Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice

Rapid Sequence Intubation, is it Time to Find an Alternative Induction Agent? A Narrative Review

Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of fentanyl as an induction agent for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in critically ill patients. Data Sources: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and clinical trial registries (1964-June 2021) was performed utilizing the keywords fentanyl, rapid sequence intubation, intubation, induction, anesthesia, hemodynamics, operating room (OR), and emergency. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Only primary literature evaluating fentanyl in combination with a sedative or as the sole induction agent was included in the final analysis. Primary literature included peer-reviewed publications and results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov actively recruiting participants. Data Synthesis: Fentanyl has been used for decades as an adjunct, and sole induction agent in the OR. Questions surrounding the use of fentanyl as a sole induction agent include optimal dosing and safety in critically ill patients as evaluation in non-OR settings remain limited. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Commonly used induction agents (eg, etomidate and ketamine) are associated with adverse events that may increase risk of morbidity and mortality. Fentanyl, a high-potency opioid could serve as an alternative induction agent for RSI due to its neutral hemodynamic response and fast onset of action. This paper compiles and describes existing data on the use of fentanyl as an induction agent for RSI. Conclusion: Fentanyl in combination with sedatives provides optimal intubating conditions with minimal impact on hemodynamic parameters. Future studies should focus on safety and impact of awareness during paralysis before fentanyl can be considered as a sole induction agent.

Review article: Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A systematic review

The use of cricoid pressure (CP) to prevent aspiration during rapid sequence induction (RSI) has become controversial, although CP is considered central to the practice of RSI. There is insufficient research to support its efficacy in reducing aspiration, and emerging concerns it reduces the first-pass success (FPS) of intubation. This systematic review aims to assess the safety and efficacy of CP during RSI in EDs by investigating its effect on FPS and the incidence of complications, including gastric regurgitation and aspiration. A systematic review of four databases was performed for all primary research investigating CP during RSI in EDs. The primary outcome was FPS; secondary outcomes included complications such as gastric regurgitation, aspiration, hypoxia, hypotension and oesophageal intubation. After screening 4208 citations, three studies were included: one randomised controlled trial (n = 54) investigating the incidence of aspiration during the application of CP and two registry studies (n = 3710) comparing the rate of FPS of RSI with and without CP. The results of these individual studies are not sufficient to draw concrete conclusions but do suggest that aspiration occurs regardless of the application of CP, and that FPS is not reduced by the application of CP. There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether applying CP during RSI in EDs affects the rate of FPS or the incidence of complications such as aspiration. Further research in the ED, including introducing CP usage into other existing airway registries, is needed.

Introduction of a rapid sequence induction checklist and its effect on compliance to guidelines and complications

BACKGROUND

Current evidence for the conduct of rapid sequence induction (RSI) is weak. This increases the risk of clinicians modifying the RSI procedure according to personal preferences. Checklists may help increase compliance to best practice guidelines and reduce complication rates. Their value during RSI, a critical procedure in anaesthesia, is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate compliance to local guidelines and frequency of RSI-related complications before and after introduction of an RSI checklist.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational, pre- and post-intervention study conducted at two hospitals. There were two interventions: the first was a standardized educational lecture to all staff at both hospitals, consisting of an educational instruction of the checklist and general information about RSI, and the second intervention was the introduction of a RSI checklist. The checklist consisted of 16 items. Compliance to guidelines was categorized as high, moderate and low, and was assessed pre- and post-intervention. The frequency of RSI-related complications was also measured.

RESULTS

We registered 811 RSI procedures of which 412 were pre-intervention. After intervention, the proportion of procedures with high compliance to RSI guidelines increased from 49% to 70% (P < .001). The proportion with partial and low compliance decreased from 37% to 26% (P < .001) and 13% to 3.3% (P < .001) respectively. No change in RSI-related complication rates was detectable post-intervention (16.6%-16.7% P = .56).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a structured RSI checklist significantly increased compliance to RSI guidelines. A change in RSI-related complications could not be detected due to the size of the study. A checklist may be a useful tool to reduce variance during the RSI procedure.