An evaluation of possible interactions between ethanol and trazodone or amitriptyline

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic-quantitative systems toxicology and safety (PBPK-QSTS) modeling approach applied to predict the variability of amitriptyline pharmacokinetics and cardiac safety in populations and in individuals

The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models allow for predictive assessment of variability in population of interest. One of the future application of PBPK modeling is in the field of precision dosing and personalized medicine. The aim of the study was to develop PBPK model for amitriptyline given orally, predict the variability of cardiac concentrations of amitriptyline and its main metabolite-nortriptyline in populations as well as individuals, and simulate the influence of those xenobiotics in therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations on human electrophysiology. The cardiac effect with regard to QT and RR interval lengths was assessed. The Emax model to describe the relationship between amitriptyline concentration and heart rate (RR) length was proposed. The developed PBPK model was used to mimic 29 clinical trials and 19 cases of amitriptyline intoxication. Three clinical trials and 18 cases were simulated with the use of PBPK-QSTS approach, confirming lack of cardiotoxic effect of amitriptyline in therapeutic doses and the increase in heart rate along with potential for arrhythmia development in case of amitriptyline overdose. The results of our study support the validity and feasibility of the PBPK-QSTS modeling development for personalized medicine.

Apathy and Reduced Speed of Processing Underlie Decline in Verbal Fluency following DBS

Objective. Reduced verbal fluency is a strikingly uniform finding following deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD). The precise cognitive mechanism underlying this reduction remains unclear, but theories have suggested reduced motivation, linguistic skill, and/or executive function. It is of note, however, that previous reports have failed to consider the potential role of any changes in speed of processing. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine verbal fluency changes with a particular focus on the role of cognitive speed. Method. In this study, 28 patients with PD completed measures of verbal fluency, motivation, language, executive functioning, and speed of processing, before and after DBS. Results. As expected, there was a marked decline in verbal fluency but also in a timed test of executive functions and two measures of speed of processing. Verbal fluency decline was associated with markers of linguistic and executive functioning, but not after speed of processing was statistically controlled for. In contrast, greater decline in verbal fluency was associated with higher levels of apathy at baseline, which was not associated with changes in cognitive speed. Discussion. Reduced generativity and processing speed may account for the marked reduction in verbal fluency commonly observed following DBS.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with ethanol (alcohol)

Ethanol (alcohol) is one of the most widely used legal drugs in the world. Ethanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2E1 drug-metabolizing enzyme that is also responsible for the biotransformation of xenobiotics and fatty acids. Drugs that inhibit ADH or CYP2E1 are the most likely theoretical compounds that would lead to a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with ethanol, which include only a limited number of drugs. Acute ethanol primarily alters the pharmacokinetics of other drugs by changing the rate and extent of absorption, with more limited effects on clearance. Both acute and chronic ethanol use can cause transient changes to many physiologic responses in different organ systems such as hypotension and impairment of motor and cognitive functions, resulting in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Evaluating drug interactions with long-term use of ethanol is uniquely challenging. Specifically, it is difficult to distinguish between the effects of long-term ethanol use on liver pathology and chronic malnutrition. Ethanol-induced liver disease results in decreased activity of hepatic metabolic enzymes and changes in protein binding. Clinical studies that include patients with chronic alcohol use may be evaluating the effects of mild cirrhosis on liver metabolism, and not just ethanol itself. The definition of chronic alcohol use is very inconsistent, which greatly affects the quality of the data and clinical application of the results. Our study of the literature has shown that a significantly higher volume of clinical studies have focused on the pharmacokinetic interactions of ethanol and other drugs. The data on pharmacodynamic interactions are more limited and future research addressing pharmacodynamic interactions with ethanol, especially regarding the non-central nervous system effects, is much needed.

What is the role of sedating antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anticonvulsants in the management of insomnia?

Psychiatric medications such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anticonvulsants are commonly prescribed by physicians for the off-label use of improving sleep. Reasons for preferential prescription of these medications over FDA-approved insomnia drugs may include a desire to treat concurrent sleep problems and psychiatric illness with a single medication, and/or an attempt to avoid hypnotic drugs due to their publicized side effects. However, there have been few large studies demonstrating the efficacy and safety of most off-label medications prescribed to treat insomnia. In addition, many of these medications have significant known side effect profiles themselves. Here we review the pertinent research studies published in recent years on antidepressant, antipsychotic, and anticonvulsant medications frequently prescribed for sleep difficulties. Although there have been few large-scale studies for most of these medications, some may be appropriate in the treatment of sleep issues in specific well-defined populations.

Toxicological interactions involving psychiatric drugs and alcohol: an update

This review focuses on the toxicological interactions between alcohol (ethanol) and psychiatric drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics), including those leading to fatal poisoning. Acute or chronic ingestion of alcohol when combined with psychiatric drugs may lead to several clinically significant toxicological interactions. The metabolism of these drugs is generally but not always delayed by acute alcohol ingestion. Drugs undergoing metabolism may also show increased metabolic clearance with chronic alcohol ingestion. Therefore, the net effect may be influenced by internal (e.g. disease, age, gender), external (e.g. environment, diet) and pharmacokinetic (e.g. dose, timing of ingestion, gastrointestinal absorption, distribution and elimination) factors. Cases of fatal poisoning involving coadministration of psychiatric drugs, alcohol and other drugs prompted this review.

A review of the effects of moderate alcohol intake on psychiatric and sleep disorders

In this chapter we discuss the effects of moderate ethanol consumption on the treatment of psychiatric and sleep disorders. A review of the literature on the interactions of ethanol with neurotransmitters and psychotropic medications suggests that although ethanol affects the clinical course of psychiatric and sleep disorders by different mechanisms, it does so principally through perturbations it causes in the balance of central nervous system neurotransmitter systems, which may modify the clinical course of primary psychiatric and sleep disorders and undermine the therapeutic response to psychotropic medications. Neurotransmitter responses may also be manifested clinically by rebound phenomena, akin to a subsyndromal withdrawal, which affect sleep and precipitate anxiety and mood symptoms. In addition, ethanol also modifies the clearance and disposition of a variety of psychotropic metabolites and interferes with their clinical effectiveness. We recommend that most psychiatric patients, and all patients with sleep disorders, should abstain from even moderate ethanol use, as this may adversely affect their clinical course and response to treatment.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the potential drug interaction between venlafaxine and ethanol

Venlafaxine is a new antidepressant with a unique mode of action. Because many patients taking antidepressant therapy may self-medicate with ethanol, this study was undertaken to assess the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between venlafaxine and ethanol. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was conducted with 16 healthy men. Multiple doses of venlafaxine (50 mg every 8 hours) or placebo were administered for 7 days. On days 5 and 7 a single dose of 0.5 g/kg of ethanol or a placebo solution was administered in a randomized fashion. Pharmacokinetic data indicated that ethanol administration did not affect the disposition of venlafaxine or O-desmethylvenlafaxine. Similarly, venlafaxine administration did not affect the pharmacokinetic disposition of ethanol. Ethanol produced its expected effects on the eight psychometric tests administered. Venlafaxine produced small effects on the results of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, the Divided Attention Reaction Time, and the Profile of Mood States. No pharmacodynamic interaction was detected between venlafaxine and ethanol.

Low blood alcohol concentrations and driving impairment. A review of experimental studies and international legislation

While noting that there is no international scientific or legislative uniformity in blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels admissible for driving motor vehicles, the authors analyse problems concerning the effects of low levels of ethyl alcohol on driving ability. A summary of the international literature on this subject reveals: the existence of contrasting assumptions, with scientific evidence clearly demonstrating altered psychomotor functions; the need to adopt sufficiently complex psychometric tests to reveal the effects of low BACs; the need to improve standardization of experimental studies on man-machine interaction; the need to investigate the following areas: tolerance to alcohol; low BACs with inexperienced, infrequent drinkers and chronic, heavy drinkers; hangover effects; alcohol-gender-age interactions, and specific effects on young drivers; alcohol-drug combinations. The analysis of legislation and enforcement policies also reveals the need for: re-evaluation of the international legal BAC threshold and standardization of procedures for ascertaining the degree of driving disability; further scientific research to compare and evaluate selected legislative initiatives currently in place in most states; to identify the best strategies and procedures to detect and arrest impaired drivers; to determine the optimum random testing rate to maximize deterrent effects in the workplace at minimal cost; to design innovative and comprehensive approaches to rehabilitation programs needed for subgroups of offenders and of workers; to study the effectiveness of new legislations and policies.

Antidepressants, alcohol and psychomotor performance

The acute psychomotor effects of moclobemide, a reversible inhibitor of MAO-A antidepressant (100 and 300 mg) compared with amitriptyline (25 and 75 mg) showed that moclobemide caused no significant impairment in contrast with amitriptyline, which caused significant impairment at both doses. Two other studies are reviewed. One study reported the acute effects of moclobemide (100 and 300 mg), trazodone (100 mg), placebo, and alcohol (0.5 g/kg) or placebo in an elderly group: moclobemide caused little impairment or alcohol potentiation and may reverse some alcohol impairment, whereas trazodone caused substantial impairment and alcohol potentiation. Another study of the acute and chronic effects of moclobemide (200 mg 3 times daily) or clomipramine (25 mg twice daily) and their interactions with alcohol (blood alcohol concentration 0.6 g/l) showed that alcohol caused significant impairment, whereas clomipramine tended to enhance and moclobemide to reduce some impairment. Moclobemide appears to be an antidepressant with few psychomotor effects and minimal alcohol potentiation and may reduce some alcohol impairment.

Evaluation and comparison of the interaction between alcohol and moclobemide or clomipramine in healthy subjects

The interaction of clomipramine and moclobemide with alcohol was compared in a double blind parallel groups study in 24 healthy volunteers. Moclobemide was given at the highest recommended therapeutic dose (200 mg t.i.d.) and clomipramine in a subtherapeutic dose (25 mg b.i.d.) because of its poor tolerance in healthy subjects. Psychometric evaluations were performed during a placebo run-in phase; after a 5-day treatment period; assessments were made before, and again 1 h and 4 h after alcohol ingestion. Alcohol doses were pre-determined for each subject in order to produce a blood alcohol concentration of 0.6 g/l 1 h after alcohol intake and this individual alcohol dose was given on test days. The day before alcohol intake tests for autonomic functions were made to assess the anticholinergic effects of the drugs. Alcohol significantly increased body sway, decreased critical flicker fusion frequency, prolonged choice reaction time, impaired copying skills, impaired memory and increased the subjective feelings of satisfaction and tension. Drugs increased the effect of alcohol on body sway and this was essentially due to clomipramine. Clomipramine both without and with alcohol increased body sway, prolonged choice reaction time more than did moclobemide. Clomipramine seemed to diminish alcohol-induced memory impairment in one of the memory tests used. Subjects taking clomipramine had significantly more adverse effects after alcohol ingestion than did subjects of the moclobemide group. In contrast to moclobemide, clomipramine produced a moderate but significant drop in standing systolic blood pressure and a clear inhibition of salivary excretion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacology of sibutramine hydrochloride (BTS 54524), a new antidepressant, in healthy volunteers

The cardiovascular, anticholinergic and central effects of single doses of 30, 45 and 60 mg of sibutramine hydrochloride (BTS 54524), a new potential antidepressant, were compared with amitriptyline (50 mg) and placebo given at weekly intervals in a randomised design to six healthy male volunteers. Sibutramine was associated with increases in both supine heart rate and systolic blood pressure at 1, 2 and 6 h after 60 mg (P less than 0.05). Amitriptyline caused a significant 50-60% decrease in salivation compared with placebo at 2 and 6 h but there were no changes with sibutramine. No significant changes in pupil size were detected with either drug. Visual analogue rating scales (VARS) revealed significant drowsiness with amitriptyline but neither sedative nor stimulant effects with sibutramine. Impairments of simple auditory and visual reaction times, visual two-choice reaction time, finger tapping and trail making, measured using an automated test battery, occurred with amitriptyline compared with sibutramine. If sibutramine proves to be an effective antidepressant it should be devoid of anticholinergic or central depressant effects. Chronic dosage studies are indicated to evaluate the clinical significance of its cardiovascular effects.

Effects of a controlled-release formulation of trazodone on psychomotor and autonomic functions in healthy volunteers: comparison with trazodone (conventional formulation), amitriptyline and placebo

Eight healthy male volunteers participated in four experimental sessions. In each session the subjects ingested a single dose of one of the following drugs: trazodone (controlled-release formulation), trazodone (conventional formulation), amitriptyline and placebo. Both trazodone and amitriptyline reduced subjectively rated alertness and increased digit cancellation time, and amitriptyline also reduced critical flicker fusion frequency. Both antidepressants reduced salivation, trazodone also caused miosis. There were no consistent differences between the effects of the two formulations of trazodone. The results of the psychological tests are indicative of the sedative properties of the antidepressants. It is likely that the reduction in salivation and pupil diameter by trazodone reflect alpha-adrenoceptor blockade, whereas the reduction in salivation by amitriptyline may be due to both cholinoceptor and alpha-adrenoceptor blockade.

The effects on performance of two antidepressants, alone and in combination with diazepam

1. Ninety healthy adult men participated in a study of the effects on performance of 60 mg fluoxetine, 50 mg amitriptyline or placebo, alone and in combination with 5 mg diazepam or placebo. 2. In a 2X3 factorial design study, groups of 15 Ss received one of six possible treatment combinations. 3. Ss were tested with a battery of laboratory tests at two post-dosing times. 4. Amitriptyline impaired the performance of all tasks. When diazepam was added to the amitriptyline treatment, the impairment of three tasks increased. Diazepam alone produced impairment on two measures. 5. Fluoxetine alone impaired no task; some impairment occurred with the fluoxetine-diazepam combination.

Alcohol withdrawal and carbamazepine

The use of pharmacologic intervention in the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome is briefly presented. The use of carbamazepine, a tricyclic anticonvulsant with clinical efficacy in depressive illness, in alcohol withdrawal treatment is reviewed. A comparative analysis between carbamazepine and major drugs used in alcohol withdrawal syndrome is made. This includes the evaluation of both clinical advantages and disadvantages in addition to identification of drug adverse reaction and interaction with alcohol. The mechanism of action of carbamazepine is also examined. Carbamazepine appears to possess a useful pharmacotherapeutic potential in the management of acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome, and its use in long-term treatment is suggested.

The effects of citalopram in single and repeated doses and with alcohol on physiological and psychological measures in healthy subjects

Citalopram, a selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor with antidepressant properties, was assessed in three studies in 12 healthy subjects using a battery of EEG, psychological, subjective and symptomatic measures. Study A involved the administration of citalopram, 20 mg and 40 mg, amitriptyline 50 mg and placebo in single dose using a balanced cross-over design. The test battery was applied before, and 1 and 3 h after each drug. Citalopram decreased slow-wave EEG activity whereas amitriptyline increased power in most EEG wavebands. Citalopram increased tapping rate and symbol copying whereas amitriptyline impaired these and other psychomotor tasks. Subjectively, amitriptyline was much more sedative than citalopram and produced more complaints of dry mouth. Study B comprised the administration of citalopram in the usual clinical dose of 40 mg, amitriptyline in the low clinical dose of 75 mg and placebo, each given for 9 nights using a balanced cross-over design. The test battery was applied on the first morning (pre-drug) and on the morning after the last nightly dose. None of the physiological tests showed any drug effects. Subjectively, citalopram was associated with feelings of shaking, nausea, loss of appetite and physical tiredness; amitriptyline produced feelings of shaking, nausea, loss of appetite, dryness of mouth, irritability, dizziness and indigestion; in general, amitriptyline effects were more marked than those of citalopram. Plasma samples were taken on the last day and plasma concentrations of both drugs and their metabolites were found to be in the expected range for the regimens used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)