Alpha-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in asthma

Adrenoceptors in airway smooth muscle

This review examines the roles and functional significance of alpha and beta-adrenoceptor subtypes in airway smooth muscle, with emphasis on human airway function and the influence of asthma. Specifically, we have examined the distribution of beta-adrenoceptors in lung and the influence of age, the epithelium, respiratory viruses and inflammation associated with asthma on airway smooth muscle beta-adrenoceptor function. Sites of action, beta 2-selectivity, efficacy and tolerance are also examined in relation to the use of beta 2-agonists in man. In addition, alpha-adrenoceptor function in airway smooth muscle has been reviewed, with some emphasis on comparing observations made in airway smooth muscle with those in animal models.

The functional conversion hypothesis: a contributor to exercise-induced asthma?

Studies on receptor stability suggest that functional conversion of adrenoceptors between alpha and beta can occur in mammalian myocardium due to variations in the environment such as temperature changes, pH or hormonal changes. If adrenoceptors of the respiratory system behave similarly, heat and water loss of airways noted during hyperventilation could lead to functional loss of inhibitory beta and expression of excitatory alpha adrenoceptors. This would have the effect of counter-action of adrenergic homeostatic mechanisms which may be of particular importance in asthmatic subjects. The hypothesis of adrenoceptor interconversion could contribute to the airway obstruction observed during exercise in asthmatics. This concept is supported by scattered reports of the efficacy of alpha adrenergic antagonists in preventing exercise-induced asthma.

Combined alpha- and beta-receptor inhibition in the treatment of hypertension

Both beta- and alpha-adrenergic mechanisms are important in the control of blood pressure; alpha-mediated vasoconstriction is responsible for the regulation of vascular tone, and beta-mediated responses stimulate the heart directly and indirectly by liberating renin and affecting vascular smooth muscle tone. beta-Adrenergic blocking drugs have long been established in the treatment of hypertension. The development of drugs which combine this action with an alpha-blocking effect represents an additional mode of action to lower the blood pressure. Numerous studies have demonstrated that labetalol intravenously or orally gives a rapid fall of blood pressure in essential and renal hypertension. It has also been used intravenously in phaeochromocytoma, tetanus, clonidine withdrawal, and as an adjunct to halothane to produce hypotensive anaesthesia. Intravenously, labetalol is probably best given as a graded infusion or as repeated small bolus injections to assure a smooth fall of blood pressure. Many long term studies have shown it to be effective orally in prolonged treatment of hypertension with studies of over 5 years, showing that tolerance does not develop. Labetalol can be used in combination with diuretics and other drugs when necessary. It can be employed to control the blood pressure in all grades of hypertension. A dosage of 100mg twice daily will often be adequate to control mild hypertension and the use of even lower doses has been reported. However, the dosage can be markedly increased in severe hypertension and while such doses are relatively exceptional, several trials have employed over 2 g per day for the more resistant cases. Studies have demonstrated that blood pressure control with labetalol is equivalent to that with beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs plus vasodilators, or methyldopa. Labetalol has been used in patients with severe renal impairment and a number of studies suggest that it may now be the drug of choice in raised blood pressure of pregnancy. Side effects can be divided into those related to beta-blockade, those related to alpha-blockade and those not clearly related to either effect. It has been suggested that the side effects attributable to the beta-blocking component are less obtrusive than those seen with pure beta-blocking drugs without alpha-activity because the alpha-blockade modifies the consequences of beta-blockade. Heart failure has been reported, but for haemodynamic reasons would be expected to be less common; careful patient selection should avoid any risk. Similarly labetalol may worsen asthma even if the risks are probably less than with non-selective beta-blockade alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparison between an alpha-adrenergic antagonist and a beta 2-adrenergic agonist in bronchial asthma

Fifteen patients suffering from asthma received inhalations of phentolamine, albuterol (salbutamol), a combination of phentolamine and albuterol, and placebo, in a single-blind fashion; the changes in the pulmonary function tests were recorded over a three-hour period. Three patients responded to phentolamine with marked bronchodilatation, whereas severe bronchoconstriction was induced by the drug in two patients. Five patients improved more with phentolamine than with placebo, while all patients improved more markedly with albuterol and still more following inhalation of the combination of both drugs. As a group, there were no statistically significant differences between the responses to phentolamine compared with placebo, or between albuterol alone compared with the combination of both drugs. We concluded that both alpha-antagonist and beta 2-agonist agents act in the same direction in most patients, the beta 2-agonist being the dominant. These results do not offer convincing proof that enhanced alpha-adrenergic activity is the main bronchoconstrictor mechanism even in those few with good response to phentolamine, who also showed very good responsiveness to albuterol. The mechanism of phentolamine-induced bronchoconstriction was discussed, but in the light of presently accepted theories, we were unable to evolve a reasonable explanation.

Labetalol, beta blockers, and acute deterioration of chronic airway obstruction

The effects on lung function of labetalol (a combined alpha and beta adrenergic receptor blocker) and three beta adrenergic receptor blockers (propranolol, atenolol, metoprolol) have been assessed in patients with chronic airflow obstruction using a double-blind trial. With the dosages used, all drugs produced an equivalent fall of blood pressure. Propranolol was the only drug that significantly increased airways obstruction (FEV1, specific airways resistance). Following salbutamol, labetalol was associated with a significantly greater improvement of airflow than either propranolol or metoprolol. On these acute studies, the order of preference for beta blocking drugs in management of hypertension in patients with obstructive airways disease, would be labetalol, (atenolol) or (metoprolol) and then propranolol.