Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis

Toxic Skin Reactions Should Be Differentiated from Allergic Reactions to Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Children: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Chemotherapeutic drugs can lead to a wide spectrum of cutaneous findings, ranging from nonimmune toxic reactions to severe immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, histopathological features, and prognosis of toxic skin reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and to compare them with characteristics of immune-mediated reactions in children with malignancies. Methods: The medical records of all children with cancer who experienced skin reactions after chemotherapy administration and diagnosed as a toxic skin reaction between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis was re-evaluated and differentiated from other similar disorders by using clinical manifestations, photodocumentation, and histopathological findings. Results: A total of 17 children aged 2-17 years were involved: toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) in 14 children, methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis in 2 children, and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)-like TEC in 1 child. The most commonly implicated drug was methotrexate. Most patients recovered rapidly after drug cessation and supportive measures. In 10 of the 17 patients, reintroduction of the culprit chemotherapeutic drug at reduced doses or increased dosage intervals was possible without any recurrence. Six patients could not receive further doses since they deceased due to sepsis and other complications. Conclusions: Cutaneous toxic eruptions to chemotherapeutic drugs may present with a severe phenotype resembling Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TEN. An accurate diagnosis prevents potentially harmful therapeutic interventions, withholding of chemotherapy, and erroneous assignment of drug allergies.

High-dose methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis in two pediatric patients

Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis (MEN) is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication. We present two pediatric oncology patients, a 5-year-old girl and a 3-year-old boy, who developed MEN from high-dose methotrexate therapy for pre-B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia. Following administration of systemic methotrexate, the patients developed erythematous lesions with subsequent skin erosions. Pre-medication with systemic corticosteroids and administration of folinic acid rescue following the methotrexate infusion allowed both patients to resume their chemotherapy regimen with methotrexate.

Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis: A case series of 24 patients

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis (MEN) is a rare but life-threatening cutaneous reaction that mimics Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinicopathology, risk factors, and prognostic factors of MEN.

METHODS

We enrolled 24 patients with MEN and 150 controls and analyzed the demographics, pathology, and plasma concentrations of methotrexate (MTX).

RESULTS

Patients with MEN showed extensive skin necrosis (mean, 33.2% total body surface area) but no target lesions. The histopathology displayed keratinocyte dystrophy. Early signs of MEN included painful skin erosions, oral ulcers, and leukopenia/thrombocytopenia. Although 79.2% patients received leucovorin treatment, there was 16.7% mortality. Risk factors for MEN included older age (>60 years), chronic kidney disease, and high initial dosage of MTX without folic acid supplementation. Renal insufficiency delayed MTX clearance. Severe renal disease and leukopenia predicted poor prognosis in MEN, but none of the SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis criteria were associated with mortality of MEN.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

MEN exhibited distinct clinicopathologic features from SJS/TEN. Recognition of the early signs and prognostic factors is important, because the rapid institution of leucovorin may be helpful. To reduce the risk of MEN, physicians should avoid prescribing MTX to high-risk patients and titrate the dosage slowly upward with folic acid supplementation.

Review article: dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

With the expanding list of medications available to treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is important to recognise adverse events, including those involving the skin. Dermatological adverse events may be confused with extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD.

AIM

To review drug-related dermatological manifestations associated with immunosuppressive and anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy.

METHODS

The literature was searched on PubMed for dermatological adverse events in IBD.

RESULTS

Present thiopurine exposure was associated with a 5.9-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-16.4] increased risk of developing non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The peak incidence is highest in Caucasians over the age of 65 years with crude incidence rates of 4.0 and 5.7/1000 patient-years for present and previous use. In anti-TNF-exposed subjects, drug-induced lupus was reported in 1% of the cases and a psoriatic rash in up to 3% of the cases. Anti-TNF monotherapy increases the risk of NMSC ~2-fold to a rate of 0.5 cases per 1000 person-years. Cutaneous lymphomas have been rarely reported in subjects on thiopurine or anti-TNF drug monotherapy. Combination therapy seems to have an additive effect on the risk of developing NMSC and lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians need to be aware of the wide spectrum of dermatological complications of immunosuppressive and anti-TNF therapy in IBD, especially psoriasis and non-melanoma skin cancer. Vigilance and regular screening for non-melanoma skin cancer is recommended. Case discussions between gastroenterologists and dermatologists should be undertaken to best manage dermatological adverse events.

Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapy and their management

International data from 2002 report 10.9 million new cases of cancer and 6.7 million cancer deaths. Chemotherapy is an essential component in the multidisciplinary management of most cancers. Cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutics are common and may contribute significantly to the morbidity, and rarely to the mortality, of patients undergoing such treatments. Recognition and management of these reactions is important to provide optimal care. This article aims to present the most common cutaneous reactions to frequently used chemotherapies and provides management guidelines. A MEDLINE search from 1966 through June 2005 was conducted to identify reports of common cutaneous toxicities with systemic chemotherapy and their appropriate management. An analysis of our literature search is presented in review form outlining common chemotherapy-related cutaneous reactions and their management, as well as the chemotherapeutics responsible for the cutaneous toxicity. Chemotherapy-related cutaneous toxicity includes generalized rashes such as the spectrum between erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis, and site-specific toxicity such as mucositis, alopecia, nail changes, extravasation reactions, or hand-foot syndrome. Most of the toxicity is reversible with chemotherapy dose reductions or delays. Certain toxicities can be effectively treated or prevented, allowing optimal delivery of chemotherapy (e.g. premedications to prevent hypersensitivity, prophylactic mouthwashes to prevent mucositis). Newer non-chemotherapeutic targeted therapies such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g. gefitinib, cetuximab) may also be associated with cutaneous toxicity and can be distressing for patients. Recent data suggest that skin toxicity associated with these agents may correlate with efficacy. Cutaneous toxicity occurs frequently with chemotherapy and non-chemotherapeutic biologic therapies. Early recognition and treatment of the toxicity facilitates good symptom control, prevents treatment-related morbidity, and allows continuation of anti-cancer therapy.

Tratamento sistêmico da psoríase - Parte I: metotrexato e acitretina

Embora a fisiopatologia da psoríase ainda não esteja totalmente esclarecida e permaneçam dúvidas quanto à natureza dos antígenos que levam à ativação do linfócito T e quanto ao papel dos mecanismos reguladores dos surtos e da resolução da inflamação, são inegáveis os avanços terapêuticos das últimas décadas. Além do surgimento de novos medicamentos, a melhor utilização de tratamentos clássicos e a valorização do impacto da terapêutica na qualidade de vida dos pacientes têm contribuído para a diminuição dos índices de morbidade da doença. Este artigo de EMC-D aborda a utilização de metotrexato e acitretina no tratamento da psoríase. A utilização de outros imunomoduladores e de terapias biológicas será objeto de próximo capítulo.

Ulceração das placas psoriáticas - efeito cutâneo adverso do metotrexato em altas doses no tratamento da psoríase: relato de três casos

Os autores relatam três casos de pacientes portadores de psoríase que utilizaram inadvertidamente doses elevadas de metotrexato e apresentaram ulceração das lesões cutâneas de psoríase. Os efeitos adversos cutâneos do metotrexato são raros, algumas vezes dose-dependentes, outras idiossincrásicos ou relacionados com alteração de metabolização da droga, ou, ainda, interações medicamentosas

Toxic epidermal necrolysis following combination of methotrexate and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

A 15-year-old boy with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (FAB L1), diagnosed in 1995, received combination chemotherapy consisting of 6 weeks of induction (vincristine, epirubicin, L-asparaginase, prednisolone) and 2 weeks of consolidation (cytosine arabinosides, etoposide). After achieving remission, for further maintenance of remission, he was treated with 14 cycles of intensive chemotherapy consisting of 6-MP, 10 mg/kg orally on the first 4 days, and cyclophosphamide, 1200 mg/m2, vincristine, 1.5 mg/m2, epirubicin, 15 mg/m2, and cytosine arabinoside, 40 mg/m2, intravenously on days 4, 11, 39, and 40, respectively. On day 18 of each cycle, he received intravenous methotrexate (MTX) infusion in a total dose of 150 mg/m2 plus oral leucovorin (30 mg/m2 ) rescue 36 h after starting MTX therapy. In addition, oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was given regularly to prevent Pneumocystis carinii infection. The patient achieved remission during the first course of treatment, but 8 months later the disease relapsed. He then received four doses of MTX (800 mg intravenously) plus leucovorin rescue in the following 4 months. During the last MTX therapy, small hemorrhagic bullae were found on the lateral side of the right ankle, but subsided after a few days. Due to partial remission of the disease, he was admitted again in January 1999 for high-dose MTX therapy. An initial hemogram on admission revealed hemoglobin 7.2 g/dL, white cell count 15,200/mm3, platelet count 153/mm3, blood creatinine 0.5 mg/dL, and alanine leucine aminotransferase (ALT) 20 U/L. He received 8500 mg of MTX (5000 mg/m2 ) as a continuous intravenous infusion for 24 h. Thirty-six hours after the start of MTX infusion, leucovorin (30 mg, intravenous) rescue was initiated every 6 h for 3 days. Another preventive measure to cover MTX toxicity included aggressive intravenous fluid replacement (4 L/m2 /day) and the addition of 25 meq/L sodium bicarbonate to the intravenous fluid to alkalinize the urine. Concurrent medication included 6-MP (50 mg) once daily and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (120 mg, 600 mg) twice daily every other day. Plasma MTX levels were 52.36 micromol/L 24 h after MTX infusion, 1.87 micromol/L after 48 h, 0.57 micromol/L after 72 h, and 0.41 micromol/L after 96 h. These indicated delayed MTX plasma clearance. The blood creatinine level was mildly elevated from 0.5 mg/dL to 0.7 mg/dL. Thirty-six hours after the administration of MTX, the patient developed an erythematous painful swelling on the right middle finger. The erythema, with subsequent large bulla formation, progressed to all the fingers, toes, palms, and the soles of the feet. Some erythematous to hemorrhagic papules also appeared on the bilateral elbows. Subsequently, diffuse tender erythema with extensive erosions and focal tiny pustules developed on the back, abdomen, proximal extremities, and face (Fig. 1a,b). A positive Nikolsky's sign was also present. A biopsy specimen of the right dorsal hand lesion revealed parakeratosis, detached acanthotic epidermis with scattered necrotic keratinocytes, dyskeratotic cells and nuclear atypia, neutrophilic exocytosis, and many neutrophils in the papillary dermis (Fig. 2). The skin condition deteriorated rapidly. Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like lesions involved 90% of the total body surface on the fifth day after MTX infusion. Mucositis, diarrhea, involuntary tremor, fever, and chills were noted. The patient was then sent to the burn unit for intensive skin care. Ten days after MTX therapy, profound agranulocytosis and thrombocytopenia (white cell count 100/mm3, platelets 14,000/mm3, and hemoglobin 5.6 g/dL) were found. The patient was then started on granulocyte colony stimulation factor (G-CSF, 5 microg/kg/day), but his general condition deteriorated rapidly and he died 6 days later due to septic shock and multiple organ failure.

Cutaneous necrotizing vasculitis after low dose methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a possible manifestation of methotrexate hypersensitivity

Large haemorrhagic and necrotic cutaneous lesions developed after two low dose (5 mg) methotrexate injections in a patient suffering from long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Differential clinical diagnosis included factitia dermatitis, infectious processes, pyoderma gangrenosum, rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatitis, necrotizing arteritis and vasculitis. Histological and direct immunofluorescent examinations of skin biopsies supported the diagnosis of leucocytoclastic vasculitis. We discuss the respective roles of methotrexate and rheumatoid arthritis in the outbreak of leucocytoclastic vasculitis. Hypersensitivity is strongly suspected.

Short-term methotrexate administration by low-dose infusion--does it influence clearance of psoriasis?

Twenty-four patients between them received 86 low-dose methotrexate infusions (given over 36 or 48 h) delivered by a Graseby syringe pump in addition to conventional topical therapy during hospital admission for treatment of severe psoriasis (either erythrodermic or severe widespread plaque-type). The average length of hospital stay, usually the time taken to achieve complete clearance, and the average relapse time in the group of patients overall showed no differences from a control group of 25 patients (matched for age and sex) having a similar severity of psoriasis treated without methotrexate. However, separation of the patients into three sub-groups (erythrodermic, severe and 'unstable' widespread plaque-type, and severe and 'stable' widespread plaque-type disease) revealed that erythrodermic patients, as expected, cleared significantly quicker when receiving methotrexate although severe and 'unstable' widespread plaque-type patients had their clearance times possibly prolonged by short-term methotrexate administration. Although methotrexate is commonly used for long-term management of patients with severe psoriasis, short-term methotrexate administered in this manner cannot necessarily be recommended for severe widespread plaque-type disease. Measurement of methotrexate levels in a further 24 patients with severe psoriasis receiving 47 low-dose infusions revealed relatively constant and predictable methotrexate concentrations. Acute side-effects of methotrexate given by the infusion method were minor and uncommon, the infusion being well tolerated by patients. However, the low-dose infusion technique did not, apparently, offer any advantage over conventional methotrexate administration.