Effect of gemfibrozil on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic warfarin in healthy subjects

Structural Analysis of Human Serum Albumin in Complex with the Fibrate Drug Gemfibrozil

Gemfibrozil (GEM) is an orally administered lipid-regulating fibrate derivative drug sold under the brand name Lopid^®, among others. Since its approval in the early 80s, GEM has been largely applied to treat hypertriglyceridemia and other disorders of lipid metabolism. Though generally well tolerated, GEM can alter the distribution and the free, active concentration of some co-administered drugs, leading to adverse effects. Most of them appear to be related to the ability of GEM to bind with high affinity human serum albumin (HSA), the major drug-carrier protein in blood plasma. Here, we report the crystal structure of HSA in complex with GEM. Two binding sites have been identified, namely Sudlow’s binding sites I (FA7) and II (FA3–FA4). A comparison of the crystal structure of HSA in complex with GEM with those of other previously described HSA–drug complexes enabled us to appreciate the analogies and differences in their respective binding modes. The elucidation of the molecular interaction between GEM and HSA might offer the basis for the development of novel GEM derivatives that can be safely and synergistically co-administered with other drugs, enabling augmented therapeutic efficacies.

Mechanisms of CYP450 Inhibition: Understanding Drug-Drug Interactions Due to Mechanism-Based Inhibition in Clinical Practice

In an ageing society, polypharmacy has become a major public health and economic issue. Overuse of medications, especially in patients with chronic diseases, carries major health risks. One common consequence of polypharmacy is the increased emergence of adverse drug events, mainly from drug–drug interactions. The majority of currently available drugs are metabolized by CYP450 enzymes. Interactions due to shared CYP450-mediated metabolic pathways for two or more drugs are frequent, especially through reversible or irreversible CYP450 inhibition. The magnitude of these interactions depends on several factors, including varying affinity and concentration of substrates, time delay between the administration of the drugs, and mechanisms of CYP450 inhibition. Various types of CYP450 inhibition (competitive, non-competitive, mechanism-based) have been observed clinically, and interactions of these types require a distinct clinical management strategy. This review focuses on mechanism-based inhibition, which occurs when a substrate forms a reactive intermediate, creating a stable enzyme–intermediate complex that irreversibly reduces enzyme activity. This type of inhibition can cause interactions with drugs such as omeprazole, paroxetine, macrolide antibiotics, or mirabegron. A good understanding of mechanism-based inhibition and proper clinical management is needed by clinicians when such drugs are prescribed. It is important to recognize mechanism-based inhibition since it cannot be prevented by separating the time of administration of the interacting drugs. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different types of mechanism-based inhibition, along with illustrative examples of how mechanism-based inhibition might affect prescribing and clinical behaviors.

Nutrient-sensing nuclear receptors PPARα and FXR control liver energy balance

The nuclear receptors PPARα (encoded by NR1C1) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR, encoded by NR1H4) are activated in the liver in the fasted and fed state, respectively. PPARα activation induces fatty acid oxidation, while FXR controls bile acid homeostasis, but both nuclear receptors also regulate numerous other metabolic pathways relevant to liver energy balance. Here we review evidence that they function coordinately to control key nutrient pathways, including fatty acid oxidation and gluconeogenesis in the fasted state and lipogenesis and glycolysis in the fed state. We have also recently reported that these receptors have mutually antagonistic impacts on autophagy, which is induced by PPARα but suppressed by FXR. Secretion of multiple blood proteins is a major drain on liver energy and nutrient resources, and we present preliminary evidence that the liver secretome may be directly suppressed by PPARα, but induced by FXR. Finally, previous studies demonstrated a striking deficiency in bile acid levels in malnourished mice that is consistent with results in malnourished children. We present evidence that hepatic targets of PPARα and FXR are dysregulated in chronic undernutrition. We conclude that PPARα and FXR function coordinately to integrate liver energy balance.

Role of gemfibrozil as an inhibitor of CYP2C8 and membrane transporters

INTRODUCTION

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 is a drug metabolizing enzyme of major importance. The lipid-lowering drug gemfibrozil has been identified as a strong inhibitor of CYP2C8 in vivo. This effect is due to mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2C8 by gemfibrozil 1-O-β-glucuronide. In vivo, gemfibrozil is a fairly selective CYP2C8 inhibitor, which lacks significant inhibitory effect on other CYP enzymes. Gemfibrozil can, however, have a smaller but clinically meaningful inhibitory effect on membrane transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 and organic anion transporter 3. Areas covered: This review describes the inhibitory effects of gemfibrozil on CYP enzymes and membrane transporters. The clinical drug interactions caused by gemfibrozil and the different mechanisms contributing to the interactions are reviewed in detail. Expert opinion: Gemfibrozil is a useful probe inhibitor of CYP2C8 in vivo, but its effect on membrane transporters has to be taken into account in study design and interpretation. Moreover, gemfibrozil could be used to boost the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C8 substrate drugs. Identification of gemfibrozil 1-O-β-glucuronide as a potent mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP2C8 has led to recognition of glucuronide metabolites as perpetrators of drug-drug interactions. Recently, also acyl glucuronide metabolites of clopidogrel and deleobuvir have been shown to strongly inhibit CYP2C8.

Role of Cytochrome P450 2C8 in Drug Metabolism and Interactions

During the last 10-15 years, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 has emerged as an important drug-metabolizing enzyme. CYP2C8 is highly expressed in human liver and is known to metabolize more than 100 drugs. CYP2C8 substrate drugs include amodiaquine, cerivastatin, dasabuvir, enzalutamide, imatinib, loperamide, montelukast, paclitaxel, pioglitazone, repaglinide, and rosiglitazone, and the number is increasing. Similarly, many drugs have been identified as CYP2C8 inhibitors or inducers. In vivo, already a small dose of gemfibrozil, i.e., 10% of its therapeutic dose, is a strong, irreversible inhibitor of CYP2C8. Interestingly, recent findings indicate that the acyl-β-glucuronides of gemfibrozil and clopidogrel cause metabolism-dependent inactivation of CYP2C8, leading to a strong potential for drug interactions. Also several other glucuronide metabolites interact with CYP2C8 as substrates or inhibitors, suggesting that an interplay between CYP2C8 and glucuronides is common. Lack of fully selective and safe probe substrates, inhibitors, and inducers challenges execution and interpretation of drug-drug interaction studies in humans. Apart from drug-drug interactions, some CYP2C8 genetic variants are associated with altered CYP2C8 activity and exhibit significant interethnic frequency differences. Herein, we review the current knowledge on substrates, inhibitors, inducers, and pharmacogenetics of CYP2C8, as well as its role in clinically relevant drug interactions. In addition, implications for selection of CYP2C8 marker and perpetrator drugs to investigate CYP2C8-mediated drug metabolism and interactions in preclinical and clinical studies are discussed.

Quantitative Rationalization of Gemfibrozil Drug Interactions: Consideration of Transporters-Enzyme Interplay and the Role of Circulating Metabolite Gemfibrozil 1-O-β-Glucuronide

Gemfibrozil has been suggested as a sensitive cytochrome P450 2C8 (CYP2C8) inhibitor for clinical investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. However, gemfibrozil drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are complex; its major circulating metabolite, gemfibrozil 1-O-β-glucuronide (Gem-Glu), exhibits time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8, and both parent and metabolite also behave as moderate inhibitors of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) in vitro. Additionally, parent and metabolite also inhibit renal transport mediated by OAT3. Here, in vitro inhibition data for gemfibrozil and Gem-Glu were used to assess their impact on the pharmacokinetics of several victim drugs (including rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, cerivastatin, and repaglinide) by employing both static mechanistic and dynamic physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. Of the 48 cases evaluated using the static models, about 75% and 98% of the DDIs were predicted within 1.5- and 2-fold of the observed values, respectively, when incorporating the interaction potential of both gemfibrozil and its 1-O-β-glucuronide. Moreover, the PBPK model was able to recover the plasma profiles of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, cerivastatin, and repaglinide under control and gemfibrozil treatment conditions. Analyses suggest that Gem-Glu is the major contributor to the DDIs, and its exposure needed to bring about complete inactivation of CYP2C8 is only a fraction of that achieved in the clinic after a therapeutic gemfibrozil dose. Overall, the complex interactions of gemfibrozil can be quantitatively rationalized, and the learnings from this analysis can be applied in support of future predictions of gemfibrozil DDIs.

Contribution of baicalin on the plasma protein binding displacement and CYP3A activity inhibition to the pharmacokinetic changes of nifedipine in rats in vivo and in vitro

Baicalin purified from the root of Radix scutellariae is widely used in clinical practices. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of baicalin on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine, a CYP3A probe substrate, in rats in vivo and in vitro. In a randomised, three-period crossover study, significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine (2 mg/kg) were observed after treatment with a low (0.225 g/kg) or high (0.45 g/kg) dose of baicalin in rats. In the low- and high-dose groups of baicalin-treated rats, C max of total nifedipine decreased by 40%±14% (P<0.01) and 65%±14% (P<0.01), AUC0-∞ decreased by 41%±8% (P<0.01) and 63%±7% (P<0.01), Vd increased by 85%±43% (P<0.01) and 224%±231% (P<0.01), and CL increased by 97%±78% (P<0.01) and 242%±135% (P<0.01), respectively. Plasma protein binding experiments in vivo showed that C max of unbound nifedipine significantly increased by 25%±19% (P<0.01) and 44%±29% (P<0.01), respectively, and there was a good correlation between the unbound nifedipine (%) and baicalin concentrations (P<0.01). Furthermore, in vitro results revealed that baicalin was a competitive displacer of nifedipine from plasma proteins. In vitro incubation experiments demonstrated that baicalin could also competitively inhibit CYP3A activity in rat liver microsomes in a concentration-dependent manner. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic changes of nifedipine may be modulated by the inhibitory effects of baicalin on plasma protein binding and CYP3A-mediated metabolism.

CYP2C8 but not CYP3A4 is important in the pharmacokinetics of montelukast

AIM

According to product information, montelukast is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. However, CYP2C8 was also recently found to be involved. Our aim was to study the effects of selective CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover study, 11 healthy subjects ingested gemfibrozil 600 mg, itraconazole 100 mg (first dose 200 mg) or both, or placebo twice daily for 5 days, and on day 3, 10 mg montelukast. Plasma concentrations of montelukast, gemfibrozil, itraconazole and their metabolites were measured up to 72 h.

RESULTS

The CYP2C8 inhibitor gemfibrozil increased the AUC(0,∞) of montelukast 4.3-fold and its t(1/2) 2.1-fold (P < 0.001). Gemfibrozil impaired the formation of the montelukast primary metabolite M6, reduced the AUC and C(max) of the secondary (major) metabolite M4 by more than 90% (P < 0.05) and increased those of M5a and M5b (P < 0.05). The CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic variables of montelukast or its M6 and M4 metabolites, but markedly reduced the AUC and C(max) of M5a and M5b (P < 0.05). The effects of the gemfibrozil-itraconazole combination on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast did not differ from those of gemfibrozil alone.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C8 is the dominant enzyme in the biotransformation of montelukast in humans, accounting for about 80% of its metabolism. CYP3A4 only mediates the formation of the minor metabolite M5a/b, and is not important in the elimination of montelukast. Montelukast may serve as a safe and useful CYP2C8 probe drug.

Validation of an LC/MS method for the determination of gemfibrozil in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

Gemfibrozil, a fibric acid hypolipidemic agent, is increasingly being used in clinical drug-drug interaction studies as an inhibitor of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. The validation of a fast, accurate and precise LC/MS method is described for the quantitative determination of gemfibrozil in an EDTA-anticoagulated human plasma matrix. Briefly, gemfibrozil was extracted from human plasma by an acetonitrile protein precipitation method. The assay was reproducible with intra-assay precision between 1.6 and 10.7%, and inter-assay precision ranging from 4.4 to 7.8%. The assay also showed good accuracy, with intra-assay concentrations within 85.6-108.7% of the expected value, and inter-assay concentrations within 89.4-104.0% of the expected value. The linear concentration range was between 0.5 and 50 µg/mL with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 µg/mL when 125 µL of plasma were extracted. This LC/MS method yielded a quick, simple and reliable protocol for determining gemfibrozil concentrations in plasma and is applicable to clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

The role of metabolites in predicting drug-drug interactions: focus on irreversible cytochrome P450 inhibition

The irreversible inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes can cause significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The formation of metabolites is fundamental for the inactivation of CYP enzymes. Of the 19 CYP enzyme inactivators for which the mechanism of action has been established, 10 have circulating metabolites, which are on the metabolic pathway to inactivation of the CYP enzyme. Because inactivation of CYP enzymes usually requires multiple metabolic steps, the prediction of interactions between metabolites and CYPs in vivo may require complex models and the availability of data generated in vitro from each metabolite. Data discussed in this review suggest that circulating metabolites are more important in CYP inhibition in vivo than has been acknowledged.

Interaction between gemfibrozil and warfarin: case report and review of the literature

Possible procoagulant effects can occur when lipid-lowering fibric acid derivatives, such as gemfibrozil and fenofibrate, are taken concomitantly with warfarin. Although there are several detailed reports of fenofibrate potentiating the anticoagulant effects of warfarin, few case reports have been published regarding an interaction between gemfibrozil and warfarin. We describe a 62-year-old man who was taking warfarin for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and came to the anticoagulation clinic for a routine follow-up. For 9 months, the patient's international normalized ratio (INR) had been stable (target range 2.0-3.0) with warfarin 45 mg/week. At this clinic visit, however, his INR was supratherapeutic at 5.8; the only identified change in his drug therapy was the addition of gemfibrozil 600 mg twice/day, started 3 weeks earlier. The patient denied any changes in his dietary intake of vitamin K, alcohol use, or addition of nonprescription or herbal agents. Recent laboratory tests revealed no signs of thyroid abnormalities and only an insignificant elevation in his alanine aminotransferase level. His warfarin dose was decreased to 35-37.5 mg/week (a 22% reduction), and a therapeutic INR was maintained until gemfibrozil was later discontinued because of myalgia. After consecutive subtherapeutic INRs, his warfarin dose was increased to 45 mg/week and a therapeutic INR was maintained. Use of the Drug Interaction Probability Scale indicated that the likelihood of the gemfibrozil-warfarin interaction was probable. The exact mechanism of the proposed interactions between fibric acid derivatives and warfarin remains unknown but may be multifactorial through inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, displacement from protein binding sites, or changes in coagulation factor synthesis. Regardless of the fibric acid derivative chosen, an empiric dosage reduction of 20% and close INR monitoring are warranted in patients receiving warfarin.

Multiple Inhibition Mechanisms and Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions: Status of Metabolism and Transporter Models as Exemplified by Gemfibrozil–Drug Interactions

PURPOSE

To assess the consequences of multiple inhibitors and differential inhibition mechanisms on the prediction of 12 gemfibrozil drug-drug interactions (DDIs). In addition, qualitative zoning of transporter-related gemfibrozil and cyclosporine DDIs was investigated.

METHODS

The effect of gemfibrozil and its acyl-glucuronide on different enzymes was incorporated into a metabolic prediction model. The impact of CYP2C8 time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil acyl-glucuronide was assessed using repaglinide, cerivastatin, loperamide, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone DDIs. Gemfibrozil and cyclosporine inhibition data obtained in human embryonic kidney cells expressing OATP1B1 and hepatic input concentration ([I]in) were used for qualitative zoning of 14 transporter-mediated DDIs.

RESULTS

Incorporation of time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil glucuronide showed no significant improvement in the prediction, as CYP2C8 contributed <65% to the overall elimination of the victim drugs investigated. Qualitative zoning of OATP1B1 DDIs resulted in no false negative predictions; yet the magnitude of observed interactions was significantly over-predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil glucuronide is only important for victim drugs eliminated predominantly (>80%) via CYP2C8. Qualitative zoning of OATP1B1 inhibitors based on [I]in/K (i) is valid in drug screening to avoid false negatives. Refinement of the transporter model by incorporating the fraction of drug transported by a particular transporter is recommended.

Simultaneous Determination of Warfarin Enantiomers and Its Metabolite in Human Plasma by Column-Switching High-Performance Liquid Chromatography With Chiral Separation

A simple and sensitive column-switching high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of warfarin enantiomers and their metabolites, 7-hydroxywarfarin enantiomers, in human plasma is described. Warfarin enantiomers, 7-hydroxywarfarin enantiomers, and an internal standard, diclofenac sodium, were extracted from 1 mL of a plasma sample using diethyl ether-chloroform (80:20, v/v). The extract was injected onto column I (TSK precolumn BSA-C8, 5 microm, 10 mm x 4.6 mm inside diameter) for cleanup and column II (Chiralcel OD-RH analytical column, 150 mm x 4.6 mm inside diameter) coupled with a guard column (Chiralcel OD-RH guard column, 10 mm x4.6 mm inside diameter) for separation. The mobile phase consisted of phosphate buffer-acetonitrile (84:16 v/v, pH 2.0) for clean-up and phosphate buffer-acetonitrile (45:55 v/v, pH 2.0) for separation. The peaks were monitored with an ultraviolet detector set at a wavelength of 312 nm, and total time for chromatographic separation was approximately 25 minutes. The validated concentration ranges of this method were 3 to 1000 ng/mL for (R)- and (S)-warfarin and 3 to 200 ng/mL for (R)- and (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin. Intra- and interday coefficients of variation were less than 4.4% and 4.9% for (R)-warfarin and 4.8% and 4.0% for (S)-warfarin, and 5.1% and 4.2% for (R)-7-hydroxywarfarin and 5.8% and 5.0% for (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin at the different concentrations. The limit of quantification was 3 ng/mL for both warfarin and 7-hydroxywarfarin enantiomers. This method was suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of warfarin enantiomers and was applied in a pharmacokinetic study requiring the simultaneous determination of warfarin enantiomers and its metabolite, 7-hydroxywarfarin enantiomers, in human volunteers.

Prediction of plasma protein binding displacement and its implications for quantitative assessment of metabolic drug-drug interactions from in vitro data

Although displacement from plasma protein binding (dPB) is usually of little clinical significance, it should be taken into account when interpreting changes in total plasma concentrations of drugs subject to metabolically based drug-drug interactions (mDDI). The aim of this study was to develop an approach to predict changes in the free fractions (fu) of pairs of drugs that compete for plasma binding, knowing their binding affinity constants, and to consider the implications of associated concentration- and time-dependence of such changes with respect to drug exposure. Experimental fu values of valproic acid and phenytoin in the presence of ibuprofen, diflunisal, or naproxen were predicted successfully (within 0.99- to 1.36-fold) by the model. In addition, the simulation of time-dependent changes in fu of valproic acid following administration of ibuprofen indicated different extents of dPB during 'first-pass' through the liver after oral absorption and on systemic recirculation. To understand the impact of the time-dependent change in fu, a full physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, that accounts for concentration-time profile of displacee and displacer and their mutual effect on each other, is required. The approach developed in this study is a first step towards the development of such a model.

Stereoselective interaction between the CYP2C8 inhibitor gemfibrozil and racemic ibuprofen

OBJECTIVE

Ibuprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, is metabolised in vitro by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 2C9. We studied the possible effect of gemfibrozil, an in vivo inhibitor of CYP2C8, on the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In a randomised two-phase crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers took 600 mg gemfibrozil or placebo orally twice daily for 3 days. On day 3, each subject ingested 400 mg of racemic ibuprofen. Plasma concentrations of ibuprofen enantiomers and gemfibrozil were measured.

RESULTS

Gemfibrozil raised the mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of R-ibuprofen by 34% (range -10 to 67%; P < 0.001). The elimination half-lives (t (1/2)) of R- and S-ibuprofen were increased by 54 and 34% (range 11-162% and 16-85%; P < 0.001) respectively. The other pharmacokinetic variables of R- and S-ibuprofen were not changed significantly. The AUC(0-infinity) ratio of R-ibuprofen to S-ibuprofen was increased by gemfibrozil (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemfibrozil moderately increases the AUC(0-infinity) of R-ibuprofen and prolongs its t (1/2), indicating that R-ibuprofen is partially metabolised by CYP2C8. The interconversion of R- to S-ibuprofen can explain the small effect of gemfibrozil on the t (1/2) of S-ibuprofen. The gemfibrozil-ibuprofen interaction is of limited clinical significance.

Pioglitazone is metabolised by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in vitro: potential for interactions with CYP2C8 inhibitors

Our objective was to identify the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes that metabolise pioglitazone and to examine the effects of the CYP2C8 inhibitors montelukast, zafirlukast, trimethoprim and gemfibrozil on pioglitazone metabolism in vitro. The effect of different CYP isoform inhibitors on the elimination of a clinically relevant concentration of pioglitazone (1 microM) and the formation of the main primary metabolite M-IV were studied using pooled human liver microsomes. The metabolism of pioglitazone by CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 was investigated using human recombinant CYP isoforms. In particular, the inhibitors of CYP2C8, but also those of CYP3A4, markedly inhibited the elimination of pioglitazone and the formation of M-IV by HLM. Inhibitors selective to other CYP isoforms had a minor effect only. Of the recombinant isoforms, CYP2C8 (20 pmol/ml) metabolised pioglitazone markedly (56% in 60 min.), and also CYP3A4 had a significant effect (37% in 60 min.). Montelukast, zafirlukast, trimethoprim and gemfibrozil inhibited pioglitazone elimination in HLM with IC50 values of 0.51 microM, 1.0 microM, 99 microM and 98 microM, respectively, and the formation of the metabolite M-IV with IC50 values of 0.18 microM, 0.78 microM, 71 microM and 59 microM, respectively. In conclusion, pioglitazone is metabolised mainly by CYP2C8 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4 in vitro. CYP2C9 is not significantly involved in the elimination of pioglitazone. The effect of different CYP2C8 inhibitors on pioglitazone pharmacokinetics needs to be evaluated also in vivo because, irrespective of their in vitro CYP2C8 inhibitory potency, their pharmacokinetic properties may affect the extent of interaction.

Effect of SLCO1B1 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide

AIMS

Nateglinide is a meglitinide analogue with antidiabetic action. A recent study showed that SLCO1B1 (which codes the OATP1B1 gene, also known as OATP-C, OATP2) is a major determinant which markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide. Our objective was to assess the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of SLCO1B1 and the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy volunteers with different SLCO1B1 genotypes (11 with 521TT, four with 521TC and two with 521CC) were enrolled in this study. Each was given a single oral dose of 90 mg nateglinide. Plasma concentrations of nateglinide were measured up to 8 h by HPLC.

RESULTS

The C(max) and AUC(0,infinity) of nateglinide were 83% (P = 0.002) and 82% (P = 0.001) higher in the SLCO1B1521TC subjects (n = 4), and 76% (P = 0.016) and 108% (P = 0.001) higher in the SLCO1B1521CC subjects (n = 2) than in the SLCO1B1521TT subjects (n = 11), respectively. The t(1/2) of nateglinide in SLCO1B1521CC subjects was 78% longer than that in 521TT subjects (P = 0.036). The difference in t(max) values among the three genotypic groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that OATP1B1-mediated hepatic uptake of nateglinide may be the prior step for its metabolism and elimination. SLCO1B1521T > C SNP might play an important role in the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide.

Coadministration of gemfibrozil and itraconazole has only a minor effect on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 substrate nateglinide

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gemfibrozil, and particularly its combination with itraconazole, greatly increases the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0, infinity)] and response to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 3A4 substrate repaglinide. In vitro, gemfibrozil is a more potent inhibitor of CYP2C9 than of CYP2C8. Our aim was to investigate the effects of the gemfibrozil-itraconazole combination on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of another meglitinide analogue, nateglinide, which is metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP3A4.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover study with two phases, nine healthy subjects took 600 mg gemfibrozil and 100 mg itraconazole (first dose 200 mg) twice daily or placebo for 3 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 30-mg dose of nateglinide. Plasma nateglinide and blood glucose concentrations were measured for up to 12 h.

RESULTS

During the gemfibrozil-itraconazole phase, the AUC(0, infinity) and C(max) of nateglinide were 47% (range 23-74%; P < 0.0001) and 30% (range - 8% to 104%; P = 0.0146) higher than during the placebo phase, respectively, but the t(max) and t1/2 of nateglinide remained unchanged. The combination of gemfibrozil and itraconazole had no effect on the formation of the M7 metabolite of nateglinide but impaired its elimination. The blood glucose response to nateglinide was not significantly changed by coadministration of gemfibrozil and itraconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemfibrozil and itraconazole has only a limited influence on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide. This is in marked contrast to the substantial effect of this combination on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide. The findings suggest that in vivo gemfibrozil, probably due to its metabolites, is a much more potent inhibitor of CYP2C8 than of CYP2C9.

GLUCURONIDATION CONVERTS GEMFIBROZIL TO A POTENT, METABOLISM-DEPENDENT INHIBITOR OF CYP2C8: IMPLICATIONS FOR DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS

Gemfibrozil more potently inhibits CYP2C9 than CYP2C8 in vitro, and yet the opposite inhibitory potency is observed in the clinic. To investigate this apparent paradox, we evaluated both gemfibrozil and its major metabolite, an acyl-glucuronide (gemfibrozil 1-O-beta-glucuronide) as direct-acting and metabolism-dependent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4) in human liver microsomes. Gemfibrozil most potently inhibited CYP2C9 (IC50 of 30 microM), whereas gemfibrozil glucuronide most potently inhibited CYP2C8 (IC50 of 24 microM). Unexpectedly, gemfibrozil glucuronide, but not gemfibrozil, was found to be a metabolism-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C8 only. The IC50 for inhibition of CYP2C8 by gemfibrozil glucuronide decreased from 24 microM to 1.8 microM after a 30-min incubation with human liver microsomes and NADPH. Inactivation of CYP2C8 by gemfibrozil glucuronide required NADPH, and proceeded with a K(I) (inhibitor concentration that supports half the maximal rate of enzyme inactivation) of 20 to 52 microM and a k(inact) (maximal rate of inactivation) of 0.21 min(-1). Potent inhibition of CYP2C8 was also achieved by first incubating gemfibrozil with alamethicin-activated human liver microsomes and UDP-glucuronic acid (to form gemfibrozil glucuronide), followed by a second incubation with NADPH. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis established that human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP2C8 both convert gemfibrozil glucuronide to a hydroxylated metabolite, with oxidative metabolism occurring on the dimethylphenoxy moiety (the group furthest from the glucuronide moiety). The results described have important implications for the mechanism of the clinical interaction reported between gemfibrozil and CYP2C8 substrates such as cerivastatin, repaglinide, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone.