1
|
Li P, Luo L, Luo D, Wang R. Can cell salvage be used for resuscitation in a patient with amniotic fluid embolism and hepatic laceration? A case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:252. [PMID: 35346090 PMCID: PMC8962550 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04572-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare disease that can lead to profound coagulopathy and hemorrhage, especially when combined with the laceration and bleeding of other organs. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) has been widely used for treating obstetric hemorrhage, but it remains unclear whether ICS can be used in the treatment of AFE. Case presentation We report the case of a 27-year-old woman at 39 weeks’ gestation who suddenly developed severe abdominal pain, convulsions, loss of consciousness, and decreased vital signs during labor. Despite an emergency cesarean section being performed, the parturient experienced sudden cardiac arrest. Fortunately, the heart rate spontaneously recovered after effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Further abdominal exploration revealed right hepatic laceration with active bleeding. ICS was performed and the salvaged blood was promptly transfused back to the patient. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with AFE based on hypotension, hypoxia, coagulopathy, and cardiac arrest. The patient was transfused with 2899 mL salvaged blood during surgery with no adverse effects. At 60- and 90-day follow-ups, no complaints of discomfort or abnormal laboratory test results were observed in the mother or the baby. Conclusion ICS was used to rescue patient with AFE, and ICS did not worsen the condition of patients with AFE. For pregnant women who received CPR, clinicians should explore the presence of hepatic laceration which can be fatal to patients.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayata E, Nakata M, Takano M, Nagasaki S, Oji A, Sakuma J, Morita M. Biochemical effects of intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion during cesarean section: A prospective pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:1743-1750. [PMID: 33719164 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM Intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion (ICSA) is a useful technique for women undergoing cesarean sections who are predicted to experience significant bleeding. This method can reduce allogeneic transfusions as well as its associated risks and costs. Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is an abnormal maternal response to ICSA similar to the classic systemic inflammatory response syndrome, but its mechanism is not well understood. This study was conducted to investigate the biochemical aspects of AFE. METHODS A prospective case-controlled pilot study was conducted in a general perinatal hospital in Japan. ICSA was performed using a two-step retransfusion process. Blood samples were collected presurgery, immediately postsurgery, and 24 h after surgery. Changes in sialyl Tn antigen (STN), complement C3 and C4, fibrinogen, and fibrin degradation product and D-dimer, C1 esterase inhibitor, and interleukin-8 (all considered AFE-related markers) activities were compared between patients who underwent cesarean sections with ICSA (ICSA group) versus without ICSA (control group). RESULTS Fibrinogen levels were significantly lower in the ICSA group than in the control group before surgery but not immediately after or 24 h after surgery. D-dimer was significantly higher immediately after surgery but not 24 h later. STN was significantly lower only before surgery. None of the AFE-related markers showed significant differences between the groups after 24 h. No adverse events were observed in the ICSA group. CONCLUSIONS There is no clinical evidence that ICSA alters the biochemical statuses of AFE-related markers in a manner that could lead to adverse maternal responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eijiro Hayata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Nakata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayumi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sumito Nagasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayako Oji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junya Sakuma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mineto Morita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan KS, Moore P, Wilson M, Hooper R, Allard S, Wrench I, Roberts T, McLoughlin C, Beresford L, Geoghegan J, Daniels J, Catling S, Clark VA, Ayuk P, Robson S, Gao-Smith F, Hogg M, Jackson L, Lanz D, Dodds J. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of intraoperative cell salvage during caesarean section in women at risk of haemorrhage: the SALVO (cell SALVage in Obstetrics) trial. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-88. [PMID: 29318985 DOI: 10.3310/hta22020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caesarean section is associated with blood loss and maternal morbidity. Excessive blood loss requires transfusion of donor (allogeneic) blood, which is a finite resource. Cell salvage returns blood lost during surgery to the mother. It may avoid the need for donor blood transfusion, but reliable evidence of its effects is lacking. OBJECTIVES To determine if routine use of cell salvage during caesarean section in mothers at risk of haemorrhage reduces the rates of blood transfusion and postpartum maternal morbidity, and is cost-effective, in comparison with standard practice without routine salvage use. DESIGN Individually randomised controlled, multicentre trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. Treatment was not blinded. SETTING A total of 26 UK obstetric units. PARTICIPANTS Out of 3054 women recruited between June 2013 and April 2016, we randomly assigned 3028 women at risk of haemorrhage to cell salvage or routine care. Randomisation was stratified using random permuted blocks of variable sizes. Of these, 1672 had emergency and 1356 had elective caesareans. We excluded women for whom cell salvage or donor blood transfusion was contraindicated. INTERVENTIONS Cell salvage (intervention) versus routine care without salvage (control). In the intervention group, salvage was set up in 95.6% of the women and, of these, 50.8% had salvaged blood returned. In the control group, 3.9% had salvage deployed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary - donor blood transfusion. Secondary - units of donor blood transfused, time to mobilisation, length of hospitalisation, mean fall in haemoglobin, fetomaternal haemorrhage (FMH) measured by Kleihauer-Betke test, and maternal fatigue. Analyses were adjusted for stratification factors and other factors that were believed to be prognostic a priori. Cost-effectiveness outcomes - costs of resources and service provision taking the UK NHS perspective. RESULTS We analysed 1498 and 1492 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Overall, the transfusion rate was 2.5% in the intervention group and 3.5% in the control group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.01; p = 0.056]. In a planned subgroup analysis, the transfusion rate was 3.0% in the intervention group and 4.6% in the control group among emergency caesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99), whereas it was 1.8% in the intervention group and 2.2% in the control group among elective caesareans (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83) (interaction p = 0.46, suggesting that the difference in effect between subgroups was not statistically significant). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups, except for FMH, which was higher under salvage in rhesus D (RhD)-negative women with RhD-positive babies (25.6% vs. 10.5%, adjusted OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43 to 22.14; p = 0.013). No case of amniotic fluid embolism was observed. The additional cost of routine cell salvage during caesarean was estimated, on average, at £8110 per donor blood transfusion avoided. CONCLUSIONS The modest evidence for an effect of routine use of cell salvage during caesarean section on rates of donor blood transfusion was associated with increased FMH, which emphasises the need for adherence to guidance on anti-D prophylaxis. We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects. Based on the findings of this trial, cell salvage is unlikely to be considered cost-effective. FUTURE WORK Research into risk of alloimmunisation among women exposed to cell salvage is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN66118656. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid S Khan
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Philip Moore
- Selwyn Crawford Department of Anaesthetics, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew Wilson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Richard Hooper
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Ian Wrench
- Anaesthetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tracy Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Lee Beresford
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - James Geoghegan
- Selwyn Crawford Department of Anaesthetics, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane Daniels
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sue Catling
- Department of Anaesthetics, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Vicki A Clark
- Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Ayuk
- Women's Services, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Robson
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fang Gao-Smith
- Perioperative, Critical Care and Trauma Trials Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew Hogg
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Louise Jackson
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Doris Lanz
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Julie Dodds
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schlembach D, Helmer H, Henrich W, von Heymann C, Kainer F, Korte W, Kühnert M, Lier H, Maul H, Rath W, Steppat S, Surbek D, Wacker J. Peripartum Haemorrhage, Diagnosis and Therapy. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/063, March 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:382-399. [PMID: 29720744 PMCID: PMC5925693 DOI: 10.1055/a-0582-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose
This is an official interdisciplinary guideline, published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The guideline was developed for use in German-speaking countries and is backed by the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine (DGAI), the Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH) and the German Association of Midwives. The aim is to provide a consensus-based overview of the diagnosis and management of peripartum bleeding obtained from an evaluation of the relevant literature.
Methods
This S2k guideline was developed from the structured consensus of representative members of the various professional associations and professions commissioned by the Guideline Commission of the DGGG.
Recommendations
The guideline encompasses recommendations on definitions, risk stratification, prevention and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanns Helmer
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Klinische Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und feto-maternale Medizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Henrich
- Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian von Heymann
- Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Kainer
- Geburtshilfe und Pränatalmedizin, Klinik Hallerwiese, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Maritta Kühnert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Gießen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Heiko Lier
- Klinik für Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Holger Maul
- Geburtshilfe & Pränatalmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Werner Rath
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Surbek
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und feto-maternale Medizin, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Wacker
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Bruchsal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lier H, von Heymann C, Korte W, Schlembach D. Peripartum Haemorrhage: Haemostatic Aspects of the New German PPH Guideline. Transfus Med Hemother 2017; 45:127-135. [PMID: 29765296 DOI: 10.1159/000478106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary Peripartum haemorrhage remains one of the main causes of maternal mortality world-wide. The German, Austrian and Swiss Societies of Gynaecology and Obstetrics have updated the current guidelines for the treatment of peripartum haemorrhage together with the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research. The recommendations have been the result of a thorough review of the available scientific literature and a consensus process involving all members of the guideline group. A key element of the anaesthesiological and haemostatic management is the development of a multidisciplinary standard operating procedure combining surgical as well as medical and haemostatic treatments depending on the severity of bleeding. The guideline underscores the value of clinical and laboratory diagnostics of peripartum haemorrhage as early as possible, even pre-emptively. This allows for an early identification of causes of bleeding and a specific treatment. The guideline comprises evidence-based recommendations for the use of uterotonics, tranexamic acid and blood products such as factor concentrates, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, packed red blood cells, recombinant activated factor VII and desmopressin. In addition, recommendations for blood conservation strategies involving the use of cell salvage, permissive hypotension and transfusion triggers are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Lier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian von Heymann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Korte
- Centre for Laboratory Medicine and Haemostasis and Haemophilia Centre, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Dietmar Schlembach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi ES, Ahn WS, Lee JM, Jeon JK, Kim HC, Lim YJ, Sim JY. A laboratory study of the effects of processing blood through a cell salvage device and leucocyte depletion filter on levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and bradykinin. Anaesthesia 2013; 68:1259-65. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.12420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E. S. Choi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
| | - W. S. Ahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
- Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering; Medical Research Center; Seoul National University; Seoul Korea
| | - J. M. Lee
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
| | - J. K. Jeon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
| | - H. C. Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
| | - Y. J. Lim
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul Korea
| | - J. Y. Sim
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine; College of Medicine; University of Ulsan; Seoul Korea
| |
Collapse
|