Closed loop control of arterial hypertension following intracranial surgery using sodium nitroprusside. A comparison of intra-operative halothane or isoflurane

Automated Blood Pressure Control

Arterial pressure management is a crucial task in the operating room and intensive care unit. In high-risk surgical and in critically ill patients, sustained hypotension is managed with continuous infusion of vasopressor agents, which most commonly have direct α agonist activity like phenylephrine or norepinephrine. The current standard of care to guide vasopressor infusion is manual titration to an arterial pressure target range. This approach may be improved by using automated systems that titrate vasopressor infusions to maintain a target pressure. In this article, we review the evidence behind blood pressure management in the operating room and intensive care unit and discuss current and potential future applications of automated blood pressure control.

Closed-loop hemodynamic management

As the operating room and intensive care settings become increasingly complex, the required vigilance practitioners must dedicate to a wide array of clinical systems has increased concordantly. The resulting shortage of available attention to these various clinical tasks creates a vacuum for the introduction of systems that can administer well-established goal-directed therapies without significant provider feedback. Recently, there has been an explosion of academic exploration into creating such automated systems, with a strong specific focus on hemodynamic control. Within this field, the largest focus has been on goal-directed fluid therapy as systems automating vasopressor administration have only recently become viable options. Our goal in this review article is to summarize the validity of the relevant goal-directed hemodynamic systems and explore the expanding role of automation within these systems.

Principles of pharmacologic hemodynamic management and closed-loop systems

Every day, physicians in critical-care settings are challenged with the hemodynamic management of patients with severe cardiovascular derangements. There is a potential role for closed-loop (automated) systems to assist clinicians in managing these patients and growing interest in the possible applications. In this review, we discuss the basic principles of critical-care hemodynamic management and the closed-loop systems that have been developed to help in this setting.

Closed-loop strategies for patient care systems

Military operations, mass casualty events, and remote work sites present unique challenges to providers of immediate medical care, who may lack the necessary skills for optimal clinical management. Moreover, the number of patients in these scenarios may overwhelm available health care resources. Recent applications of closed-loop control (CLC) techniques to critical care medicine may offer possible solutions for such environments. Here, feedback of a monitored variable or group of variables is used to control the state or output of a dynamic system. Some potential advantages of CLC in patient management include limiting task saturation when there is simultaneous demand for cognitive and active clinical intervention, improving quality of care through optimization of the titration of medications, conserving limited consumable supplies, preventing secondary insults in traumatic brain injury, shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation, and achieving appropriate goal-directed resuscitation. The uses of CLC systems in critical care medicine have been increasingly explored across a wide range of therapeutic modalities. This review will provide an overview of control system theory as applied to critical care medicine that must be considered in the design of autonomous CLC systems, and introduce a number of clinical applications under development in the context of deployment of such applications to austere environments.

Automated information systems in anesthesiology

The current state of the art of anesthesia information systems remains primitive. Currently, available commercial systems focus only at automating the charting process and not the care process. Until systems are available that integrate these two functions, anesthesiologists will not truly benefit from such systems.

Enalaprilat controls postoperative hypertension while maintaining cardiac function and systemic oxygenation after neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of intravenous enalaprilat in lowering postoperative hypertension.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind trial.

SETTING

Surgical ICT in a university hospital (tertiary care center).

PATIENTS

18 neurosurgical patients subjected to the extirpation of a supratentorial intracerebral tumour were studied after detection of postoperative hypertension. This was defined as a constant elevation of systolic arterial pressure over 160 mmHg or diastolic arterial pressure over 95 mmHg.

INTERVENTIONS

Enalaprilat 0.015 mg kg-1 was injected within 5 min to 9 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Central haemodynamics and systemic oxygenation were assessed at baseline before enalaprilat injection, and repeatedly during four hours after the injection. The statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance for repeated measurements. As compared to control patients, the blood pressure lowering effect of enalaprilat became evident within 15 min and lasted for over four hours (p = 0.008). It was mainly due to the reduced systemic vascular resistance. Enalaprilat also induced a small decline in myocardial perfusion pressure. Cardiac performance, preload, heart rate and systemic oxygenation were not affected by enalaprilat.

CONCLUSIONS

We found intravenous enalaprilat effective and safe in lowering postoperative hypertension following neurosurgery as assessed by it's effects on central haemodynamics and systemic oxygenation.