These two therapies were equally safe and tolerated. Besides this, the metronidazole-containing therapy was cheaper. So it is persuasive that high-dose metronidazole-containing quadruple therapy could be a good choice for second-line H. pylori eradication in areas with high resistance.

Modified Sequential Therapy Regimen versus Conventional Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication in Duodenal Ulcer Patients in China: A Multicenter Clinical Comparative Study

Objective. Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide. To observe the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the treatment of duodenal ulcer by 2 kinds of modified sequential therapy through comparing with that of 10-day standard triple therapy. Methods. A total of 210 patients who were confirmed in duodenal ulcer active or heal period by gastroscopy and H. pylori positive confirmed by rapid urease test, serum anti-H. pylori antibody (ELASE), or histological examination enrolled in the study. All the patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (70 cases) and group B (70 cases) were provided 10-day modified sequential therapy; group C (70 cases) was provided 10-day standard triple therapy. Patients of group A received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the remaining 5 days. Group B received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the first 5 days, followed by 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for the remaining 5 days. Group C received 20 mg of Esomeprazole, 500 mg of Clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of Amoxicillin for standard 10-day therapy. All drugs were given twice daily. H. pylori eradication rate was checked four to eight weeks after taking the medicine by using a ¹³C urea breath test. In the first, second, third, seventh, twenty-first, thirty-fifth days respectively, the symptoms of patients such as epigastric gnawing, burning pain, and acidity were evaluated simultaneously. Results. Overall, 210 patients accomplished all therapy schemes, 9 case patients were excluded. The examination result indicated that the H. pylori eradication rate of each group was as follows: group A 92.5% (62/67), group B 86.8% (59/68), and group C 78.8% (52/66). The H. pylori eradication rate of group A was slightly higher than group B (P < 0.05) and both of them were obviously higher than group C (P < 0.05). Modified sequential therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains (80%/67% versus 31%; P = 0.02). Symptoms improvement: all the three groups could improve the symptoms such as epigastric gnawing, burning pain, and acidity since the first day. There was no significant difference in total score descending of symptoms between each group (P > 0.05). Conclusions. All the three therapy schemes could alleviate symptoms of duodenal ulcer patients in China efficiently. But as far as eradicating H. pylori is concerned, the modified sequential therapy was better than standard triple therapy, especially the therapy scheme used in group A.

Empirical modified sequential therapy containing levofloxacin and high-dose esomeprazole in second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicentre clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Sequential therapy appears to achieve a higher Helicobacter pylori eradication rate than triple therapy. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of modified sequential therapy containing levofloxacin and high-dose esomeprazole in second-line therapy.

METHODS

Patients who failed first-line triple therapy with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and a proton pump inhibitor were eligible in this multicentre trial. Eligible patients were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days, followed by esomeprazole 40 mg, levofloxacin 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg for another 5 days (all given twice daily). Eradication was confirmed with a (13)C-urea breath test 6 weeks after therapy. Drug susceptibility, presence/absence of gyrA mutation and CYP2C19 genotype were also determined.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled. The eradication rate was 95.1% [135/142, 95% confidence interval (CI) 91.5%-98.6%] in the intention-to-treat analysis and 96.4% (133/138, 95% CI 93.3%-99.5%) in the per protocol analysis. Four patients (2.8%) failed to take at least 80% of the drugs due to adverse effects. The eradication rates were 50% (4/8) and 97.7% (43/44) in patients with and without metronidazole resistance, respectively (P = 0.001). The eradication rates were 84.6% (11/13) and 95.1% (58/61) in patients with and without gyrA mutation, respectively (P = 0.210). The eradication rates were not affected by the CYP2C19 polymorphism (P = 0.421).

CONCLUSIONS

This modified sequential therapy achieved an excellent eradication rate (>95%) in second-line treatment and the eradication rate appeared to be affected by metronidazole resistance.

Optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections

Although Helicobacter pylori infection is both a common and a serious bacterial infection, antimicrobial therapies have rarely been optimized, are prescribed empirically, and provide inferior results compared with antimicrobial therapies for other common infectious diseases. The effectiveness of many of the frequently recommended H. pylori infection treatment regimens has been increasingly compromised by antimicrobial resistance. Regional data on the susceptibility of strains of H. pylori to available antimicrobials are sorely needed. Noninvasive molecular methods are possible to assess clarithromycin susceptibility in isolates obtained from stool specimens. As a general rule, clinicians should prescribe therapeutic regimens that have a ≥90% or, preferably, ≥95% eradication rate locally. If no available regimen can achieve a ≥90% eradication rate, clinicians should use the most effective regimen(s) available locally. Eradication of infection should always be confirmed after treatment in order to provide feedback regarding local effectiveness and an early warning of increasing resistance. In most regions of the world, four-drug treatment regimens, including a PPI plus three antimicrobials (clarithromycin, metronidazole/tinidazole and amoxicillin), or a PPI plus a bismuth plus tetracycline and metronidazole provide the best results. Standard triple therapy (a PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) should now be avoided owing to increasing resistance to this treatment.

Dual proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin as an empiric anti-H. pylori therapy: studies from the United States

BACKGROUND

Studies with CYP2C19 slow metabolizers have shown that the combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus amoxicillin (dual therapy) can reliably cure more than 90% of Helicobacter pylori infections. Theoretically, the use of a PPI dose that provides equivalent acid suppression with fast metabolizers and slow metabolizers would achieve high cure rates irrespective of the CYP2C19 genotype.

AIM

To evaluate high-dose PPI plus amoxicillin dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

H. pylori-infected individuals (positive by 2 tests) received esomeprazole 40 mg plus amoxicillin 750 mg every 8 h for 14 days. The protocol was planned based on the "efficient identification strategy" requiring more than 90% success, with stop criteria of 6 or more failures within 50 patients or a cure rate of less than 80%.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (5 women, 31 men), average age 58 years, were enrolled before achieving stop criteria. All were first H. pylori treatments. The intention-to-treat cure was achieved in 26/36 [72.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 56-84%] and in 26/35 per protocol (74.2%; 95% CI = 56-87%). There were no significant side effects. Compliance was 85% or greater in all (100% in 91.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

If the hypothesis that consistently high intragastric pH is required to reliably achieve more than 90% H. pylori eradication, our regimen was not sufficient. Success may require more than every 8 h dosing, the concomitant administration of sodium bicarbonate, or the use of a long-acting PPI. However, the result was positive in that dual therapy with the doses tested here was at least as successful as empiric triple therapy.

The modified sequential treatment regimen containing levofloxacin for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori have declined to unacceptable levels in recent years. New and effective treatment options are warranted both as a first and second line treatment.

AIM

To test an effectiveness of modified sequential therapy with levofloxacin for H. pylori eradication in Turkey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Helicobacter pylori infected dyspeptic patients were included to the study. Subjects were treated with modified sequential therapy consisting of rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., for 7 days followed by rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d, levofloxacin 500 mg q.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d for the remaining 7 days.

RESULTS

Sixty-three treatment naive patients and 37 previous treatment failures were enrolled to the study (59 F, 41 M, age: 21-80 years). There was five drop out. Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 80 patients, intention-to-treat (ITT): 80% (95% CI: 71-87%) and per-protocol (PP): 84.2% (95% CI: 75-91%), totally. In treatment naive patients ITT and PP eradication rates were 82.5% (95% CI: 71-91%), and 86.7% (95% CI: 75-94%), respectively. As a second line treatment eradication was successful in ITT 75.7%.(95% CI: 59-88%), and PP 80% (95% CI: 63-92%).Mild side effects were reported by 8 patients (8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy using "rabeprazole and amoxicillin 7 days followed by rabeprazole, metronidazole and levofloxacin for 7 days" is a new regimen with acceptable eradication rates in naïve patients in Turkey. Further modifications in the dose or duration of this new sequential therapy might increase its effectiveness as both first and second line treatment.

Specific therapeutic schemes of omeprazole affect the orientation of Helicobacter pylori

Until now, it has been unclear how proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) support Helicobacter pylori therapy. We tested whether the PPI omeprazole acts on the spatial orientation of H. pylori in the gastric mucus of infected Mongolian gerbils. Following repetitive PPI administration once daily but not following single doses or administration every 8 h, the bacterial spatial distribution changed, indicating a loss of orientation. Therefore, the therapeutic scheme of PPI administration may affect efficiency of treatment.

Prevalence of primary fluoroquinolone resistance among clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori at a University Hospital in Southern Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolone-containing therapy is effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. However, the resistance rate of H. pylori to fluoroquinolones in Taiwan has not yet been reported. In this study, we aimed to investigate the susceptibility to antibiotics commonly used in eradication schedules and fluoroquinolones in H. pylori.

METHODS

A total of 210 clinical isolates of H. pylori were collected from April 1998 to September 2007 from patients in southern Taiwan. The in vitro activities of six antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method and Etest. The mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and gyrB were investigated by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Overall, 5.7% of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. The resistance rate to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and tetracycline was 1.0% (two of 210), 9.5% (20 of 210), 27.6% (58 of 210), and 0.5% (one of 210), respectively. The resistance rate to either ciprofloxacin or to levofloxacin increased from 2.8% (1998-2003) to 11.8% (2004-2007). The mutations in gyrA at N87 or D91 had an impact on primary fluoroquinolone resistance in H. pylori. Garenoxacin, but not moxifloxacin, had a good in vitro inhibitory effect against ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strains compared with objective minimal inhibitory concentration values.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in H. pylori collected from 2004 to 2007 increased significantly compared with resistance level observed during 1998-2003. The continuous surveillance of quinolone resistance among H. pylori is important in this area.

Therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection can be improved: sequential therapy and beyond

As with other bacterial infections, successful treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections depends on the use of antibacterial agents to which the organism is susceptible. In this article, we use the proposed report card grading scheme (i.e. grade A, B, C, D, F) for the outcome of clinical trials, where intention-to-treat cure rates >95% = A, 90-95% = B, 85-89% = C, 81-84% = D and <81% = F. The goal of therapy is to consistently cure >95% of patients (e.g. provide grade A results). Like tuberculosis, H. pylori infections are difficult to cure and successful treatment generally requires the administration of several antibacterial agents simultaneously. Duration of therapy is also important and depends upon whether resistance is present; 14 days is often best. With few exceptions, worldwide increasing macrolide resistance now undermines the effectiveness of the legacy triple therapy (e.g. a proton pump inhibitor [PPI], clarithromycin and amoxicillin) and, in most areas, cure rates have declined to unacceptable levels (e.g. grade F). The development of sequential therapy was one response to this problem. Sequential therapy has repeatedly been shown in head-to-head studies to be superior to legacy triple therapy. Sequential therapy, as originally described, is the sequential administration of a dual therapy (a PPI plus amoxicillin) followed by a Bazzoli-type triple therapy (a PPI plus clarithromycin and tinidazole) and has been shown to be especially useful where there is clarithromycin resistance. However, the cure rates of the original sequential treatment are grade B and can probably be further improved by changes in dose, duration or administration, such as by continuing the amoxicillin into the triple therapy arm. The sequential approach may also be more complicated than necessary, based on the fact that the same four drugs have also been given concomitantly (at least nine publications with >700 patients) as a quadruple therapy with excellent success. This article discusses the approach to therapy in the modern era where antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem and legacy triple therapy is no longer an acceptable initial choice. Methods to achieve acceptable eradication rates (e.g. grade A or B results) are discussed and, specifically, sequential therapy is considered both conceptually and practically. Suggestions are provided regarding how sequential therapy might be improved to become a grade A therapy as well as how to identify situations where it can be expected to yield unacceptable results. New uses for current drugs are discussed and suggestions for subsequent randomized comparisons to overcome phenotypic and genotypic resistance are given. We propose a change in focus from comparative studies (designed to prove that a new therapy is superior to a known inferior therapy) to demanding that efficacious therapies meet or exceed a pre-specified level of success (i.e. grade A or B result). To do so, coupled with less concern about the effect of recommendations on the pharmaceutical industry, should provide clinicians with much higher quality information, and improve the quality of medical care and recommendations regarding treatment. Ultimately, there is little or no justification for comparative testing that includes an arm with known unacceptably low results. H. pylori gastritis is an infectious disease and should be approached and treated as such.

Failure of sequential therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in previously treated subjects

BACKGROUND

Recently, studies in adults and subsequently in children have demonstrated a very high success rate for sequential therapy as a primary therapy when compared to traditional therapy regimens.

METHODS

We report our experience with a sequential therapy regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in five infected children and a young adult, whose conventional therapy regimens had been unsuccessful.

RESULTS

Five patients failed the sequential therapy. All of them experienced between two and four failures of traditional therapy prior to the sequential treatment protocol. The only patient who succeeded on the sequential therapy had just one previous failure. All of our patients who had failed sequential therapy achieved eradication of the bacteria with quadruple therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of our disappointing results, sequential therapy is unsuccessful as a therapy for children and young adults who have failed previous treatment regimens. At the present time, quadruple therapy is indicated for this group. Well-designed placebo-controlled trials are indicated to further characterize this group of patients.

Role of sequential therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

Evaluation of: Vaira D, Zullo A, Vakil N et al.: Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 146, 556–563 (2007). The standard proton pump inhibitor-based triple-drug therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection fails in approximately 20% of patients. Antimicrobial resistance is significantly decreasing the eradication rates worldwide. This article evaluates whether sequential treatment is more effective than standard triple-drug therapy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The sequential regimen includes pantoprazole and amoxicillin (standard doses), each administered twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by the triple therapy of pantoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole (standard doses), each administered twice daily for the remaining 5 days. The results confirm that sequential therapy is more effective than standard therapy for eradicating H. pylori infection, mainly in patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains. Tolerance and compliance are similar with both treatments. These encouraging results should ideally be confirmed in other countries in larger cohorts. However, in the event of sequential therapy faliure, the effectiveness of the standard in dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance needs to be clarified.