Rapid tolerance to acute psychomotor impairment with carbamazepine in epileptic patients

Manual motor speed dysfunction as a neurocognitive endophenotype in euthymic bipolar disorder patients and their healthy relatives. Evidence from a 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined Manual Motor Speed (MMS) in bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this longitudinal, family study was to explore whether dysfunctional MMS represents a neurocognitive endophenotype of BD.

METHODS

A sample of 291 subjects, including 131 BD patients, 77 healthy first-degree relatives (BD-Rel), and 83 genetically-unrelated healthy controls (HC), was assessed with the Finger-Tapping Test (FTT) on three occasions over a 5-year period. Dependence of FTT on participants´ age was removed by means of a lineal model of HC samples, while correcting simultaneously the time and learning effect. Differences between groups were evaluated with an ANOVA test.

RESULTS

The patients' performance was significantly worse than that of HC over time (p≤0.006), and these deficits remained when non-euthymic BD patients (n=9) were excluded from analysis. Some significant differences between BD patients and BD-Rel (p≤0.037) and between BD-Rel and HC (p≤0.033) were found, but they tended to disappear as time progressed (p≥0.057). Performance of the BD-Rel group was intermediate to that of BD and HC. Most sociodemographic and clinical variables did not affect these results in patients. (p≥0.1). However, treatment with carbamazepine and benzodiazepines may exert a iatrogenic effect on MMS performance (p≤0.006).

LIMITATIONS

Only right-handed subjects were included in this study. Substantial attrition over time was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences between the patients´ MMS performance and that of healthy relatives and controls, regardless of most clinical and sociodemographic variables. Dysfunctional MMS could be considered an endophenotype of BD. Further studies are needed to rule out possible iatrogenic effects of some psychopharmacological treatments.

The cognitive impact of antiepileptic drugs

Effective treatment of epilepsy depends on medication compliance across a lifetime, and studies indicate that drug tolerability is a significant limiting factor in medication maintenance. Available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have the potential to exert detrimental effects on cognitive function and therefore compromise patient wellbeing. On the other hand, some agents may serve to enhance cognitive function. In this review paper, we highlight the range of effects on cognition linked to a variety of newer and older AEDs, encompassing key alterations in both specific executive abilities and broader neuropsychological functions. Importantly, the data reviewed suggest that the effects exerted by an AED could vary depending on both patient characteristics and drug-related variables. However, there are considerable difficulties in evaluating the available evidence. Many studies have failed to investigate the influence of patient and treatment variables on cognitive functioning. Other difficulties include variation across studies in relation to design, treatment group and assessment tools, poor reporting of methodology and poor specification of the cognitive abilities assessed. Focused and rigorous experimental designs including a range of cognitive measures assessing more precisely defined abilities are needed to fill the gaps in our knowledge and follow up reported patterns in the literature. Longitudinal studies are needed to improve our understanding of the influence of factors such as age, tolerance and the stability of cognitive effects. Future trials comparing the effects of commonly prescribed agents across patient subgroups will offer critical insight into the role of patient characteristics in determining the cognitive impact of particular AEDs.

Epilepsy in sports and recreation

In the US, millions of people participate in physical activity on a regular basis. However, among the many people with epilepsy, few incorporate exercise into their daily routine. Whether it is because of parental or physician restriction, the fact remains that people with epilepsy are less fit and are not getting the exercise they need. For many years, patients with seizure disorders have been discouraged from participating in physical fitness and team sports due to the fear that it will exacerbate their seizure disorder. However, this overprotective attitude has been slowly changing in light of more recent data on this subject. The evidence shows that patients with good seizure control can participate in both contact and non-contact sports without adversely affecting seizure frequency. This article reviews the effects of exercise on seizure control among patients with epilepsy. It examines the morbidity and mortality associated with exercise, as well as its psychological and physiological effects. Various topics concerning antiepileptic drugs and exercise are also discussed.

Neuropsychological effects of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs

Epilepsy and its treatment can have deleterious cognitive and behavioural consequences. Affected individuals have a higher prevalence of neuropsychological dysfunction than the general population because of complex interactions among several multifaceted and overlapping influences--for example, underlying neuropathologies, ictal and interictal neuronal discharges, a plethora of antiepileptic drugs, and numerous psychosocial issues. Research into the clinical relevance of these factors has been dogged by a range of methodological pitfalls including lack of standardisation of neuropsychological tests, small numbers and multiple testing, and statistical failure to appreciate differential effects of interactive elements in individual patients. Although antiepileptic drugs can impair neuropsychological functioning, their positive effect on seizure control might improve cognition and behaviour. Each person should be assessed individually with respect to factors unique to his or her seizure disorder and its treatment.

Established antiepileptic drugs

Despite the recent entry into the market-place of a range of new pharmacological treatments for epilepsy, most patients still receive the standard antiepileptic drugs. This review considers the clinical place and practical use of these agents. Detailed consideration is given to carbamazepine, phenytoin, sodium valproate, phenobarbital and ethosuximide, with lesser emphasis on primidone, clobazam and clonazepam. Individualization of therapy, polypharmacy, refractory epilepsy, therapeutic drug monitoring, pregnancy, withdrawing treatment, epilepsy prophylaxis and referral to an epilepsy centre are also discussed. The paper concludes with a statement of 12 basic rules in prescribing established antiepileptic drugs.

Gabapentin and cognition: a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled study in refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different doses of gabapentin (GBP) on cognitive function in treated epileptic patients.

METHODS

Twenty seven patients with refractory partial seizures commenced a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled, crossover study of adjuvant GBP. Each treatment phase lasted three months, during which the dose of GBP or matched placebo was increased stepwise at intervals of four weeks (1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, and 2400 mg/day in three daily doses). Psychomotor and memory testing was carried out at the end of each four week period, at which time the patient also completed subjective measures of cognition, fatigue, worry, temper, and dysphoria. A visual analogue scale was used to assess drowsiness and a questionnaire was employed to gauge the severity of side effects.

RESULTS

In the 21 patients completing the study, GBP produced a significant reduction in median monthly seizure frequency from 7 to 4.3 (P = 0.02), the decrease being most pronounced for secondarily generalised seizures (from 1.0 to 0.3, P = 0.01). Forty three per cent of patients reported a reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50% throughout all GBP doses. Mean (SD) plasma concentrations of GBP at 1200, 1800, and 2400 mg/day were 4.7 (2.6), 6.8 (3.8), and 8.6 (3.3) mg/l respectively. The drug had no effect on composite psychomotor and memory scores; nor was there alteration in any self assessment subscore. The mean drowsiness (P = 0.03) score was higher during treatment with 2400 mg GBP daily compared with matched placebo. Composite psychomotor (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), tiredness (r = 0.42, P < 0.01), and side effect (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) scores correlated significantly with seizure frequency but not with GBP dose.

CONCLUSION

GBP is a well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug which had no measurable effect on cognition but did produce sedation at the highest dose. This study also supports the suggestion that seizures can cause cognitive impairment.

Cognitive side-effects of chronic antiepileptic drug treatment: a review of 25 years of research

Over 90 investigations have been conducted over the past 25 years to determine what effect AEDs have on cognition. No satisfactory answer to this problem can be given, however, chiefly because there is a paucity of studies that pass fairly basic standards of methodology, design and analysis that apply to the evaluation of any clinical research. This severely limits the precision of statements regarding cognitive AED effects. More particularly, there is little reason to recommend any of the first-line AEDs as the AED of choice from the standpoint of cognitive side-effects. On the basis of the present review we are not in a position to provide a straightforward answer to the most pertinent question, i.e., whether AEDs in therapeutic doses have any cognitive effects at all, good or bad. If we reduce the available database to monotherapy studies in epilepsy that use control group data for comparison, employ an appropriate form of repeated measures analysis, and provide sufficient information, very few studies remain that are directly relevant to this issue. This in itself precludes definitive conclusions. As can be seen from Table 9, absolute effects of CBZ and VPA have been examined in epilepsy patients three times each (in four studies), PB has been examined two times, PHT only once. In addition to the paucity of relevant data, there are miscellaneous validity concerns in all of these studies, one recurring theme being that of inconclusive 'no effect' findings with small samples. Without firm knowledge about absolute effects, relative effects, and particularly their absence, are difficult to interpret. Employing the above criteria (except that concerning controls), ten epilepsy studies that address this issue remain (Table 10). It is instructive to look at the number of times particular AEDs have been compared against each other (Table 11). CBZ has been compared to PHT five times, other comparisons occur only once or twice. Again, this is hardly a basis for definitive statements, particularly because validity concerns occur here as well. Recurring concerns here are scattered significant findings that tend to disappear if adjustment of the significance level for multiple comparisons is done, and inconclusive 'no difference' findings with small samples. Even if there were no conclusion validity concerns in individual studies, comparison between studies would be complicated by considerable variation in the subjects studied. Five of the studies summarized in Tables 8 and 9 use children as subject, nine use adults; results obtained in one group may not be generalizable to the other. Also, subjects may be newly diagnosed cases, or patients already on chronic treatment. The latter choice of subjects may be a factor working against detecting cognitive side-effects, as the damage (if any) may already have been done before the beginning of the trial. In addition, a wide variety of assessment tools have been used to search for cognitive effects of AEDs, ranging from measurements of reaction time and motor speed to intelligence tests. Some of these may be more sensitive to drug induced changes in cognition than others. Still, the tentative overall picture emerging from the creme de la creme of research on cognitive AED effects is that differences in cognitive profiles may not be very large. An important point here, of course, is the magnitude of the difference one considers worth detecting. Very few studies have attempted to answer this question. In the majority of studies we examined, a large treatment effect was anticipated implicitly, judging from the generally limited sample sizes. The choice of a study design based on a large treatment effect size may not always be appropriate, though. Of course, one could argue that it is only large effects that may be of practical or clinical significance anyways [30] and that effects of lesser magnitude are of no consequence. However, there are many examples where even a small benefit of one treatme

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatrics: a need for improvement

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is practiced for a number of frequently used drugs in infants and children. It is believed that monitoring drug levels will increase the probability of a therapeutic response and minimize the probability of adverse drug sequelae. Dose adjustments are based on measured drug levels interpreted relative to published therapeutic ranges which may or may not reflect the true relationship with either therapeutic or adverse effects. Potential errors derive from many sources, some amenable to solutions based on current knowledge, others awaiting improved understanding of the causes and consequences of unreliable therapeutic ranges.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticonvulsant therapy

Changing attitudes towards the use of antiepileptic drugs have led to an emphasis on monotherapy with serum concentration measurement coupled with standard, weight-adjusted starting and maintenance regimens to guide initial therapy and subsequent dosage titration. Currently, the established anticonvulsants are carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and phenytoin. Phenobarbital is now less commonly prescribed due to its propensity to produce sedation and impair cognitive function. The value of pharmacokinetic optimisation with valproic acid is limited by its wide therapeutic index, large fluctuations in the concentration-time profile and concentration-dependent protein binding. Thus, although serum concentrations are often measured, they are rarely subjected to pharmacokinetic interpretation. Carbamazepine has a flatter concentration-time profile than valproic acid. Its target range is more clearly defined and it undergoes autoinduction of metabolism and interacts with other drugs. Pharmacokinetic principles can, therefore, be more readily applied to carbamazepine, although, in general, a simple clinical approach to its use is usually satisfactory. Phenytoin has required the greatest pharmacokinetic input due to its nonlinear pharmacokinetics and narrow target range. Many different graphical methods, equations and computer programs have been reported, some of which demand 2 steady-state, dose-concentration pairs; others function satisfactorily with only 1. Recent attempts have been made to interpret non-steady-state data. In addition, a number of workers have demonstrated the value of altering the population parameter estimates to account for ethnic differences. A pharmacokinetic approach can also be used to tailor the use of phenytoin in the treatment of status epilepticus. Dosage alterations may be needed for specific patient groups. In particular, children generally require higher dosages on a weight-for-weight basis than adults, while equivalently lower dosages should be given to neonates. Most anticonvulsants are principally cleared by hepatic mechanisms, so dosage adjustment is not usually required in renal disease, although care must be taken in interpreting serum concentrations because of changes in protein binding. Close monitoring is required in the elderly and patients with hepatic impairment, while increased dosages may be needed in critically ill patients and during pregnancy. Pharmacokinetic principles can be used in the treatment of treat self-poisoning with anticonvulsants. There are few data available on the pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and gabapentin in patients. Due to its mode of action in binding irreversibly to its target enzyme, serum concentration monitoring of vigabatrin plays no role in optimising therapy. The value of applying pharmacokinetic principles with the other 3 drugs remains to be investigated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)