A clinical study to assess CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 induction by AZD7325, a selective GABA(A) receptor modulator - an in vitro and in vivo comparison

BAER-101, a selective potentiator of α2- and α3-containing GABAA receptors, fully suppresses spontaneous cortical spike-wave discharges in Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS)

BAER-101 (formerly AZD7325) is a selective partial potentiator of α2/3-containing γ-amino-butyric acid A receptors (GABAARs) and produces minimal sedation and dizziness. Antiseizure effects in models of Dravet and Fragile X Syndromes have been published. BAER-101 has been administered to over 700 healthy human volunteers and patients where it was found to be safe and well tolerated. To test the extent of the antiseizure activity of BAER-1010, we tested BAER-101 in the Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS) model, a widely used and translationally relevant model. GAERS rats with recording electrodes bilaterally located over the frontal and parietal cortices were used. Electroencepholographic (EEG) signals in freely moving awake rats were analyzed for spike-wave discharges (SWDs). BAER-101 was administered orally at doses of 0.3-100 mg/kg and diazepam was used as a positive control using a cross-over protocol with a wash-out period between treatments. The number of SWDs was dose-dependently reduced by BAER-101 with 0.3 mg/kg being the minimally effective dose (MED). The duration of and total time in SWDs were also reduced by BAER-101. Concentrations of drug in plasma achieved an MED of 10.1 nM, exceeding the Ki for α2 or α3, but 23 times lower than the Ki for α5-GABAARs. No adverse events were observed up to a dose 300× MED. The data support the possibility of antiseizure efficacy without the side effects associated with other GABAAR subtypes. This is the first report of an α2/3-selective GABA PAM suppressing seizures in the GAERS model. The data encourage proceeding to test BAER-101 in patients with epilepsy.

General Framework to Quantitatively Predict Pharmacokinetic Induction Drug-Drug Interactions Using In Vitro Data

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic inducers can expose people with polypharmacy to adverse health outcomes. A limited fraction of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have been or can ethically be studied in clinical trials, leaving the vast majority unexplored. In the present study, an algorithm has been developed to predict the induction DDI magnitude, integrating data related to drug-metabolising enzymes.

METHODS

The area under the curve ratio (AUC_ratio) resulting from the DDI with a victim drug in the presence and absence of an inducer (rifampicin, rifabutin, efavirenz, or carbamazepine) was predicted from various in vitro parameters and then correlated with the clinical AUC_ratio (N = 319). In vitro data including fraction unbound in plasma, substrate specificity and induction potential for cytochrome P450s, phase II enzymes and uptake, and efflux transporters were integrated. To represent the interaction potential, the in vitro metabolic metric (IVMM) was generated by combining the fraction of substrate metabolised by each hepatic enzyme of interest with the corresponding in vitro fold increase in enzyme activity (E) value for the inducer.

RESULTS

Two independent variables were deemed significant and included in the algorithm: IVMM and fraction unbound in plasma. The observed and predicted magnitudes of the DDIs were categorised accordingly: no induction, mild, moderate, and strong induction. DDIs were assumed to be well classified if the predictions were in the same category as the observations, or if the ratio between these two was < 1.5-fold. This algorithm correctly classified 70.5% of the DDIs.

CONCLUSION

This research presents a rapid screening tool to identify the magnitude of potential DDIs utilising in vitro data which can be highly advantageous in early drug development.

Co-Administration with Voriconazole Doubles the Exposure of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Background

Ruxolitinib is newly approved for glucocorticoid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allo-geneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and voriconazole is commonly used in allo-HSCT recipients for the prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Drug–drug interaction (DDI) may occur between them because their metabolic pathways overlap and can be inhibited by voriconazole, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes 3A4 and 2C9.

Objective

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the DDI between ruxolitinib and voriconazole in patients with hematological malignancies.

Methods

A total of 12 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled in this single-arm, single-center, Phase I/II, fixed sequence self-control study. All subjects received 5 mg ruxolitinib alone, followed by the co-administration of ruxolitinib and voriconazole. The plasma concentrations of the two drugs were determined by two well-validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Phoenix WinNonlin software was used to compare the differences in maximum plasma concentration (C_max), time to C_max (T_max), terminal elimination half-life (T_1/2), and apparent plasma clearance (CL/F), as well as area under the curve from time zero to last (AUC_last) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC_inf) between the two periods.

Results

After pre-treatment with voriconazole, no significant change existed in T_max, while C_max, T_1/2, AUC_last, and AUC_inf of ruxolitinib were significantly increased by 50.4%, 81.3%, 110.1%, and 118.3%, respectively, and CL/F was significantly decreased to 43.6% compared with patients receiving ruxolitinib alone.

Conclusion

Our findings confirmed a moderate inhibitory DDI between ruxolitinib and voriconazole as voriconazole decreased the elimination and increased the exposure of ruxolitinib in patients with hematologic malignancies. We recommended a dose reduction regimen when voriconazole and ruxolitinib were coadministered. Drug monitoring might help determine the ruxolitinib treatment concentration for aGVHD patients, improve efficacy, and reduce toxicity.

Designing Out PXR Activity on Drug Discovery Projects: A Review of Structure-Based Methods, Empirical and Computational Approaches

This perspective discusses the role of pregnane xenobiotic receptor (PXR) in drug discovery and the impact of its activation on CYP3A4 induction. The use of structural biology to reduce PXR activity on drug discovery projects has become more common in recent years. Analysis of this work highlights several important molecular interactions, and the resultant structural modifications to reduce PXR activity are summarized. The computational approaches undertaken to support the design of new drugs devoid of PXR activation potential are also discussed. Finally, the SAR of empirical design strategies to reduce PXR activity is reviewed, and the key SAR transformations are discussed and summarized. In conclusion, this perspective demonstrates that PXR activity can be greatly diminished or negated on active drug discovery projects with the knowledge now available. This perspective should be useful to anyone who seeks to reduce PXR activity on a drug discovery project.

Potentiating α2 subunit containing perisomatic GABAA receptors protects against seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome

KEY POINTS

Dravet syndrome mice (Scn1a^+/- ) demonstrate a marked strain dependence for the severity of seizures which is correlated with GABA_A receptor α₂ subunit expression. The α₂ /α₃ subunit selective positive allosteric modulator (PAM) AZD7325 potentiates inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) specifically in perisomatic synapses. AZD7325 demonstrates stronger effects on IPSCs in the seizure resistant mouse strain, consistent with higher α₂ subunit expression. AZD7325 demonstrates seizure protective effects in Scn1a^+/- mice without apparent sedative effects in vivo.

ABSTRACT

GABA_A receptor potentiators are commonly used for the treatment of epilepsy, but it is not clear whether targeting distinct GABA_A receptor subtypes will have disproportionate benefits over adverse effects. Here we demonstrate that the α₂ /α₃ selective positive allosteric modulator (PAM) AZD7325 preferentially potentiates hippocampal inhibitory responses at synapses proximal to the soma of CA1 neurons. The effect of AZD7325 on synaptic responses was more prominent in mice on the 129S6/SvEvTac background strain, which have been demonstrated to be seizure resistant in the model of Dravet syndrome (Scn1a^+/- ), and in which the α₂ GABA_A receptor subunits are expressed at higher levels relative to in the seizure prone C57BL/6J background strain. Consistent with this, treatment of Scn1a^+/- mice with AZD7325 elevated the temperature threshold for hyperthermia-induced seizures without apparent sedative effects. Our results in a model system indicate that selectively targeting α₂ is a potential therapeutic option for Dravet syndrome.

Synthesis of C-14 labeled GABAA α2/α3 selective partial agonists and the investigation of late-occurring and long-circulating metabolites of GABAA receptor modulator AZD7325

Anxiolytic activity has been associated with GABAA α2 and α3 subunits. Several target compounds were identified and required in C-14 labeled form to enable a better understanding of their drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic properties. AZD7325 is a selective GABAA α2 and α3 receptor modulator intended for the treatment of anxiety through oral administration. A great number of AZD7325 metabolites were observed across species in vivo, whose identification was aided by [14 C]AZD7325. An interesting metabolic cyclization and aromatization pathway leading to the tricyclic core of M9 and the oxidative pathways to M10 and M42 are presented.

The central nervous system effects of the partial GABA-Aα2,3 -selective receptor modulator AZD7325 in comparison with lorazepam in healthy males

AIMS

AZD7325 is a novel α2,3 -subtype-selective partial GABA-A-receptor modulator. This study investigated the pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of AZD7325 2 mg and 10 mg on the central nervous system (CNS) compared with placebo and lorazepam 2 mg.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, four way crossover study enrolled 16 healthy males and administered two validated CNS test batteries to measure drug effects on cognitive, neurophysiologic and psychomotor function and subjective feelings. The pharmacological selectivity of AZD7325 was compared with lorazepam by plotting saccadic peak velocity change from baseline (ΔSPV) against body sway (ΔSway) and visual analogue scale for alertness(ΔVASalertness ). This analysis has previously been used to identify α2,3 -subtype-selectivity.

RESULTS

In contrast with the robust impairment caused by lorazepam (all P < 0.05 vs. placebo), neither dose of AZD7325 induced statistically significant effects on any pharmacodynamic measurements. Lorazepam-induced SPV-reduction was linearly related to changes in other neurophysiologic biomarkers. In contrast, the slopes of the regression lines were flatter for AZD7325, particularly for the Δlog(Sway) -ΔSPV relation (estimate slope, AZD7325 10 mg vs. lorazepam, difference [95% confidence interval], P value -0.00036 vs. -0.00206, 0.001704 [0.000639, 0.002768], P = 0.0018) and the ΔVASalertness -ΔSPV relationship (0.01855 vs. 0.08216, -0.06360 [-0.1046, -0.02257], P = 0.0024). AZD7325 10 mg and lorazepam induced different response patterns on VAS 'feeling high' and electro-encephalography.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic ΔSPV-relative effect profiles of AZD7325 vs. lorazepam suggest anxio-selectivity related to α2,3 -selective GABAA agonism. However, exploration of higher doses may be warranted. The paucity of effects on most CNS-PD parameters also indicates a mitigated side effect pattern, with potentially lower cognitive and neurophysiological side effect burden than non-selective benzodiazepines.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling to assess clinical drug-drug interaction between AZD7325 and midazolam

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

AZD7325 is a selective gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABAA )α2, 3 receptor modulator. The aims of this analysis were to develop population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of AZD7325 and midazolam and to assess the induction effect of AZD7325 on CYP3A4 with midazolam as a substrate.

METHODS

Drug-drug interaction data of AZD7325 and midazolam from 24 healthy subjects were available for model development. PPK models were developed in a sequential manner using NONMEM. Both AZD7325 and midazolam pharmacokinetics were described by two-compartment models, and a transit compartment absorption model and a first-order absorption model were applied for the absorption of AZD7325 and midazolam, respectively. The induction of CYP3A by AZD7325 was described by a transit enzyme model, where the elimination of midazolam was proportionally linked to the enzyme amount. Simulations were performed to predict dosing regimens to account for the induction of CYP3A4.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The population estimates for AZD7325 clearance, intercompartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume were 36, 29·2 L/h, 169 and 392 L, respectively, with interindividual variability (IIV) of 35% and 24% for clearance and central volume. Midazolam clearance, intercompartmental clearance, central and peripheral volume were estimated to be 62·7, 34·7 L/h, 133 and 146 L, respectively, with 43% IIV for clearance. The estimated mean transit time for induction of the CYP3A4 enzyme was 197 h, with 57% IIV.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The PPK models developed adequately described the clinical observation of AZD7325-mediated CYP3A4 enzyme induction with midazolam as a probe. The model could provide basis for the rational dosing of AZD7325 in clinical practice.