A comparison of the effects of isoflurane and desflurane on the neuromuscular effects of mivacurium

Botulinum Toxin A, a Better Choice for Skeletal Muscle Block in a Comparative Study With Lidocaine in Rats

A positive response to scalene muscle block (SMB) is an important indication for the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. Lidocaine injection is commonly used in clinical practice in SMB, although there have been some cases of misdiagnosis. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is one of the therapeutic agents in SMB, but whether it is also indicated for SMB diagnosis is controversial. To evaluate the muscle block efficiency of these two drugs, the contraction strength was repeatedly recorded on tibialis anterior muscle in rats. It was found that at a safe dosage, 2% lidocaine performed best at 40 μL, but it still exhibits an unsatisfactory partial blocking efficiency. Moreover, neither lidocaine injection in combination with epinephrine or dexamethasone nor multiple locations injection could improve the blocking efficiency. On the other hand, injections of 3, 6, and 12 U/kg BTX-A all showed almost complete muscle block. Gait analysis showed that antagonistic gastrocnemius muscle, responsible for heel rising, was paralyzed for nonspecific blockage in the 12 U/kg BTX-A group, but not in the 3 U/kg or 6 U/kg BTX-A group. Cleaved synaptosomal associated protein 25 (c-SNAP 25) was stained to test the transportation of BTX-A, and was additionally observed in the peripheral muscles in 6 and 12 U/kg groups. c-SNAP 25, however, was barely detectable in the spinal cord after BTX-A administration. Therefore, our results suggest that low dosage of BTX-A may be a promising option for the diagnostic SMB of thoracic outlet syndrome. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Muscle block is important for the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome and commonly performed with lidocaine. However, misdiagnosis was observed sometimes. Here, we found that intramuscular injection of optimal dosage lidocaine only partially blocked the muscle contraction in rats, whereas low-dosage botulinum toxin, barely used in diagnostic block, showed almost complete block without affecting the central nervous system. This study suggests that botulinum toxin might be more suitable for muscle block than lidocaine in clinical practice.

Desflurane - revisited

The search for an ideal inhalational general anesthetic agent continues. Desflurane, which was recently introduced in the Indian market, possesses favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and is closer to the definition of an ideal agent. It offers the advantage of precise control over depth of anesthesia along with a rapid, predictable, and clear-headed recovery with minimal postoperative sequelae, making it a valuable anesthetic agent for maintenance in adults and pediatric patients in surgeries of all durations. The agent has advantages when used in extremes of age and in the obese. Its use may increase the direct costs of providing anesthetic care. Methods or techniques, such as low-flow anesthesia, to reduce the overall cost and along with minimal environmental implications must be followed.

Potency and time course of mivacurium block during sevoflurane, isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia

PURPOSE

To determine the potency and time course of action of mivacurium neuromuscular block under routine clinical conditions during sevoflurane, isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia.

METHOD

Patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen and 1.5 MAC sevoflurane or isoflurane or a propofol infusion, neuromuscular block being monitored using mechanomyography. Potency was determined using administration of single doses of mivacurium of 40-100 micrograms.kg-1 and construction of dose-response curves (n = 72). The onset and duration of action were determined following a bolus dose of 0.2 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium (n = 30).

RESULTS

The ED50 and ED95 (with 95% confidence limits) were estimated to be 42 (35-51) and 86 (74-98) micrograms.kg-1, 52 (45-60) and 89 (72-110) micrograms.kg-1, and 53 (45-62) and 95 (81-112) micrograms.kg-1 during sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol anesthesia respectively (P < 0.05 between sevoflurane and propofol). Following administration of the 0.2 mg.kg-1 dose, neither the times (mean +/- SD) to maximum block (1.6 +/- 0.31, 1.7 +/- 0.21 and 1.6 +/- 0.45 min, respectively) nor the times to 25 and 90% recovery of T1 (20 +/- 4.5 and 33 +/- 8.8 min, 21 +/- 3.8 and 33 +/- 6.5 min, and 18 +/- 4.1 and 28 +/- 5.8 min respectively) were different among groups. The times to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.8 were 40 +/- 10.0, 36 +/- 8.5 and 29 +/- 5.5 min in the sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol groups respectively (P = 0.017 between the sevoflurane and propofol groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Under usual conditions of clinical anesthesia the potency of mivacurium was slightly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with intravenous anesthesia but the duration of action was only minimally prolonged during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia.