Neurocardiogenic syncope in the obstetric patient

Syncope in pregnancy, immediate pregnancy outcomes, and offspring long-term neurologic health

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the perinatal consequences of maternal syncope during pregnancy, and even less is known about the potential long-term effect on offspring health.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine perinatal outcomes as well as long-term offspring neurologic morbidity associated with prenatal maternal syncope, and the possible differential effect by trimester of first syncope episode.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all singleton deliveries occurring between 1991 and 2021 at a large tertiary medical center. Multivariable analyses were applied to study the associations between prenatal maternal syncope and various perinatal outcomes as well as offspring neurologic morbidity up to the age of 18 years, while adjusting for clinically relevant factors. Analyses were further conducted by trimester of first syncope episode.

RESULTS

The study population included 232,475 pregnancies, 774 (0.3%) were affected by maternal syncope, which most frequently first occurred during the second trimester (44.5%), followed by the first trimester (31.8%) and finally the third trimester (27.7%). Maternal syncope was independently associated with increased risk for intrauterine growth restriction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.29), which appeared to be mainly driven by first trimester syncope occurrence; as well as with increased risk for cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.61), and for long-term offspring neurologic morbidity (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.08), regardless of the trimester of syncope occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal maternal syncope is an independent risk factor for intrauterine growth restriction, cesarean delivery, and for long-term offspring neurologic morbidity.

2023 HRS expert consensus statement on the management of arrhythmias during pregnancy

This international multidisciplinary expert consensus statement is intended to provide comprehensive guidance that can be referenced at the point of care to cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists, and other health care professionals, on the management of cardiac arrhythmias in pregnant patients and in fetuses. This document covers general concepts related to arrhythmias, including both brady- and tachyarrhythmias, in both the patient and the fetus during pregnancy. Recommendations are provided for optimal approaches to diagnosis and evaluation of arrhythmias; selection of invasive and noninvasive options for treatment of arrhythmias; and disease- and patient-specific considerations when risk stratifying, diagnosing, and treating arrhythmias in pregnant patients and fetuses. Gaps in knowledge and new directions for future research are also identified.

An anesthetic experience with cesarean section in a patient with vasovagal syncope -A case report-

Epidural anesthesia was performed for a cesarean section in a patient with vasovagal syncope. A 26-year-old woman at 41 weeks of gestation and with a known history of vasovagal syncope was scheduled to undergo an emergency cesarean section. She received epidural anesthesia for the cesarean delivery and showed signs and symptoms of vasovagal syncope, which were treated successfully with fluids and the administration of a vasoconstrictor. This case highlights the need for anesthesiologists to understand vasovagal syncope precisely because severe hypotension in a patient under anesthesia for a cesarean section is dangerous to both the mother and baby.

An obstetric patient with neurocadiogenic syncope

We report the peripartum management of a 29-year-old primigravid patient with neurocardiogenic syncope, which had been diagnosed six years previously on tilt-table testing. General principles were applied to minimise the risk of precipitating syncopal episodes. She had an uneventful ventouse-assisted vaginal delivery under epidural anaesthesia in our obstetric high dependency unit. The optimum management of these patients has yet to be established.