Methylnaltrexone bromide for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness--a cost-effectiveness analysis

Opioid-Induced Constipation: Cost Impact of Approved Medications in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) prescription medications (OIC-Rx) like methylnaltrexone subcutaneous (SC) have shown efficacy in treating OIC in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs in ED patients with OIC receiving OIC-Rx versus those not receiving OIC-Rx.

METHODS

Adult patients with OIC during an ED encounter were identified from a hospital-based ED encounters database (2016-2019) and classified on the basis of receipt of OIC-Rx (OIC-Rx versus No OIC-Rx cohorts). Entropy balancing was used to reweight characteristics of the two cohorts. HRU and healthcare costs were measured and compared during the ED encounter and 30-day post-discharge period.

RESULTS

Among 11,135 patients in the OIC-Rx cohort (21,474 in the No OIC-Rx cohort), 93% received methylnaltrexone SC. Patients in the OIC-Rx cohort had 0.7 fewer inpatient days per OIC ED encounter and 64% decreased odds of being hospitalized versus the No OIC-Rx cohort (both p < 0.001). During the post-discharge period, the OIC-Rx cohort had 35% decreased odds of any re-encounter (p < 0.001). The OIC-Rx cohort had a $732 reduction in costs per OIC ED encounter versus the No OIC-Rx cohort (p < 0.001), driven by larger hospitals and patients with Medicare or Commercial insurance. During the post-discharge period, the OIC-Rx cohort had a $421 reduction in costs associated with any re-encounter versus the No OIC-Rx cohort (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving OIC-Rx in the ED had decreased odds of being hospitalized and fewer re-encounters in the 30-day post-discharge period versus patients who did not receive OIC-Rx, resulting in cost savings for insurance agencies and healthcare providers.

Cyclopropyl Scaffold: A Generalist for Marketed Drugs

In recent decades, much attention has been given to cyclopropyl scaffolds, which commonly exist in natural products and synthetic organic molecules. Clinical drug molecules with cyclopropyl rings are an area of focus in therapeutic research due to their interesting chemical properties and unique pharmacology activity. These molecular drugs against different targets are applicable in some therapeutic treatment fields including cancer, infection, respiratory disorder, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, dysphrenia, nervous system disorders, endocrine and metabolic disorders, skin disease, digestive disorders, urogenital diseases, otolaryngological and dental diseases, and eye diseases. This review is a guide for pharmacologists who are in search of valid preclinical/clinical drug compounds where the progress, from 1961 to the present day, of approved marketed drugs containing cyclopropyl scaffold is examined.

Measuring quality of life in opioid-induced constipation: mapping EQ-5D-3 L and PAC-QOL

BACKGROUND

In health economic evaluations, quality of life should be measured with preference-based utilities, such as the EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3 L). Non-preference-based instruments (often disease-specific questionnaires) are commonly mapped to utilities. We investigated if the relationship observed between the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) and the EQ-5D-3 L in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) also applies in opioid-induced constipation (OIC).

METHODS

EQ-5D-3 L patient-level data from a clinical study of lubiprostone in OIC (n = 439) were scored using the UK tariff. A published mapping between the PAC-QOL and the EQ-5D-3 L was tested using these data. New mapping formulas were analysed, including PAC-QOL total and subscale scores. The root mean square error (RMSE), the adjusted R(2) and predicted/observed plots were used to test the fit.

RESULTS

The utility measured with the EQ-5D-3 L was 0.450 ± 0.329, with a distinctly bimodal distribution. This significantly improved if patients responded to treatment (defined as an increase of three spontaneous bowel movements per week, with no rescue medication taken). The published mapping in CIC performed poorly in this OIC population, and the PAC-QOL could not be reliably mapped on to the EQ-5D-3 L even when re-estimating coefficients. This was shown in our two mappings (using PAC-QOL total score, and subscale scores) by a high RMSE (0.317 and 0.314) and a low R(2) (0.068 and 0.080), with high utilities underestimated and low utilities overestimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with OIC have a low quality of life which does improve with the resolution of symptoms. However the PAC-QOL cannot be used to estimate the EQ-5D-3 L utility - potentially as the PAC-QOL does not capture the all relevant aspects of the patients quality of life (for example the cause of the opioid use).

[Is the pharmacological treatment of constipation in palliative care evidence based? : a systematic literature review]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate the evidence for clinically established pharmacological therapies for constipation in palliative care, a systematic literature review was performed in different databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL), textbooks, and publications.

RESULTS

Whereas 130 randomized controlled trials were found with patients outside of palliative care settings, only 10 controlled studies with patients in end-of-life situations were identified: three RCTs with methylnaltrexone and one with the combination of oxycodone and naloxone showed the effect and safety of opiate antagonists for patients who are not at risk of gastrointestinal perforation. There have been no studies which test methylnaltrexone against the optimization of therapy with conventional laxatives. Six other controlled studies of limited quality in design and execution and with only few participants tested naloxone, senna, lactulose, Co-danthramer, an Ayurvedic preparation (Misrakasneham), magnesium hydroxide, fluid paraffin, sodium picosulfate and docusate without finding statistically significant differences in efficacy or side effects. Most patients in these studies had cancer. Only case studies with few patients in palliative care were found for meglumine, neostigmine, and other substances mentioned above.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on medical treatment of constipation in palliative care is sparse and guidelines have to refer to evidence from outside the palliative care setting and to expert opinions. Results from studies with other patient groups can only be transferred with limitations to very ill patients at the end of life who might have a higher risk for potential side effects such as gastrointestinal perforation in case of abdominal tumor manifestation. Therefore further studies are required to evaluate the medical treatment of multiple reasons for constipation in these patients. These studies should focus on feasibility, clinical relevance and quality of life. The English full text version of this article will be available in SpringerLink as of November 2012 (under "Supplemental").

Management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: focus on methylnaltrexone

Opioids are one of the most widely used therapies for the palliative treatment of cancer pain; however, despite their proven analgesic efficacy, they are associated with several adverse effects. Associated with psychological distress and multiple concomitant clinical concerns, constipation is the most commonly occurring adverse effect of chronic opioid therapy in cancer patients. Whilst prophylaxis remains the first-line management option, methylnaltrexone is a recommended treatment option for opioid-related constipation if administration of laxatives is ineffective. Due to its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier, methylnaltrexone exerts a peripheral inhibition of opioid-related effects without influencing the opioid-induced central effects; as a result, the analgesic effect of opioids is unaffected. Moreover, multiple clinical trials, albeit not always conducted specifically in cancer patients, have demonstrated that up to 4 months' treatment with either intravenous or subcutaneous methylnaltrexone provides effective relief from opioid-related constipation and is well tolerated. Preliminary evidence indicates that the addition of methylnaltrexone to standard care for opioid-related constipation may also be advantageous from a pharmacoeconomic perspective. In addition, preliminary data suggest that methylnaltrexone could be associated with some further clinical benefits other than the treatment of opioid-related constipation, such as the improvement of gastric emptying, the relief of nausea/vomiting, and the reduction of the risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. This narrative review examines the most recent evidence and evaluates the current role of methylnaltrexone in the management of opioid-related constipation, and its potential efficacy in cancer patients. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and tolerability of methylnaltrexone are discussed.

Opioid-induced constipation in advanced illness: safety and efficacy of methylnaltrexone bromide

Constipation, one of the major side effects of opiates used in palliative care, can impair patients’ quality of life to a point where it prevents sufficient pain control. Methylnaltrexone is a novel μ-receptor antagonist, which does not pass the blood brain barrier. It is licensed to treat opiate induced constipation for patients with advanced diseases. This review article presents an overview of pharmacology and safety of its application, evidence of its efficacy and economic aspects of its use in clinical practice. Available data are limited but strongly suggest that methylnaltrexone causes laxation in less than 24 hours for at least half of those patients over the first two weeks of usage without impairing pain control or causing serious adverse effects. To avoid danger of gastrointestinal perforation it is contraindicated for patients at risk for that complication. More research is needed to evaluate its long-term efficacy and economic impact.