Review article: current management of metastatic colorectal cancer - the evolving impact of targeted drug therapies

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Raltitrexed in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Use of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with significant toxicities. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of raltitrexed use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who developed significant toxicities after fluoropyrimidine-based treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with raltitrexed-based systemic therapy after developing serious adverse events with fluoropyrimidine-based treatment in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2018. Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Progression-free and overall survival were assessed from the start of raltitrexed-based therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were identified for the study. The median age was 66.5 years, and 58.1% of patients were men. The primary cancer site was right, left, and transverse colon in 38.4%, 27.9%, and 9.3%, respectively. The remaining 24.4% had rectal cancer. Among all patients, 43.0% had received more than 2 prior systemic therapies, and 37.6% had developed previous cardiotoxicity to fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. The median progression-free and overall survival were 8.5 and 10.2 months, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression model, patients with left-sided colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.97; P = .044) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.82; P = .032) had a longer progression-free survival, whereas left-sidedness of colon cancer was the only factor that predicted overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88; P = .029). Raltitrexed was well-tolerated with common adverse events that included anemia in 41.7% of patients and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in 27.4%. Most toxicities were grade 1/2, but 16.7% of patients experienced grade 3. There were no cardiac events and treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed in patients with colorectal cancer who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based systemic therapy is effective and well-tolerated.

The perception of health-related quality of life in colon cancer patients during chemotherapy: differences between men and women

There is a need for more information on the quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing chemotherapy. We wanted to investigate the perception of health status in colon cancer patients before, 3 and 6 months after chemotherapy. A secondary purpose was to assess the different perceptions of QoL between men and women during and after adjuvant or palliative therapy. We investigated 100 patients throughout chemotherapy for colon cancer. Data were collected through the SF-36 questionnaire. The score of all variables analyzed in the study group was lower than in the control group, which indicates a lower performance status, more marked in the female sex. Patients were then subdivided by the state of disease (localized or metastatic) and the variables, were evaluated before, 3 and 6 months after therapy. In patients treated with adjuvant treatment, there was a worsening of the performance status, followed by an increase after 6 months. We found that after 3 months of therapy, affected male patients perceived more limitations in carrying out their work, other daily activities and social relationships, owing to both their emotional state and their physical health. In metastatic patients the values of the eight variables decreased dramatically after 6 months, indicating a worsening of the QoL. In patients who received adjuvant treatment there was a certain worsening of the health status at 3 months, followed by a general improvement after 6 months. This improvement was not observed in patients undergoing palliative therapy. Several differences were observed between men and women in performance status after treatment.

Outcome of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver resection provides one of the best oncological outcomes for liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. However, long-term results concerning laparoscopic resection versus open hepatectomy for stage IV colon cancer are still limited. The aim of this study is to compare the survival outcome of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection for colorectal metastases.

METHOD

Between October 2002 and September 2011, a total of 1697 patients underwent liver resection for liver tumour and 60 patients underwent pure laparoscopic liver resection. Twenty patients had laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Case-matched control patients who received open liver resection were included for comparison. The immediate operative outcomes and survival outcomes including operation morbidity were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases. Forty patients who had open hepatectomy for colorectal metastases were selected as case control. Comparing the laparoscopic group with the open resection group, the median operating time was 180 min versus 210 min P = 0.059, the median blood loss was 200 versus 310 mL (P = 0.043). Hospital stay was 4.5 versus 7 days (P = 0.021), disease-free survival was 9.8 versus 10.9 months (P = 0.299), and the median survival was 69.4 versus 42.1 months (P = 0.235).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe and effective treatment for liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. It is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay when compared with open surgery. Long-term survival is comparable to the conventional open approach.

Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer: surgical considerations

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading worldwide health concern that is responsible for thousands of deaths each year. The primary source of mortality for patients with CRC is the development and subsequent progression of metastatic disease. The most common site for distant metastatic disease is the liver. Although patients with metastatic disease to the liver have several effective treatment options, the only one for cure remains surgical resection of the liver metastases. Historically, most patients with liver metastases have had unresectable disease, and only a small percentage of patients have undergone complete curative resection. However, improved systemic therapies have led to an evolution in strategies to treat metastatic CRC to the liver. Under most conditions the management of these patients remains complex; and as chemotherapy options and new targeted therapies continue to improve outcomes, it is clear that a multidisciplinary approach must be the foundation on which advanced surgical and medical techniques are employed. Here, in this review, we highlight the role of targeted therapies in the surgical management of patients with metastatic CRC to the liver.

Synchronous resections of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis by laparoscopic approach

Liver metastasis of colorectal cancer is common. Resection of solitary tumors of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer can have a favorable outcome. Open resection of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis in one operation or in separate operations is currently common practice. Reports have shown that synchronous resections do not jeopardize short or long-term surgical outcomes and that this is a safe and effective approach in open surgery. The development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery and laparoscopic hepatectomy has made a minimally invasive surgical approach to treating colorectal cancer with liver metastasis feasible. Synchronous resections of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis by laparoscopy have recently been reported. The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic colorectal resection and laparoscopic hepatectomy have been proven separately but synchronous resections by laparoscopy are in hot debate. As it has been shown that open resection of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis in one operation results in an equally good short-term outcome when compared with that done in separate operations, laparoscopic resection of the same in one single operation seems to be a good option. Recent evidence has shown that this new approach is a safe alternative with a shorter hospital stay. Large scale randomized controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this minimally invasive approach.

PRAP1 is a novel executor of p53-dependent mechanisms in cell survival after DNA damage

p53 has a crucial role in governing cellular mechanisms in response to a broad range of genotoxic stresses. During DNA damage, p53 can either promote cell survival by activating senescence or cell-cycle arrest and DNA repair to maintain genomic integrity for cell survival or direct cells to undergo apoptosis to eliminate extensively damaged cells. The ability of p53 to execute these two opposing cell fates depends on distinct signaling pathways downstream of p53. In this study, we showed that under DNA damage conditions induced by chemotherapeutic drugs, gamma irradiation and hydrogen peroxide, p53 upregulates a novel protein, proline-rich acidic protein 1 (PRAP1). We identified functional p53-response elements within intron 1 of PRAP1 gene and showed that these regions interact directly with p53 using ChIP assays, indicating that PRAP1 is a novel p53 target gene. The induction of PRAP1 expression by p53 may promote resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as knockdown of PRAP1 increases apoptosis in cancer cells after 5-FU treatment. PRAP1 appears to protect cells from apoptosis by inducing cell-cycle arrest, suggesting that the induction of PRAP1 expression by p53 in response to DNA-damaging agents contributes to cancer cell survival. Our findings provide a greater insight into the mechanisms underlying the pro-survival role of p53 in response to cytotoxic treatments.

EGFR(S) inhibitors in the treatment of gastro-intestinal cancers: what's new?

In the past 10 to 15 years, a considerable progress has been made in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) related malignancies, as number of agents expanded from only one in 1995 to seven in 2006. Current review describes the recent role of targeted therapies, specifically EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of GI cancers. Importance of dietary agents in the treatment and prevention of GI cancers is also reviewed.

Forecasting drug utilization and expenditure in a metropolitan health region

BACKGROUND

New pharmacological therapies are challenging the healthcare systems, and there is an increasing need to assess their therapeutic value in relation to existing alternatives as well as their potential budget impact. Consequently, new models to introduce drugs in healthcare are urgently needed. In the metropolitan health region of Stockholm, Sweden, a model has been developed including early warning (horizon scanning), forecasting of drug utilization and expenditure, critical drug evaluation as well as structured programs for the introduction and follow-up of new drugs. The aim of this paper is to present the forecasting model and the predicted growth in all therapeutic areas in 2010 and 2011.

METHODS

Linear regression analysis was applied to aggregate sales data on hospital sales and dispensed drugs in ambulatory care, including both reimbursed expenditure and patient co-payment. The linear regression was applied on each pharmacological group based on four observations 2006-2009, and the crude predictions estimated for the coming two years 2010-2011. The crude predictions were then adjusted for factors likely to increase or decrease future utilization and expenditure, such as patent expiries, new drugs to be launched or new guidelines from national bodies or the regional Drug and Therapeutics Committee. The assessment included a close collaboration with clinical, clinical pharmacological and pharmaceutical experts from the regional Drug and Therapeutics Committee.

RESULTS

The annual increase in total expenditure for prescription and hospital drugs was predicted to be 2.0% in 2010 and 4.0% in 2011. Expenditures will increase in most therapeutic areas, but most predominantly for antineoplastic and immune modulating agents as well as drugs for the nervous system, infectious diseases, and blood and blood-forming organs.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilisation and expenditure of drugs is difficult to forecast due to uncertainties about the rate of adoption of new medicines and various ongoing healthcare reforms and activities to improve the quality and efficiency of prescribing. Nevertheless, we believe our model will be valuable as an early warning system to start developing guidance for new drugs including systems to monitor their effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness in clinical practice.

TNM: therapeutically not mandatory

Cancer survival may be inversely related to the speed at which a primary tumour grows and disseminates. Assessment of prognosis using surgical and/or radiological definition of disease extent, i.e. staging, has thus become a standard intervention in newly diagnosed patients, with the most popular framework being the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) system. However, increasing use of biomarkers--non-TNM factors that predict therapeutic benefit, rather than adverse disease outcome--has weakened the decision-making dominance of TNM. This shift from risk-led to benefit-led practice is now starting to blur the time-honoured qualitative distinction between curable (M(0), early stage, adjuvant) and incurable (M(1), early metastatic, palliative) disease treatment strategies; the same biologic drug strategy may improve average survival outcomes by similar increments for two patients, one of whom is 'adjuvant' and the other 'metastatic'. Plausibly, then, biomarker-positive patients presenting with high-TNM (M(1)) disease may enjoy the same, if not more, disease-free and/or overall survival benefit as conventional low-TNM (M(0)) patients when treated with standard adjuvant interventions. Conversely, M(0) patients concerned by quality-of-life issues such as alopecia may in future be able to choose better-tolerated personalized drug regimens similar to those now used with survival benefit in palliative settings, even if such adjuvant regimens have not yet been validated by level 1 data. To these ends, a modernised decision-oriented disease staging system called METS (molecular/extra-primary/tumour/symptoms) is presented here.