Influence of different degrees of liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of clazosentan

Clinical Pharmacology of Clazosentan, a Selective Endothelin A Receptor Antagonist for the Prevention and Treatment of aSAH-Related Cerebral Vasospasm

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may lead to cerebral vasospasm and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It represents a major unmet medical need due to few treatment options with limited efficacy. The role of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptor ET_A in the pathogenesis of aSAH-induced vasospasm suggests antagonism of this receptor as promising asset for pharmacological treatment. Clazosentan is a potent ET_A receptor antagonist for intravenous use currently under development for the prevention of aSAH-induced cerebral vasospasm. The pharmacokinetics of clazosentan are characterized by an intermediate clearance, a volume of distribution similar to that of the extracellular fluid volume, dose-proportional exposure, an elimination independent of drug-metabolizing enzymes, and a disposition mainly dependent on the hepatic uptake transporter organic anion transport polypeptide 1B1/1B3. In healthy subjects, clazosentan leads to an increase in ET-1 concentration and prevents the cardiac and renal effects mediated by infusion of ET-1. In patients, it significantly reduced the incidence of moderate or severe vasospasm as well as post-aSAH vasospasm-related morbidity and mortality. Clazosentan is well tolerated up to the expected therapeutic dose of 15 mg/h and, in aSAH patients, lung complications, hypotension, and anemia were adverse events more commonly reported following clazosentan than placebo. In summary, clazosentan has a pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile suitable to become a valuable asset in the armamentarium of therapeutic modalities to prevent aSAH-induced cerebral vasospasm.

Influence of Rifampin-Mediated Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptide 1B1/1B3 Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of Clazosentan

Clazosentan is a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist in development for the prevention and treatment of vasospasm postsubarachnoid hemorrhage. It is a substrate of organic anion‐transporting polypeptide 1B1/1B3 based on preclinical data. This randomized, double‐blind, two‐period, cross‐over study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of clazosentan (15 mg/hour for 3 hours) after the intravenous administration of placebo or rifampin (600 mg/100 mL in 30 minutes). A total of 14 healthy male participants were enrolled resulting in 13 completers. Clazosentan exposure was three to four times higher after organic anion‐transporting polypeptide 1B1/1B3 inhibition, as reflected by the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from zero to infinity: 3.88 (3.24–4.65). Clearance and volume of distribution decreased to a similar extent. Elimination half‐life was not affected. A similar pattern but a higher incidence and frequency of adverse events were observed when clazosentan was given with rifampin than with placebo.

Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Buprenorphine and Naloxone in Subjects with Mild to Severe Hepatic Impairment (Child-Pugh Classes A, B, and C), in Hepatitis C Virus-Seropositive Subjects, and in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Suboxone(®) is a sublingual tablet of buprenorphine/naloxone, approved for the treatment of opioid dependence. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of hepatic impairment or hepatitis C virus infection on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine or naloxone and their major metabolites.

METHODS

Forty-three subjects received a single dose of a Suboxone 2.0/0.5-mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 168 h and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from 33 subjects. Compared with healthy subjects, for patients with severe hepatic impairment, total and peak exposures increased to 281.4 % [90 % confidence interval 187.1-423.3] and 171.8 % [117.9-250.2] for buprenorphine, 1401.9 % [707.6-2777.5] and 1129.8 % [577.2-2211.4] for naloxone. For moderate hepatic impaired subjects, naloxone total and peak exposure increased to 317.6 % [164.9-611.5] and 270.0  % [141.9-513.9]. For buprenorphine, only total exposure increased to 163.9 % [110.8-242.3]. Changes in maximum observed plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity of buprenorphine or naloxone in subjects with mild hepatic impairment or with hepatitis C virus infection were within twofold of those of healthy subjects. Serious adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe and moderate hepatic impairment significantly increased exposure of naloxone and to a lesser extent of buprenorphine. Therefore, buprenorphine/naloxone combination products should generally be avoided in patients with severe hepatic impairment and may not be appropriate for patients with moderate hepatic impairment. However, buprenorphine/naloxone products may be used with caution for maintenance treatment in patients with moderate hepatic impairment who have initiated treatment on a buprenorphine product without naloxone [Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01846455].

Challenges in collecting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information in an intensive care setting: PK/PD modelling of clazosentan in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

PURPOSE

This paper describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of clazosentan in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH), and the impact of collecting data in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Factors influencing data quality, analysis, and interpretation are provided with recommendations for future clinical studies in ICU settings.

METHODS

CONSCIOUS-2 was a phase III study involving 1,157 patients with aSAH. Secured by surgical clipping, patients were infused with clazosentan or placebo for up to 14 days post-aSAH. Clazosentan exposure relationships with vital signs, QT intervals, and AST/ALT values as well as efficacy and safety endpoints were characterised using population PK/PD and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Clazosentan clearance was influenced by age, sex, Asian origin, and disease status at baseline, and increased with time. Volume of distribution showed a sex difference. Exposure had no relationship with any efficacy endpoint or ALT/AST values, but was related to the increasing probability of lung complications. Blood pressure decreased proportionally to clazosentan concentrations, and the presence of clazosentan was associated with QT interval increases. Implausible values in the concentration data reflect the specific ICU challenges, possibly arising from PK sampling from the infusion arm or haemodilution.

CONCLUSIONS

Population PK/PD modelling of CONCIOUS-2 data provided clinically relevant knowledge about various effects of clazosentan in the aSAH patient population in a real clinical setting. The quality of data and analyses could be improved by the collection of additional data and stricter training of study personnel. Differences in clinical practice between sites and geographical regions are more challenging to overcome.

Pharmacokinetics of the novel PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar in patients with hepatic impairment

PURPOSE

To determine whether hepatic impairment has an effect on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorapaxar or M20, its main pharmacologically active metabolite.

METHODS

This was an open-label study in which a single 40-mg oral dose of vorapaxar was administered to patients with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), and severe (n = 4) hepatic impairment and healthy controls (n = 16) matched for age, gender, weight, and height. Blood samples for vorapaxar and M20 assay were collected predose and at frequent intervals up to 8 weeks postdose.

RESULTS

Plasma vorapaxar and M20 PK profiles were similar between patients with impaired liver function and healthy controls. Group mean values for vorapaxar C(max) and AUC(tf) were 206-279 ng/mL and 14,200-18,200 ng·h/mL, respectively, with the lowest values observed in patients with severe impairment. Vorapaxar median T(max) and mean t(1/2) values were 1.00-1.75 h and 298-366 h, respectively. There was no apparent correlation between vorapaxar or M20 exposure or t(1/2) values and disease severity. Vorapaxar was generally well tolerated; one serious adverse event (gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to ruptured esophageal varices) was reported in a patient with severe hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant effect on the PK of vorapaxar and M20. No dose or dosage adjustment of vorapaxar will be required in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Although systemic exposure to vorapaxar does not appear to increase in patients with severe hepatic impairment, administration of vorapaxar to such patients is not recommended given their bleeding diathesis.