The Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality: a review of areas of concern related to anaesthesia over 10 years

Enhancing knowledge, skills, and comfort in providing anesthesia assistance during obstetric general anesthesia for operating room nurses: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Due to a nationwide shortage of anesthesia assistants, operating room nurses are often recruited to assist with the induction of obstetric general anesthesia (GA). We developed and administered a training program and hypothesized there would be significant improvements in knowledge and skills in anesthesia assistance during obstetric GA by operating room nurses following training with adequate retention at six months.

METHODS

Following informed consent, all operating room nurses at our institution were invited to participate in the study. Baseline knowledge of participants was assessed using a 14-item multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ), and skills were assessed using a 12-item checklist scored by direct observation during simulated induction of GA. Next, a 20-min didactic lecture followed by a ten-minute hands-on skills station were delivered. Knowledge and skills were immediately reassessed after training, and again at six weeks and six months. The primary outcomes of this study were adequate knowledge and skills retention at six months, defined as achieving ≥ 80% in MCQ and ≥ 80% in skills checklist scores and analyzed using longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 34 nurses completed the study at six months. The mean MCQ score at baseline was 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.4) out of 14. The mean skills checklist score was 5.5 (95% CI, 4.9 to 6.1) out of 12. The mean comfort scores for assisting elective and emergency Cesarean deliveries were 3.6 (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.9) and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.5) out of 5, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean MCQ and skills checklist scores across the different study periods (overall P value < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise tests suggested that, compared with baseline, there were significantly higher mean MCQ scores at all time points after the training program at six weeks (11.9; 95% CI, 11.4 to 12.4; P < 0.001) and at six months (12.0; 95% CI, 11.5 to 12.4; P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The knowledge and skills of operating room nurses in providing anesthesia assistance during obstetric GA at our institution were low at baseline. Following a single 30-min in-house, anesthesiologist-led, structured training program, scores in both dimensions significantly improved. Although knowledge improvements were adequately retained for up to six months, skills improvements decayed rapidly, suggesting that sessions should be repeated at six-week intervals, at least initially.

Measuring and Improving the Quality of Preprocedural Assessments

BACKGROUND

Preprocedural assessments are used by anesthesia providers to optimize perioperative care for patients undergoing invasive procedures. When these assessments are performed in advance by providers who are not caring for the patient during the procedure, there is an additional layer of complexity in ensuring that the workup meets the needs of the primary anesthesia care team. In this study, anesthesia providers were asked to rate the quality of preprocedural assessments prepared by other providers to evaluate anesthesia care team satisfaction.

METHODS

Quality ratings for preprocedural assessments were collected from anesthesia providers on the day of surgery using an electronic quality assurance tool from January 9, 2014 to October 21, 2014. Users could rate assessments as "exemplary," "satisfactory," or "unsatisfactory." Free text comments could be entered for any of the quality ratings chosen. A reviewer trained in clinical anesthesia categorized all comments as "positive," "constructive," or "neutral" and conducted in-depth chart reviews triggered by 67 "constructive" comments submitted during the first 3 months of data collection to further subcategorize perceived deficiencies in the preprocedural assessments. In May 2014, providers were asked to participate in a midpoint survey and provide general feedback about the preprocedural process and evaluations.

RESULTS

37,611 procedures requiring anesthesia were analyzed. Of the 17,522 (46.6%) cases with a rated preprocedural assessment, anesthesia providers rated 3828 (21.8%) as "exemplary," 13,454 (76.8%) as "satisfactory," and 240 (1.4%) as "unsatisfactory." The monthly proportion of "unsatisfactory" ratings ranged from 3.1% to 0% over the study period, whereas the midpoint survey showed that anesthesia providers estimated that the number of unsatisfactory evaluations was 11.5%. Preprocedural evaluations performed on inpatients received significantly better ratings than evaluations performed on outpatients by the preadmission testing clinic or phone program (P < .0001). The most common reason given for "unsatisfactory" ratings was a perception of "missing information" (49.2%). Chart reviews revealed that inadequate documentation was in reality the most common deficiency in preprocedural evaluations (35 of 67 reviews, 52.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overwhelming majority of preprocedural assessments performed at our institution were considered satisfactory or exemplary by day-of-surgery anesthesia providers. This was demonstrated by both the case-by-case ratings and midpoint survey. However, the perceived frequency of "unsatisfactory" evaluations was worse when providers were asked to reflect on the quality of preprocedural evaluations generally versus rate them individually. Analysis of comments left by providers allowed us to identify specific and actionable areas for improvement. This method can be used by other institutions to identify systemic deficiencies in the preprocedural evaluation process.

How participation in surgical mortality audit impacts surgical practice

Background

Surgical mortality audit is an important tool for quality assurance and professional development but little is known about the impact of such activity on professional practice at the individual surgeon level. This paper reports the findings of a survey conducted with a self-selected cohort of surgeons in Queensland, Australia, on their experience of participating in the audit and its impact on their professional practice, as well as implications for hospital systems.

Methods

The study used a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. All surgeons registered in Queensland in 2015 (n = 919) were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire between September and October 2015. 184 surgeons completed and returned the questionnaire at a response rate of 20%.

Results

Thirty-nine percent of the participants reported that involvement in the audit process affected their clinical practice. This was particularly the case for surgeons whose participation included being an assessor. Thirteen percent of the participants had perceived improvement to hospital practices or advancement in patient care and safety as a result of audit recommendations. Analysis of the open-ended responses suggested the audit experience had led surgeons to become more cautious, reflective in action and with increased confidence in best practice, and recognise the importance of effective communication and clear documentation.

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine the impact of participation in a mortality audit process on the professional practice of surgeons. The findings offer evidence for surgical mortality audit as an effective strategy for continuous professional development and for improving patient safety initiatives.

The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality-birth, deaths, and carriage

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines the formation of the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) and describes its objectives, governance, functioning and challenges.

BACKGROUND

A nationwide audit of surgical mortality provides an overview of the leading causes of death in patients who require surgical care. It identifies system or process errors, trends in deficiency of care and helps develop strategies to reduce deaths in the surgical arena.

METHODS

A standardized tool is used to systematically collect data after every surgical death. Patient details are reviewed by a peer surgeon (and in certain cases a second) to identify issues with patient management and hospital processes. The treating surgeon is then offered confidential feedback and alternate views on patient management.

RESULTS

From January 2009 to December 2012, 19,096 deaths were reported to the ANZASM. Eighty-six percent of the audited deaths occurred in patients requiring an emergency admission. Significant criticism of patient care was reported in 13% of cases with 16% of clinical issues perceived to be preventable. Western Australia, which first began the audit process, has shown a 30% reduction in surgical deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide mortality audits are a useful and worthwhile exercise. Recommendations identified in the audit reports direct educational workshops and seminars to address these issues. They allow Departments of Health to make informed decisions in their hospitals. Through this model, and the lessons learnt, we would encourage other countries planning to set up their own audits to follow a similar concept.

Analysis of the causes and effects of delay before diagnosis using surgical mortality data

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the causes and effects of delay in diagnosis in surgical patients who died in 20 public hospitals participating in the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality (QASM) in Australia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis (June 2007 to December 2011) of deaths reported to QASM. Deaths were assigned to one of two groups (no delay or delay in diagnosis). Logistic regression was used to compare the association of delay with surgical complications, both overall and by surgical specialty.

RESULTS

A total of 3139 deaths were reported. Diagnostic delay was reported in 293 (9·3 per cent). The primary cause of delay was attributed to diagnostic support services (41·7 per cent). Some 174 (13·8 per cent) of 1259 general (gastrointestinal) surgery patients experienced delayed diagnosis. Delay across all surgical specialties was associated with an increased risk of unplanned return to theatre (odds ratio (OR) 1·77, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·24 to 2·52), of being treated in intensive care (OR 1·71, 1·15 to 2·54) and of postoperative complications (OR 1·39, 1·05 to 1·85).

CONCLUSION

General (gastrointestinal) surgery patients who experienced delayed diagnosis were at increased risk of postoperative complications.

Interventional radiology emergency service provision for a large UK urban population: initial 3.5 years of experience

AIM

To review the activity and impact of an out-of-hours (OOH) interventional radiology service introduced in Glasgow in 2007.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the first 42 months formal OOH activity across 11 hospital sites covering a population of 1.2 million was undertaken. The 30 day mortality and cause of death was logged for each procedural subtype [nephrostomy, biliary and abscess drainage, enteric stenting, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS), thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR), endovascular, and embolization].

RESULTS

From October 2007 to March 2011, 502 cases were identified. The mean number of procedures performed per month was 12 (range 5-21). This represents an event rate of 12/100,000 population/year. A minority (11%) of cases were undertaken after midnight. The activity levels were stable over the 42 month study period. The most frequent procedures were percutaneous nephrostomy (32%) and embolization for haemorrhage (30%). Thirty-day mortality was 17% for the entire group but varied from 53% (biliary intervention) to 0% (TEVAR). There was no death following embolization for obstetric haemorrhage. Approximately half of the deaths were due to a failure of the procedure to control the underlying clinical problem.

CONCLUSION

The demand for OOH services is important but not unduly onerous. There is no evidence of expansion of demand after launching such a service. Mortality rates probably reflect the underlying clinical status of this emergency patient group. Certain procedures carry a high mortality rate, raising issues of clinical judgement, appropriateness of intervention, and/or timing.

[In-hospital mortality in surgical patients. Predictive factors]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the value of patient and surgical variables as predictors of the survival until discharge of hospitalized surgical patients in a tertiary care hospital over the course of 1 year.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The hospital records for patients admitted for surgery between January 1 and December 31, 2007, were consulted to extract age, sex, ASA physical status classification of the patient, type of admission and surgery (scheduled or emergency), surgical department assigned, and date of discharge or exitus. The data were subjected to multivariate survival analysis using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 4184 patients underwent surgery in 2007; the median (25th-75th percentile) patient age was 56 (39-71) years. In 77.5% of the cases (3244 patients) surgery was scheduled; 23.1% of those patients had been admitted by the emergency department. The ASA classification was 1 for 21.8%, 2 for 44.2%, 3 for 28%, and 4 for 6%. Of patients classified as ASA 1-3, a total of 33.2% were aged 65 years or older; in contrast, 78.7% of ASA 4 patients were in that age bracket. Eighty-nine (2.1%) surgical patients died. Cox regression survival analysis showed that variables related to a lower likelihood of survival to discharge were a physical status classification of ASA 4, age 65 years or older, and emergency surgery (P < .0005 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients over the age of 65 years, in an ASA 4 anesthetic risk category, admitted on an emergency basis for emergency surgery were at higher risk of death. Greater vigilance in the perioperative care of patients with these risk factors is advisable in the interest of reducing mortality.