Airway management techniques in head and neck cancer surgeries: a retrospective analysis.
Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;
23:311-315. [PMID:
31172388 DOI:
10.1007/s10006-019-00782-1]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of modalities of airway management and its impact on patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgeries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective review of the medical record of 500 patients operated from January 2008 to December 2013 was conducted at our institute. Patients were reviewed for a mode of airway management, a total length of post-operative hospital stay (PLOS), and incidence of elderly patients in the total number of head and neck cancer surgeries posted for various diagnostic and definitive treatments.
RESULTS
Out of 500 patients, 462 patients (92.4%) underwent nasal intubation, of which 320 underwent fiberoptic (FO) intubation (64%), 7 underwent tracheotomies after completion of surgery (1.4%), and 3 underwent at the beginning of surgery (0.6%). The remaining 38 patients (7.6%) underwent oral intubation.
CONCLUSION
Nasotracheal intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy is the most preferred technique for the management of a difficult airway. Efficient airway management during the perioperative period significantly reduces the post-operative length of hospital stay and morbidity.
Collapse