Endocannabinoid control of gastric sensorimotor function in man

Multi-omics analysis reveals the metabolic regulators of duodenal low-grade inflammation in a functional dyspepsia model

Several gastrointestinal phenotypes and impairment of duodenal mucosal barrier have been reported in clinical studies in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Due to the preferential colonization of the mucosa, intestinal microbes and their metabolites are commonly involved in host metabolism and immune responses. However, there are no studies on the intertwined correlation among multi-level data. For more comprehensive illustrating, a multi-omics analysis focusing on the duodenum was performed in the FD rat model. We found that differential microbiomes in the duodenum were significantly correlated with the biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan. The innate immune response-related genes, which were upregulated in the duodenum, were associated with the TLR2/TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway. More importantly, arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) and endocannabinoid analogues showed linear relationships with the FD phenotypes. Taken together, multi-level data from microbiome, transcriptome and metabolome reveal that AEA may regulate duodenal low-grade inflammation in FD. These results suggest an important cue of gut microbiome–endocannabinoid system axis in the pathogenesis of FD.

The gastrointestinal tract in hunger and satiety signalling

BACKGROUND

Different peripheral pathways are implicated in the regulation of the food ingestion-digestion cycle.

METHODS

Narrative review on gastrointestinal mechanisms involved in satiety and hunger signalling.

RESULTS

Combined mechano- and chemoreceptors, peripherally released peptide hormones and neural pathways provide feedback to the brain to determine sensations of hunger (increase energy intake) or satiation (cessation of energy intake) and regulate the human metabolism. The gastric accommodation reflex, which consists of a transient relaxation of the proximal stomach during food intake, has been identified as a major determinant of meal volume, through activation of tension-sensitive gastric mechanoreceptors. Motilin, whose release is the trigger of gastric Phase 3, has been identified as the major determinant of return of hunger after a meal. In addition, the release of several peptide hormones such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), cholecystokinin as well as motilin and ghrelin contributes to gut-brain signalling with relevance to control of hunger and satiety. A number of nutrients, such as bitter tastants, as well as pharmacological agents, such as endocannabinoid receptor antagonists and GLP-1 analogues act on these pathways to influence hunger, satiation and food intake.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal mechanisms such as gastric accommodation and motilin release are key determinants of satiety and hunger.

Influence of itopride and domperidone on gastric tone and on the perception of gastric distention in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Itopride, a prokinetic with dopamine D2-antagonistic and cholinesterase inhibitor properties, is used for treating functional dyspepsia (FD) patients. However, the effects of itopride on sensitivity to gastric distention and impaired gastric accommodation, major pathophysiological mechanisms of FD, are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of itopride on gastric distention and on gastric accommodation in healthy volunteers, compared to placebo and domperidone.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers (6 male, mean age 28.3 ± 5.8) were studied after pretreatment for 2 days tid with placebo (P), itopride 50 mg (I50), itopride 100 mg (I100), or domperidone 10 mg (D10) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design. A gastric barostat study was performed to assess gastric compliance, sensitivity to gastric distention, and gastric accommodation. Symptoms were evaluated by visual analogue scales and perception scores.

RESULTS

I50, I100, and D10 did not influence gastric compliance and sensitivity compared to placebo. No significant differences in accommodation were observed after I100 compared to P. Preprandial intragastric volumes were similar with D10, I50, or placebo (respectively, 244 ± 21, 225 ± 23, and 261 ± 36 mL, NS). However, postprandial gastric volumes were lower after I50 compared to placebo (303 ± 34 vs. 448 ± 50 mL, P < 0.01). Gastric accommodation was significantly reduced after D10 (90 ± 26 mL) and I50 (78 ± 25 mL) compared to placebo (186 ± 37 mL, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In healthy subjects, itopride and domperidone do not alter gastric compliance or sensitivity. I50 and D10 three times daily, but not I100, decrease meal-related gastric accommodation.

The effect of sildenafil on gastric motility and satiation in healthy controls

Sildenafil induces relaxation of smooth muscle cells by blocking PDE5. Dyspepsia is one of sildenafil's most frequently reported adverse events, suggesting its effect on gastric motility. Our aim was to study the effect of sildenafil on gastric accommodation (GA) and gastric emptying (GE) in healthy volunteers (HVs).

Methods

Sildenafil (50 mg) or placebo was randomly administered to 16 blinded HVs. After a manometry probe and an infusion catheter were positioned in the proximal stomach, the intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured before and during nutrient drink infusion (ND, 60 ml/min). HVs were asked to score their hunger, satiation and six epigastric symptoms at five-minute intervals. The experiment ended when the HVs scored maximal satiation during ND infusion at one-minute intervals. To assess GE, breath samples were collected every 15 minutes for six hours after the meal (244 kcal).

Results

ND infusion induced a drop in proximal stomach IGP, which was suppressed by sildenafil (average area under the curve for sildenafil: -33.6 ± 8.8 mmHg; placebo: -60.8 ± 11.3 mmHg, p = 0.005). Sildenafil-treated volunteers reached earlier maximal satiation compared to placebo (678 ± 70 ml vs. 836 ± 82.6 ml, p = 0.019). Finally, GE was significantly slower after sildenafil (90.6 ± 5.9 min vs. 76.6 ± 7.1 min, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Sildenafil inhibits GA, leading to significantly decreased nutrient tolerance, and slightly delays the GE rate in humans.

Endocannabinoid-related compounds in gastrointestinal diseases

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is an endogenous signalling pathway involved in the control of several gastrointestinal (GI) functions at both peripheral and central levels. In recent years, it has become apparent that the ECS is pivotal in the regulation of GI motility, secretion and sensitivity, but endocannabinoids (ECs) are also involved in the regulation of intestinal inflammation and mucosal barrier permeability, suggesting their role in the pathophysiology of both functional and organic GI disorders. Genetic studies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease have indeed shown significant associations with polymorphisms or mutation in genes encoding for cannabinoid receptor or enzyme responsible for their catabolism, respectively. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are testing EC agonists/antagonists in the achievement of symptomatic relief from a number of GI symptoms. Despite this evidence, there is a lack of supportive RCTs and relevant data in human beings, and hence, the possible therapeutic application of these compounds is raising ethical, political and economic concerns. More recently, the identification of several EC-like compounds able to modulate ECS function without the typical central side effects of cannabino-mimetics has paved the way for emerging peripherally acting drugs. This review summarizes the possible mechanisms linking the ECS to GI disorders and describes the most recent advances in the manipulation of the ECS in the treatment of GI diseases.

Review: The Role of Cannabinoids on Esophageal Function-What We Know Thus Far

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) primarily consists of cannabinoid receptors (CBRs), endogenous ligands, and enzymes for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and inactivation. Although the presence of CBRs, both CB1 and CB2, as well as a third receptor (G-protein receptor 55 [GPR55]), has been established in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, few studies have focused on the role of cannabinoids on esophageal function. To date, studies have shown their effect on GI motility, inflammation and immunity, intestinal and gastric acid secretion, nociception and emesis pathways, and appetite control. Given the varying and sometimes limited efficacy of current medical therapies for diseases of the esophagus, further understanding and investigation into the interplay of the ECS on esophageal health and disease may present new therapeutic modalities that may help advance current treatment options. In this brief review, the current understanding of the ECS role in various esophageal functions and disorders is presented.

CB1 antagonism produces behaviors more consistent with satiety than reduced reward value in food-maintained responding in rats

Cannabinoid CB1 antagonists are widely known to reduce motivation for food, but it is not known whether they induce satiety or reduce reward value of food. It may therefore be necessary to compare effects of altered satiety and reward food value in the same appetitive task, and determine whether CB1 antagonism produces a behavior pattern similar to either, both, or neither. A fine-grained analysis of fixed-ratio 10 (FR10) responding for palatable food initially included number and duration of, and between, all lever presses and food tray entries in order to differentiate the pattern of suppression of prefeeding from that caused by reducing the reward value of the pellets with quinine. Discriminant function analysis then determined that these manipulations were best differentiated by effects on tray entries, pellet retrieval latencies, and time of the first response. At 0.5 mg/kg, AM 6527 produced similar effects to reducing reward value, but at 1.0 and 4.0 mg/kg, effects were more similar to those when animals were satiated. We conclude that AM 6527 both reduced reward value and enhanced satiety, but as dose increased, effects on satiety became much more prominent. These findings contribute to knowledge about the behavioral processes affected by CB1 antagonism.

Gastroduodenal mechanisms underlying functional gastric disorders

Functional dyspepsia (FD), a disorder thought to originate from the gastroduodenum, is one of the most prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorders. In this review, we focused on gastroduodenal mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of FD. The roles of impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention and to luminal agents, altered mucosal integrity, low-grade inflammation and psychological stress are reviewed. The underlying pathophysiology in FD is probably multifactorial, involving a combination of several of these factors, ultimately leading to symptom pattern and severity.

Rimonabant, gastrointestinal motility and obesity

Background:

Obesity and overweight affect more than half of the US population and are associated with a number of diseases. Rimonabant, a cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker in the endocannabinoid (EC) system, was indicated in Europe for the treatment of obesity and overweight patients with associated risk factors but withdrawn on Jan, 2009 because of side effects. Many studies have reported the effects of rimonabant on gastrointestinal (GI) motility and food intake.

The aims of this review are:

to review the relationship of EC system with GI motility and food intake;

to review the studies of rimonabant on GI motility, food intake and obesity;

and to report the tolerance and side effects of rimonabant.

Methods:

the literature (Pubmed database) was searched using keywords: rimonabant, obesity and GI motility.

Results:

GI motility is related with appetite, food intake and nutrients absorption. The EC system inhibits GI motility, reduces emesis and increases food intake; Rimonabant accelerates gastric emptying and intestinal transition but decreases energy metabolism and food intake. There is rapid onset of tolerance to the prokinetic effect of rimonabant. The main side effects of rimonabant are depression and GI symptoms.

Conclusions:

Rimonabant has significant effects on energy metabolism and food intake, probably mediated via its effects on GI motility.

Alternative targets within the endocannabinoid system for future treatment of gastrointestinal diseases

Many beneficial effects of herbal and synthetic cannabinoids on gut motility and inflammation have been demonstrated, suggesting a vast potential for these compounds in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. These effects are based on the so-called 'endocannabinoid system' (ECS), a cooperating network of molecules that regulate the metabolism of the body's own and of exogenously administered cannabinoids. The ECS in the gastrointestinal tract quickly responds to homeostatic disturbances by de novo synthesis of its components to maintain homeostasis, thereby offering many potential targets for pharmacological intervention. Of major therapeutic interest are nonpsychoactive cannabinoids or compounds that do not directly target cannabinoid receptors but still possess cannabinoid-like properties. Drugs that inhibit endocannabinoid degradation and raise the level of endocannabinoids are becoming increasingly promising alternative therapeutic tools to manipulate the ECS.