Antidepressant drugs, convulsions and epilepsy

Effects of psychotropic drugs on seizure threshold

Psychotropic drugs, especially antidepressants and antipsychotics, may give rise to some concern in clinical practice because of their known ability to reduce seizure threshold and to provoke epileptic seizures. Although the phenomenon has been described with almost all the available compounds, neither its real magnitude nor the seizurogenic potential of individual drugs have been clearly established so far. In large investigations, seizure incidence rates have been reported to range from approximately 0.1 to approximately 1.5% in patients treated with therapeutic doses of most commonly used antidepressants and antipsychotics (incidence of the first unprovoked seizure in the general population is 0.07 to 0.09%). In patients who have taken an overdose, the seizure risk rises markedly, achieving values of approximately 4 to approximately 30%. This large variability, probably due to methodological differences among studies, makes data confusing and difficult to interpret. Agreement, however, converges on the following: seizures triggered by psychotropic drugs are a dose-dependent adverse effect; maprotiline and clomipramine among antidepressants and chlorpromazine and clozapine among antipsychotics that have a relatively high seizurogenic potential; phenelzine, tranylcypromine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine and trazodone among antidepressants and fluphenazine, haloperidol, pimozide and risperidone among antipsychotics that exhibit a relatively low risk. Apart from drug-related factors, seizure precipitation during psychotropic drug medication is greatly influenced by the individual's inherited seizure threshold and, particularly, by the presence of seizurogenic conditions (such as history of epilepsy, brain damage, etc.). Pending identification of compounds with less or no effect on seizure threshold and formulation of definite therapeutic guidelines especially for patients at risk for seizures, the problem may be minimised through careful evaluation of the possible presence of seizurogenic conditions and simplification of the therapeutic scheme (low starting doses/slow dose escalation, maintenance of the minimal effective dose, avoidance of complex drug combinations, etc.). Although there is sufficient evidence that psychotropic drugs may lower seizure threshold, published literature data have also suggested that an appropriate psychotropic therapy may not only improve the mental state in patients with epilepsy, but also exert antiepileptic effects through a specific action. Further scientific research is warranted to clarify all aspects characterising the complex link between seizure threshold and psychotropic drugs.

Antidepressant drugs and seizure susceptibility: from in vitro data to clinical practice

The use of antidepressant drugs (ADs) in patients with epilepsy still raises uncertainties because of the widespread conviction that this class of drugs facilitates seizures. A detailed knowledge of this issue in its various aspects may help in optimal management of patients suffering concurrently from epilepsy and depression. This article reviews the available data in vitro in animals and humans concerning the known potential of various ADs to induce epileptic seizures. Emphasis has been placed on those variables that may generate confusion in interpreting the results of the various studies. Most ADs at therapeutic dosages exhibit in nonepileptic patients a seizure risk close to that reported for the first spontaneous seizure in the general population (i.e., <0.1%). In patients taking high AD doses, seizure incidence rises markedly and may reach values up to 40%. With a patient history of epilepsy and/or concomitant drugs that act on neuronal excitability, low or therapeutic AD doses may be sufficient to trigger seizures. Experimental data are in partial conflict with human data on the relative potential seizure risk of the various ADs. Therefore, a reliable scale for assigning a relative value to an individual AD or to single AD classes cannot be made. It appears fair to say that maprotiline and amoxapine exhibit the greatest seizure risk, whereas trazodone, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine exhibit the least. Some ADs may also display antiepileptic effects, especially in low doses, in experimental models of epilepsy and in humans, but the mechanism of this action is largely unknown. The available data suggest that ADs may display both convulsant and anticonvulsant effects and that the most important factor in determining the direction of a given compound in terms of excitation/inhibition is drug dosage. It is probable that drugs that increase serotonergic transmission are less convulsant or, even, more anticonvulsant than others. Because of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs and ADs, with consequent marked changes in plasma concentrations, it remains to be established whether or not plasma AD levels that are effective against depression also facilitate seizures. Finally, exploring the mechanisms through which ADs modulate neuronal excitability might open new possibilities in antiepileptic drug development.

Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin-uptake inhibitor, enhances the anticonvulsant effects of phenytoin, carbamazepine, and ameltolide (LY201116)

Dose-response curves for the prototypical anticonvulsants phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ), and a novel anticonvulsant, ameltolide (LY201116), were determined with and without pretreatment with the selective serotonin-uptake inhibitor fluoxetine by maximal electroshock seizure (MES) test in mice. Fluoxetine (2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally, i.p.) produced a dose-related decrease in the ED50 values for the anticonvulsants (i.p. administration) to protect against MES-induced tonic-extensor seizures. Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p.) also decreased the intravenous (i.v.) ED50 doses of the three anticonvulsants by a factor of approximately 2. These data suggest that fluoxetine, through its selective inhibition of serotonergic reuptake, may have beneficial advantages as compared with common antidepressant drugs in treatment of depressed patients with epilepsy and may also enhance the seizure control of prototypical anticonvulsants in treatment of epilepsy.

The safety of antidepressants

In this article, a distinction is proposed between safe and less safe antidepressants. The safety of 18 antidepressants is discussed in relation to 3 principal issues: the safety of the drug in the event of an overdose; the seriousness of its side effects; and the existence of dangerous interactions. On the basis of present information, it can be said with reasonable confidence that fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine are safe antidepressants, and with some reservation (mainly because of hypnosedation) the same can be said of mianserin and trazodone.

Psychoactive agents, seizure production, and sudden death in epilepsy

Major tranquilizers as well as antidepressant agents have been associated with clinical seizures in patients administered these agents. The incidence of such seizures is generally low when these drugs are administered in therapeutic doses. However, administration of large doses of these agents has been associated with many cases of convulsion production. The effects that these drugs have on animal models of epilepsy have been examined. It appears that the phenothiazines act as convulsant agents at lower doses, whereas, at higher doses, they act as anticonvulsant drugs. Antidepressants, on the other hand, appear to exert an anticonvulsant effect at low doses and convulsant effects at high doses. The mechanism by which these agents alter the seizure threshold is not yet known. Clinically, drugs of lower seizure production potential should be substituted for those drugs with greater potential in treating epileptic patients for psychiatric ailments. The problem of sudden death in epileptic patients is one that must be confronted. Sudden death has most frequently been attributed to autonomic dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmia in these patients. The contribution of stress in sudden death production also must be taken into account. In addition, some psychoactive agents have been associated with sudden death as well as cardiac arrhythmia and seizure production. Thus, in light of the possible additivity of the factors involved in the production of sudden death, the administration of a psychoactive agent to an epileptic patient should be approached with caution. Those agents that do not alter cardiac rhythm or seizure threshold should be administered if a psychoactive agent is deemed necessary for the management of psychiatric illness in the epileptic patient.