The effect of cerebrospinal fluid dilution of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia

Evaluation Effect of Aspiration of 0.2 ml of Cerebrospinal Fluid After Completion of Injection 0.5% Bupivacaine and Reinjection Into Subarachnoid Space on Sensory and Motor Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Spinal anesthesia (SPA) is the most common type of anesthesia administered for cesarean section. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aspiration of CSF (0.2 mL) immediately after SPA with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine on the extent of sensory and motor block.

Methods

In this clinical trial, 60 women at ≥37 weeks of gestation and aged between 18 and 46 years, candidate for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 30). Group A (CSF-aspiration group) received the spinal anesthesia with 10 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with aspiration of 0.2 ml of CSF. Group B (no-CSF-aspiration group) received only 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pin-prick analgesia and motor block were tested during the induction.

Results

The mean maximum level of analgesia was T6 in each group. Although the mean time to reach the maximum level of anesthesia (4.43 ± 5.14 vs. 2.76 ± 2.04, P = 0.107) and to reach T10 level (50.56 ± 11.51 vs. 49.10 ± 13.68, P = 0.665) in the CSF-aspiration group is longer than the non-CSF-aspiration group, but this differences were not significant. There were no significant between-group differences regarding sensory and motor block quality (P = 0.389) or failed SPA (four cases in CSF-aspiration group vs. two cases in no-CSF-aspiration group, P = 0.389). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, headache, vomiting and nausea were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the difference in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups over times was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our finding indicated that the aspiration of 0.2 ml of CSF after injection of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine does not seem to affect the extent of sensory and motor block, success rate, or outcome after SPA in cesarean section.

Clinical Trial Registration

[https://www.irct.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20120915010841N25], identifier [IRCT20120915010841N25].

Low-dose bupivacaine: a comparison of hypobaric and near isobaric solutions for arthroscopic surgery of the knee

The results of studies on the effect of volume, concentration or total dose of local anaesthetic on the spread of spinal anaesthesia are inconclusive. Most support the assumption that the total dosage is more important than the volume. We compared low-dose bupivacaine (6 mg) in 0.5% and 0.18% solutions as sole anaesthetic to achieve predominantly unilateral spinal anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups to receive either 1.2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine (6 mg) (n = 30) or 3.4 ml 0.18% hypobaric bupivacaine (6.1 mg) (n = 30). Drugs were administered at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral position. Patients remained in this position for 20 min before being turned supine for the operation. Spinal block was assessed by pinprick and modified Bromage scale and compared between the operated and nonoperated sides. No significant changes were found in the spread or duration of sensory or motor block (p > 0.05). The haemodynamic changes were also similar between the groups. The same pinprick level of analgesia, degree of motor block and duration of spinal anaesthesia was obtained with bupivacaine (6 mg) in low (1.2 ml) or high (3.4 ml) volumes.