TAP blocks in breast reconstructions using abdominal wall tissue

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Liposomal to Plain Bupivacaine in the Transversus Abdominis Plane for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Pain control after autologous breast reconstruction is important for patient satisfaction and early recovery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly used as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for breast reconstruction. It is uncertain whether liposomal bupivacaine used in TAP blocks offers additional advantages. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus plain bupivacaine for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction.

METHODS

This double-blinded randomized controlled trial studied patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction between June of 2019 and August of 2020. Subjects were randomly assigned liposomal or plain bupivacaine, performed using ultrasound-guided TAP block technique. All patients were managed according to an ERAS protocol. Primary outcomes were postoperative narcotic analgesia required, measured in oral morphine equivalents from postoperative days 1 to 7. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scale score on postoperative days 1 to 7, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to first narcotic use, return of bowel function, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled: 30 received liposomal bupivacaine and 30 received plain bupivacaine. There were no significant differences in demographics, daily oral morphine equivalent narcotic use, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to narcotic use, numeric pain scale score, time to bowel function, or length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal bupivacaine does not confer advantages over plain bupivacaine when used in TAP blocks for abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction in patients under ERAS protocols and multimodal approaches for pain control.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Anesthesiologist Provided Regional Nerve Block Against Surgeon Provided Infiltration Block for Abdominal Surgery: Case Series

We present two patients who underwent double mastectomy and breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The goal of this case series was to compare surgeon-provided infiltration block against anesthesiologist-provided regional nerve block, focusing on abdominal analgesia. This case report highlights that pain control for a patient could be successful when done collaboratively. To achieve this, it is important for both the surgical and anesthesia team to discuss the best analgesic plan for the patient while taking into consideration the confidence, experience, and technique that both the surgical and anesthesiology team can offer.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Pain, Narcotic Consumption, Length of Stay, and Cost

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly being used in microvascular breast reconstruction. The implications of these blocks on specific reconstructive, patient, and institutional outcomes remain to be fully elucidated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed. Length of stay, complications, narcotic consumption, donor-site pain, and hospital expenses were compared between patients who did and did not receive transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Outcomes were subsequently compared in patients with elevated body mass index.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (43.9 percent) received blocks [27 (54.0 percent) under ultrasound guidance] and 64 patients (56.1 percent) did not. Patients with the blocks had significantly decreased oral and total narcotic consumption (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and significantly less donor-site pain (3.3 versus 4.3; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in hospital expenses between the two cohorts ($21,531.53 versus $22,050.15 per patient; p = 0.5659). Patients with a body mass index of 25 kg/m(2) or greater who received a block had a significantly decreased length of stay (3.8 days versus 4.4 days; p = 0.0345) and decreased narcotic consumption and postoperative pain compared with patients without blocks. Patients with a body mass index less than 25 kg/m(2) did not have a significant difference in postoperative pain, narcotic consumption, or length of stay between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine significantly reduce oral and total postoperative narcotic consumption and donor-site pain in all patients after abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction without increasing hospital expenses. The blocks also significantly decrease length of stay in patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 kg/m(2).

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Intravenous patient-controlled fentanyl with and without transversus abdominis plane block in cirrhotic patients post liver resection

Background

Coagulation changes can complicate liver resection, particularly in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this prospective hospital-based comparative study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) with and without transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

Methods

Fifty patients with Child’s A cirrhosis undergoing liver resection were randomly divided into two groups for postoperative analgesia, ie, an IVPCA group receiving a 10 μg/mL fentanyl bolus of 15 μg with a 10-minute lockout and a maximum hourly dose of 90 μg, and an IVPCA + TAP group that additionally received TAP block (15 mL of 0.375% bupivacaine) on both sides via a posterior approach with ultrasound guidance before skin incision. Postoperatively, bolus injections of bupivacaine 0.375% were given every 8 hours through a TAP catheter inserted by the surgeon in the open space during closure of the inverted L-shaped right subcostal with midline extension (subcostal approach) guided by the visual analog scale score (<3, 5 mL; 3 to <6, 10 mL; 6–10, 15–20 mL) according to weight (maximum 2 mg/kg). The top-up dosage of local anesthetic could be omitted if the patient was not in pain. Coagulation was monitored using standard coagulation tests.

Results

Age, weight, and sex were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). The visual analog scale score was significantly lower at 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours (P<0.01) in IVPCA + TAP group. The Ramsay sedation score was lower only after 72 hours in the IVPCA + TAP group when compared with the IVPCA group (1.57±0.74 versus 2.2±0.41, respectively, P<0.01). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and fentanyl consumption were lower in the IVPCA + TAP group at 24, 48, and 72 hours (P<0.05). Intensive care unit stays were significantly shorter with TAP (2.61±0.74 days versus 4.35±0.79 days, P<0.01). Prothrombin time and International Normalized Ratio indicated temporary hypocoagulability in both groups.

Conclusion

Combining TAP with IVPCA improved postoperative pain management and reduced fentanyl consumption, with a shorter stay in intensive care. TAP block can be included as part of a balanced multimodal postoperative pain regimen.

Chronic pain following abdominal free flap breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain after breast reconstruction is an ill-defined process which can generate significant patient morbidity and disability. The purpose of this study was to examine chronic, persistent pain in a prospective study of free flap breast reconstruction patients, in an effort to identify possible points of intervention and counseling.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study evaluating function, quality of life, and satisfaction in patients undergoing abdominally based autologous reconstruction between 2006 and 2010. Using the short form 36, we examined the presence of chronic body pain (>4 months) as well as overall mental and physical health. Patients with debilitating pain were compared to those without in a post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 399 women underwent reconstruction during the study period, with 149 enrolling and having long-term follow-up in this portion of the prospective study. Twenty-six (17%) of 149 patients experienced chronic body pain that was moderately debilitating after autologous reconstruction, making it one of the most common complications experienced in this cohort. No differences were noted in demographics, medical history, procedure type, history of axillary surgery, radiation treatment, surgical outcomes, or follow-up time between the cohorts. However, patients with chronic pain were found to have higher preoperative pain scores (P < 0.0001) and lower physical, mental, and overall health scores across time points. All scores significantly worsened with time in comparison to the cohort without pain, who, in contrast showed score improvement across all areas. Although pain issues trended toward being noted in postoperative visits more frequently in the chronic pain cohort (37% vs 19%, P = 0.051), only 1 (4.2%) patient was referred for pain service consultation. Additionally, satisfaction with reconstruction was significantly lower in patients who demonstrated chronic pain (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors contributing to chronic pain continue to be elusive and understudied. Our data demonstrate the importance of screening for chronic pain, as we determined that preoperative pain is linked to increased, moderately debilitating postoperative chronic pain. Persistent chronic pain, in turn, is associated with significant morbidity, disability, and dissatisfaction. Such patients with pain issues may benefit from additional preoperative counseling and early involvement of the pain service.