The pharyngeal mucosa is not involved in eosinophilic oesophagitis

Respiratory symptoms associated with eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an atopic condition diagnosed based on eosinophilic infiltration in the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Typical clinical manifestations of EoE include feeding refusal, vomiting, and dysphagia however recent reports highlight an associations with extraesophageal symptoms. By definition the inflammatory response in EoE is restricted to the esophagus. However, accounts of symptoms such as chronic refractory cough, recurrent croup, hoarseness as well as subglottic stenosis, and an increase in otolaryngologic surgeries in patients with EoE raise the possibility of extraesophageal manifestations of the disease. These symptoms have been reported at times in the absence of typical gastrointestinal symptoms. While the condition is usually managed by gastroenterologist and/or allergist, the presence of extraesophageal symptoms and comorbid conditions may result in patients presenting initially to providers in other subspecialties such as pulmonology and otorhinolaryngology. The use of proton pump inhibitors and corticosteroids are part of the management of EoE. Awareness of the possibility of EoE before the empiric use of these therapies is important as there use can make identifying and diagnosing patients with EoE correctly challenging. We review the medical literature regarding extraesophageal manifestations of EoE and highlight the importance of awareness for subspecialist outside of gastroenterology and allergy for the condition.

The cultivable bacterial flora of the esophagus in subjects with esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The healthy human esophagus is colonized by bacteria similar to that of the oral mucosa. However, little is known about the microbiome of the esophagus in esophagitis or the possible role of bacteria in the inflammatory response.

AIM

To survey bacterial diversity and compare the microbiome of the esophagus in subjects with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventeen subjects diagnosed with GERD and 10 with EoE underwent endoscopic examination with brush sampling and biopsies from the oral cavity, upper and lower esophagus. The samples were cultivated on agar plates, and bacterial growth was identified to the genus or species level and semi-quantified.

RESULTS

Significantly higher numbers of bacterial groups or species were found in specimens from the lower esophagus in subjects with EoE compared to subjects with GERD (median 4 (range 1-7) vs. 2 (range 0-6), p < .0014). Sixteen vs. 14 different bacterial groups or species were found in subjects with GERD and EoE, respectively, mostly in sparse or very sparse amounts. Alfa-streptococci (viridans streptococci) were the most common bacteria in both groups. Streptococci were present in all of the EoE-subjects but only in approximately 75% in lower esophagus of the GERD-subjects, regardless of the sampling method.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with GERD had significantly less bacterial diversity in both oral and esophageal samples than EoE-subjects. Whether this discrepancy might be explained by an effect on the protective mucosal biofilm by the acidic content of the reflux in subjects with GERD remains unclear.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: a systematic review for otolaryngologists

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated oesophageal disease, only recently, but increasingly, recognised in the world literature. It is diagnosed and managed primarily by medical gastroenterologists and allergy specialists, and is a distinct disease entity, affecting both children and adults. Few studies have been published in otolaryngology journals, although otolaryngologists will encounter patients with undiagnosed eosinophilic oesophagitis. Patients may present with dysphagia, bolus obstruction or with other ENT disorders, such as atopic rhinitis, reflecting the underlying systemic allergic disorder.

OBJECTIVE

This paper systematically reviews the evidence base published on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis, particularly as it relates to otolaryngology practice.

Otolaryngologic surgeries are frequent in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to study the prevalence of otolaryngologic surgeries in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center. The type of otolaryngologic surgeries performed in patients with diagnosis of EoE was recorded during a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of patients were male, with average age of EoE diagnosis at 7.5 years with an 83% incidence of atopy. Cohort analysis revealed that 33% (119/362) had a total of 275 otolaryngologic surgeries. Surgeries performed on 119 patients are as follows: 20% bilateral myringotomy with tubes, 14% tonsillectomy, 18.5% adenoidectomy, 1.4% sinus irrigation, 3.3% bronchoscopy, and 1.4% laryngotracheoplasty (LTP); 63% of patients underwent multiple procedures. Thirty percent of patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy with tube placement (BMT) needed additional tubes. Four of 5 LTP patients had successful operations. Twelve percent of patients had EoE diagnosis prior to an otolaryngologic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-three percent of children with EoE required otolaryngologic surgical intervention and nearly one-third who underwent BMT required additional ear tubes. A large fraction of children with EoE will undergo an otolaryngologic surgery, only a minority with a preoperative EoE diagnosis. Until the nature of this relationship is clarified, the high coincidence with otolaryngologic surgeries dictates that otolaryngologists should be familiar with diagnosis of EoE in patients.

The otolaryngologic manifestations in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

(1) To describe the incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the population of patients undergoing esophagoscopy with biopsy by a pediatric otolaryngology service. (2) To elucidate the demographics, presenting symptoms, and endoscopic findings in children with EoE.

DESIGN

Case series.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The reports of esophageal biopsy specimens taken over 5 years in 2429 patients were reviewed. Ninety-two patients who received their initial diagnosis of EoE by the pediatric otolaryngology service with specimens showing 15 or greater eosinophils per high power field (HPF) were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The demographic data, history, presenting symptoms, and endoscopic findings were reviewed retrospectively for the patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The percentage of children diagnosed with EoE of all children undergoing esophageal biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 92 children were diagnosed with EoE (3.8% of total children biopsied). The mean age at biopsy was 4.4 years, much lower than previously reported in the literature (approximately 8 years); 73% were boys and 27% girls. The main presenting symptom was cough (46%) followed by hoarseness, throat clearing, burping/vomiting, and abdominal pain. Forty three percent had a history of asthma and 17% a history of GERD. Half of patients had esophageal edema, a third were normal, and only a quarter had mucosal furrowing on endoscopic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

EoE is increasingly diagnosed as a clinical entity with a distinct symptom profile and etiology. Increased understanding of EoE and its predisposing factors requires a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management involving the pediatric otolaryngologist.

The incidence of esophageal bolus impaction: is there a seasonal variation?

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a disease associated with dysphagia and has a seasonal variation in incidence. The primary aim of this study was to search for a potential seasonal variation in the incidence of esophageal foreign bodies or food impaction. In addition, after exclusion of structural or accidental causes, the authors sought to explore if such a variation would differ between patients with or without atopic disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

NÄL Medical Centre Hospital, a secondary referral hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 314 consecutive cases of esophageal bolus impaction from 2004 through 2009 were included and analyzed regarding seasonal variation in incidence. The analysis was repeated after exclusion of cases with sharp items, cancer, or atresia and again separately after subdividing this group according to presence of atopy.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of esophageal bolus impaction was significantly higher during summer and fall than during the corresponding winter and spring period. In cases with atopic disorders and soft foods or meat bolus obstruction (n = 90), the incidence during the fall was significantly higher than that during the winter, and the incidence during the summer and fall was significantly higher than the corresponding incidence during the winter and spring. This variation was not present in patients without any signs or symptoms of atopy.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant seasonal variation in the incidence of acute esophageal bolus impaction. This variation was pronounced in patients with a coexisting atopic diathesis but was nonsignificant in patients without atopy.

Toward uniformity in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE): the effect of guidelines on variability of diagnostic criteria for EoE

OBJECTIVES

Recent consensus guidelines for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been published. Whether these guidelines have standardized diagnostic criteria for EoE is unknown. We aimed to determine if the EoE guidelines had an impact on the diagnostic criteria reported in the EoE literature, and whether the previously observed variability in diagnostic criteria has become more uniform.

METHODS

Two investigators independently conducted a MEDLINE search from 1 January 2007 through 30 June 2010 for all publications reporting EoE in human subjects, and also searched the proceedings of the 2007-2010 American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association meetings, using a predefined search strategy. Data were extracted from all relevant publications.

RESULTS

Of the 799 publications identified, 149 original reports, 99 reviews, and 165 abstracts were included. In all, 32 original reports (21%) used diagnostic criteria consistent with each of the three components of the consensus guidelines. There was a significant increase when comparing original articles published after the release of the guidelines with those published earlier (31 vs. 6%, P<0.001). The proportion of original articles using 15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) as a histological cut-point increased significantly (P=0.001). There was still substantial variability in biopsy protocols and eosinophil count methodology. The majority of original articles did not report microscope high-power field (HPF) area.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of original reports with diagnostic criteria consistent with the consensus guidelines has increased significantly. However, the majority of articles still did not conform to all three of the criteria in the guidelines, and biopsy and eosinophil count protocols continue to demonstrate significant variability. Standardization of biopsy and eosinophil count protocols is needed.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic condition of increasing recognition and prevalence. In 2007, a consensus recommendation provided clinical and histopathologic guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of EoE; however, only a minority of physicians use the 2007 guidelines, which require fulfillment of both histologic and clinical features. Since 2007, the number of EoE publications has doubled, providing new disease insight. Accordingly, a panel of 33 physicians with expertise in pediatric and adult allergy/immunology, gastroenterology, and pathology conducted a systematic review of the EoE literature (since September 2006) using electronic databases. Based on the literature review and expertise of the panel, information and recommendations were provided in each of the following areas of EoE: diagnostics, genetics, allergy testing, therapeutics, and disease complications. Because accumulating animal and human data have provided evidence that EoE appears to be an antigen-driven immunologic process that involves multiple pathogenic pathways, a new conceptual definition is proposed highlighting that EoE represents a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated disease characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The diagnostic guidelines continue to define EoE as an isolated chronic disorder of the esophagus diagnosed by the need of both clinical and pathologic features. Patients commonly have high rates of concurrent allergic diatheses, especially food sensitization, compared with the general population. Proved therapeutic options include chronic dietary elimination, topical corticosteroids, and esophageal dilation. Important additions since 2007 include genetic underpinnings that implicate EoE susceptibility caused by polymorphisms in the thymic stromal lymphopoietin protein gene and the description of a new potential disease phenotype, proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophila. Further advances and controversies regarding diagnostic methods, surrogate disease markers, allergy testing, and treatment approaches are discussed.

Eosinophil counts in upper digestive mucosa of Western European children: variations with age, organs, symptoms, Helicobacter pylori status, and pathological findings

AIM

The aim of the study was to measure the number of eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF) according to age, organs, and clinical symptoms and to compare the results to histological characteristics of the upper digestive tract mucosa in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic prospective assessment of 284 esophagus, 342 antrum, 453 corpus, and 167 duodenum biopsies was carried out in 316 girls and 366 boys referred for endoscopy (median age 9 months), eos/HPF, and histological analysis.

RESULTS

Counts (mean-max SD) were as follows: esophagus 1.73 to 50 eos/HPF (5.35), antrum 3.27 to 40 (4.7), corpus 2.11 to 38 (3.76), and duodenum 4.80 to 46 (7.7). Counts >15 eos/HPF were found in 2.8% esophagi, 3.5% corpora, 4.9% antra, and 10.7% duodena. Duodenal eos/HPF were significantly higher than those of esophageal, corporeal, and antral. Mucosal eos/HPF increased with age in esophagus and antrum. The highest esophageal eos/HPF were significantly associated with recurrent abdominal pain, and with anemia in antrum, corpus, and duodenum. Major and/or minor histological features of eosinophilic esophagitis were seen in 9 of 10 esophagi with 5 to 15 eos/HPF and 7 of 8 esophagi with >15 eos/HPF. Eosinophils per high-power field were significantly correlated with histological antral and corporeal gastric inflammation. Helicobacter pylori-positive children had higher eosinophils per high-power field than H pylori negative ones both in esophagus and in antrum.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that in a western European country mucosal hypereosinophilia is rare. Mucosal eosinophil counts increase from esophagus to duodenum, and also with age in esophagus and antrum. The highest eos/HPF in the esophagus are associated with recurrent abdominal pain and in the corpus, antrum, and duodenum with anemia. Features of eosinophilic esophagitis are rare but detectable in association with counts as low as 6 eos/HPF.

Correlation between eosinophilic oesophagitis and aeroallergens

BACKGROUND

Aeroallergens have been implicated in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

AIM

To determine whether a seasonal variation exists in the diagnoses of eosinophilic oesophagitis and whether there is a correlation with seasonal pollen count.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from January 2006 to November 2008 to identify eosinophilic oesophagitis patients. Cases were classified by endoscopic date. Daily pollen counts for grass, trees and weeds were obtained from a certified counting station. Per cent of eosinophilic oesophagitis cases were collated seasonally and compared with mean pollen counts for grass, trees and weeds during the same time period.

RESULTS

A total of 127 eosinophilic oesophagitis cases were identified (median age 41, range 19-92 years, 84% men). The highest percentage of cases (33.0%; Binomial P = 0.022) was diagnosed in the spring, while the least percentage (16%; Binomial P = 0.0.010) occurred in the winter. There was a significant association between per cent eosinophilic oesophagitis cases diagnosed seasonally and mean grass pollen count (r(s) = 1.000, P < 0.01), but not with trees (r(s) = 0.400, P = 0.600) or weeds (r(s) = 0.800, P = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

A seasonal variation was seen in the diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis which correlated with pollen counts. These findings have important implications regarding the pathogenesis of eosinophilic oesophagitis, suggesting a potential role for aeroallergens.