An in vitro lymphocytotoxicity assay for studying adverse reactions to sulphonamides

Role of Oxidative Stress in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Sulfonamides

Antimicrobial sulfonamides are important medications. However, their use is associated with major immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions with a rate that ranges from 3% to 4% in the general population. The pathophysiology of sulfa-induced drug hypersensitivity reactions is not well understood, but accumulation of reactive metabolites (sulfamethoxazole [SMX] hydroxylamine [SMX-HA] and SMX N-nitrosamine [SMX-NO]) is thought to be a major factor. These reactive metabolites contribute to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) known to cause cellular damage and induce cell death through apoptosis and necroptosis. ROS can also serve as "danger signals," priming immune cells to mount an immunological reaction. We recruited 26 sulfa-hypersensitive (HS) patients, 19 healthy control subjects, and 6 sulfa-tolerant patients to this study. Peripheral blood monocytes and platelets were isolated from blood samples and analyzed for in vitro cytotoxicity, ROS and carbonyl protein formation, lipid peroxidation, and GSH (glutathione) content after challenge with SMX-HA. When challenged with SMX-HA, cells isolated from sulfa-HS patients exhibited significantly (P ≤ .05) higher cell death, ROS and carbonyl protein formation, and lipid peroxidation. In addition, there was a high correlation between cell death in PBMCs and ROS levels. There was also depletion of GSH and lower GSH/GSSG ratios in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from sulfa-HS patients. The amount of ROS formed was negatively correlated with intracellular GSH content. The data demonstrate a major role for oxidative stress in in vitro cytotoxicity of SMX reactive metabolites and indicate increased vulnerability of cells from sulfa-HS patients to the in vitro challenge.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS): How Far Have We Come?

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is an uncommon severe adverse reaction to medications. It is important to recognize it as it is potentially fatal and can cause significant morbidity. From the first reports of drug reactions related to certain anticonvulsants characterized by fever, liver enzyme elevation, and skin changes, our continuously growing understanding of this entity has allowed us to describe its physiopathology and clinical features even further. The relationship of genetic factors, viral activation, and specific drug exposure is now known to play a role in this disease. There is still not a widely accepted marker for DReSS/DiHS, but the spectrum of clinical and laboratory features has now been better outlined. The mainstay of treatment is the use of systemic corticosteroids, but other options such as intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide have been described. We present a comprehensive review of the literature on DReSS/DiHS, focusing on its history, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approach, and outcome.

In vitro testing for diagnosis of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: Implications for pathophysiology

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) represent a major health problem, as they are unpredictable, often severe and can be life threatening. The low incidence of IDRs makes their detection during drug development stages very difficult causing many post-marketing drug withdrawals and black box warnings. The fact that IDRs are always not predictable based on the drug's known pharmacology and have no clear dose-effect relationship with the culprit drug renders diagnosis of IDRs very challenging, if not impossible, without the aid of a reliable diagnostic test. The drug provocation test (DPT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of IDRs but it is not always safe to perform on patients. In vitro tests have the advantage of bearing no potential harm to patients. However, available in vitro tests are not commonly used clinically because of lack of validation and their complex and expensive procedures. This review discusses the current role of in vitro diagnostic testing for diagnosis of IDRs and gives a brief account of their technical and mechanistic aspects. Advantages, disadvantages and major challenges that prevent these tests from becoming mainstream diagnostic tools are also discussed here.

Differential toxicity of reactive metabolites of clindamycin and sulfonamides in HIV-infected cells: influence of HIV infection on clindamycin toxicity in vitro

Hypersensitivity adverse drug reactions are much more common among patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) than in the general population. High rates of hypersensitivity reactions to clindamycin have been noted. To investigate the role of reactive metabolites in these reactions, the authors studied toxicity of clindamycin and sulphamethoxazole (SMX) and their metabolites in uninfected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected MOLT3 cells. Infected and uninfected cells were incubated with clindamycin or sulphamethoxazole hydroxylamine in increasing concentrations; reactive metabolites were generated by coincubation of cells and drug with murine microsomes and a microsomal activating system. Over a concentration range of 0 to 400 microM SMX-HA, there was a significant concentration-dependent increase in cell death in HIV-infected compared to uninfected cells (28%+/-3% vs 8%+/-5% at 400 microM, P < .05). In contrast, coincubation of cells with clindamycin, microsomes, and a microsomal activating system, as well as combinations of primaquine or pyrimethamine, was not associated with an increase in cell death among infected compared to uninfected cells. No concentration-toxicity was demonstrated. These data support the role of reactive metabolites in adverse drug reactions to sulfonamides during HIV infection, whereas alternate mechanism(s) may be responsible for increased rates of adverse drug reactions to clindamycin among patients with AIDS.

Mechanisms in cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reactions

Up to 3% of all hospital admissions are due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and between 10% and 20% of hospital inpatients develop ADRs. Individual susceptibility to becoming 'sensitized' or allergic to a drug is thought to result from altered metabolic handling of the drug. Reactive intermediate compounds form haptens, bind to proteins and induce immune responses. Depending on whether the immune system generates antibodies or sensitized T cells, different clinical patterns of hypersensitivity may result. At present, both in vivo or in vitro tests to identify the culprit drug or to confirm the presence of hypersensitivity are not widely used because they are either not generally robust or not readily accessible. In vitro tests require the true immunogen/antigen to detect antibodies or sensitized T cells. As the metabolic basis underlying susceptibility to adverse drug reactions is elucidated, the resolution of immunological mechanisms and development of reliable tests will ensue. This will also become of great value for prediction of individuals at risk of becoming sensitized by a particular drug.

Diagnosis and treatment of allergic skin disorders in the elderly

Allergic skin disorders in the elderly may arise from contact with or ingestion of offending allergens. Itching associated with skin allergy must be distinguished from other causes of itching in the elderly such as xerosis, itching due to systemic disease and bullous disease. Although elderly people have somewhat decreased cell-mediated immunity and may be harder to sensitise under experimental conditions, they have had many years to acquire allergic responses, and therefore develop contact dermatitis frequently. Patch testing is a valuable tool to diagnose contact allergy and should be used often in the elderly, particularly in patients at high risk of contact dermatitis, such as those with chronic lower extremity dermatitis or ulcers due to venous stasis. When prescribing topical medications to high risk patients, a knowledge of the common sensitisers is important. In addition to allergy to medicaments and dressings used to treat stasis ulcers, contact allergy to dental prostheses and medications used to treat ocular disease are common in the elderly as a result of increased usage and exposure. Rash caused by ingested allergens is much more commonly due to medications than to food in the elderly. Allergic noneczematous dermatoses in the elderly are commonly drug-induced. Urticarial skin reactions are often associated with the administration of antibacterials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants or opioids. Morbilliform rashes are a common sign of systemic reaction to anticonvulsants, gold, allopurinol or diuretics. Phototoxic reactions may be associated with the administration of tetracyclines, diuretics, NSAIDs and antihyperglycaemic agents. Patient-specific variables such as HLA type and concomitant medication may affect the likelihood of an allergic response to medication. Many elderly patients take multiple medications, which can make diagnosis of drug allergy difficult because diagnosis is most commonly accomplished by observing clinical response once the medication is withdrawn. In the case of lichenoid cutaneous reactions, clinical improvement may take several months after withdrawal of the offending drug. Laboratory tests to detect drug-induced allergic skin disorders may be available in the future.

Clinical assessment of drug-induced disease

Physicians are often confronted with patients who state that they are "allergic" to a drug or drugs. Knowing which medications can be prescribed safely is therefore difficult, and care of such patients frustrating. The goal of this review is to help physicians develop management plans for patients who present with drug-induced diseases. It provides information that allows physicians to differentiate between reactions that are truly allergic in nature and those that are not immunologically mediated. Relevant information on medical history, physical findings, and laboratory tests that may be helpful in the assessment are discussed, and guidance is provided on when and if a drug may be safely readministered. Unfortunately, however, until we are able to better understand the mechanisms responsible for drug-induced reactions, our management tools will remain limited.

Cytotoxicity of sulfonamide reactive metabolites: apoptosis and selective toxicity of CD8(+) cells by the hydroxylamine of sulfamethoxazole

Treatment with sulfonamide antibiotics in HIV-infected patients is associated with a high incidence (> 40%) of adverse drug events, including severe hypersensitivity reactions. Sulfonamide reactive metabolites have been implicated in the pathogenesis of these adverse reactions. Sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine (SMX-HA) induces lymphocyte toxicity and suppression of proliferation in vitro; the mechanism(s) of these immunomodulatory effects remain unknown. We investigated the cytotoxicity of SMX-HA via apoptosis on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and purified cell subpopulations in vitro. CD19(+), CD4(+), and CD8(+) cells were isolated from human peripheral blood by positive selection of cell surface molecules by magnetic bead separation. SMX-HA induced significant CD8(+) cell death (67 +/- 7%) at 100 microM SMX-HA, with only minimal CD4(+) cell death (8 +/- 4%). No significant subpopulation toxicity was shown when incubated with parent drug (SMX). Flow cytometry measuring phosphatidylserine externalization 24 h after treatment with 100 microM and 400 microM SMX-HA revealed 14.1 +/- 0.7% and 25. 6 +/- 4.2% annexin-positive cells, respectively, compared to 3.7 +/- 1.2% in control PBMCs treated with 400 microM SMX. Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation was observed in quiescent and stimulated PBMCs 48 h after incubation with SMX-HA. Our data show that CD8(+) cells are highly susceptible to the toxic effects of SMX-HA through enhanced cell death by apoptosis.

Antigen processing: the gateway to the immune response

The T-lymphocyte response to an antigen is governed by the source of that antigen and the way in which it is processed. Before recognition by T lymphocytes, proteins must be degraded to peptides by antigen-presenting cells. The peptides are then presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules for recognition by the T cells. Antigens arising outside the cell (e.g., bacteria) are phagocytosed and processed by the exogenous pathway for presentation on MHC class II molecules (e.g., DR) to CD4+ cells. Antigens derived from the cytoplasm (e.g., viral proteins) are processed by the endogenous pathway for presentation by MHC class I molecules (e.g., HLA-A, -B, -C) to CD8+ cells. The response to a hapten or drug is a function of the antigen processing pathway and is determined by its chemical properties. Antigen processing also governs the T-cell response to pathogens, vaccines, and autoimmune conditions.

Sulfonamide-reactive lymphocytes detected at very low frequency in the peripheral blood of patients with drug-induced eruptions

BACKGROUND

The role of T lymphocytes in mediating drug eruptions is uncertain.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with eruptions induced by sulfonamide-related drugs were studied to detect lymphocyte reactivity to drugs. Both the lymphocyte transformation test and limiting dilution analysis were used as assays for drug-reactive lymphocytes. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were expanded in interleukin-2 and tested for reactivity to sulfamethoxazole and furosemide.

RESULTS

The lymphocyte transformation test results to sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole, and furosemide were found to be generally unreliable with a high rate of false-negative and false-positive results. However, as determined by limiting dilution analysis, sulfamethoxazole-reactive lymphocytes were detected in the peripheral blood of one patient at a frequency of 1/172,000. This is within the lower range of frequencies of urushiol-reactive T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with allergic contact dermatitis to urushiol (poison ivy). Two sulfonamide-reactive lymphocyte lines were cultured from two patients. Both lines proliferated in response to sulfamethoxazole but not in response to furosemide, suggesting that furosemide does not cross-react with the sulfonamides.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocytes reactive to sulfamethoxazole were detected at low frequencies in the peripheral blood of three patients with drug eruptions secondary to administration of sulfamethoxazole.